The Journal of Korean Institute of Information Technology (한국정보기술학회논문지)

Korean Institute of Information Technology (한국정보기술학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Study on Factors Related to Core Competencies According to PMO Workers

PMO 수행인력별 핵심역량 요인에 관한 연구

  • Received : 2015.11.09
  • Accepted : 2015.12.30
  • Published : 2016.03.31
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

PMO(Project Management Office) is considered an efficient work approach in that it delivers knowledge about the success or failure of projects in the past, and it provides project teams with support services related to the project. With the difficulties related to project management constantly increasing, PMO, as a new approach to management that enhances the efficiency of performance and the successful management of a project is urgently needed due to the limits of existing management methods. In this study, a factor analysis was carried out based upon the core competencies for PMO workers derived from previous research, and core factors including PMO competency clusters were suggested. According to the success factors and characteristics of the project, PMO competency clusters are considered as important criteria in making a decision when organizing PMO.

PMO는 과거 프로젝트의 성공이나 실패에 대한 지식을 효과적으로 전달한다거나, 프로젝트 팀에게 프로젝트 수행과 관련된 지원 서비스를 제공한다는 점에서 효율적인 방법으로 인식되고 있다. 한편, 프로젝트 관리에 대한 어려움이 지속적으로 증가되고 있는 가운데, 기존 관리 방식의 한계로 프로젝트의 효과적 수행과 성공적 관리를 위해 관리에 대한 새로운 접근법으로서 프로젝트 관리 전문 조직(PMO)의 도입이 절실히 요구되고 있는 환경이다. 본 논문은 이러한 프로젝트 관리환경에 효율적인 PMO의 운영을 위하여 선행연구로서 분석된 PMO 수행인력별 중요 역량을 기준으로 주성분 분석을 수행하여 PMO 수행인력별 핵심요인을 제시한다. PMO 역량군은 프로젝트의 성공요인 및 특성에 따라 PMO 조직 구성시 의사결정의 중요 기준으로서 사용될 것으로 판단된다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 서울과학기술대학교

References

  1. The Standish Group, "CHAOS MANIFESTO - Think Big, Act Small", Standish group, 2015.
  2. Sang-Bog Kim, Jin-Tae Kim, and Byung-Man Chang, "A Comparative Study on Critical Competence Importance Between Top, Management and Technical Specialty PMO", Journal of KIIT, Vol. 12, No. 7, pp. 179-198, July 2014.
  3. G. M. Hill, "Evolving the Project Management Office: A competency continuum", Information Systems Management, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 45-51, Sep. 2004.
  4. Eun-Suk Kim, "An Empirical Study on PMO Affecting the Success of IT Projects", Soongsil University, 2015.
  5. Jae-Kwon Bae, Jin-Hwa Kim, and Sang-Yeoul Kim "An Exploratory Study on the Project Performance by PMO Capability", Asia Pacific Journal of Information Systems(APJIS), Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 53-77, Mar. 2008.
  6. Ministry of Security and Public Administration, "Regulations on e-government project management trust, Ministry of Security and Public Administration", Ministry of Security and Public Administration, 2013.
  7. Seong-Mong Lee, Eun-Hong Kim, and Song-Chul Moon, "An Effect of Project and Organization Performance by PMO Service and PMO Capability", Journal of Information Technology Applications & Management, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 107-132, 2012
  8. Rad. Parviz F. and Ginger Levin., "Project Portfolio Management Tools & Techniques", ISBN-10: 0970827687, 2007.
  9. B. Hobbs and M. Aubry, "A multi-phase research program investigating project management offices : the results of phase 1", Project Management Journal, Vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 74-86, Jan. 2007. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.20007
  10. K. C. Desouza and J. R. Evaristo, "Project management offices : A case of knowledge-based archetypes", International Journal of Information Management, Vol. 26, No. 5. pp. 414-423, Oct. 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2006.07.002
  11. R. Acapulco. Ayyagari, R. Henry, and R. Purvis, "A conceptual framework of the alignment of the project management office (PMO) with the organizational structure", In Proceedings of the 12th Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS), pp. 3741-3749, Aug. 2006.
  12. C. Dai and W. Wells, "An exploration of project management office features and their relationship to project performance", International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 22, No. 7. pp. 523-532, Oct. 2004
  13. Kwak and Dai, "Assessing the Value of Project Management Offices(PMO)", PMI Research Conference, 2000
  14. Bates, William, "Improving Project Management", IIE Solutions Vol. 30, No. 10, pp. 42-43, 1998.
  15. A. Parasuraman, V. A. Zeithaml, and L. L. Berry, "Refinement and Reassessment of the SER VQUAL Scale", Journal of Retailing, Vol. 67. No. 4, pp. 420-450, Dec. 1991.
  16. Brian Hobbs, "The Multi-Project PMO: A Global Analysis of the Current State of Practice", Whitepaper prepared for PMI, 2007.
  17. Nashvile, Novembro de, Duggal, and S. Jack, "Building a next generation pmo", Proceedings of the PMI Annual Seminars & Symposium, 2001.
  18. Young Jong Kim, "Social Science Research Methods", Hak-Ji-Sa, 2007.
  19. Ei Kyu Choi, "Structural Equation Modeling", Trade Management Inc, 2006
  20. Ji Joon Song, "SPSS/AMOS Statistical Methods", 21th Inc, 2012.
  21. R. B. Kline, "Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling", 2nd edition, NY: Guilford Press, 2005.
  22. Byung Ryul Bae, "Structural Equation Modeling : Principles and Practices", Seoul-Chung-Lam, 2009.
  23. D. W. Gerbing and J. G. Hamilton, "Viability of exploratory factor analysis as a precursor to confirmatory factor analysis", Structural Equation Modeling, pp. Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 62-72, Jan. 1996. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519609540030