Journal of Engineering Education Research (공학교육연구)

Korean Society for Engineering Education (한국공학교육학회)
권호 표지

Analysis on Team Interaction of Team size in Creative Engineering Design Activity

창의적 공학 설계 활동에서 팀 규모에 따른 팀 상호작용 분석

  • Kim, Minwoong (Graduate School of Industrial & Technology Education, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Jo, Hanjin (Graduate School of Industrial & Technology Education, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Wi, Sunbok (Graduate School of Industrial & Technology Education, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Kim, Taehoon (Dept. of Electric, Electronic & Communication Engineering Education, College of Education, Chungnam National University)
  • 김민웅 (충남대학교 대학원 공업기술교육학과) ;
  • 조한진 (충남대학교 대학원 공업기술교육학과) ;
  • 위선복 (충남대학교 대학원 공업기술교육학과) ;
  • 김태훈 (충남대학교 사범대학 전기.전자.통신공학교육과)
  • Received : 2016.04.28
  • Accepted : 2016.07.19
  • Published : 2016.07.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study is to analyze the team interaction in accordance with the team size. Thereby, it is to reveal the team size for the attainment of the effective team interaction and the specific goals to achieve the purpose of this study are as follows. Firstly, the frequency and percentage of team interaction in accordance with the team size are presented. Secondly, the statistical verification of the team interaction in the social emotional area is conducted. Thirdly, the statistical verification of the team interaction in the task area is conducted. In order to do this study, we explain the purpose of study, confidentiality, and withdrawal right were described and then 32 persons who agreed to participate were selected as the subjects for the study. After that, the autonomous organization of team was induced and a total of 8 teams were organized - 3 teams comprised of 3 members, 3 teams of 4 members, 1 team of 5 members, and 1 team of 6 members. Further, Bales' (1950) Interaction Process Analysis (IPA) was used in order to analyze the team interaction, and Mangold INTERACT was used as a coding program. The results of study are as follows. Firstly, the highest frequency of the team interaction showed up in the case of five or six members and the lowest in the case of 3 members. Secondly, a statistically significant difference in the social emotional (positive) area showed up in accordance with the team size and the team organizations of three or four members were effective. Thirdly, a statistically significant value in the answer area showed up in accordance with the team size and the team organizations of five or six members were effective.

Keywords

References

  1. 강명희, 엄소연, 이정민(2010). 웹기반 협력학습에서 학습자특성과 학습자 간 상호작용이 학습성과에 미치는 영향. 교육공학연구, 26(3), 53-79.
  2. 김시라, 서순식(2006). 웹 기반 협동학습에서 학습자간 상호작용에 영향을 미치는 요인에 관한 연구. 교육방법연구, 18(1), 43-62.
  3. 김충련(2012). SPSS 데이터분석. 서울: 21세기사
  4. 김태훈, 조한진(2012). 기술적 문제해결에서 MBTI 성격 유형과 팀 상호작용 간의 관계 분석. 한국기술교육학회지, 12(2), 160-182.
  5. 노혜란, 최미나(2016). 팀학습에서 팀메타인지가 팀상호작용에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구. 교육방법연구, 28(1), 151-170.
  6. 서형업(2010). MBTI에 따른 모둠 구성이 창작로봇 제작 모둠의 창의성과 상호작용에 미치는 효과. 박사학위논문. 충남대학교 대학원.
  7. 송재준, 김문중(2013). 팀 협업과 정보교류체제가 성과에 미치는 영향: 성숙도의 조절효과를 중심으로. 상업교육연구, 27(3), 45-72.
  8. 유지원(2014). 대학생의 팀 기반 프로젝트 학습에서 학습성과에 대한 협력적 자기효능감, 팀 효능감, 팀 상호작용 간 관계. 학습자중심교과교육연구, 14(10), 89-110.
  9. 이근수(2014). PBL을 적용한 창의공학설계 교수설계 방안 연구. 한국산학기술학회논문지, 15(7), 4573-4579. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2014.15.7.4573
  10. 이동원(1995). 인간교육과 협동학습 활동. 서울: 성화사.
  11. 이상운, 박중양, 박재흥(2003). 개발과 유지보수 프로젝트의 이상적인 팀 규모. 정보처리학회논문지, 10(1), 77-84.
  12. 이상호, 박선민(2002). 팀제의 이론과 실제. 사회과학논총, 5, 127-145
  13. 이종수 외(2008). 체험학습기반의 기초 창의공학설계 교육 및 운영. 공학교육연구, 11(2), 32-41.
  14. 이태식 외(2009). 공학교육평가 : 공학대학 캡스톤 디자인(창의적 공학 설계) 교육과정 운영실태 및 학습 만족도 조사. 공학교육연구, 12(2), 36-50.
  15. 이태호, 김태훈(2014). Capstone-Design 활동에서 MBTI 성격 유형에 따른 팀 상호작용 변화 분석. 공학교육연구, 17(1), 57-64.
  16. 임규연(2011). 집단탐구 협동학습에서 학업적 자기효능감, 협력적 자기효능감, 학업성과의 관계. 교육의 이론과 실천, 16(2), 19-36
  17. 조일현(2010). 대학 프로젝트 수업환경에서 분업화, 상호작용, 공유정신모형이 팀 수행성과와 개인 학습에 미치는 영향. 교육공학연구, 26(3), 1-20.
  18. 최유현(2008). 공학기술과 팀워크. 고양: 지호출판사.
  19. 최윤미(2010). 대학에서의 팀 학습 활동에 대한 학습자의 평가. 교육방법연구, 22(4), 143-163.
  20. Aktouf, O. (1992). Management and theories of organizations in the 1990's: Toward a critical humanism?. Academy of Management Review, 84, 191-215.
  21. Bales, R. F. (1950). Interaction Process Analysis: A Method for the Study of Small Groups. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley Press.
  22. Bales, R. F. (1955). How people interact in conferences. Scientific American, 192, 31-35.
  23. Balbin, R. W. (1991). "Design Innovation and the Team", DMI, summer.
  24. Cummings, T. G., Griggs, W. H. (1977). Worker reactions to autonomous work groups: Conditions for functioning, differential effects, and individual differences. Organization and Administrative Sciences, 7 (4), 87-100.
  25. Donald, C. P. (2005). 소그룹 내 행동의 사회심리학. 서울: 시그마프레스.
  26. Edmondson, A. C. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 350-383. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666999
  27. Frank, M., Lavy, I., & Elata, D. (2003). Implementing the project-based learning approach in an academic engineering course. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 13 (3), 273-288. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026192113732
  28. Jehn, K., & Mannix, E. A. (2001). The dynamic nature of conflict: A longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44 (2), 238-251. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069453
  29. Kephart, W. M. (1950). A quantitative analysis of intergroup relations. American Journal of Sociology, 60, 544-549.
  30. Key, N. (1986). Abating risk and accidents through communication. Professional Safety, 31 (11), 25-28
  31. Kravitz, D. A., & Martin, B. (1986). Ringelmann rediscovered: The original article. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 1134-1146.
  32. Latane, B., & Nida, S. (1980). Social impact theory and group influence: A social engineering perspective. Psychology of group influence, 3-34.
  33. Leana, C. R., Ahlbrandt, R. S., & Murrel, A. J. (1992). The effect of employee involvement programs on unionized workers' attitudes, perceptions, and preferences in decision making. Academy of Management Journal, 35 (4), 861-873. https://doi.org/10.2307/256319
  34. Levi, D. (2001). Group dynamics for teams. London: Sage Publication.
  35. Michaelsen, L. K., Knight, A. B., & Fink, L. D. (Eds.). (2002). Team-based learning: A transformative use of small groups. Westport: Greenwood publishing group.
  36. Miller, K. I., Monge, P. R. (1986). Participation, satisfaction, and productivity: A meta-analytic review. Academy of Management Journal, 29, 727-753. https://doi.org/10.2307/255942
  37. Morgan Jr, B. B., Glickman, A. S., Woodard, E. A., Blaiwes, A. S., & Salas, E. (1986). Measurement of team behaviors in a Navy environment. Orlando: Naval Training Systems Center, Human Factors Division.
  38. Mullen, B. J., Chapman, J., & Satas, E. (1989). Effects of group comopsition: 'Lost in the crowd' or 'centre of attention', Revista Latino Americana de Psycologia, 21, 43-55.
  39. Napier, R. W., Gershenfeld, M. K. (1999). Groups: Theory and Experience. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
  40. Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge creating company. New York: Oxford University Press.
  41. Pennington, D. C., Gillen, K. & Hill, P. (1999). Social Psychology. London: Arnold.
  42. Sharan, S. (1980). Cooperative learning in small groups: Recent methods and effects on achievement, attitudes, and ethnic relations. Review of educational research, 50 (2), 241-271. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543050002241
  43. Shaw, M. E. (1981). Group dynamics: The social psychology of small group behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  44. Stasser, G., & Titus, W. (1987). Effects of information load and percentage of shared information on the dissemination of unshared information during group discussion. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 53, 81-93. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.53.1.81
  45. Webb, N. M. (1982). Group composition, group interaction, and achievement in cooperative small groups. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74 (4), 475. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.74.4.475