Safety and Health at Work

Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute, Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency (산업안전보건연구원)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation of Interhandle Distance During Pushing and Pulling of a Four-Caster Cart for Upper Limb Exertion

  • Ohnishi, Akihiro (Human Engineering and Risk Management Research Group, National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health) ;
  • Takanokura, Masato (Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, Faculty of Engineering, Kanagawa University) ;
  • Sugama, Atsushi (Human Engineering and Risk Management Research Group, National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health)
  • Received : 2015.10.09
  • Accepted : 2016.01.24
  • Published : 2016.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Background: This study examined the relationship between interhandle distances and upper limb exertion during simply pushing and pulling of a cart with four swivel wheels, defined by a roll box pallet (RBP) in a Japanese industrial standard. Methods: Six healthy young male participants were asked to push and pull an RBP at a distance of 5.2 m under six conditions corresponding to different interhandle distances (40 cm, 60 cm, and 80 cm) and weights (130 kg and 250 kg). The upper limb exertion was studied by shoulder abduction and flexion, and elbow flexion, as well as surface electromyogram (EMG) in shoulder extensor, and elbow flexor and extensor. Participants were required to provide subjective evaluations on operability after each trial. Results: Subjective operability indicated that a narrower interhandle distance had a better operability for pushing. Interhandle distance was also related to upper limb exertion especially for pushing. A narrow interhandle distance caused smaller shoulder adduction but larger elbow flexion. The normalized EMG data revealed that muscular activity became smaller with a narrow interhandle distance in shoulder extensor. During the pulling task, elbow flexion was smaller at a narrow interhandle distance, although subjective operability and normalized EMG were not significantly varied. Conclusion: A wider interhandle distance, such as 80 cm, was not suitable in the forwardbackward movement of the RBP. Therefore, this study concluded that an interhandle distance of 40 cm would be suitable for pushing and pulling an RBP to protect the workers' hands against the risk of injury by installing inner handles.

Keywords

References

  1. BS EN 12674-1 (Roll Containers) Part 1: Terminology. London (UK): British Standard Institution; 1999. p. 1-13.
  2. Roebuck B, Norton G. Safety of roll containers. Research Report 009. Health and Safety Executive. London (UK): HSE Books; 2002. p. 1-59.
  3. Ohnishi A. Actual situation and features of industrial accidents related to the use of roll box pallets (RBP). Jpn J Ergon 2013;49:175-82. [in Japanese]. https://doi.org/10.5100/jje.49.175
  4. Van der Beek AJ, Kluver BDR, Frings-Dresen MHW, Hoozemans MJM. Gender differences in exerted forces and physiological load during pushing and pulling of wheeled cages by postal workers. Ergonomics 2000;43:269-81. https://doi.org/10.1080/001401300184602
  5. Mital A, Nicholson AS, Ayoub MM. A guideline to manual materials handling. 2nd ed. London (UK): Taylor & Francis; 1997. p. 72-83.
  6. Knapik GG, Marras WS. Spine loading at different lumber levels during pushing and pulling. Ergonomics 2009;52:60-70. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130802480828
  7. Lee YJ, Hoozemans JM, van Dieën JH. Handle height and expectation of cart movement affect the control of trunk motion at movement onset in cart pushing. Ergonomics 2011;54:971-82. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2011.604432
  8. JIS Z 0610 (Box pallets). Tokyo (Japan): Japan Standards Association; 1991. p. 1-9.
  9. Lawrence JH, De Luca CJ. Myoelectric signal versus force relationship in different human muscles. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol 1983;54:1653-9.
  10. Woods JJ, Bigland-Ritchie B. Linear and non-linear surface EMG/force relationships in human muscles. Am J Phys Med 1983;62:287-99.
  11. Cogley RM, Archambault TA, Fibeger JF, Koverman MM, Youdas JW, Hollman JH. Comparison of muscle activation using various hand positions during the push-up. J Strength Cond Res 2005;19:628-33.
  12. Donkers MJ, An KN, Chao EY, Morrey BF. Hand position affects elbow joint load during push-up exercise. J Biomech 1993;26:625-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(93)90026-B
  13. Lin JH, McGorry RW, Chang CC. Effects of handle orientation and betweenhandle distance on bi-manual isometric push strength. Appl Ergon 2012;43: 664-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2011.10.004

Cited by

  1. Pulling strength, muscular fatigue, and prediction of maximum endurance time for simulated pulling tasks vol.13, pp.11, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207283
  2. Design and Development of an Ergonomic Trolley-Lifter for Sheet Metal Handling Task: A Preliminary Study vol.10, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2019.06.006
  3. Factors Affecting Material-Cart Handling in the Roofing Industry: Evidence for Administrative Controls vol.18, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18041510