Thinking Strategies of Triage Nurses' Decision Making in the Emergency Department: Think Aloud Study

응급실 중증도 분류 간호사의 의사결정과정에 나타난 사고전략: 소리내어 생각하기

  • Moon, Sun Hee (College of Nursing, Seoul National University) ;
  • Park, Yeon Hwan (College of Nursing, The Research Institute of Nursing Science, Seoul National University)
  • Received : 2016.01.09
  • Accepted : 2016.02.16
  • Published : 2016.06.30

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to identify thinking strategies in the complicated decision-making process based on real patient-based data of triage nurses in the emergency department (ED). Methods: This study used the 'think aloud' method to collect data from 8 triage nurses from one general hospital ED in South Korea. The data were analyzed with protocol analysis using thinking strategies. Results: The triage process was divided into three stages. The first stage consisted of 8 thinking strategies, including searching for information. They used intuition based on directly observed concepts for identifying a crisis. The second stage consisted of 17 thinking strategies related to the decision-making process. They assessed patients and generated a hypothesis to try to understand their health problems through analytic thinking. The third stage consisted of 10 thinking strategies, including qualifying. They considered the situation of the ED and properly triaged the patients. During the triage process, they frequently used judging the value and searching for information on 17 thinking strategies. Conclusions: Triage nurses demonstrated various connected thinking strategies for each stage. Based on our results, further studies should be done to develop a triage education program.

Keywords

References

  1. Andersson, A. K., Omberg, M., & Svedlund, M. (2006). Triage in the emergency department-a qualitative study of the factors which nurses consider when making decisions. Nursing in Critical Care, 11(3), 136-145 . https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1362-1017.2006.00162.x
  2. Arslanian-Engoren, C. (2005). Patient cues that predict nurses' triage decisions for acute coronary syndromes. Applied Nursing Research, 18(2), 82-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnr.2004.06.013
  3. Arslanian-Engoren, C. (2009). Explicating nurses' cardiac triage decisions. Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 24(1), 50-57. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.JCN.0000317474.50424.4f
  4. Castner, J. (2011). Emergency department triage: What data are nurses collecting? Journal of Emergency Nursing, 37(4), 417-422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2011.01.002
  5. Chen, S.-S., Chen, J.-C., Ng, C.-J., Chen, P.-L., Lee, P.-H., & Chang, W.-Y. (2010). Factors that influence the accuracy of triage nurses' judgement in emergency departments. Emergency Medicine Journal, 27(6), 451-455. https://doi.org/10.1136/emj.2008.059311
  6. Cioffi, J. (1999). Triage decision making: Educational strategies. Accident Emergency Nursing, 7(2), 106-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0965-2302(99)80031-9
  7. Cone, K. J., & Murray, R. (2002). Characteristics, insights, decision making, and preparation of ED triage nurses. Journal of Emergency Nursing, 28(5), 401-406. http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/men.2002.127513
  8. Croskerry, P., & Nimmo, G. R. (2011). Better clinical decision making and reducing diagnostic error. Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh, 41(2), 155-162. doi:10.4997/jrcpe.2011.208
  9. Fonteyn, M. E. (1998). Thinking strategies for nursing practice. Chicago, Illinois: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
  10. Fonteyn, M. E., Kuipers, B., & Grobe, S. J. (1993). A description of think aloud method and protocol analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 3(4), 430-441. https://doi.org/10.1177/104973239300300403
  11. Fossum, M., Alexander, G. L., Goransson, K. E., Ehnfors, M., & Ehrenberg, A. (2011). Registered nurses' thinking strategies on malnutrition and pressure ulcers in nursing homes: A scenario-based think-aloud study. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 20(17-18), 2425-2435. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03578.x
  12. Fry, M., & Stainton, C. (2005). An educational framework for triage nursing based on gatekeeping, timekeeping and decision-making processes. Accident and Emergency Nursing, 13(4), 214-219. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aaen.2005.09.004
  13. Garbez, R. O. (2008). Level 2 and level 3 patients in a 5-level triage system: Factors related to acuity assignment and trajectory of the emergency department experience. Ann Arbor, Michigan: ProQuest.
  14. Gobet, F., & Chassy, P. (2008). Towards an alternative to Benner's theory of expert intuition in nursing: A discussion paper. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 45(1), 129-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2007.01.005
  15. Goransson, K. E., Ehnfors, M., Fonteyn, M. E., & Ehrenberg, A. (2008). Thinking strategies used by registered nurses during emergency department triage. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 61(2), 163-172. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04473.x
  16. Janssen, M. A. P., van Achterberg, T., Adriaansen, M. J. M., Kampshoff, C. S., Schalk, D. M. J., & Mintjes-de Groot, J. (2012). Factors influencing the implementation of the guideline triage in emergency departments: A qualitative study. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 21(3-4), 437-447. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03921.x
  17. Korean Triage and Acuity Scale Committee. (2015). Korean triage and acuity scale manual(Version 2.0). Seoul: The Korean Society of Emergency Medicine KTAS Committee.
  18. Kuiper, R. A. and D. J. Pesut (2004). Promoting cognitive and metacognitive reflective reasoning skills in nursing practice: Self-regulated learning theory. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 45(4), 381-391. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02921.x
  19. Lundgren-Laine, H., & Salantera, S. (2010). Think-aloud technique and protocol analysis in clinical decision-making research. Qualitative Health Research, 20(4), 565-575. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732309354278
  20. McCutcheon, H. H., & Pincombe, J. (2001). Intuition: An important tool in the practice of nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 35(3), 342-348. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01882.x
  21. National Emergency Nurses Association. (2014, November). Role of the triage nurse. Retrieved July 1, 2015, from http://nena.ca/role-of-the-triage-nurse/
  22. Noon, A. J. (2014). The cognitive processes underpinning clinical decision in triage assessment: A theoretical conundrum? International Emergency Nursing, 22(1), 40-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ienj.2013.01.003
  23. Paley, J., Cheyne, H., Dalgleish, L., Duncan, E. A., & Niven, C. A. (2007). Nursing's ways of knowing and dual process theories of cognition. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 60(6), 692-701. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04478.x
  24. Park, J., Choi, H., Kang, B., Kim, C., Kang, H., & Lim, T. (2014). A nationwide survey of korean emergency department triage systems and scales; A first step towards reform of the emergency medical service system. Journal of the Korean Society of Emergency Medicine, 25(5), 499-508.
  25. Van Someren, M. W., Barnard, Y. F., & Sandberg, J. A. (1994). The think aloud method: A practical guide to modelling cognitive processes (Vol. 2). London: Academic Press.