Journal of Korean Society on Water Environment (한국물환경학회지)

Korean Society on Water Environment (한국물환경학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Application of Saccharified Acorn-starch for Biomass and Lipid Accumulation of Microalgae

당화된 도토리의 전분이 미세조류 바이오매스 증식과 바이오오일 함량에 미치는 영향

  • Choi, Hee-Jeong (Department of Energy and Environment Convergence, Catholic Kwandong University) ;
  • Lee, Jung-Min (Department of Global Language and Cultures, Catholic Kwandong University)
  • 최희정 (가톨릭관동대학교 에너지환경융합학과) ;
  • 이정민 (가톨릭관동대학교 글로벌 어문학부)
  • Received : 2016.01.04
  • Accepted : 2016.03.10
  • Published : 2016.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The growth of the algae strain Chlorella vulgaris under mixotrophic conditions in the presence of saccharified acorn-starch (acorn-glucose) was evaluated with the objective of increasing biomass growth and triacylglycerols (TAGs) content. The results indicated that 81.3% of starch was converted to glucose in acorns. C.vulgaris algal strains grown with acorn-glucose produced higher biomass and TAGs content than with autotrophic growth. The highest biomass production and TAGs content with 3 g/L acorn-glucose were 12.44 g/L and 32.9%, respectively. Biomass production with 3 g/L acorn-glucose was 16.4 fold higher than under autotrophic growth condition. These findings suggested that 3 g/L acorn-glucose is economic and efficient for biomass production/productivity and TAGs content of microalgae. This study provides a feasible way to reduce the cost of bioenergy production from microalgae.

본 연구는 당화된 도토리의 전분이 미세조류(Chlorella vulgaris) 바이오매스 증식과 바이오오일 함량에 미치는 영향을 알아보고자 하였다. 실험결과 도토리의 전분은 당화 후에 81.3%가 글루코스로 전환되었다. 도토리-글루코스를 이용한 복합영양 상태에서 미세조류는 독립영양 상태보다 높은 바이오매스 증식률과 TAGs (Triacyglycerols)의 함유량을 나타내었는데, 최대 바이오매스 생산량과 TAGs의 함유량은 3 g/L의 도토리-글루코스의 농도에서 각각 12.44 g/L와 32.9%를 나타내었다. 이는 3 g/L의 도토리-글루코스 농도에서 독립영양 상태의 바이오매스 생산량과 비교하면 16.4배의 많은 양의 바이오매스를 생산하였음을 알 수 있었다. 따라서 경제성과 바이오매스의 생산량/생산률 그리고 TAGs의 함유량을 고려한다면 3 g/L의 도토리-글루코스 농도가 미세조류의 증식에 가장 효과적이였다. 본 연구의 결과는 미세조류 유래 바이오에너지의 생산 비용을 절감하는 데 도움이 될 수 있을 것으로 생각된다.

Keywords

1. Introduction

Algae strains that are robust and highly productive are selected for the conversion of biomass into energy (Spolaore et al., 2006), and strains with relatively high lipid contents are very attractive for biodiesel fuel production (Choi, 2015b; Rudolfi et al., 2009). Microalgae have received considerable interest as a source of renewable energy; however, further optimization of the mass culture conditions is necessary to make microalgal biofuel production economically viable and sustainable (Choi, 2014; Pittman et al., 2011).

Many algal organisms can use either autotrophic, heterotrophic or mixotrophic metabolic processes for growth. The growth rate and biomass production for some algae in mixo-or heterotrophic conditions can be several times higher than in photoautotrophic-only conditions (Qiao et al., 2009; Yang et al., 2000; Zhang et al., 2011). Moreover, the synthesis of metabolic products, such as lipids and pigments, is influenced by the quality and quantity of organic carbon. The use of organic carbon in mixotrophic cultures reduces the need for carbon dioxide in the culture and facilitates the growth of algal species that are sensitive to agitation (Andrade and Costa, 2007; Chojnacka and Noworyta, 2004). Bouarab et al. (2004) reported that Micractinium pusillum grew in the presence of organic substrates, such as glucose and acetate, under both mixotrophic and heterotrophic conditions. It can be concluded from the above that mixotrophism is an ideal nutritional mode for high density cultivation of microalgae for the production of biofuels and functional components. However, even though the biomass and lipid productivities are significantly higher compared with those from autotrophic growth, the cost of organic carbon sources (usually in the form of glucose or acetate) is high when compared to all other added nutrients. To overcome this high carbon cost, a cheap resource must be found.

Acorns are capable of providing such a supply. Acorns are much cheaper than other organic carbon sources and are found everywhere in the world. The acorn is the nut from oaks and their close relatives (genera Quercus and Lithocarpus, in the family Fagaceae). It usually contains a single seed (rarely two seeds), enclosed in a tough, leathery shell and borne in a cup-shaped cupule. Acorns vary from 1-6 cm in length and 0.8-4 cm in width. Acorns are also rich in nutrients. Percentages vary from species to species, but all acorns contain large amounts of water (10.6%), protein (0.8%), carbohydrates (87.3%) and fats (1.2%), as well as various minerals (e.g., calcium, phosphorus, magnesium, potassium and the vitamin niacin) and sugar (e.g., rhamnose, galactose, arainose, mannose, fucose and xylose) (Choi, 2015a). Glucose is especially rich in the acorn, representing 97.9% of the sugar composition. Glucose is an important carbohydrate in biology, indicated by the fact that cells use it as a secondary source of energy and a metabolic intermediate. Glucose is one of the main products of photosynthesis and fuels for cellular respiration (Pyle et al., 2008). In mixotrophic growth, there are two distinctive processes: photosynthesis and aerobic respiration. The former is influenced by light intensity, and the latter is related to the organic substrate (glucose) concentration (Andruleviciute et al., 2014; Heredia-Arroyo et al., 2011). The high cell density in mixotrophic cultures has demonstrated that the growth stimulating effects of light and CO2 in mixotrophic cultures are as strong as the effects of glucose (Kong et al., 2013).

The above findings suggest that acorn-glucose is a potential substrate for the mixotrophic cultivation of microalgae that may reduce the production cost of microalgal biodiesel. However, there are few reports on the use of acorn-glucose in biomass production and algal cell components under mixotrophic conditions. Therefore, the effects of various concentrations of saccharified acorn-starch (acorn-glucose) on the biomass growth and triacylglycerols (TAGs) content of Chlorella vulgaris (C. vulgaris) were evaluated under mixotrophic conditions in this study.

 

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Microalgae Cultures and Medium

The investigated microalgae were isolated from KMMCC (Korea Marine Microalgae Culture Center). The C. vulgaris (FC-16, KMMCC-135) cells were round in shape and 3-8 μm in diameter. C. vulgaris cells were cultivated in Jaworski’s medium (JM), which was prepared using deionised water under LED lamps at ambient temperature. Jaworski’s medium is comprised of 4.0 g Ca(NO3)2H2O, 2.48 g KH2PO4, 10.0 g MgSO4·7H2O, 3.18 g NaHCO3, 0.45 g EDTAFeNa, 0.45 g EDTANa2, 0.496 g H3BO3, 0.278 g MnCl2·4H2O, 0.20 g (NH4)6Mo7O24·4H2O, 0.008 g cyanocobalamin, 0.008 g thiamine HCl, 0.008 g biotin, 16.0 g NaNO3 and 7.2 g Na2HPO4·12H2O in 200 ml of deionised water. The initial concentration of C. vulgaris was 0.357 g/L, and the pH was adjusted to 7.3±0.3. Each culture was grown at room temperature (23±2℃) under 200~250 μmol photons/m 2s illumination using white LEDs (light emitting diodes) for dark and light cycles of 12 h each. Light intensity was measured with a data logger (model LI-1400) using an LI-190SA quantum sensor. For batch cultivation in laboratory conditions, Erlenmeyer glass flasks with a working volume of 5 L were used, and a 15-day cultivation period was chosen. The cultivation period of 15 days was not chosen randomly; the highest biomass concentration is reached during the stationary growth phase, and the lipid content increases with increasing cultivation time.

Mixotrophic conditions for microalgae cultivation were achieved with acorn-glucose. This acorn contained considerable amounts of starch and glucose. The corresponding amount of acorn-glucose was added to the JM growth medium to achieve the desired mixotrophic medium. The cultures were shaken by hand several times a day to avoid sticking.

2.2. Pretreatment of Acorn

Acorns were collected in Ganuneung City in Korea. To remove adherent and interference materials, such as organics and salts, the acorns were rinsed several times with deionised water. After cleaning, the hard shell of the acorn was removed, and the nuts were dried in an oven at 105℃ for 24 h then crushed into a fine powder using a mortar and pestle. Tannins were removed by soaking chopped acorns in several changes of water until the water no longer turned brown. The acorn powder was extracted using ultrasonic cycle extraction equipment (JYD-US01, Shenzhen Jiayuanda Technol. Co., Ltd, Guangdong, China) with 20-kHz ultrasonic frequency in an 80% ethanol solution for 120 min with a liquid-to-solid ratio of 15:1 (Pan et al., 2014).

2.3. Saccharification of Acorn-starch

Acorn powder was added to deionized water at a ratio of 1:5 and mixed with calcium chloride and α-amylase (30 U/g dry acorn) for 2h at 90℃. The liquefied mixture was saccharified with glucoamylase (150 U/g dry acorn) for 4h at pH 4.0 and 60℃ (Tang et al., 2011). Acorn powder was treated as above for the liquefaction step; however, the saccharification step was allowed to continue for 12 h to completely convert all the starch to glucose. The glucose was measured to determine the total starch in the powder.

2.4. Analytical Methods

The experiment was carried out five times, and the mean values and standard deviations were calculated. Saccharification of starch represents a normal glucose equivalent (Dextrose Equivalent, DE).

DE = (Glucose form saccharified starch/ total solid) × 100

2.4.1. Proximate Compositions

The moisture content of the acorns was determined by drying the various parts in an oven at 105℃ until a constant weight was obtained. The crude protein content was calculated by converting the nitrogen content, which was determined using the method proposed by Kjeldahl (6.25 × N). The fat content was determined with the acid saccharification Soxhlet system using the method described by the AOAC (2005). The ash content was determined by dry ashing in a furnace oven at 600℃ for 10 h. The carbohydrate content was estimated by subtracting the sum of the weights of the protein, fibre and ash from the total dry matter. All determinations were performed in triplicate.

2.4.2. Measurement of Minerals

The samples used for mineral determination were first digested in HNO3/HCl. The elements K, Ca, Fe, Na and Mg were measured with atomic absorption spectrophotometry (AAS) using a Varian Spectra atomic absorption spectrophotometer, Buck Scientific 210 GVP model. All determinations were performed in triplicate, and we also added spike samples to verify the accuracy of the procedure. P was analysed according to the Mo-blue method using a UV/Vis Spectrophotometer DU800 (Beckman Coulter, USA).

2.4.3. Determination of Monosaccharides for Acorn

The monosaccharide content was determined by a method of separation described by Blakeney et al. (1983). The 10-mg sample was placed into a Teflon-lined screw cap tube and mixed with 125 μL of 73% (w/w) H2SO4. After 45 minutes, the solution was saccharified with 1.35 mL of distilled water at 100℃ for 3 hour, and then it was neutralised by adding 320 μL of 15M NH4OH. After neutralization, 1 mL of 2% NaBH4 in DMSO was added to the mixture to react for 90 minutes at 40℃. Next, 100 μL of 18 M glacial acetic acid, 200 μL of 1-methylimidazole and 2.0 mL of acetic anhydride were added to the reaction mixture and allowed to stand at room temperature for 10 minutes. After decomposing, the excess acetic anhydride was separated into a microcentrifuge tube for analysis by GLC. The GLC analysis conditions are shown in Table 1.

Table 1.Instrument and operation conditions for monosaccharide analysis by GLC

2.4.4. Measurement of Cell Weight and Specific Growth Rate

Acorn-glucose at various concentrations (0, 1, 2, 3 and 5 g/L) was added during the initial growth phase and the growth of the algae biomass as well as the lipid accumulation was evaluated. To determine the biomass concentration, a sample of microalgae in growth medium was centrifuged for 10 min at 628 g, washed with distilled water and dried in an oven at 105ºC for 24 h to constant weight. The biomass productivity P (g/(L·day)) was calculated from the variation in biomass concentration X (g/L) within a cultivation time t (in days), according to the following equation:

The specific growth rate μ (in days) was calculated using equation (2):

where X1 and X0 are the biomass concentration (g/L) on days t1 and t0, respectively.

2.4.5. Extraction of Lipids

The algal biomass for lipid extraction was prepared by centrifugation and drying. After oven drying, the algae were pulverised and subjected to Soxhlet extraction. All Soxhlet extractions were performed for 72 h using 500 mL of solvent for 1 g of pulverised dry algae with a cycle time of 10-15 min. The Soxhlet extraction with hexane was selected because the Bligh and Dyer (1959) extraction method is suitable for the extraction of all lipids, including triglycerides, phospholipids and other pigments (Sobczuk and Chisti 2010). The lipid content does not reflect the exact amount of triacylglycerols (TAGs) because only triglycerides are used in the synthesis of biodiesel, and other components are undesirable. The excess hexane was evaporated by rotary evaporation until the total volume reached 30-40 mL. The solutions were diluted to 50 mL and used to determine the TAG content. The amount of TAGs was determined using a Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectrometer Spectrum RX 1 (Perkin Elmer) according to the carbonyl stretching absorption at 1740/cm (Stehfest et al., 2005). The amount of TAGs in the extract solutions was determined using a standard graph, and the amount of TAGs was calculated in the dry algae (%, w/w). The experiments were performed five times, and the mean values and standard deviations were calculated.

 

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Saccharification of Acorn Powder

The composition of raw acorn and saccharified acorn is represented in Table 2. The proximate compositions such as moisture, crude ash, crude protein, crude fat and carbohydrate decreased from 70.2-78.8% to 14.7-20.5%. In contrast, sugar composition (Glucose, Rhamnose, Galactose, Arabinose, Mannose, Fructose and Xylose) increased after sacchrification of the acorns, from 23.2-28.6% to 75.3-91.4%. These results indicated that most of the starch in the acorns was converted to glucose through saccahrification. Mineral contents (K, P, Ca, Na, Mg and Fe etc.) and fatty acid composition decreased slightly from 4.3-5.2% to 3.8-4.9% and 5.6-6.2% to 5.1-5.4%, respectively, with saccharification.

Table 2.The acorn composition

Fig. 1 illustrates glucose release during the saccharification of acorn starch from the pretreated materials. Starch concentration decreased to 14.50 g/L from 123.50 g/L. While starch concentration decreased by 88.3%, glucose increased 9.8 fold in 5 hours after saccharification. The saccharification rate reached 81.3% within 5 hours but the starch could not be converted completely. After 5 hours of saccharification, the glucose and starch concentrations did not change further. α-amylase and glucoamylase, saccharified enzymes, convert the α-1,4- bond polymer in starch to form low molecular weight dextrins such as glucose, maltose, oligosaccharides. The activities of α-amylase and glucoamylase are inhibited by tannins (Pan et al., 2014), which comprise about 6.2% of acorns. After the saccharification enzymes saccharified amylose to dextrins (6 to 8 form glucose), the dextrin is decomposed into oligosaccharides such as maltoteratose, maltopentaose and maltotriose by the enzyme. Thereafter, oligosaccharides are slowly broken down to glucose and maltose by the enzyme and the concentration becomes diluted (Charef et al., 2008). However, if the concentration of oligosaccharides is high, isomaltose and panose can be regenerated using saccharified energy from maltose and glucose. In particular, since the concentration of glucose and maltose increase rapidly in accordance with the progress of sacchrification, the regeneration of isomaltose and panose also occurs rapidly (Tang et al., 2011). Thus, obtaining a large amount of glucose from starch saccharification is difficult. Glucose is a very important carbon source for the growth of microalgae under mixotrophic conditions and was the main sugar composition in the acorns evaluated. Chaudhary et al. (2012) reported that glucose is a very important factor for microalgae growth and that E. coli growth with glucose is 3 times faster than with glycerol. The results of the current study indicated that the acorns contained a considerable amount of carbonate and glucose, which positively affected the growth of microalgae.

Fig. 1.Process of glucose and starch concentration during saccharification of acorn starch.

3.2. Effect of Acorn-glucose Dosage on the Growth of Algal Species

Figure 2 shows the effect of different acorn-glucose concentrations on the growth of C. vulgaris compared to growth in the autotrophic condition. On the first day, the microalgae grew at the same rate in all concentrations of acorn-glucose. After 2 days, microalgae growth in 5 g/L acorn-glucose was significantly higher than the other samples. The biomass increased for the first 6 days in the sample containing 5 g/L acorn-glucose. Thereafter, the rate of biomass production was similar to the 3 g/L acorn-glucose sample, indicating that high glucose concentrations inhibit the growth of microalgae. Maximum biomass productions were 0.76±0.03, 3.49±0.05, 8.06±0.35, 12.44±1.34 and 10.62±0.75 g/L in the media containing 0, 1, 2, 3 and 5 g/L acorn-glucose, respectively. This was 4.6, 10.6, 16.4 and 14.0 fold higher than the concentration achieved with C. vulgaris in autotrophic medium, respectively. The highest biomass production in the mixotrophic condition was obtained with 3 g/L acorn-glucose. All media with acorn-glucose yielded a higher biomass than the autotrophic condition.

Fig. 2.Growth of C. vulgaris in various acorn-glucose concentrations.

The oxidation of glucose in microalgae contributes to a series of complex biochemical reactions that provide the energy needed by cells (Choi and Yu, 2015; Liang et al., 2009). The first step in the breakdown of glucose in all cells is glycolysis to produce pyruvate, which is the starting point for all other processes in cellular respiration. In cells where oxygen is present (aerobic respiration), these processes are modelled in the tricarboxylic acid cycle (TCA) or the Krebs cycle. The majority of the energy generated from glucose oxidation is used in the conversion of adenosine diphosphate (ADP) to adenosine triphosphate (ATP), with the energy-rich molecule ATP used subsequently as the energy currency of the cell (Mitra et al., 2012; Perez-Garcia et al., 2010). Bouarab et al. (2004) reported that Micractinium pusillum grew in the presence of organic substrates, i.e., glucose and acetate, under mixotrophic conditions, as well as they did under heterotrophic conditions. The growth of M. pusillum was much more eugenic in the light than in the dark and was higher in the presence of glucose than acetate. It can be concluded from the above that mixotrophism is an ideal nutritional model for the production of biofuels and functional components. In the present study, the acorn-glucose concentration influenced the biomass production of C. vulgaris. The results of this study suggest that the investigated algae species may be excellent biofuel producers because organic materials stimulate the growth rate of these strains.

Growth of C. vulgaris in various acorn-glucose concentrations depicted in Figure 3. C. vulgaris achieved a maximum biomass productivity of 0.342±0.015 g/L·day and a maximum specific grow rate of 0.367±0.021 g/L·day with 3 g/L acorn-glucose. The maximum biomass productivity and maximum specific growth rate in samples with acorn-glucose were higher than the authotrophic condition.

Fig. 3.Pmax and μmax with various acorn-glucose concentrations.

An early report indicated that mixotrophic growth had the potential to greatly increase the microalgal cell concentration and volumetric productivity in a batch system (Yamane et al., 2001). The report established that the adenosine triphosphate formed in photochemical reactions accelerated glucose anabolism in the mixotrophic culture of Euglena gracilis and was the reason why growth in the mixotrophic culture increased. The results of our study suggest that C. vulgaris has the potential to be an excellent biofuel producer because the growth rate of the strains can be stimulated by organic materials.

3.3. Total TAGs (triacylglycerols) Content in Algae Species

The total TAGs content with different acorn-glucose concentrations are represented in Table 3. The highest TAGs content was 32.9% for C. vulgaris with 3 g/L acorn-glucose. Furthermore, 3 g/L acorn-glucose resulted in 29.2% more TAGs content in C. vulgaris compared with the autotrophic condition. The TAGs content increased approximately 2 fold with each 1 g/L acorn-glycerol increment, up to 3 g/L acorn-glucose. However, slight inhibition was observed during the initial cultivation when the acorn-glucose concentration reached 5 g/L. Therefore, to obtain high TAGs content, the recommended mixotrophic condition for the microalgae species is 3 g/L acorn-glucose.

Table 3.* The data from the 15-day cell growth was used for the determination. TAGs: Triacylglycerols

Liang et al. (2010) observed an increase in lipid content with increasing concentrations of glucose. The lipid content increased from 22% with 1 g/L glucose to 32% with 2 g/L glucose; however, the highest amount (10 g/L) of glucose had an inhibitory effect on the growth of algae and on TAGs content. Another study demonstrated that Chlorella protothecoides was slightly inhibited by glucose and could still grow even when the salinity of the culture medium reached 35 g/L (Chaudhary et al., 2012). Chlorella vulgaris, however, had a much lower tolerance of glucose and its growth was inhibited when the glucose concentration reached 15 g/L. In this study, slight inhibition was observed during the initial cultivation when the acorn-glucose concentration reached 5 g/L. The TAGs content and biomass production with acorn-glucose increased with increasing acorn-glucose concentration. The results showed that using acorn-glucose as a carbon source for the mixotrophic cultivation of C. vulgaris is a feasible way to solve the problem of low algal cell density when the acorn-glucose is the sole carbon source, which stimulates additional utilization of the acorn-glucose. Furthermore, this study demonstrated the feasibility of acorn-glucose as an alternative carbon substrate to glucose for microalgae cultivation, and cost reduction of the carbon substrate feed for microalgal lipid production is expected. The TAGs content and efficiency of microalgae growth are important for biodiesel production (Ramos et al., 2009). Improved lipid accumulation with slower microalgae growth may result in lower oil yields compared to faster growing microalgae with less lipid accumulation.

Various carbon sources, such as sodium acetate (Qiao et al., 2009), fructose (Gao et al., 2009), glucose (Yeh and Chang, 2012), glycerol (Heredia-Arroyo et al., 2010), sucrose (Gao et al., 2009), and acetate (Heredia-Arroyo et al., 2010), have been successfully applied to increase the rate of growth and lipid content of microalgae. However, these methods are cost-intensive (Borowitzka and Moheimani, 2013; Lin and Wu, 2015; Vidotti et al., 2014). The carbon source used in this study is simple and cost effective. The prices of glucose (obtained from starch produced from plants that are cultivated under phototrophic conditions, e.g. corn), glycerol and acetate are in the range of 0.5-0.8, 0.6-0.7 and 0.9-0.94 US dollars per kg, respectively. While the use of carbon dioxide from flue gases has an additional bonus due to the reduction of emissions to the atmosphere (Gouveia and Oliveira, 2009), additional cleanup steps are likely to be required for the flue gas. In contrast, acorns are inexpensive, costing approximately $0.15-0.3 USD per kilogram (Leon-Camacho et al., 2004; Shim et al., 2005). Acorn-glucose does not contaminate the growth medium, which can be recycled to reduce not only the cost and the demand for water but also the extra operational costs for reusing growth medium. This cost effective carbon source will help reduce the production cost of using algae for biodiesel.

 

4. Conclusions

The growth of the algae strain C. vulgaris under mixotrophic conditions in the presence of saccharified acorn-starch (acorn-glucose) was investigated with the objective of increasing the biomass growth and TAGs content. Acorn-starch concentration decreased by 88.26% and glucose increased 9.8 fold within 5 hours after saccharification. The saccharification reached 81.3% in 5 hours. Biomass production from 0.357 g/L of C. vulgaris was determined to be 0.76, 3.49, 8.06, 12.44 and 10.62 g/L with 0, 1, 2, 3 and 5 g/L acorn-glucose, respectively. Biomass production with 3 g/L acorn-glucose was 16.4 fold higher than that of the autotrophic growth condition. In addition, the amount of TAGs in the algal strains was 3.7, 8.7, 18.2, 32.9 and 18.4% for 0, 1, 2, 3 and 5 g/L acorn-glucose, respectively. The 3 g/L acorn-glucose concentration under the mixotrophic conditions was most effective for maximum increases in biomass production/productivity and TAGs content. The acorn-glucose enhanced the investigated microalgae growth, biomass productivity and TAGs content.

References

  1. Andrade, M. R. and Costa, J. A. V. (2007). Mixotrophic Cultivation of Microalga Spirulina platensis using Molasses as Organic Substrate, Aquaculture, 264, pp. 130-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2006.11.021
  2. Andruleviciute, V., Makareviciene, V., Skorupskaite, V., and Gumbyte, M. (2014). Biomass and Oil Content of Chlorella sp., Haematococcus sp., Nannochloris sp. and Scenedesmus sp. under Mixotrophic Growth Conditions in the Presence of Technical Glycerol, Journal of Applied Phycology, 26, pp. 83-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-013-0048-x
  3. Association of Official Analytical Chemist (AOAC). (1980). Official Methods of Analysis, 14th ed, Association of official analytical chemist, Washington DC, pp. 129-133.
  4. Blakeney, A. B., Harris, P. J., Henry, R. J., and Stone, B. A. (1983). A Simple and Rapid Preparation of Alditol Acetate for Monosaccharide Analysis, Carbohydrate Research, 113(2), pp. 291-299. https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-6215(83)88244-5
  5. Bligh, E. G. and Dyer, W. J. (1959). A Rapid Method of Total Lipid Extraction and Purification, Canadian Journal of Biochemistry and Physiology, 37, pp. 911-917. https://doi.org/10.1139/o59-099
  6. Bouarab, L., Dauta, A., and Loudiki, M. (2004). Heterotrophic and Mixotrophic Growth of Micractinium pusillum fresenius in the Presence of Acetate and Glucose: Effect of Light and Acetate Gradient Concentration, Water Research, 38, pp. 2706-2712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2004.03.021
  7. Borowitzka, M. A. and Moheimani, N. R. (2013). Sustainable Biofuels from Algae, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 18, pp. 13-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-010-9271-9
  8. Charef, M., Yousfi, M., Saidi, M., and Stocker, P. (2008). Determineation of the Fatty Acid Composition of Acorn (Quercus), Pistacia Lentiscus Seeds Growing in Algeria, Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society, 85, pp. 921-924. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11746-008-1283-1
  9. Chaudhary, N., Ngadi, M. O., and Simpson, B. (2012). Comparison of Glucose, Glycerol and Crude Glycerol Fermentation by Echerichia Coli K12, Journal of Bioprocessing and Biotechniques, S1:001 doi:10.4172/2155-9821
  10. Choi, H. J. (2014). Efficiency of Nutrient Removal and Biomass Productivity in the Wastewater by Microalgae Membrane Bioreactor Process, Journal of Korean Society on Water Environment, 30(4), pp. 386-393. [Korean Literature] https://doi.org/10.15681/KSWE.2014.30.4.386
  11. Choi, H. J. (2015a). Effect of Acorn Powder on the Biomass Productivity of Microalgae, Journal of Korean Society on Water Environment, 31(2), pp. 134-141. [Korean Literature] https://doi.org/10.15681/KSWE.2015.31.2.134
  12. Choi, H. J. (2015b). A Comparative Study on Microalgae Recovery Rates in Response to Different Low Cost Bio-flocculant Applications, Journal of Korean Society on Water Environment, 31(6), pp. 625-631. [Korean Literature] https://doi.org/10.15681/KSWE.2015.31.6.625
  13. Choi, H. J. and Yu, S. W. (2015). Influence of Crude Glycerol on the Biomass and Lipid Content of Microalgae, Biotechnology and Biotechnological Equipment, 29(3), pp. 506-513. https://doi.org/10.1080/13102818.2015.1013988
  14. Chojnacka, K. and Noworyta, A. (2004). Evaluation of Spirulina sp. Growth in Photoautotrophic, Heterotrophic and Mixotrophic Cultures, Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 34, pp. 461-465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enzmictec.2003.12.002
  15. Gao, C., Zhai, Y., Ding, Y., and Wu, Q. (2009). Application of Sweet Sorghum for Biodiesel Production by Heterotrophic Microalga Chlorella protothecoides, Applied Energy, 87, pp. 756-761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.09.006
  16. Gouvela, L. and Oliveira, C. (2009). Microalgae as a Raw Material for Biofuels Production, Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology, 36, pp. 269-274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-008-0495-6
  17. Heredia-Arroyo, T., Wei, W., Ruan, R., and Hu, B. (2011). Mixotrophic Cultivation of Chlorella vulgaris and its Potential Application for the Oil Accumulation from non-sugar Materials, Biomass Bioenergy, 5, pp. 2-10.
  18. Kong, W. B., Yang, H., Cao, Y. T., Song, H., Hua, S. F., and Xia, C. G. (2013). Effects of Glycerol and Glucose on the Enhancement of Biomass, Lipid and Soluble Carbohydrate Production by Chlorella vulgaris in Mixotrophic Cultures, Food Technology and Biotechnology, 51, pp. 62-69.
  19. Leon-Camacho, M., Viera-Alcaide, I., and Vicario, I. M. (2004). Acorn (Quercus Spp) Fruit Lipids: Saponifiable and Unsaponifiable Fractions: A detailed Study, Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society, 81, pp. 447-453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11746-004-0921-8
  20. Liang, Y., Sarkany, N., and Cui, Y. (2009). Biomass and Lipid Productivities of Chlorella vulgaris under Autotrophic, Heterotrophic and Mixotrophic Growth Conditions, Biotechnology Letters, 3, pp. 1043-1049. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-009-9975-7
  21. Liang, Y., Sarkany, N., Cui, Y., and Blackburn, J. M. (2010). Batch Stage Study of Lipid Production from Crude Glycerol derived from Yellow Grease or Animal Fats through Microalgal Fermentation, Bioresource Technology, 101, pp. 6745-6750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.03.087
  22. Lin, T. S. and Wu, J. Y. (2015). Effect of Carbon Source on Growth and Lipid Accumulation of newly isolated Microalga cultured under Mixtrophic Condition, Bioresource Technology, 184, pp. 100-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.11.005
  23. Mitra, D., van Leenwen, J., and Lamsal, B. (2012). Heterotrophic/Mixotrophic Cultivation of Oleaginous Chlorella vulgaris on Industrial Co-products, Algal Research, 1, pp. 40-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2012.03.002
  24. Pan, P., Tang, Y., Sun, D., Jiang, J., and Song, X. (2014). Effect of Ultrasonic-assisted Pretreatment on Hydrolysis and Fermentation of Acorn Starch, Bioresources, 9(2), pp. 2705-2716. https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.9.2.2705-2716
  25. Perez-Garcia, O., de-Bashan, L. E., Hernandez, J. P., and Bashan, Y. (2010). Efficiency of Growth and Nutrient Uptake from Wastewater by Heterotrophic, Autotrophic, and Mixotrophic Cultivation of Chlorella vulgaris immobilized with Azospirillum brasilense, Journal of Phycology, 46, pp. 800-812. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-8817.2010.00862.x
  26. Pittman, J. K., Dean, A. P., and Osundeko, O. (2011). The Potential of Sustainable Algal Biofuel Production using Wastewater Resources, Bioresource Technology, 102(1), pp. 17-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.06.035
  27. Pyle, D. J., Garcia, R. A., and Wen, Z. (2008). Docosahexaenoic Acid (DHA)-rich Algae from Biodiesel-derived Crude Glycerol: Effects of Impurities on DHA Production and Algal Biomass Composition, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 56, pp. 3933-3939. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf800602s
  28. Qiao, H., Wang, G., and Zhang, X. (2009). Isolation and Characterization of Chlorella sorokiniana GXNN01(Chlorophyta) with the Properties of Heterotrophic and Microaerobic Growth, Journal of Phycology, 45, pp. 1153-1162. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-8817.2009.00736.x
  29. Ramos, M. J., Fernández, C. M., Casas, A., Rodríguez, L., and Pérez, A. (2009). Influence of Fatty Acid Composition of Raw Materials on Biodiesel Properties, Bioresource Technology, 100, pp. 261-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.06.039
  30. Rudolfi, L., Zittelli, G. C., Bassin, N., Padovani, G., Biondi, N., Bonini, G., and Tredicil, M. R. (2009). Microalgae for Oil: Strain Selection, Induction of Lipid Synthesis and Outdoor Mass Cultivation in a Low-cost Photobioreactor, Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 102, pp. 100-112. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.22033
  31. Shim, T. H., Jin, Y. S., Sa, J. H., Shin, I. C., Heo, S. I., Lee, T. W., Kim, T. W., Park, K. Y., Jeong, K. J., Han, K. S., Oh, H. S., and Wang, M. H. (2005). Studies on the Components and Evaluation of Antioxidation Activity in Acorn Powder, Report, Institute of Health and Environment, 16, pp. 46-52.
  32. Sobczuk, T. M., and Chisti, Y. (2010). Potential Fuel Oils from the Microalga Choricystis minor, Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, 85, pp. 100-108. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.2272
  33. Spolaore, P., Joannis-Cassan, C., Duran, E., and Isambert, A. (2006). Commercial Applications of Microalgae, Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, 10, pp. 87-96. https://doi.org/10.1263/jbb.101.87
  34. Stehfest, K., Toepel, J., and Wilhelm, C. (2005). The Application of Micro-FTIR Spectroscopy to analyze Nutrient Stress-related Changes in Biomass Composition of Phytoplankton algae, Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 43, pp. 717-726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2005.07.001
  35. Tang, Y., Zhao, D. Q., Cristhian, C., and Jiang, J. X. (2011). Simultaneous Saccharification and Cofermentation of Lignocellulosic Residues from Commercial Furfural Production and Corn Kernels using Different Nutrient Media, Biotechnology for Biofuels, 4(22), doi: 10.1186/1754-6834-4-22.
  36. Vidotti, A. D. S., Coelho, R. S., Franco, L. M., and Franco, T. T. (2014). Miniaturized Culture for Hetrotrophic Microalgae using Low Cost Carbon Sources as a Tool to isolate fast and economical Strains, Chemical engineering transactions, 38, pp. 325-330.
  37. Yamane, Y., Utsunomiya, T., Watanabe, M., and Sasaki, K. (2001). Biomass Production in Mixotrophic Culture of Euglena gracilis under Acidic Conditions and its Growth Energetic, Biotechnology Letters, 23, pp. 1223-1228. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010573218863
  38. Yang, C., Hua, Q., and Shimizu, K. (2000). Energetics and Carbon Metabolism during Growth of Microalgal Cells under Photoautotrophic, Mixotrophic and Cyclic Light-autotrophic/Dark-heterotrophic Conditions, Biochemical Engineering Journal, 6, pp. 87-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-703X(00)00080-2
  39. Yeh, K. L. and Chang, J. S. (2012). Effects of Cultivation Conditions and Media Composition on Cell Growth and Lipid Productivity of Indigenous Microalga Chlorella vulgaris ESP-31, Bioresource Technology, 105, pp. 120-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.11.103
  40. Zhang, H., Weiliang, L. Y., Yang, W., and Shen, G. (2011). Mixotrophic Cultivation of Botryococcus braunii, Biomass Bioenergy, 35, pp. 1710-1715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.01.002

Cited by

  1. Parametric study of brewery wastewater effluent treatment using Chlorella vulgaris microalgae vol.21, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4491/eer.2016.024
  2. Advances in microalgal biomass/bioenergy production with agricultural by-products: Analysis with various growth rate models vol.24, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4491/eer.2018.193