Healthcare Informatics Research

Korean Society of Medical Infomatics (대한의료정보학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Nomogram of Naive Bayesian Model for Recurrence Prediction of Breast Cancer

  • Kim, Woojae (Department of Public Health and Medical Administration, Dongyang University) ;
  • Kim, Ku Sang (Department of Biomedical Informatics, Ajou University School of Medicine) ;
  • Park, Rae Woong (Department of Biomedical Informatics, Ajou University School of Medicine)
  • Received : 2015.10.29
  • Accepted : 2015.04.04
  • Published : 2016.04.30
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objectives: Breast cancer has a high rate of recurrence, resulting in the need for aggressive treatment and close follow-up. However, previously established classification guidelines, based on expert panels or regression models, are controversial. Prediction models based on machine learning show excellent performance, but they are not widely used because they cannot explain their decisions and cannot be presented on paper in the way that knowledge is customarily represented in the clinical world. The principal objective of this study was to develop a nomogram based on a $na{\ddot{i}}ve$ Bayesian model for the prediction of breast cancer recurrence within 5 years after breast cancer surgery. Methods: The nomogram can provide a visual explanation of the predicted probabilities on a sheet of paper. We used a data set from a Korean tertiary teaching hospital of 679 patients who had undergone breast cancer surgery between 1994 and 2002. Seven prognostic factors were selected as independent variables for the model. Results: The accuracy was 80%, and the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) of the model was 0.81. Conclusions: The nomogram can be easily used in daily practice to aid physicians and patients in making appropriate treatment decisions after breast cancer surgery.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : Dongyang University

References

  1. Korean Breast Cancer Society. Breast cancer facts and figures 2006-2008. Seoul: Breast Cancer Society; 2008. p. 1-16.
  2. Bourdes VS, Bonnevay S, Lisboa PJ, Aung MH, Chabaud S, Bachelot T, et al. Breast cancer predictions by neural networks analysis: a comparison with logistic regression. Proceedings of 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBS): 2007 Aug 22-26; Lyon, France. p. 5424-7.
  3. Jerez JM, Franco L, Alba E, Llombart-Cussac A, Lluch A, Ribelles N, et al. Improvement of breast cancer relapse prediction in high risk intervals using artificial neural networks. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2005;94(3):265-72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-005-9013-y
  4. Jerez-Aragones JM, Gomez-Ruiz JA, Ramos-Jimenez G, Munoz-Perez J, Alba-Conejo E. A combined neural network and decision trees model for prognosis of breast cancer relapse. Artif Intell Med 2003;27(1):45-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0933-3657(02)00086-6
  5. Yi M, Buchholz TA, Meric-Bernstam F, Bedrosian I, Hwang RF, Ross MI, et al. Classification of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrences after breast conservation therapy can predict patient prognosis and facilitate treatment planning. Ann Surg 2011;253(3):572-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e318208fc2a
  6. Mozina M, Demsar J, Kattan M, Zupan B. Nomograms for naive Bayesian classifiers and how can they help in medical data analysis. Proceedings of International Medical Informatics Association (MEDINFO2004); 2004 Sept 7-11; San Francisco, CA. p. 1762.
  7. Kim W, Kim KS, Lee JE, Noh DY, Kim SW, Jung YS, et al. Development of novel breast cancer recurrence prediction model using support vector machine. J Breast Cancer 2012;15(2):230-8. https://doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2012.15.2.230
  8. Mozina M, Demsar J, Kattan MW, Zupan B. Nomograms for visualization of naive Bayesian classifier. In: Boulicaut JF, Esposito F, Giannotti F, Pedreschi D, editors. Knowledge discovery in databases: PKDD 2004. Heidelberg: Springer; 2004. p. 337-48.
  9. Huang J, Ling CX. Using AUC and accuracy in evaluating learning algorithms. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 2005;17(3):299-310. https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2005.50
  10. Greiner M, Pfeiffer D, Smith RD. Principles and practical application of the receiver-operating characteristic analysis for diagnostic tests. Prev Vet Med 2000;45(1-2):23-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-5877(00)00115-X
  11. Aitkin M, Laird N, Francis B. A reanalysis of the Stanford heart transplant data. J Am Stat Assoc 1983;78(382): 264-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1983.10477959
  12. Xiang A, Lapuerta P, Ryutov A, Buckley J, Azen S. Comparison of the performance of neural network methods and Cox regression for censored survival data. Comput Stat Data Anal 2000;34(2):243-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9473(99)00098-5
  13. Ohno-Machado L. A comparison of Cox proportional hazards and artificial neural network models for medical prognosis. Comput Biol Med 1997;27(1):55-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-4825(96)00036-4

Cited by

  1. Comparison of Logistic Regression and Bayesian Networks for Risk Prediction of Breast Cancer Recurrence vol.38, pp.7, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989x18790963
  2. A Nomogram for Predicting Amyloid PET Positivity in Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment vol.66, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3233/jad-180048
  3. A novel nomogram of naïve Bayesian model for prevalence of cardiovascular disease vol.25, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.29220/csam.2018.25.3.297
  4. Developing Children’s Oral Health Assessment Toolkits Using Machine Learning Algorithm vol.5, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1177/2380084419885612
  5. Machine Learning Algorithms to Predict Recurrence within 10 Years after Breast Cancer Surgery: A Prospective Cohort Study vol.12, pp.12, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12123817
  6. Machine Learning Classifiers on Breast Cancer Recurrences vol.192, pp.None, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.09.044
  7. Feature Selection is Critical for 2-Year Prognosis in Advanced Stage High Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer by Using Machine Learning vol.28, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1177/10732748211044678
  8. Weakly supervised temporal model for prediction of breast cancer distant recurrence vol.11, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-89033-6
  9. AutoBRB: An automated belief rule base model for pathologic complete response prediction in gastric cancer vol.140, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.105104