Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society (기술혁신학회지)

Korea Technology Innovation Society (한국기술혁신학회)
권호 표지

Living Lab as Transition Arena: Case Analysis and Implication

시스템 전환 실험의 장으로서 리빙랩: 사례분석과 시사점

  • 성지은 (과학기술정책연구원) ;
  • 박인용 (한국과학기술원 기술경영학부)
  • Received : 2016.01.29
  • Accepted : 2016.03.23
  • Published : 2016.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Current Korean innovation system is facing a new turning point while the growth-oriented and S&T provide-oriented development strategy. Accordingly, there are needs for not only system transition in various area, such as sustainable energy, agriculture, and rural area but also STI policy paradigm shift to create a new innovative pathway. Living lab is being discussed in European country as a new innovative model based on user participation and as a niche experiments for sustainable system transition. This study attempts to analyze the living lab cases which are for the purpose of energy transition, agriculture rural areas system transition, and STI policy paradigm shift. Based on this analysis, the implications were derived in Korea. European Suslab project, C@R project, and Taiwan living lab, promoted diverse transitional experiments successfully by collecting users' background and experiences from pre-planning stage and by maintaining the user-driven innovative actions within the whole development process. This result provides various suggestions to current Korean situation that central government and local governments are considering the introduction of living lab. Living lab can also be utilized as a strategic niche experiments for socio-technical system transition in region or country, as a mean of policy integration, and as a new regional innovation model. In addition, it can be an important platform to realize the policy integration reflecting the user and demand-side which are highlighted in recent innovative policy paradigm.

현재 우리나라 혁신시스템은 기존의 성장 및 기술공급 위주의 발전전략이 한계를 노정하면서 새로운 전환기를 맞고 있다. 이에 새로운 혁신 경로 창출을 위한 과학기술 ICT 정책 패러다임 전환은 물론 지속가능한 에너지, 농업 농촌 등 다양한 영역에서의 시스템 전환이 필요한 상황이다. 리빙랩은 사용자 참여를 기반으로 하는 새로운 혁신모델이자 지속가능한 시스템 전환의 니치 실험으로서 유럽을 중심으로 논의되고 있다. 본 연구에서는 과학기술 ICT가 에너지 전환, 농업 농촌 시스템 전환, ICT 정책 패러다임의 전환에 적용된 리빙랩 사례를 살펴보고 우리나라에서의 시사점을 도출하였다. 유럽의 SusLab 프로젝트, C@R 프로그램, 대만의 리빙랩 사례 모두 사전기획 단계부터 지역 사용자의 배경과 경험을 적극적으로 수집하고, 사용자 주도의 혁신활동을 개발프로세스 전반에서 유지함으로써 다양한 전환 실험을 성공적으로 추진하였다. 이러한 결과는 중앙정부와 지자체가 리빙랩 도입을 검토하는 현 상황에 맞춰 다양한 시사점을 제공한다. 리빙랩은 국가 또는 지역 전반의 사회 기술시스템의 전환을 위한 전략적 니치 실험, 정책 간 연계통합의 수단, 새로운 지역혁신 모델로 활용될 수 있다. 또한 최근 혁신정책 패러다임에서 강조하고 있는 사용자 및 수요 측면을 반영한 정책통합을 실현할 수 있는 중요한 플랫폼이 될 수 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. 김규남.김민식.진홍윤 (2014), ICT 부문의 사용자 주도형 혁신플랫폼 구축 방안 연구, 과천: 미래창조과학부.
  2. Daniel Kim.성지은 (2015), "지속가능한 에너지 시스템 전환을 위한 리빙랩: SusLab NWE의 독일 보트롭 사례", STEPI Insight, 158.
  3. 성지은 (2008), "脫추격 혁신과 정부의 역할", 과학기술정책, 11.12월호.
  4. 성지은 (2009), "녹색성장 추진전략과 정책통합", 과학기술정책, 19(1): 82-89..
  5. 성지은 (2012), "과학기술조정체계의 변화 분석: 일본, 미국, 핀란드 과학기술조정체계를 중심으로", 한국정책과학학회보, 16(2): 213-238.
  6. 성지은.송위진.장병걸.김민수.박미영.정연진 (2012), 속가능한 과학기술혁신 거버넌스 발전방안, 세종: 과학기술정책연구원.
  7. 성지은.송위진.김왕동.김종선.정병걸.박미영.박인용.정연진 (2013), 저성장 시대의 효과적인 기술혁신지원제도, 세종: 과학기술정책연구원.
  8. 성지은.송위진 (2010), "탈추격 혁신과 통합적 혁신정책", 과학기술학연구, 10(2): 1-36.
  9. 성지은.송위진.김종선 (2012), '통합형 혁신정책' 구현을 위한 국과위의 개방형 정책 네트워크 구축 방안, 과천: 국가과학기술위원회.
  10. 성지은.송위진.김종선.박인용 (2015), ICT 분야의 한국형 리빙랩 구축 방안 연구, 과천: 미래창조과학부.
  11. 성지은.송위진.박인용 (2014가), "사용자 주도형 혁신모델로서 리빙랩 사례 분석과 적용 가능성 탐색", 기술혁신학회지, 17(2): 309-333.
  12. 성지은.송위진.박인용 (2014나), "과학기술과 농촌의 새로운 만남: 농촌 리빙랩", STEPI Insight, 140.
  13. 성지은.한규영.박인용 (2016), "국내 리빙랩의 현황과 과제", STEPI Insight, 184.
  14. 송위진.성지은 (2013), 사회문제 해결을 위한 과학기술혁신정책, 서울: 한울.
  15. 송위진.성지은.김연철.황혜란.정재용 (2006), 탈추격형 기술혁신정책의 모색, 세종: 과학기술정책연구원.
  16. 위정현.김진서 (2011), "IT 산업에서 사용자 혁신을 이용한 콘텐츠 개발 사례 분석", e-비즈니스연구, 12(3): 419-440.
  17. 이미영.박남춘 (2013), "사용자 경험 중심의 제품-서비스 디자인 Toolkit 개발", 디자인학연구, 26(2): 165-191.
  18. 황혜란.정재용.송위진 (2012), "탈추격 연구의 이론적 지향성 및 과제", 기술혁신연구, 20(1): 75-114.
  19. Baedeker, C. et al. (2014), Transition through Sustainable Product and Service Innovations in Sustainable Living Labs: Application of User-centers Research Methodology within Four Living Labs in Northern Europe, Presented at 5th International Conference on Sustainable Transition(IST), 8.27-29, Utrecht, Netherlands.
  20. Bergvall-Kareborn, B. and Stahlbrost, A. (2009), "Living Lab: an Open and Citizen-Centric Approach for Innovation", International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development, 1(4): 356-370. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIRD.2009.022727
  21. C@R Consortium (2007), Requirement for Application and Platform Development: Cudillero Rural Living Lab, C@R_WP3.5.-D.3.5.1.
  22. Chen, Y. J. (2012), Suan-Lien Living Lab with Elderly Welfare Focus, presented at III ENoLL Living Labs Summer School Programme, August 20th, Helsinki.
  23. De Moor, K., Ketyko, I., Joseph, W., Deryckere, T., De Marez, L., Martens, L. and Verleye, G. (2010), "Proposed Framework for Evaluating Quality of Experience in a Mobile, Testbed-oriented Living Lab Setting", Mobile Network and Applications, 15(3): 378-391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-010-0223-0
  24. Geels, G. W. (2004), "Understanding System Innovations: A Critical Literature Review and a Conceptual Synthesis", in Elzen, B. et al. (eds.), System Innovation and the Transition to Sustainability, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  25. Gumbo, S., Thinyane, H., Thinyane, M., Terzoli, A. and Hansen, S. (2012), "Living Lab Methodology as an Approach to Innovation in ICT4D: The Siyakhula Living Lab Experience", Proceedings of IST-Africa Conference 2012.
  26. Kang, S. C. (2012), "Initiation of Suan-Lien Living Lab - A Living Lab with an Elderly Walfare Focus", International Journal of AUtomation and SMart Technology(AUSMT), 2(3): 189-199. https://doi.org/10.5875/ausmt.v2i3.132
  27. Keyson, D. V. (2014), SusLab NWE: Sustainable Labs North West Europe, [www.suslabnwe.eu(2014)] Delft University of Technology, Netherlands.
  28. Lee, C. K., Lee, J., Lo, P. W., Tang, H. L., Hsiao, W. H., Liu, J. Y. and Lin, T. L. (2011), "Taiwan Perspective: Developing Smart Living Technology", International Journal of AUtomation and SMart Technology(AUSMT), 1(1): 93-106.
  29. Liedtke, C., Baedeker, C., HasselkuB, M., Rohn, H. and Grinewitschus, V. (2014), User-integrated Innovation in Sustainable LivingLabs: An Experimental Infrastructure for Researching and Developing Sustainable Product Service Systems, Wuppertal Institute, Germany.
  30. Liedtke, C., HasselkuB, M., Welfens, M. J., Nordmann, J. and Baedeker, C. (2013), "Transformation towards Sustainable Consumption: Changing Consumption Patterns through Meaning in Social Practices", Presented at 4th International Conference on Sustainability Transitions(IST), 6.18-21, ETH Zurich, Switzerland.
  31. Loorbach, D. and Rotmans, J. (2010), "The Practice of Transition Management: Examples and Lessons from Four Distinct Cases", Futures, 42: 237-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2009.11.009
  32. Navarro, M., Lopez, M., Ralli, C., Pena, C., Schaffers, H. and Merz, C. (2012), "A Living Lab for Stimulating Innovation in the Fishery Sector in Spain", Living Labs for Rural Development: Results from C@R Integrated Project, TRAGSA and FAO, 1-10.
  33. Pallot, M. (2009), The Living Lab Approach: A User Centered Open Innovation Ecosystem, Webergence Blog, http://www.cweprojects.eu/pub/bscw.cgi/715404.
  34. Pino, M. et al. (2013), "Key Factors for a Framework Supporting the Design, Provision, and Assessment of Assistive Technology for Dementia Care", Assistive technology research series, 33: 1247-1252.
  35. Schaffers, H., Garcia Guzman, J. and Merz, C. (2008), "An Action Research Approach to Rural Living Labs Innovation", Proceedings of the Cunningham and Cunningham, M. (eds.), Collaboration and the Knowledge Economy: Issues, Applications, Case Studies. IOS Press.
  36. Schaffers, H., Guzman, J. G. and Merz, C. (2010), "Living Labs for Enhancing Innovation and Rural Development: Methodology and Implementation", Living Lab for Rural Development: Results from C@R Integrated Project, TRAGSA and FAO, 25-51.
  37. Schaffers, H., Merz, C. and Guzman, J. G. (2009), "Living Labs as Intruments for Business and Social Innovation in Rural Areas", Proceedings of ICE 2009 Conference.
  38. Schliwa, G. I. (2013), Exploring Living Labs through Transition Management - Challenges and Opportunities for Sustainable Urban Transitions, IIIEE Master Thesis.
  39. Stahlbrost, A. (2012), "A Set of Key Principles to Assess the Impact of Living Labs", International Journal of Product Development, 17(1-2): 60-75. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPD.2012.051154
  40. Valenzuela, F., Azucena, S. and Navarro, M. (2012), "A Living Lab for Stimulating Innovation in the Fishery Sector in Spain", Living Lab for Rural Development: Results from C@R Integrated Project, TRAGSA and FAO, 83-104.
  41. Wang, K. Y. (2014), "Taiwan's Hardware & Software Industry Transformation: A Case for Transforming from IoT Devices to S mart S ervices on the C loud", presented at Brazil IoT forum, May, 15th.
  42. Westerlund, M. and Leminen, S. (2011), "Managing the Challenges of Becoming an Open Innovation Company: Experiences from Living Labs", Technology Innovation Management Review, October 2011: 20-25.
  43. Wolfert, J., Verdouw, C. N., Verloop, C. M. and Beulens, A. J. M. (2010), "Organizing Information Integration in Agri-food: A Method Based on a Service-oriented Architecture and Living Lab Approach", Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 70(2): 389-405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2009.07.015