DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Adaptation Experience of Living Kidney Donors after Donation

생체 신장 공여자의 공여 후 적응 경험

  • 강다해솜 (가야대학교 간호학과) ;
  • 양진향 (인제대학교 간호학과.건강과학연구소)
  • Received : 2015.08.17
  • Accepted : 2015.12.17
  • Published : 2016.04.30

Abstract

Purpose: This study was done to explore adaptation experience of living kidney donors after donation. Specific aims were to identify challenges donors face in the process of adaptation following surgery and how they interact with recipients and other people. Methods: Grounded theory methodology was utilized. Participants were 13 living kidney donors at six months or more after donation. Data were collected by in-depth interviews with individual participants. Data were analyzed using constants comparative method with theoretical saturation. Results: A core category emerged as 'keeping the fences of my family in spite of vulnerability'. The adaptation process after donation was manifested in four phases: exploration, balance, maintenance, and acclimatization. Phenomenon was perception of vulnerability. Strategies to manage the vulnerability were assessing changes of body awareness, tailoring regimen to one's own body condition, coping with health problems, keeping restoration of health, and ruminating on the meaning of one's kidney donation. Consequences were reestablishing family well-being, realizing the values of one's kidney donation, and living with uncertainty. Conclusion: Findings of the study indicate that there is a need for health professionals to understand the vulnerability of living kidney donors and help their family system maintain a healthy and productive life. The results of this study can be used to develop phase-specific, patient-centered, and tailored interventions for living kidney donors.

Keywords

References

  1. Okamoto M. Long-term renal function, complications and life expectancy in living kidney donors. World Journal of Transplantation. 2012;2(1):5-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.5500/wjt.v2.i1.5
  2. Ministry of Health & Welfare, Korean Network for Organ Sharing. Annual report of the transplant 2012. Seoul: Korean Netword for Organ Sharing; 2013.
  3. Crombie AK, Franklin PM. Family issues implicit in living donation. Mortality. 2006;11(2):196-210. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13576270600616011
  4. Lee BM. Korea is the country of the devoted son and devoted daughter [Internet]. Seoul: Maeil Business News Korea; 2013 [cited 2014 October 7]. Available from: http://news.mk.co.kr/newsRead.php?year=2013&no=356011.
  5. Park SH. Decision of organ donation by the bucket list [Internet]. Seoul: Newsis; 2014 [cited 2014 October 7]. Available from: http://www.newsis.com/ar_detail/view.html?ar_id=NISX20140820_0013119207&cID=10201&pID=10200.
  6. Tong A, Chapman JR, Wong G, Kanellis J, McCarthy G, Craig JC. The motivations and experiences of living kidney donors: A thematic synthesis. American Journal of Kidney Diseases. 2012;60(1):15-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2011.11.043
  7. Park MR. Living organ donation [Internet]. Seoul: Medical Observer; 2014 [cited 2014 November 7]. Available from: http://www.monews.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=78873.
  8. Mjoen G, Hallan S, Hartmann A, Foss A, Midtvedt K, Oyen O, et al. Long-term risks for kidney donors. Kidney International. 2014;86(1):162-167. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ki.2013.460
  9. Tong A, Chapman JR, Wong G, Craig JC. Living kidney donor assessment: challenges, uncertainties and controversies among transplant nephrologists and surgeons. American Journal of Transplantation. 2013;13(11):2912-2923. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajt.12411
  10. Williams AM, Colefax L, O'Driscoll CT, Dawson S. An exploration of experiences of living renal donors following donation. Nephrology Nursing Journal. 2009;36(4):423-427.
  11. Nagib AM, Refaie AF, Hendy YA, Elfawal MA, Shokeir AA, Bakr MA, et al. Long term prospective assessment of living kidney donors: Single center experience. ISRN Nephrology. 2014;2014:502414. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/502414
  12. Kim MH, Kwon OJ, Kang CM. The quality of life for living donors after kidney transplantation. The Journal of the Korean Society for Transplantation. 2012;26(1):15-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.4285/jkstn.2012.26.1.15
  13. Yi M. Decision-making process for living kidney donors. Journal of Nursing Scholarship. 2003;35(1):61-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2003.00061.x
  14. Yi M. Psychosocial adjustment after kidney transplantation. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 1998;28(2):291-302. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.1998.28.2.291
  15. Brown JB, Karley ML, Boudville N, Bullas R, Garg AX, Muirhead N. Living kidney donors' experiences with the health care system. Social Work in Health Care. 2008;46(3):53-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J010v46n03_03
  16. Agerskov H, Bistrup C, Ludvigsen MS, Pedersen BD. Living kidney donation: Considerations and decision-making. Journal of Renal care. 2014;40(2):88-95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jorc.12071
  17. Fujita M, Akabayashi A, Slingsby BT, Kosugi S, Fujimoto Y, Tanaka K. A model of donors' decision-making in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation in Japan: Having no choice. Liver Transplantation. 2006;12(5):768-774. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lt.20689
  18. Adams-Leander S. The experiences of African-American living kidney donors. Nephrology Nursing Journal. 2011;38(6):499-508.
  19. Langenbach M, Stippel A, Stippel D. Kidney donors' quality of life and subjective evaluation at 2 years after donation. Transplantation Proceedings. 2009;41(6):2512-2514. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2009.06.122
  20. Corbin J, Strauss A. Basic of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2008.
  21. Ingram RE, Miranda J, Segal ZV. Cognitive vulnerability to depression. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2000.
  22. Schipper K, Abma TA, Koops C, Bakker I, Sanderman R, Schroevers MJ. Sweet and sour after renal transplantation: A qualitative study about the positive and negative consequences of renal transplantation. British Journal of Health Psychology. 2014;19(3):580-591. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12057
  23. Andersen MH, Bruserud F, Mathisen L, Wahl AK, Hanestad BR, Fosse E. Follow-up interviews of 12 living kidney donors one yr after open donor nephrectomy. Clinical Transplantation. 2007;21(6):702-709. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-0012.2007.00726.x
  24. Korea Ministry of Government Legislation. Internal organs, etc. Transplant act [Internet]. Sejong: Author; 2013 [cited 2014 October 7]. Available from: http://www.law.go.kr/lsSc.do?menuId=0&subMenu=1&query=%EC%9E%A5%EA%B8%B0%EC%9D%B4%EC%8B%9D#undefined.
  25. Lee HK, Park JH, Chung SY, Choi SJ. Long term outcomes for living renal donors. The Journal of the Korean Society for Transplantation. 2012;26(1):10-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.4285/jkstn.2012.26.1.10
  26. Choi SB. 'Sharing of sublime life' support system is 'poor' [Internet]. Seoul: Able News; 2014 [cited 2014 October 7]. Available from: http://www.ablenews.co.kr/News/NewsContent.aspx?Cat egoryCode=0014&NewsCode=001420141126192323370676.
  27. Tong A, Craig JC, Wong G, Morton J, Armstrong S, Schollum J, et al. "It was just an unconditional gift." Self reflections of non-directed living kidney donors. Clinical Transplantation. 2012;26(4):589-599. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-0012.2011.01578.x
  28. Weng LC, Huang HL, Wang YW, Chang CL, Tsai CH, Lee WC. The coping experience of Taiwanese male donors in living donor liver transplantation. Nursing Research. 2012;61(2):133-139. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/NNR.0b013e3182475688
  29. Mishel MH. Reconceptualization of the uncertainty in illness theory. Image-the Journal of Nursing Scholarship. 1990;22(4):256-262. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.1990.tb00225.x

Cited by

  1. Experiences of physical complications and sequelae among living liver donors vol.33, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4285/jkstn.2019.33.2.36
  2. Living Donors: Altruism and Feeling Forgotten vol.18, pp.suppl1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.6002/ect.tond-tdtd2019.l25
  3. 청년 생체 간이식 기증자의 경험 vol.51, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.20235