Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology (한국환경생태학회지)

Korean Society of Environment and Ecology (한국환경생태학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Concept and Policy Developments on Eco-welfare of National Parks based on Ecosystem Service

생태계서비스 기반 국립공원 생태복지 개념정립 및 정책방향 설정

  • Park, Eun-ha (Graduate School, Dept. of Biological and Environmental Science, Dongguk Univ.) ;
  • Choi, Su-Jung (Graduate School, Dept. of Biological and Environmental Science, Dongguk Univ.) ;
  • Oh, Hyeon-Choong (Dept. of Biological and Environmental Science, Dongguk Univ.) ;
  • Jung, Boo Hee (Korea Entomological Institute) ;
  • Lee, Na-yeon (Korea National Park Service, National Park Research Institute)
  • 박은하 (동국대학교 바이오환경과학과 대학원) ;
  • 최수정 (동국대학교 바이오환경과학과 대학원) ;
  • 오충현 (동국대학교 바이오환경과학과) ;
  • 정부희 (고려대학교 한국곤충연구소) ;
  • 이나연 (국립공원관리공단 국립공원연구원)
  • Received : 2015.07.17
  • Accepted : 2016.03.19
  • Published : 2016.04.29
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The concept of Eco-welfare emerged in the process of discovering the relationship between a healthy ecosystem and human wellbeing. The objective of this study is to offer basic data for eco-welfare policy realization by conceptualizing the 'National Park Eco-welfare' since national parks are appropriate places for eco-welfare to be optimally implemented. A pre-workshop and two rounds of Delphi surveys were conducted to determine the concept of the 'National Park Eco-welfare ' and the main elements to be included in ecosystem service. Through this study, the concept of 'National Park Eco-welfare' was defined as efforts to conserve the biodiversity and sustainability of the ecosystem and create harmony between 'National Park Ecosystem Welfare' and 'National Park Human Welfare'. To establish the direction of the National Park Eco-welfare policy, we identified the main elements of ecosystem services which are appropriate for the National Park. These are comprised of 3 elements (food, fresh water and genetic resources) from supply service, all elements from regulating service and supporting/habitat service and 4 elements (aesthetic information, recreation-based ecotourism, healing, and knowledge systems with educational values) from culture service. In this study, the concept of National Park Eco-welfare was established, and its policy objectives and scope were suggested. However, further studies are necessary to develop action plans areand thereby realize the policy.

생태복지는 인간의 복지와 건강한 생태계의 상호관계성에 대한 국제적 담론에서 시작되었다. 본 연구는 국립공원이 생태복지의 최대 실현가능 지역이라는 점에서 국립공원에 적합한 '국립공원 생태복지' 개념을 정립하고 정책방향을 설정함으로써 향후 국립공원에서의 생태복지 실현을 도모하기 위한 기초자료를 제공하는데 그 목적이 있다. 이를 위해 사전워크숍과 총 2회에 걸친 델파이 조사를 수행하였다. 본 연구를 통해 '국립공원 생태복지'는 국립공원에서 생태계의 지속가능성과 생물다양성을 유지하며, '국립공원 인간복지'와 '국립공원 생태계복지'의 조화를 지향하는 복지로 정의되었다. 2차 델파이 결과 모든 항목에서 평균 4.00 이상, 내용 타당도(CVR) 0.37 이상, 변이계수(CV) 0.5 미만으로 타당한 내용으로 확인되었다. 국립공원 생태복지의 정책방향을 설정하기 위해 생태복지의 바탕이 되는 생태계서비스의 요소들 중 국립공원에 적합한 주요 요소를 도출한 결과 공급서비스에서 먹이 식량, 물, 유전자원 3항목, 조절서비스와 기반(서식지)서비스의 모든 항목, 문화서비스에서 미적정보, 휴양관광, 심신치유, 지식체계 교육적 가치 4항목이 최종 도출되었다. 또한 본 연구에서는 국립공원 생태복지의 개념과 향후 국립공원 생태복지 정책이 어떻게 나아가야할지 방향성을 제시하였다. 그러나 이를 실현하기 위해서는 향후 이에 대한 구체적인 단위사업에 대한 실행계획이 수반되어야 하며 이를 위한 추가적인 연구가 필요할 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Bryant, B., (1995) Environmental Justice: Issues, Policies, and Solutions, Washington D.C: Island Press
  2. Bullard, R.D. and G.S. Johnson(2000) Environmentalism and Public Policy: Environmental Justice: Grassroots Activism and its Impact on Public Policy Decision Making, Journal of Social Issues, 56(3): 555-578 https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00184
  3. English, J. M. and G. L. Kernan(1976) "The prediction of air travel and aircraft technology to the year 2000 using the delphi method." Transport Research. 10: 1-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/0041-1647(76)90094-0
  4. European Commission(EC) and German Ministry for the Environmen, BMU.(2008) the Economics of Ecosystem and biodiversity : an interim report
  5. Im, E.A., K.C. Son, and J.K. Kam(2012) Development of Elements of Horticultural Therapy Evaluation Indices (HTEI) through Delphi Method, Kor. J. Hort. Sci. Technol. 30(3):308-324(in Korean with English abstract)
  6. Ju H.J., G.H. Kwon and S.H. Moon(2011) The Study on the Dynamic Efficiency of the Korean National Parks: Utilizing DEA & DEA-Window Methodology, Journal of Korean Association for Policy Analysis and Evaluation 21(1): 243-273(in Korean with English abstract)
  7. Kim, M.K. and S.J. Park(2014) A Study on the Conceptualization of Korean Leisure Addiction. Korean Society of Leisure and Recreation. 38(1):1-16(in Korean with English abstract)
  8. Kim, Y.W(2012) Study on National Park Visitors Consciousness on Nature Conservation and their attitude toward Eco-Tourism -Focusing on Buk Han San National Park-, Journal of Korea Academic Society Of Tourism Management 25(6): 77-97(in Korean with English abstract)
  9. Koh, J. K. and H.S. Jeong(2013) Toward a Preliminary Conceptualization of Environmental Welfare, JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY AND ADMINISTRATION 21(3) 23-52(in Korean with English abstract)
  10. Ko, J.Y. and M.R. Jung(2006) Developing Evaluation Items on Sommelier Certification Program. Journal of tourism sciences 30(5): 133-151 (in Korean with English summary)
  11. Korea Forest Service(2013) Forest Welfare comprehensive plan(in Korean)
  12. Lawshe, C.H.(1975) A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology 28:563-575 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x
  13. Lee J.S(2001) Delphi Method. (in Korean)
  14. Lynn, M. R.(1986) "Determination and quantification of content validity." Nursing Research. 35(6): 382-385
  15. MA(2005) Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Island Press, Washington, D.C.
  16. Ministry of Health & Welfare(2009) Framework and Conceptual Model of Korean Ecowelfare(in Korean)
  17. Pops, Gerald M.(1997) Seeking Environmental Equity and Justice, KETRI, Environmental Ethics for the 21st Century, pp. 1-32
  18. Prescott-Allen, R.(2001) The wellbeing of nations. Island Press
  19. TEEB(2010) The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity : Main streaming the Economics of Nature: A synthesis of the approach, conclusions and recommendations of TEEB
  20. 戶田淸(1994) 環境的公正を求めて