Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science

Korean Academy of Periodontology (대한치주과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Association between dental implants in the posterior region and traumatic occlusion in the adjacent premolars: a long-term follow-up clinical and radiographic analysis

  • Lee, Jae-Hong (Department of Periodontology, Wonkwang University Daejeon Dental Hospital, Wonkwang University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Kweon, Helen Hye-In (Department of Periodontology, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital) ;
  • Choi, Seong-Ho (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Kim, Young-Taek (Department of Periodontology, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital)
  • Received : 2016.09.20
  • Accepted : 2016.11.02
  • Published : 2016.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this retrospective study was to determine the association between dental implants in the posterior region and traumatic occlusion in the adjacent premolars, using data collected during from 2002 to 2015. Methods: Traumatic occlusion in the adjacent premolars was assessed by examining clinical parameters (bleeding on probing, probing pocket depth, fremitus, and tooth mobility) and radiographic parameters (loss of supporting bone and widening of the periodontal ligament space) over a mean follow-up of 5 years. Clinical factors (gender, age, implant type, maxillary or mandibular position, opposing teeth, and duration of functional loading) were evaluated statistically in order to characterize the relationship between implants in the posterior region and traumatic occlusion in the adjacent premolars. Results: The study inclusion criteria were met by 283 patients, who had received 347 implants in the posterior region. The incidence of traumatic occlusion in the adjacent premolars was significantly higher for splinted implants (P=0.004), implants in the maxillary region (P<0.001), and when implants were present in the opposing teeth (P<0.001). The other clinical factors of gender, age, and duration of functional loading were not significantly associated with traumatic occlusion. Conclusions: This study found that the risk of traumatic occlusion in the adjacent premolars increased when splinted implants were placed in the maxillary molar region and when the teeth opposing an implant also contained implants.

Keywords

References

  1. Schulte W. Implants and the periodontium. Int Dent J 1995;45:16-26.
  2. Berglundh T, Abrahamsson I, Welander M, Lang NP, Lindhe J. Morphogenesis of the peri-implant mucosa: an experimental study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;18:1-8.
  3. Yuan JC, Sukotjo C. Occlusion for implant-supported fixed dental prostheses in partially edentulous patients: a literature review and current concepts. J Periodontal Implant Sci 2013;43:51-7. https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2013.43.2.51
  4. Koyano K, Esaki D. Occlusion on oral implants: current clinical guidelines. J Oral Rehabil 2015;42:153-61. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12239
  5. Lewis MB, Klineberg I. Prosthodontic considerations designed to optimize outcomes for single-tooth implants. A review of the literature. Aust Dent J 2011;56:181-92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.2011.01322.x
  6. Klineberg I, Kingston D, Murray G. The bases for using a particular occlusal design in tooth and implant-borne reconstructions and complete dentures. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;18 Suppl 3:151-67. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01446.x
  7. Weinberg LA. Reduction of implant loading with therapeutic biomechanics. Implant Dent 1998;7:277-85. https://doi.org/10.1097/00008505-199807040-00005
  8. Morneburg TR, Proschel PA. In vivo forces on implants influenced by occlusal scheme and food consistency. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:481-6.
  9. Kim Y, Oh TJ, Misch CE, Wang HL. Occlusal considerations in implant therapy: clinical guidelines with biomechanical rationale. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16:26-35.
  10. Craddock HL, Youngson CC, Manogue M, Blance A. Occlusal changes following posterior tooth loss in adults. Part 1: a study of clinical parameters associated with the extent and type of supraeruption in unopposed posterior teeth. J Prosthodont 2007;16:485-94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2007.00212.x
  11. Craddock HL, Youngson CC, Manogue M, Blance A. Occlusal changes following posterior tooth loss in adults. Part 2. Clinical parameters associated with movement of teeth adjacent to the site of posterior tooth loss. J Prosthodont 2007;16:495-501. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2007.00223.x
  12. Craddock HL. Occlusal changes following posterior tooth loss in adults. Part 3. A study of clinical parameters associated with the presence of occlusal interferences following posterior tooth loss. J Prosthodont 2008;17:25-30.
  13. Powell LV. Caries prediction: a review of the literature. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1998;26:361-71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.1998.tb01974.x
  14. Liu S, Liu Y, Xu J, Rong Q, Pan S. Influence of occlusal contact and cusp inclination on the biomechanical character of a maxillary premolar: a finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:1238-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.04.011
  15. Torbjorner A, Fransson B. Biomechanical aspects of prosthetic treatment of structurally compromised teeth. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:135-41.
  16. Hallmon WW, Harrel SK. Occlusal analysis, diagnosis and management in the practice of periodontics. Periodontol 2000 2004;34:151-64. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0906-6713.2003.003430.x
  17. Misch CE, Bidez MW. Implant-protected occlusion: a biomechanical rationale. Compendium 1994;15:1330, 1332, 1334 passim.
  18. Pihlstrom BL, Anderson KA, Aeppli D, Schaffer EM. Association between signs of trauma from occlusion and periodontitis. J Periodontol 1986;57:1-6. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1986.57.1.1
  19. Alkan A, Keskiner I, Arici S, Sato S. The effect of periodontal surgery on bite force, occlusal contact area and bite pressure. J Am Dent Assoc 2006;137:978-83. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2006.0319
  20. Heitz-Mayfield LJ, Schmid B, Weigel C, Gerber S, Bosshardt DD, Jonsson J, et al. Does excessive occlusal load affect osseointegration? An experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15:259-68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01019.x
  21. Gotfredsen K, Berglundh T, Lindhe J. Bone reactions adjacent to titanium implants subjected to static load of different duration. A study in the dog (III). Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:552-8. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.120602.x
  22. Wiskott HW, Cugnoni J, Scherrer SS, Ammann P, Botsis J, Belser UC. Bone reactions to controlled loading of endosseous implants: a pilot study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:1093-102. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01548.x
  23. Okada T, Ikebe K, Inomata C, Takeshita H, Uota M, Mihara Y, et al. Association of periodontal status with occlusal force and food acceptability in 70-year-old adults: from SONIC Study. J Oral Rehabil 2014;41:912-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12214
  24. Norton MR, Gamble C. Bone classification: an objective scale of bone density using the computerized tomography scan. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:79-84. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.012001079.x
  25. Ishigaki S, Kurozumi T, Morishige E, Yatani H. Occlusal interference during mastication can cause pathological tooth mobility. J Periodontal Res 2006;41:189-92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0765.2005.00856.x
  26. Park HS, Lee YJ, Jeong SH, Kwon TG. Density of the alveolar and basal bones of the maxilla and the mandible. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;133:30-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.01.044
  27. Jung RE, Zembic A, Pjetursson BE, Zwahlen M, Thoma DS. Systematic review of the survival rate and the incidence of biological, technical, and aesthetic complications of single crowns on implants reported in longitudinal studies with a mean follow-up of 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23 Suppl 6:2-21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02547.x
  28. Hermanides L. Criteria to manage the technical and biologic success of an implant abutment. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2014;35:463-8.
  29. Albrektsson T, Donos NWorking Group 1. Implant survival and complications. The third EAO consensus conference 2012. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23 Suppl 6:63-5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02557.x
  30. Falcon-Antenucci RM, Pellizzer EP, de Carvalho PS, Goiato MC, Noritomi PY. Influence of cusp inclination on stress distribution in implant-supported prostheses. A three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Prosthodont 2010;19:381-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2010.00582.x
  31. Hsu YT, Fu JH, Al-Hezaimi K, Wang HL. Biomechanical implant treatment complications: a systematic review of clinical studies of implants with at least 1 year of functional loading. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2012;27:894-904.
  32. Bhatnagar VM, Karani JT, Khanna A, Badwaik P, Pai A. Osseoperception: an implant mediated sensory motor control- a review. J Clin Diagn Res 2015;9:ZE18-20.
  33. Sutter F, Weingart D, Mundwiler U, Sutter FJ, Asikainen P. ITI implants in combination with bone grafts: design and biomechanical aspects. Clin Oral Implants Res 1994;5:164-72. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1994.050307.x
  34. Jacobs R, Van Steenberghe D. From osseoperception to implant-mediated sensory-motor interactions and related clinical implications. J Oral Rehabil 2006;33:282-92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2006.01621.x
  35. Norton MR. Assessment of cold welding properties of the internal conical interface of two commercially available implant systems. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:159-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70243-X

Cited by

  1. Possibility and Limitation of Applying Occlusal Adjustment on Implant Prosthesis similar to Natural Teeth vol.22, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.32542/implantology.20180014
  2. Immediately Loaded Bicortical Implants Inserted in Fresh Extraction and Healed Sites in Patients with and Without a History of Periodontal Disease vol.9, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4103/ams.ams_147_19
  3. Risk Indicators Affecting the Survival of the Mandibular First Molar Adjacent to an Implant at the Mandibular Second Molar Site: A Retrospective Study vol.10, pp.12, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10122543