DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Relationship among Pro-environmental Attitude, Behavior to Decrease Exposure, Knowledge of Endocrine Disruptors, and Obesity-related Profiles in Nursing Students

간호대학생들의 환경친화적 태도, 노출저감화 행동, 내분비계 장애물질에 대한 지식과 비만의 관련성 연구

  • Kim, Min A (Department of Nursing, Mokpo Catholic University)
  • 김민아 (목포가톨릭대학교 간호학과)
  • Received : 2016.08.03
  • Accepted : 2016.08.12
  • Published : 2016.08.31

Abstract

Purpose: This study was conducted to examine the pro-environmental attitude (actual commitment domain, verbal commitment domain, affect domain), behavior to decreased exposure and knowledge of endocrine disruptors by obesity -related profiles (BMI, body fat percentage, visceral fat percentage, skeletal muscle mass percentage, waist circumference, waist-hip ratio). Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 102 nursing students. Data were collected from November to December, 2015 using self-report questionnaires and physical measurements. Data were analyzed using t-test, Pearson correlation and coefficients with SPSS 18.0. Results: The study results showed that actual commitment domain of pro-environmental attitude and behavior to decreased exposure level on endocrine disruptors were significantly related to visceral fat percentage. Actual commitment domain of a pro-environmental attitude was significantly related to body fat percentage. Pro-environmental attitude was significantly related to the behavior to decreased exposure level on endocrine disruptors and knowledge thereof. Conclusion: These findings suggest that visceral fat and body fat percentages were significantly related to the actual commitment domain of a pro-environmental attitude. Therefore, a replication study is recommended to understand the connection between endocrine disruptors and obesity. In addition, developing an education program about endocrine disruptors for nursing students is recommended. In particular, a pro-environmental attitude, especially on actual commitment domain, could be involved as an education program.

Keywords

References

  1. Kim MK. Predicting pro-environmental behavior: a cross-national analysis. dissertation]. Seoul: graduate school of governance sungkyunkwan university; 2014. p. 1-274.
  2. Stern PC. Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Jounal of Social Issue. 2000;56(3):407-424. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00175
  3. Nightingale F. Notes on nursing. NewYork: Dover Publication, Inc; 1969.
  4. Kim HK. Pro-environmental health behavior:a concept analysis. Korean Jornal of Adult Nursing. 2011;23(6):527-542.
  5. Choue RW, Lee EY, Ryu KA, Yim JE, Lee HB, Oh JW. Effects of types of formulas on the clinical symptoms, nutritional status and immune markers in infants with atopic dermatitis. Korean Journal of Asthma Allergy Clinical Immunology. 2007;27(1):33-42.
  6. What is endocrine disruption? [Internet]. [cited 2016 March 14]. Available from: https://www.epa.gov/endocrine-disruption/what-endocrine-disruption.
  7. Grun F, Blumberg B. Perturbed nuclear receptor signaling by environmental obesogens as emerging factors in the obesity crisis. Reviews in Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders. 2007;8(2):161-71. doi:10.1007/s11154-007-9049-x
  8. Scinicariello F, Buser MC. Urinary polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and childhood obesity: NHANES(2001-006). Environmental Health Perspectives. 2014;122(3):299-303. http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1307234
  9. Thayer KA, Heindel JJ, Bucher JR, Gallo MA. Role of environmental chemicals in diabetes and obesity: a national toxicology program workshop review. Environment Health Perspectives. 2012;120(6):779-789. http://dx.do i.org./10.1289/ehp.1104597
  10. Kim SH, Park MJ. Phthalate exposure and childhood obesity. Annals of Pediatric Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2014;19(2):69-75. http://dx.doi.org/10.6065/apem.2014.19.2.69
  11. Newbold RR. Impact of environmental endocrine disrupting chemicals on the development of obesity. Hormones (Athens). 2010;9(3):206-217. https://doi.org/10.14310/horm.2002.1271
  12. Somm E, Schwitzgebel VM, Toulotte A, Cederroth CR, Combescure C, Nef S, Aubert ML, Huppi PS. Perinatal exposure to bisphenol A alters early adipogenesis in the rat. Environmental Health Perspectives. 2009;117(10): 1549-1555. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.11342
  13. Honma S, Suzuki A, Buchanan DL, Katsu Y, Watanabe H, Iguchi T. Low dose effect of in utero exposure to bisphenol A and diethylstilbestrol on female mouse reproduction. Reproduction Toxicology. 2002;16(2):117-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0890-6238(02)00006-0
  14. Rubin BS, Murray MK, Damassa DA, King JC, Soto AM. Perinatal exposure to low doses of bisphenol A affects body weight, patterns of estrous cyclicity, and plasma LH levels. Environmental Health Perspectives. 2001;109(7):675-680. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.01109675
  15. Kim SH, Park MJ. Endocrine disrupting chemicals and pubertal development. Endocrinology Metabolism. 2012;27(1):20-27. https://doi.org/10.3803/EnM.2012.27.1.20
  16. Malony MP, Ward MP. Ecology : let's hear from people; an objective scale for the emasurement of ecological attitudes and knowledge. American Psychologist. 1973;28(7):583-586. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0034936
  17. Kim MK, Moon SH. Predicting pro-environmental behavior: A cross-national analysis. Korean Public Administration Review. 2014;48(3): 257-293.
  18. Mobley C, Vagias, W. M., Deward, S. L. Exploring additional determinants of environmentally responsible behavior: the influence of environmental literature and environmental attitudes". Environmental and Behavior, 2010;42(4):420-447. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916508325002
  19. Lee CW, Choi KH, Jeong SW, Kim HL, Seo YR. An overview and future perspective on endocrine disruptors. Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2009;24(1):7-14. https://doi.org/10.3803/jkes.2009.24.1.7
  20. Shin DC. Endocrine disruptors and human health. Korean Journal of Occupatinal Health. 1999;38(4):154-171.
  21. Kim MR, Kim HC. Recognition, information, acquisition behavior, knowledge, behaviors to decrease exposure and education need toward endocrine disruptors among middle and high school students. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education, 2005;21(3):123-142.
  22. Keum J. Relationship between green consumer behavior, environmental knowledge, and environmental attitudes among students at the university of education. Journal of Korean Home Economy Association. 2013;51(1):89-95. http://dx.doi.org/10.6115/khea.2013.51.1.089
  23. Choi SY, So KH Shim KC, Yeau SH. A study on the cognition of high school students and science teachers of Seoul and province of gyeonggi on the endocrine disruptors. The Environmental Education. 2006; 19(3):.93-101.
  24. Park UA, Lee KC. Pro-environmental behavior of consumer and its related factors. Journal of the Korean Home Economics Association. 1997;35(5): 221-238.
  25. Choi EJ, Kim YS. An effect of values, environmental knowledge, and environmental involvement on the ecologically concerned behavior of college students. Journal of Korean Consumption Culture Association. 2007;10(3):15-41. https://doi.org/10.17053/jcc.2007.10.3.002
  26. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.:1-559.
  27. Kim SY. Effects of environmental documentaries on elementary students' pro-environmental attitudes. [master's thesis]. Seoul: Major in Elementary Environmental Education Graduate school of Education Seoul National University of Education; 2008. p. 1-93.
  28. Milfont TL, Duckittb J. The environmental attitudes inventory: A valid and reliable measure to assess the structure of environmental attitudes. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 2010;30(1):80-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.09.001
  29. Koh JW. Evaluation of pubertal development and obesity in Korean children and adolescents, including its affecting environmental factors. [master's tesis]. Cheonan: graduate school of Dankook University; 2014. p. 1-44.
  30. Kaiser FG, Urs F. Ecological behavior's dependency on different forms of knowledge. International Association for Applied Psychology. 2003;52(4):598-613. https://doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.00153