DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Promotion of the Low-carbon Agriculture Certification System

저탄소 농축산물 인증제 활성화 방안에 관한 연구

  • 임성수 (건국대학교 국제통상학전공)
  • Received : 2016.05.09
  • Accepted : 2016.05.23
  • Published : 2016.05.30

Abstract

To internalize climate-related external costs from agricultural production and food consumption Pigou taxes and carbon credits increase private costs for food. Voluntary GHG reduction program for carbon-neutral food can be advantageous over such policy measures since they avoid higher food prices for the poor. The pilot project of low-carbon agriculture certification system is to reduce GHG emissions from agricultural production and enhance the competitiveness of domestic agricultural products. This study examines producers', distributors', and consumers' perceptions of the low-carbon agriculture certification system and analyzes alternatives to promote the low-carbon certificated agricultural products.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahn B. I. and J. H. Choi. 2014. Ex-ante Estimations of Demand, Market Price and Equilibrium Quantity for the GAP-certified Rice. Korea J. of Food Marketing Economics. 31(2): 1-15.
  2. Cohen, M. A. and M. P. Vandenbergh. 2012. The Potential Role of Carbon Labeling in a Green Economy. Energy Economics. 34: 853-863.
  3. Ecosian. 2014. Establishment of Emission Trading Strategies in Agriculture Sector using Foreign Case Study Analysis.
  4. Gadema, Z. and D. Oglethorpe. 2011. The Use and Usefulness of Carbon Labeling Food: A Policy Perspective from a Survey of UK Supermarket Shoppers. Food Policy. 36: 815-822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.08.001
  5. Grunert, K. G., S. Hieke, and J. Wills. 2014. Sustainability Labels on Food Products: Consumer Motivation, Understanding and Use. Food Policy. 44: 177-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2013.12.001
  6. Gunnar, B. 2014. Demand for Carbon-neutral Food - Evidence from a Discrete Choice Experiment for Milk and Apple Juice. Contributed Paper prepared for Presentation at the 88th Annual Conference of the Agricultural Economics Society, AgroParisTech. France.
  7. Kim C. G., H. K. Jeong, J. S. Kim, and D. H. Moon. 2013. Introducing Direct Payment Program for Low-Carbon Farming Practices and Creating an Action Plan Guideline, KREI.
  8. Kemp, K., A. Insch, D. K. Holdsworth, and J. G. Knight. 2010. Food Miles: Do UK Consumers Actually Care. Food Policy. 35: 504-513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2010.05.011
  9. Lee J. H., S. S. Lim, S. J. Lee, Y. D. Cho, and G. Y. Woo. 2010. Evaluation and Remedies of the Upbringing Business of Environmental-Friendly Agriculture in Korea. GS&J Institute.
  10. Loo, E. J., V. V. Caputo, R. M. Nayga Jr. and W. Verbeke. 2014. Consumers' Valuation of Sustainability Labels on Meat. Food Policy. 49: 137-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2014.07.002
  11. Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs. 2014. The Meeting Paper of Low-carbon Certification Agricultural Products Marketing.
  12. Ministry of Environment, www.me.go.kr.
  13. Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, www.motie.go.kr
  14. Nam J. J., G. J. Lee, J. W. Jeong, and S. H. Park. 2011. Introducing Carbon Labeling and Carbon Point System in AgroFood & Fishery Sector. Foundation of Agri, Tech, Commercialization & Transfer.
  15. National Agricultural Products Quality Management Service, www.naqs.go.kr.
  16. Roos, E. and H. Tjarnemo. 2011. Challenges of Carbon Labelling of Food Products: A Consumer Research Perspective. British Food Journal. 113: 982-996. https://doi.org/10.1108/00070701111153742
  17. Stokes, A. and A. M. Turri. 2013. Consumer Perceptions of Carbon Labeling in Print Advertising: Hype or Effective Communication Strategy? Journal of Marketing Communications, Published online. DOI: 10.1080/13527266.2012.762420.
  18. Upham, P., L. Dendler, and M. Bleda. 2011. Carbon Labelling of Grocery Products: Public Perceptions and Potential Emissions Reductions. Journal of Cleaner Production. 19: 348-355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.05.014
  19. Yang, G. S. 2009. Distribution Conditions and Marketing Strategies for Environmentally Friendly Agricultural Products. The Journal of Korean Island. 21: 153-170.