DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Promoting a Shared Representation of Workers' Activities to Improve Integrated Prevention of Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders

  • Roquelaure, Yves (University of Angers, Laboratory of Ergonomics and Epidemiology in Occupational Health (LEEST))
  • Received : 2015.07.16
  • Accepted : 2016.02.06
  • Published : 2016.06.30

Abstract

Effective and sustainable prevention of work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WR-MSDs) remains a challenge for preventers and policy makers. Coordination of stakeholders involved in the prevention of WR-MSDs is a key factor that requires greater reflection on common knowledge and shared representation of workers' activities among stakeholders. Information on workers' strategies and operational leeway should be the core of common representations, because it places workers at the center of the "work situation system" considered by the intervention models. Participatory ergonomics permitting debates among stakeholders about workers' activity and strategies to cope with the work constraints in practice could help them to share representations of the "work situation system" and cooperate. Sharing representation therefore represents a useful tool for prevention, and preventers should provide sufficient space and time for dialogue and discussion of workers' activities among stakeholders during the conception, implementation, and management of integrated prevention programs.

Keywords

References

  1. National Research Council. Musculoskeletal disorders and the workplace: low back and upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders. Washington (DC): National Academy Press; 2001. 492 p.
  2. Parent-Thirion A, Vermeylen G, Van Houten G, Lily-Yrjanainen M, Billeta I, Cabreta J. Eurofound. Fifth European Working Conditions Survey. Overview report. Dublin(Ireland): Eurofound; 2012. Report No.: EF1182. 160 p.
  3. Roquelaure Y, Ha C, Fouquet N, Descatha A, Leclerc A, Goldberg M, Imbernon E. Attributable risk of carpal tunnel syndrome in the general population: implications for intervention programs in the workplace. Scand J Work Environ Health 2009;35:342-8. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.1342
  4. Wells R. Why have we not solved the MSD problem? Work 2009;34:117-21.
  5. Kennedy CA, Amick 3rd BC, Dennerlein JT, Brewer S, Catli S, Williams R, Serra C, Gerr F, Irvin E, Mahood Q, Franzblau A, Van Eerd D, Evanoff B, Rempel D. Systematic review of the role of occupational health and safety interventions in the prevention of upper extremity musculoskeletal symptoms, signs, disorders, injuries, claims and lost time. J Occup Rehabil 2010;20: 127-62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-009-9211-2
  6. Westgaard RH, Winkel J. Occupational musculoskeletal and mental health: significance of rationalization and opportunities to create sustainable production systems. A systematic review. Appl Ergon 2011;42:261-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2010.07.002
  7. Freivalds A. Biomechanics of the upper limbs: mechanics, modeling, and musculoskeletal injuries. 2nd ed. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 2011. 564 p.
  8. Waddell G, Aylward M. Models of sickness and disability applied to common health problems. London (UK): Royal Society of Medicine Press; 2010. 58 p.
  9. St-Vincent M, Vezina N, Bellemare M, Denis D, Ledoux E, Imbeau D. Ergonomics intervention. Montreal (Canada): IRSST Editions; 2014. 632 p.
  10. Bao SS, Kapellusch JM, Merryweather AS, Thiese MS, Garg A, Hegmann KT, Silverstein BA. Relationships between job organizational factors, biomechanical and psychosocial exposures. Ergonomics 2015;23:1-26.
  11. Caroly S, Coutarel F, Landry A, Mary-Cheray I. Sustainable MSD prevention: management for continuous improvement between prevention and production. Ergonomic intervention in two assembly line companies. Appl Ergon 2010;4:591-9.
  12. World Health Organization (WHO). Workers' health: global plan of action. 60th world health assembly. Geneva (Switzerland): WHO; 2007. 44 p. Report No.: WHA 60.26.
  13. Rivilis I, Van Eerd D, Cullen K, Cole DC, Irvin E, Tyson J, Mahood Q. Effectiveness of participatory ergonomic interventions on health outcomes: a systematic review. Appl Ergon 2008;39:342-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2007.08.006
  14. Driessen MT, Proper KI, van Tulder MW, Anema JR, Bongers PM, van der Beek AJ. The effectiveness of physical and organizational ergonomic interventions on low back pain and neck pain: a systematic review. Occup Environ Med 2010;67:277-85. https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.2009.047548
  15. Hoe VC, Urquhart DM, Kelsal HL, Sim MR. Ergonomic design and training for preventing work-related musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limb and neck in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;8:CD008570.
  16. Durand MJ, Vezina N, Loisel P, Baril R, Richard MC, Diallo B. Workplace interventions for workers with musculoskeletal disabilities: a descriptive review of content. J Occup Rehab 2007;17:123-36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-006-9036-1
  17. Shaw W, Hong QN, Pransky G, Loisel P. A literature review describing the role of return-to-work coordinators in trial programs and interventions designed to prevent workplace disability. J Occup Rehabil 2008;18:2-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-007-9115-y
  18. Berthelette D, Leduc N, Bilodeau H, Durand MJ, Faye C. Evaluation of the implementation fidelity of an ergonomic training program designed to prevent back pain. Appl Ergon 2012;43:239-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2011.05.008
  19. Durand MJ, Vezina N, Baril R, Loisel P, Richard MC, Ngomo S. Margin of manoeuvre indicators in the workplace during the rehabilitation process: a qualitative analysis. J Occup Rehab 2009;19:194-202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-009-9173-4
  20. Coutu MF, Baril R, Durand MJ, Cote D, Rouleau A. Representations: an important key to understanding workers’ coping behaviours during rehabilitation and the return-to-work process. J Occup Rehabil 2007;17: 522-44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-007-9089-9

Cited by

  1. Investigation on musculoskeletal discomfort and ergonomics risk factors among production team members at an automotive component assembly plant vol.257, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/257/1/012040
  2. Risk Factors for Shoulder Pain in a Cohort of French Workers: A Structural Equation Model vol.187, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwx218
  3. A Pilot Study of Five Types of Maximum Hand Strength among Manufacturing Industry Workers in Taiwan vol.16, pp.23, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16234742
  4. Expérience de mise en place d’échauffements musculaires au poste de travail chez neuf arboristes-élagueurs vol.80, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.admp.2019.09.010
  5. Comparison Between a Job-Exposure Matrix (JEM) Score and Self-Reported Exposures for Carrying Heavy Loads Over the Working Lifetime in the CONSTANCES Cohort vol.64, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1093/annweh/wxaa015
  6. Méthodologie interdisciplinaire de prévention des TMS : association de la Biomécanique et de la Clinique de l’activité vol.17, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4000/activites.5802
  7. Interdisciplinary methodological framework of biomechanics and occupational psychology for MSD prevention vol.17, pp.2, 2020, https://doi.org/10.4000/activites.5836
  8. Moving toward an integrated prevention approach for mental health at work: Promoting workers’ involvement through concrete actions vol.69, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3233/wor-213478
  9. Integrative prevention and coordinated action toward primary, secondary and tertiary prevention in workplaces: A scoping review vol.70, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3233/wor-213609