DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The effect of curvature on the impact response of foam-based sandwich composite panels

  • Yurddaskal, Melis (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Celal Bayar University, Engineering Faculty) ;
  • Baba, Buket Okutan (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Celal Bayar University, Engineering Faculty)
  • Received : 2015.10.12
  • Accepted : 2015.12.29
  • Published : 2016.04.10

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate the impact behavior and impact-induced damage of sandwich composites made of E-glass/epoxy face sheets and PVC foam. The studies were carried out on square flat and curved sandwich panels with two different radius of curvatures. Impact tests were performed under impact energies of 10 J, 25 J and 80 J using an instrumented drop-weight machine. Contact force and displacement versus time and contact force- displacement graphs of sandwich panels were presented to determine the panel response. Through these graphs, the energy absorbing capacity of the sandwich panels was determined. The impact responses and failure modes of flat and curved sandwich panels were compared and the effect of curvature on sandwich composite panel was demonstrated. Testing has shown that the maximum contact force decrease while displacement increases with increasing of panel curvature and curved panels exhibits mixed failure mode, with cylindrical and cone cracking.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey

References

  1. Aslan, Z., Karakuzu, R. and Okutan, B. (2003), "The response of laminated composite plates under lowvelocity impact loading", Compos. Struct., 59(1), 119-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-8223(02)00185-X
  2. Belingardi, G. and Vadori, R. (2002), "Low velocity impact tests of laminate glass-fiber-epoxy matrix composite material plates", Int. J. Impact Eng., 27(2), 213-229. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0734-743X(01)00040-9
  3. Belingardi, G. and Vadori, R. (2003), "Influence of the laminate thickness in low velocity impact behavior of composite material plate", Compos. Struct., 61(1-2), 27-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-8223(03)00027-8
  4. Ganapathy, S. and Rao, K.P. (1998), "Failure analysis of laminated composite cylindrical/spherical shell panels subjected to low-velocity impact", Comput. Struct., 68(6), 627-641. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(98)00080-7
  5. Hazizan, M.D.A. and Cantwell, W.J. (2002), "The low velocity impact response of foam-based sandwich structures", Compos.: Part B, 33(3), 193-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-8368(02)00009-4
  6. Kistler, L.S. and Waas, A.M. (1998), "Experiment and analysis on the response of curved laminated composite panels subjected to low velocity impact", Int. J. Impact Eng., 21(9), 711-736. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0734-743X(98)00026-8
  7. Kistler, L.S. and Waas, A.M. (1999), "On the response of curved laminated panels subjected to transverse impact loads", Int. J. Solid. Struct., 36(9), 1311-1327. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7683(98)00005-5
  8. Lee, L.J., Huang, K.Y. and Fann, Y.J. (1993), "Dynamic responses of composite sandwich plate impacted by rigid ball", J. Compos. Mater., 27(13), 1238-1256. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199839302701301
  9. Leijten, J., Bersee, H.E.N., Bergsma, O.K. and Beukers, A. (2009), "Experimental study of the low-velocity impact behaviour of primary sandwich structures in aircraft", Compos.: Part A, 40(2), 164-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2008.10.019
  10. Mitrevski, T., Marshall, I.H., Thomson, R., Jones, R. and Whittingham, R. (2005), "The effect of impactor shape on the impact response of composite laminates", Compos. Struct., 67(2), 139-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2004.09.007
  11. Mitrevski, T., Marshall, I.H. and Thomson, R. (2006), "The influence of impactor shape on the damage to composite laminates", Compos. Struct., 76(1-2), 116-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2006.06.017
  12. Saghafi, H., Minak, G. and Zucchelli, A. (2014), "Effect of preload on the impact response of curved composite panels", Compos.: Part B, 60, 74-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.12.026
  13. Schubel, P.M., Luo, J.J. and Daniel, I.M. (2007), "Impact and post impact behavior of composite sandwich panels", Compos.: Part A, 38(3), 1051-1057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2006.06.022
  14. Shen, J., Lu, G., Wang, Z. and Zhao, L.M. (2010), "Experiments on curved sandwich panels under blast loading", Int. J. Impact Eng., 37(9), 960-970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2010.03.002
  15. Srivastava, V.K. (2012), "Impact behaviour of sandwich GFRP-foam-GFRP composites", Int. J. Compos. Mater., 2(4), 63-66.
  16. URL (2015), http://www.3accorematerials.com/products/airex/airexreg-c70.html (Accessed 05 May 2015)
  17. Uyaner, M., Kara, M. and Ataberk, N. (2007), "Size effect on low velocity impact behavior of laminated eglass composite", Prooceedings of 8th International Fracture Conference, Istanbul, Turkey, November, pp. 361-368.
  18. Yapici, I. and Yapici, A. (2012), "An investigation of low velocity impact behavior of e-glass/epoxy laminated composites using finite element method", Nigde Universitesi Muhendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 1(2), 48-60.
  19. You, C., Kim, D., Cho, S. and Hwang, W.B. (2010), "Impact behavior of composite antenna array that is conformed around cylindrical bodies", Compos. Sci. Technol., 70(4), 627-632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.12.015
  20. Zhou, J., Hassan, M.Z., Guan, Z. and Cantwell, W.J. (2012), "The low velocity impact response of foambased sandwich panels", Compos. Sci. Technol., 72(14), 1781-1790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2012.07.006

Cited by

  1. Design of stepwise foam claddings subjected to air-blast based on Voronoi model vol.23, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2017.23.1.107
  2. Vibration analysis of honeycomb sandwich composites filled with polyurethane foam by Taguchi Method vol.28, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2018.28.4.461
  3. Energy absorption of foam-filled lattice composite cylinders under lateral compressive loading vol.31, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2019.31.2.133
  4. Dynamic Compressive Behaviors of Two-Layer Graded Aluminum Foams under Blast Loading vol.12, pp.9, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12091445
  5. Low-velocity impact, bending, and compression response of carbon fiber/epoxy-based sandwich composites with different types of core materials vol.23, pp.6, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1177/1099636220908862
  6. A review on manufacture of polymeric foam cores for sandwich structures of complex shape in automotive applications vol.24, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1177/10996362211030564
  7. The effect of degree of curvature and fabric orientation on the impact properties of single and multilayer textile composites vol.113, pp.1, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1080/00405000.2020.1863566