Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture (한국조경학회지)

The Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture (한국조경학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Urban Gardening in Everyday Life toward Sustainable Urban Regeneration - Case of Sujin 2-dong, Seongnam-si in South Korea -

지속가능한 도시재생 모색을 위한 일상적 도시정원 가꾸기 유형 특성 연구 - 성남시 수진2동을 중심으로 -

  • Park, Jae-min (Construction Engineering Research Laboratory, Hankyung National University) ;
  • Choi, Jung-Kwon (Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Gachon University) ;
  • Park, Eun-Yeong (Dept. of Environmental Landscape Architecture, Joongbu University)
  • 박재민 (한경대학교 건설공학연구소) ;
  • 최정권 (가천대학교 조경학과) ;
  • 박은영 (중부대학교 환경조경학과)
  • Received : 2016.04.19
  • Accepted : 2016.06.17
  • Published : 2016.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

What are the roles and functions of urban gardening created by citizens in Sujin 2-dong, Seongnam-si? This study has looked into urban gardening in everyday life in a bid to find possible solutions for sustainable urban regeneration. The paper has examined the types, functions, and characteristics of urban gardens in Sujin 2-dong, where the urban restoration project is in progress. This study has conducted primarily on-site inspections and interviews. The research findings are as follows. Most urban gardens in Sujin 2-dong have a vertical structure rather than a regular ground-based one due to lack of land. Six major locations of building a garden include the front of a building, rooftop, top of a gate, stairs, wall, and yard. Rooftop gardens are most common and are built mostly for production purposes. Due to architectural characteristics of this village, there are relatively many stair gardens built mostly for aesthetic purposes. The garden in front of a building has served multiple functions, including formation of entry, privacy protection, and prevention of unauthorized parking. Other than those, detached houses have quality urban gardens built with greater effort and care, while multi-household houses have seen a decrease of stair gardens and an increase of vertical gardens due to their comparatively limited space. By utilizing this research, we hope to show that it is important to understand the local's wisdom and voice for a sustainable urban environment as well as keep these findings in mind during the construction of new buildings. This study would be expected to be useful as primary research for urban gardening in everyday life and alternative ways of urban regeneration.

열악한 도시환경에서 주민이 일상적으로 가꾸어온 정원은 과연 어떤 기능과 역할을 하고 있을까? 본 연구는 일상적 도시정원을 살핌으로써, 지속가능한 도시재생의 대안을 찾고자 하였다. 이를 위해 최근 도시재생사업이 활발히 진행되고 있는 수진2동을 대상으로, 정원 조성 유형, 특성과 기능을 살펴보았다. 연구는 현장조사를 중심으로 진행하였고, 일부 조성 이유와 목적을 파악하기 위하여 인터뷰를 진행하였다. 연구 결과, 수진2동의 도시정원은 협소한 공간문제를 극복하기 위하여, 평지형보다는 입체형 정원이 주로 나타났다. 정원 조성 위치에 따라 6가지(건물 앞, 옥상, 현관지붕, 계단, 벽면, 마당)로 구분되었으며, 이중 공간 확보가 용이한 옥상 정원이 가장 많았고, 주로 생산을 목적으로 조성되었다. 지역 내 건축적 특징으로 인해 계단 정원이 상대적으로 많이 나타났는데, 주로 심미적 목적을 위해 조성되었다. 건물 앞 정원은 입구성, 시선차폐, 불법주차방지 등 다기능으로 사용하였다. 그 외, 단독주택에서는 적극적으로 조성한 수준 높은 정원이 확인되었고, 반면 다가구 주택에서는 공간이 상대적으로 협소해지며, 계단정원이 감소하고 벽면녹화가 증가하였다. 본 연구는 수진2동 도시정원의 현황과 특성을 파악함으로써, 현재 진행하고 있는 성남시 도시재생사업에서 철거와 신축만이 아니라 그 속에 살아가고 있는 주민의 삶 속에 담겨진 지혜를 발견하여 이용하는 것 또한 중요함을 말하고자 하였다. 특히 도시 공간 내에서 정원을 가꾼다는 것은 단지 개인의 취미를 넘어 도시의 공공성과 사회적 가치를 창출하고 있음을 드러내고자 하였다. 본 연구는 향후 도시재생 사업과 일상적 도시정원에 대한 이해를 위한 기초 연구로서 도움이 될 수 있을 것이라 예상한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Blair, D., C. C. Giesecke and S. Sherman(1991) A dietary, social and economic evaluation of the Philadelphia urban gardening project. Society for Nutrition Education 23(4): 161-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3182(12)81191-5
  2. Boulianne, M., G. Olivier-d'Avignon and V. Galarneau(2010) Les retombees sociales dujardinage communautaire et collectif dans la conurbation de Quebec. VertigO -La revue electronique en sciences de l'environnement 10(2).
  3. Cerezuelle, D., Y. Le Formal and P. J. Roca(1990) Les Jardins collectifs: un outil d'insertion. Institut regional du travail social Aquitaine.
  4. Certomaa, C.(2011) Critical urban gardening as a post-environmentalist practice. Local Environment 16(10): 977-987. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2011.592181
  5. Ernwein, M.(2014) Framing urban gardening and agriculture: On space, scale and the public. Geoforum 56: 77-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.06.016
  6. Gwon, G. H.(1982) Seongnamsiji(성남시지). Seongnam-si.
  7. Han, S. J.(1992) Developing of new towns on Seoul metropolitan area: Gwangju housing district and Bundang newtown(서울 대도시권 신도 시개발의성격: 광주대단지와 분당신도시의 비교 연구). Society and History 37: 61-101.
  8. Holland, L.(2004) Diversity and connections in community gardens: a contribution to local sustainability. Local Environ. 9(3): 285-305. https://doi.org/10.1080/1354983042000219388
  9. Hunt, J. D.(2000) Greater Perfection: The Practice of Garden Theory. London: Thames & Hudson.
  10. Kim, J. S. and W. D. Choi(2013) A study on the characteristics of everydayness in contemporary architecture: Focused on the contemporary Japanese architectural works. Korean Institute of Interior Design Journal 22(2): 39-47. https://doi.org/10.14774/JKIID.2013.22.2.039
  11. Korea Jungang Daily. 1971. 8. 12.
  12. Lash, S. and J. Urry(1996) Economics of Signs and Space, Park et al.(2004) 기호와공간의경계. Seoul: Hyundai meehak. sage publications Ltd.
  13. Lee, H. R.(2001) A study on the everyday-ness in contemporary architecture. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planing & Design 17(7): 117-125.
  14. Lefebvre, H.(1987) The everyday and everydayness. Levich, C. trans. (1987). Yale French Studies 73: 7-11.
  15. National Archives of Korea.(2008) Event of the month: Accident of Gwangju district.
  16. Niwa, N.(2009) La nature en ville peut-elle etre agricole? De la Suisse au Japon. Urbia 8: 103-126.
  17. Pae, J. H.(2004) Theory and Critical Practice in Contemporary Landscape Architecture. Seoul: Landscape Publisher.
  18. Park, H. G.(2015) Urban modernization of Seoul in late 1960s: reorganization of the urban space for the segregation between the poor and the middle class. Democracy and Human Rights 15(2): 237-275.
  19. Partel, I. C.(1996) Rutgers urban gardening: A case study in urban agriculture. Journal of Agricultural & Food Information 3(3): 35-46. https://doi.org/10.1300/J108V03N03_05
  20. Preston, P. and M. W. Wilson.(2014) Practicing GIS as mixed method: Affordances and limitations in an urban gardening study. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 104(3): 510-529. https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2014.892325
  21. Seongnam-si. (2004) History of Seongnam-si(성남시사). Seongnam-si.
  22. Sim, J. Y. and Zoh. K. J.(2015) Examination of urban gardening as an everydayness in urban residential area, Haebangchon. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 43(2): 1-12.
  23. The Chosun Ilbo. 1970, 11. 15.