DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Probabilistic Seismic Assessment of Buckling Restrained Braces and Yielding Brace Systems

  • Veismoradi, Sajad (School of Civil Engineering, Iran University of Science & Technology) ;
  • Amiri, Gholamreza Ghodrati (Center of Excellence for Fundamental Studies in Structural Engineering, School of Civil Engineering, Iran University of Science & Technology) ;
  • Darvishan, Ehsan (Department of Civil Engineering, Roudehen Branch, Islamic Azad University)
  • Received : 2015.05.05
  • Accepted : 2016.06.23
  • Published : 2016.09.30

Abstract

The current paper investigates the effectiveness of using an innovative structural fuse named YBS over the Buckling Restrained Brace (BRB) within the context of performance-based earthquake engineering. To this end, two groups of structures equipped with BRB and YBS braces are modeled by OpenSEES platform. In the first part of the paper, simplified procedures including pushover and Incremental Dynamic Analysis (IDA) are utilized for seismic performance evaluation. In the second part, two EDP-based and IM-based probabilistic frameworks are employed to gain a more comprehensive assessment. On this basis, fragility analysis is carried out for different performance levels. Also, limit state frequencies are calculated to compare collapse capacity of both systems. Finally, confidence levels are estimated to study reliability of the structures against collapse. Results show that both systems can achieve the expected performance objectives. However, YBS represent superior performance beyond the sideway collapse performance level.

Keywords

References

  1. Asgarian, B., and Shokrgozar, H. R. (2009). "BRBF response modification factor." Journal of constructional steel research, 65(2), pp. 290-298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2008.08.002
  2. BHRC Publication No. S-253, (2005), Standard No. 2800, Third Edition, Iranian Code of Practice for Seismic Resistant Design of Buildings, Building and Housing Research Center., Iran.
  3. Black, C. J., Makris, N., and Aiken, I. D. (2004). "Component testing, seismic evaluation and characterization of buckling-restrained braces." Journal of Structural Engineering, 130(6), pp. 880-894. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:6(880)
  4. Bozorgnia, Y., and Bertero, V. V., (2004). Earthquake engineering: from engineering seismology to performancebased engineering. CRC press.
  5. Clark, P., Aiken, I., Kasai, K., Ko, E., and Kimura, I. (1999). "Design procedures for buildings incorporating hysteretic damping devices." Proc. 68th annual convention, pp. 355-371.
  6. Dusicka, P., and Tinker, J. (2012). "Global restraint in ultralightweight buckling-restrained braces." Journal of Composites for Construction, 17(1), pp. 139-150. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000320
  7. Fahnestock, L. A., Sause, R., and Ricles, J. M. (2006). "Analytical and large-scale experimental studies of earthquake-resistant buckling-restrained braced frame systems." ATLSS Reports. Paper 71.
  8. FEMA-350. (2000). Recommended Seismic Design Criteria for New Steel Moment-Frame Buildings. SAC Joint Venture. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington D.C.
  9. FEMA-356. (2000). Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC.
  10. FEMA-P695. (2009). Quantification of building seismic performance factors, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC.
  11. Gray, M. G., Christopoulos, C., and Packer, J. A. (2013). "Cast steel yielding brace system for concentrically braced frames: Concept development and experimental validations." Journal of Structural Engineering, 140(4).
  12. Gray, M. G., Christopoulos, C., and Packer, J. A. (2010). "Cast steel yielding fuse for concentrically braced frames." Proc. 9th US National and 10th Canadian Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Toronto, Canada, pp. 25-29.
  13. Gray, M.G., Christopoulos, C., Packer, J.A., Lignos, D.G. (2012). "Development, Validation and Modeling of the New Cast Steel Yielding Brace System," Proc. ASCE Structures Congress, March 29th-31st, Chicago, IL, USA, SEI institute.
  14. Ibarra, L., Medina, R., and Krawinkler, H. (2002). "Collapse assessment of deteriorating SDOF systems." Proc. 12th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, pp. 9-13.
  15. Jalayer, F., and Cornell, C. A. (2002). "A technical framework for probability-based demand and capacity factor (DCFD) seismic formats." Report No. RMS-43, RMS Program, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
  16. Jia, M., Guo, L., and Lu, D. (2014). "Performance testing and comparison of buckling-restrained braces with H and crisscross cross section unrestrained segments." International Journal of Steel Structures, 14(4), pp. 745-753. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-014-1206-y
  17. Leon, Roberto T., Yang, Chuang-Sheng, Reinhorn, A., Schachter, M., Stojadinovic, B., Yang, T., Shing, B., and Wei, Z. (2005). "Results of early collaborative research on behavior of braced steel frames with innovative bracing schemes (zipper frames)." Proc. The First International Conference on Advances in Experimental Structural Engineering, Nagoya, Japan.
  18. Mahmoudi, M., and Zaree, M. (2010). "Evaluating response modification factors of concentrically braced steel frames." Journal of constructional steel research, 66(10), pp. 1196-1204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2010.04.004
  19. Mazzoni, S., McKenna, F., Scott, M. H., and Fenves, G. L. (2006). "OpenSees command language manual." Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research (PEER) Center.
  20. Miller, D. J., Fahnestock, L. A., and Eatherton, M. R. (2012). "Development and experimental validation of a nickeltitanium shape memory alloy self-centering bucklingrestrained brace." Engineering Structures, 40, pp. 288-298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.02.037
  21. MHUD. 2014. "Iranian National Building Code, part 10, steel structure design." Ministry of Housing and Urban Development, Tehran, Iran. (in persian).
  22. Sabelli, R., Mahin, S., and Chang, C. (2003). "Seismic demands on steel braced frame buildings with bucklingrestrained braces." Engineering Structures, 25(5), pp. 655-666. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(02)00175-X
  23. Tabatabaei, S. A. R., Mirghaderi, S. R., and Hosseini, A. (2014). "Experimental and numerical developing of reduced length buckling-restrained braces." Engineering Structures, 77, pp. 143-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.07.034
  24. Tsai, K. C., Chen, H. W., Hong, C. P., and Su, Y. F. (1993). "Design of steel triangular plate energy absorbers for seismic-resistant construction." Earthquake spectra, 9(3), pp. 505-528. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585727
  25. Vamvatsikos, D. and Cornell, C. A. (2002). "Incremental dynamic analysis." Journal of Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 31(3), pp. 487-747. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.160
  26. Vargas, R., and Bruneau, M. (2009). "Experimental response of buildings designed with metallic structural fuses" Journal of structural engineering, 135(4), pp. 394-403. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2009)135:4(394)
  27. Vayas, I., and Thanopoulos, P. (2005). "Innovative dissipative (INERD) pin connections for seismic resistant braced frames." International Journal of Steel Structures, 5(5), pp. 453-464.
  28. Ward, K. M., Fleischman, R. B., and Federico, G. (2012). "A cast modular bracing system for steel special concentrically braced frames." Engineering Structures, 45, pp. 104-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.05.025
  29. Wigle, V. R., and Fahnestock, L. A. (2010). "Bucklingrestrained braced frame connection performance." Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 66(1), pp. 65-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2009.07.014
  30. Zareian, F., and Krawinkler, H. (2007). "Assessment of probability of collapse and design for collapse safety." Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 36(13), pp. 1901-1914. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.702
  31. Zareian, F., Krawinkler, H., Ibarra, L., and Lignos, D. (2010). "Basic concepts and performance measures in prediction of collapse of buildings under earthquake ground motions." The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 19(1-2), pp. 167-181. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.546

Cited by

  1. Reliability-based seismic evaluation of buried pipelines subjected to earthquake-induced transient ground motions vol.18, pp.8, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-020-00852-w