The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of surface treatments on shear bond strength of resin composite bonded to CAD/CAM resin-ceramic hybrid materials

  • Gungor, Merve Bankoglu (Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Gazi University) ;
  • Nemli, Secil Karakoca (Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Gazi University) ;
  • Bal, Bilge Turhan (Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Gazi University) ;
  • Unver, Senem (Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Gazi University) ;
  • Dogan, Aylin (Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Gazi University)
  • Received : 2015.11.17
  • Accepted : 2016.05.30
  • Published : 2016.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

PURPOSE. The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of surface treatments on shear bond strength of resin composite bonded to thermocycled and non-thermocycled CAD/CAM resin-ceramic hybrid materials. MATERIALS AND METHODS. 120 specimens ($10{\times}10{\times}2mm$) from each material were divided into 12 groups according to different surface treatments in combination with thermal aging procedures. Surface treatment methods were airborne-particle abrasion (abraded with 50 micron alumina particles), dry grinding (grinded with $125{\mu}m$ grain size bur), and hydrofluoric acid (9%) and silane application. According to the thermocycling procedure, the groups were assigned as non-thermocycled, thermocycled after packing composites, and thermocycled before packing composites. The average surface roughness of the non-thermocycled specimens were measured after surface treatments. After packing composites and thermocycling procedures, shear bond strength (SBS) of the specimens were tested. The results of surface roughness were statistically analyzed by 2-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), and SBS results were statistically analyzed by 3-way ANOVA. RESULTS. Surface roughness of GC were significantly lower than that of LU and VE (P<.05). The highest surface roughness was observed for dry grinding group, followed by airborne particle abraded group (P<.05). Comparing the materials within the same surface treatment method revealed that untreated surfaces generally showed lower SBS values. The values of untreated LU specimens showed significantly different SBS values compared to those of other surface treatment groups (P<.05). CONCLUSION. SBS was affected by surface treatments. Thermocycling did not have any effect on the SBS of the materials except acid and silane applied GC specimens, which were subjected to thermocycling before packing of the composite resin.

Keywords

References

  1. Villarroel M, Fahl N, De Sousa AM, De Oliveira OB Jr. Direct esthetic restorations based on translucency and opacity of composite resins. J Esthet Restor Dent 2011;23:73-87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2010.00392.x
  2. Alshehri SA. An investigation into the role of core porcelain thickness and lamination in determining the flexural strength of In-Ceram dental materials. J Prosthodont 2011;20:261-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00707.x
  3. Tinschert J, Zwez D, Marx R, Anusavice KJ. Structural reliability of alumina-, feldspar-, leucite-, mica- and zirconiabased ceramics. J Dent 2000;28:529-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(00)00030-0
  4. Beuer F, Schweiger J, Edelhoff D. Digital dentistry: an overview of recent developments for CAD/CAM generated restorations. Br Dent J 2008;204:505-11. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2008.350
  5. Coldea A, Swain MV, Thiel N. Mechanical properties of polymer-infiltrated-ceramic-network materials. Dent Mater 2013;29:419-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2013.01.002
  6. Schlichting LH, Maia HP, Baratieri LN, Magne P. Noveldesign ultra-thin CAD/CAM composite resin and ceramic occlusal veneers for the treatment of severe dental erosion. J Prosthet Dent 2011;105:217-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(11)60035-8
  7. Frankenberger R, Hartmann VE, Krech M, Krämer N, Reich S, Braun A, Roggendorf M. Adhesive luting of new CAD/CAM materials. Int J Comput Dent 2015;18:9-20.
  8. Koller M, Arnetzl GV, Holly L, Arnetzl G. Lava ultimate resin nano ceramic for CAD/CAM: customization case study. Int J Comput Dent 2012;15:159-64.
  9. Awada A, Nathanson D. Mechanical properties of resin-ceramic CAD/CAM restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 2015;114:587-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.04.016
  10. Bottino MA, Campos F, Ramos NC, Rippe MP, Valandro LF, Melo RM. Inlays made from a hybrid material: adaptation and bond strengths. Oper Dent 2015;40:E83-91. https://doi.org/10.2341/13-343-L
  11. Raposo LH, Neiva NA, da Silva GR, Carlo HL, da Mota AS, do Prado CJ, Soares CJ. Ceramic restoration repair: report of two cases. J Appl Oral Sci 2009;17:140-4. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572009000200013
  12. Kupiec KA, Wuertz KM, Barkmeier WW, Wilwerding TM. Evaluation of porcelain surface treatments and agents for composite-to-porcelain repair. J Prosthet Dent 1996;76:119-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90294-2
  13. Elsaka SE. Repair bond strength of resin composite to a novel CAD/CAM hybrid ceramic using different repair systems. Dent Mater J 2015;34:161-7. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2014-159
  14. Ozcan M, Niedermeier W. Clinical study on the reasons for and location of failures of metal-ceramic restorations and survival of repairs. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15:299-302.
  15. Kim BK, Bae HE, Shim JS, Lee KW. The influence of ceramic surface treatments on the tensile bond strength of composite resin to all-ceramic coping materials. J Prosthet Dent 2005;94:357-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.08.012
  16. Roggendorf MJ, Kunzi B, Ebert J, Roggendorf HC, Frankenberger R, Reich SM. Seven-year clinical performance of CEREC-2 all-ceramic CAD/CAM restorations placed within deeply destroyed teeth. Clin Oral Investig 2012;16:1413-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-011-0642-8
  17. Sjögren G, Molin M, van Dijken JW. A 10-year prospective evaluation of CAD/CAM-manufactured (Cerec) ceramic inlays cemented with a chemically cured or dual-cured resin composite. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:241-6.
  18. Neis CA, Albuquerque NL, Albuquerque Ide S, Gomes EA, Souza-Filho CB, Feitosa VP, Spazzin AO, Bacchi A. Surface treatments for repair of feldspathic, leucite - and lithium disilicate-reinforced glass ceramics using composite resin. Braz Dent J 2015;26:152-5. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440201302447
  19. Attia A. Influence of surface treatment and cyclic loading on the durability of repaired all-ceramic crowns. J Appl Oral Sci 2010;18:194-200. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572010000200015
  20. Gourav R, Ariga P, Jain AR, Philip JM. Effect of four different surface treatments on shear bond strength of three porcelain repair systems: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent 2013;16:208-12. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.111315
  21. Colares RC, Neri JR, Souza AM, Pontes KM, Mendonça JS, Santiago SL. Effect of surface pretreatments on the microtensile bond strength of lithium-disilicate ceramic repaired with composite resin. Braz Dent J 2013;24:349-52. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440201301960
  22. Matinlinna JP, Vallittu PK. Bonding of resin composites to etchable ceramic surfaces - an insight review of the chemical aspects on surface conditioning. J Oral Rehabil 2007;34:622-30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01569.x
  23. Ozcan M, Valandro LF, Amaral R, Leite F, Bottino MA. Bond strength durability of a resin composite on a reinforced ceramic using various repair systems. Dent Mater 2009;25:1477-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.06.020
  24. Blum IR, Nikolinakos N, Lynch CD, Wilson NH, Millar BJ, Jagger DC. An in vitro comparison of four intra-oral ceramic repair systems. J Dent 2012;40:906-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2012.07.008
  25. Kocaagaoglu HH, Gurbulak A. An assessment of shear bond strength between ceramic repair systems and different ceramic infrastructures. Scanning 2015;37:300-5. https://doi.org/10.1002/sca.21213
  26. de Melo RM, Valandro LF, Bottino MA. Microtensile bond strength of a repair composite to leucite-reinforced feldspathic ceramic. Braz Dent J 2007;18:314-9. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-64402007000400008
  27. Stawarczyk B, Krawczuk A, Ilie N. Tensile bond strength of resin composite repair in vitro using different surface preparation conditionings to an aged CAD/CAM resin nanoceramic. Clin Oral Investig 2015;19:299-308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-014-1269-3
  28. Wiegand A, Stucki L, Hoffmann R, Attin T, Stawarczyk B. Repairability of CAD/CAM high-density PMMA- and composite-based polymers. Clin Oral Investig 2015;19:2007-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-015-1411-x
  29. Elsaka SE. Influence of surface treatments on bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets to a novel CAD/CAM hybrid ceramic material. Odontology 2016;104:68-76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-014-0188-8
  30. Awad D, Stawarczyk B, Liebermann A, Ilie N. Translucency of esthetic dental restorative CAD/CAM materials and composite resins with respect to thickness and surface roughness. J Prosthet Dent 2015;113:534-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.12.003
  31. Elsaka SE. Bond strength of novel CAD/CAM restorative materials to self-adhesive resin cement: the effect of surface treatments. J Adhes Dent 2014;16:531-40.
  32. Hu M, Weiger R, Fischer J. Comparison of two test designs for evaluating the shear bond strength of resin composite cements. Dent Mater 2016;32:223-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.11.023
  33. Otani A, Amaral M, May LG, Cesar PF, Valandro LF. A critical evaluation of bond strength tests for the assessment of bonding to Y-TZP. Dent Mater 2015;31:648-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.03.002
  34. Heintze SD. Crown pull-off test (crown retention test) to evaluate the bonding effectiveness of luting agents. Dent Mater 2010;26:193-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.10.004
  35. Magni E, Ferrari M, Papacchini F, Hickel R, Ilie N. Influence of ozone on the composite-to-composite bond. Clin Oral Investig 2011;15:249-56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-009-0370-5
  36. Versluis A, Tantbirojn D, Douglas WH. Why do shear bond tests pull out dentin? J Dent Res 1997;76:1298-307. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345970760061001
  37. Lutz F, Krejci I, Barbakow F. Quality and durability of marginal adaptation in bonded composite restorations. Dent Mater 1991;7:107-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(91)90055-4
  38. Heintze SD, Zimmerli B. Relevance of in vitro tests of adhesive and composite dental materials. A review in 3 parts. Part 3: in vitro tests of adhesive systems. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 2011;121:1024-40.
  39. Hatta M, Shinya A, Yokoyama D, Gomi H, Vallittu PK, Shinya A. The effect of surface treatment on bond strength of layering porcelain and hybrid composite bonded to zirconium dioxide ceramics. J Prosthodont Res 2011;55:146-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2010.10.005
  40. Lee JJ, Kang CK, Oh JW, Seo JM, Park JM. Evaluation of shear bond strength between dual cure resin cement and zirconia ceramic after thermocycling treatment. J Adv Prosthodont 2015;7:1-7. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2015.7.1.1
  41. Kim GH, Park SW, Lee K, Oh GJ, Lim HP. Shear bond strength between resin cement and colored zirconia made with metal chlorides. J Prosthet Dent 2015;113:603-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.12.013
  42. Shahdad SA, Kennedy JG. Bond strength of repaired anterior composite resins: an in vitro study. J Dent 1998;26:685-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(97)00044-4
  43. Baur V, Ilie N. Repair of dental resin-based composites. Clin Oral Investig 2013;17:601-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-012-0722-4
  44. Amaral FL, Colucci V, Palma-Dibb RG, Corona SA. Assessment of in vitro methods used to promote adhesive interface degradation: a critical review. J Esthet Restor Dent 2007;19:340-53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2007.00134.x
  45. Xie C, Han Y, Zhao XY, Wang ZY, He HM. Microtensile bond strength of one- and two-step self-etching adhesives on sclerotic dentin: the effects of thermocycling. Oper Dent 2010;35:547-55. https://doi.org/10.2341/10-025-L
  46. Gale MS, Darvell BW. Thermal cycling procedures for laboratory testing of dental restorations. J Dent 1999;27:89-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(98)00037-2
  47. Ozel Bektas O, Eren D, Herguner Siso S, Akin GE. Effect of thermocycling on the bond strength of composite resin to bur and laser treated composite resin. Lasers Med Sci 2012;27:723-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-011-0958-2
  48. Celik C, Cehreli SB, Arhun N. Resin composite repair: Quantitative microleakage evaluation of resin-resin and resin-tooth interfaces with different surface treatments. Eur J Dent 2015;9:92-9. https://doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.149652
  49. Gregory WA, Moss SM. Effects of heterogeneous layers of composite and time on composite repair of porcelain. Oper Dent 1990;15:18-22.

Cited by

  1. Current status and future prospect of CAD/CAM composite crown vol.9, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.2186/ajps.9.1
  2. Repair bond strengths of non-aged and aged resin nanoceramics vol.9, pp.5, 2017, https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2017.9.5.364
  3. Comparative approach to analyse the effects of different surface treatments on CAD/CAM resin nanoceramics–resin composite repair bond strength vol.32, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/13102818.2017.1392260
  4. Roughness, surface energy, and superficial damages of CAD/CAM materials after surface treatment vol.22, pp.8, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2365-6
  5. A Comparative Study on the Mechanical Properties of a Polymer-Infiltrated Ceramic-Network Material Used for the Fabrication of Hybrid Abutment vol.11, pp.9, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11091681
  6. Shear Bond Strength of Nanohybrid Composite to the Resin Matrix Ceramics After Different Surface Treatments vol.36, pp.8, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2018.4467
  7. Bond strength between a polymer-infiltrated ceramic network and a composite for repair: effect of several ceramic surface treatments vol.32, pp.0, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2018.vol32.0028
  8. Effect of Different Surface Treatment Methods on Micro-Shear Bond Strength of CAD-CAM Restorative Materials to Resin Cement. vol.33, pp.2, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2018.1514992
  9. Biomechanical properties of polymer-infiltrated ceramic crowns on one-piece zirconia implants after long-term chewing simulation vol.4, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-018-0127-5
  10. Effect of grinding and polishing on the roughness and fracture resistance of cemented CAD-CAM monolithic materials submitted to mechanical aging vol.121, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.02.012
  11. Effect of surface treatments on the bond strength of indirect resin composite to resin matrix ceramics vol.11, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2019.11.4.223
  12. Repair strength and surface topography of lithium disilicate and hybrid resin ceramics with LLLT and photodynamic therapy in comparison to hydrofluoric acid vol.18, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1177/2280800020966938
  13. Repair bond strength of resin composite to three aged CAD/CAM blocks using different repair systems vol.12, pp.3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2020.12.3.131
  14. Evaluation of the repair capacities and color stabilities of a resin nanoceramic and hybrid CAD/CAM blocks vol.12, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2020.12.3.140
  15. Shear bond strengths of aged and non-aged CAD/CAM materials after different surface treatments vol.12, pp.5, 2020, https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2020.12.5.273
  16. Effect of color of the cement and the composite resin foundation on the resultant color of resin-matrix ceramics vol.125, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.09.021
  17. Repair bond strength and surface topography of resin‐ceramic and ceramic restorative blocks treated by laser and conventional surface treatments vol.84, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.23672
  18. Clinical performance of two different adhesive strategies for metal-ceramic cracks repairing and related in vitro study vol.40, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2020-260
  19. Shear‐bond strength and optical properties of short fiber‐reinforced CAD/CAM composite blocks vol.129, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1111/eos.12815
  20. Chemical Composition, Knoop Hardness, Surface Roughness, and Adhesion Aspects of Additively Manufactured Dental Interim Materials vol.30, pp.8, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13302
  21. Repair Bond Strength of Composite Resin to Aged Resin and Glass-Matrix CAD/CAM Ceramic Materials Using Two Different Repair Systems vol.11, pp.11, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings11111331
  22. Surface Characterisation of Dental Resin Composites Related to Conditioning and Finishing vol.13, pp.23, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13234236