Korean Journal of Poultry Science (한국가금학회지)

The Korean Society of Poultry Science (한국가금학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of Chemical Composition and Immune-enhancing Activity of the Four Lines of Korean Native Chickens

4계통 재래종 닭고기의 화학적 특성 및 면역활성

  • Received : 2016.05.25
  • Accepted : 2016.08.17
  • Published : 2016.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study was conducted to compare the general composition and immunomodulatory activity of breast and thigh meats from four lines of Korean native chickens: Yeonsan Ogye, Hyunin Black, Hwangbong, and Hoengseong Yakdak. White Leghorn was used as a control. Fifteen male chickens (three chickens in each line) were grown under the same conditions and slaughtered at 13 weeks old. The four lines of Korean native chickens, regardless of the part, had higher contents of crude fat (p<0.05) than White Leghorn. The cholesterol contents were significantly higher in Hyunin Black and significantly lower in Hoengseong Yakdak than those of other chickens (p<0.05). The immunomodulatory effect, assessed by macrophage cell proliferation and nitric oxide production, was only observed in the breast meat of the four lines of Korean native chickens. The phagocytic activity of macrophage cells was significantly augmented by the breast meat of Hyunin Black and Hoengseong Yakdak. Furthermore, the mRNA expressions of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-4, IL-10 and $IFN-{\gamma}$, was significantly suppressed by Korean native chickens compared with White Leghorn. These results suggested that the four lines of Korean native chickens exhibited greater immune-enhancing activity than White Leghorn.

본 연구는 4종의 재래닭인 연산오계, 현인흑계, 횡성약닭, 황봉의 일반성분, 카르노신, 안세린 함량 및 면역활성을 비교하기 위하여 실시하였고, 대조구로 백색 레그혼을 사용하였다. 시험용 닭을 모두 동일한 조건에서 13주간 사육하여 도계한 후 화학적 성분조사를 실시하였다. 일반성분 분석에서는 4종의 재래닭이 백색레그혼에 비하여 조지방 함량이 높았으며, 콜레스테롤 함량은 현인흑계가 다른 품종에 비하여 높았고 횡성약닭이 유의적으로 낮았다(p<0.05). 면역증진 효능을 측정하기 위하여 대식세포를 이용하여 실험한 결과는 재래닭 4종의 가슴육에서만 대식세포 증식 및 NO 억제 효능이 있었다. 대식세포 탐식작용은 현인흑계와 횡성약닭가슴육에서 유의적으로 증가되었고, 염증 관련 사이토카인(IL-4, IL-10, $IFN-{\gamma}$) 유전자 발현은 백색레그혼에 비하여 4종의 재래닭에서 억제효과가 컸다. 결론적으로 4종류의 재래닭이 백색레그혼에 비하여 면역증진 효능이 높았으며, 특히 가슴육에서 효능이 있었다. 재래닭 품종 간에도 일반성분 및 면역조절능에 차이가 있는 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. 농림축산식품주요통계 2015 Ministry of Agriculture. Food and Rural Affairs.
  2. Adams DO, Hamilton TA 1984 The cell biology of macrophage activation. Annu Rev Immunol 2:283-318. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.iy.02.040184.001435
  3. Ahn DH, Park SY, Kwon YJ, Sung SK 1997 Postmortem changes in myofibrillar protein in muscle of Korean native chicken. Korean J Anim Sci 39:577-586.
  4. Ahn DH, Park SY 2002 Studies on components related to taste such as free amino acids and nucleotides in Korean native chicken meat. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 31:547-552. https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2002.31.4.547
  5. AOAC 2012 Official Methods of Analysis. 19th ed, Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC.
  6. Chae HS, Chou HC, Na JC, Jang A, Kim MJ, Bang HT, Kim DW, Seo OS, Park SB, Cho SH, Kang HK 2011 Effects of raising periods on physico-chemical meat properties of chicken. Korean J Poult Sci 38:285-291. https://doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2011.38.4.285
  7. Chan KM, Decker EA 1994 Endogenous skeletal muscle antioxidants. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 34:403-426. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408399409527669
  8. Hipkiss AR, Brownson C, Carrier MJ 2001 Carnosine, the anti-ageing, anti-oxidant dipeptide, may react with protein carbonyl groups. Mech Ageing Dev 122:1431-445. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-6374(01)00272-X
  9. Janeway CJ, Medzhitov R 2002 Innate immune recognition. Annu Rev Immunol 20:197-216. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.immunol.20.083001.084359
  10. Jaturasitha S, Srikanchai T, Kreuzer M, Wicke M 2008 Difference in carcass and meat characteristics between chicken indigenous to northern Thailand (black boned and Thai native) and imported extensive breeds (Bresse and Rhode Island Red). Poult Sci 87:160-169. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2006-00398
  11. Jeon HJ, Choe JH, Jung Y, Kruk ZA, Lim DG, Jo C 2010 Comparison of the chemical composition, textural characteristics, and sensory properties of North and South Korean native chickens and commercial broilers. Korean J Food Sci Ani Resour 30:171-178. https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2010.30.2.171
  12. Kim DJ, Ryu SN, Kim HY, Kim JH, Hong SG 2011 In vivo immunological activity in fermentation with black rice bran. Korean J Food Nutr 24:273-281. https://doi.org/10.9799/ksfan.2011.24.3.273
  13. Kim YH, Min JS, Hwang GS, Lee SO, Kim IS, Bark HI, Lee MH 1999 Fatty acids composition and sensory characteristics of the commercial native chicken meat. Korean J Food Sci 31:964-970.
  14. Kweon YJ, Yeo JS, Sung SK 1995 Quality characteristics of Korean native chicken meat. Korean J Poult Sci 22: 223-231.
  15. Kwon S, Newcomb RL, George SC 2001 Mechanisms of synergistic cytokine-induced nitric oxide production in human alveolar epithelial cells. Nitric Oxide 5:534-546. https://doi.org/10.1006/niox.2001.0387
  16. Lee SG, Utama DT, Baek KH, Park YH, Han JY, Lee SK 2015 Comparison of physicochemical characteristics of the meat in four lines of Korean native chickens. Korean J Poult Sci 42:335-345. https://doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2015.42.4.335
  17. Li YF, He RR, Tsoi B, Kurihara H 2012 Bioactivities of Chicken Essence. J Food Sci 77:R105-R110. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3841.2012.02625.x
  18. Man YC, Yee CW, Shing WK, Lai TP, Ching WK, Kei KK 2005 The enhancing effects of a chicken-meat extract on serum Ig concentrations in normal and scalded animals. Br J Nutr 94:51-55.77:R105-R110.
  19. Park SB, Kang HK, Bang HT, Kim MJ, Choi HC, Chae HS, Suh OS, Na JC 2009 The study on comparison of carcass and meat quality traits in different sexes of Korean native chickens. Annal Animal Resour Sci 20:28-32.
  20. Roitt I, Brostoff J, Male D 1996 Immunology 4th ed. Mosby Schmid A 2009 Bioactive substances in meat and meat products. Fleischwirtschaft 89:83-90.
  21. Sung SK, Kwon YJ, Kim DG 1998 Postmortem changes in the physico-chemical characteristics of Korean native chicken. Korean J Poult Sci 25:55-64.
  22. Szczesniak D, Budzen S, Kopec W, Rymaszewska J 2014 Anserine and carnosine supplementation in the elderly: Effects on cognitive functioning and physical capacity. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 59:485-490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2014.04.008
  23. Tomonaga S, Yamane H, Onitsuka E, Yamada S, Sato M, Takahata Y, Morimatsu F, Furuse M 2008 Carnosine-induced antidepressant-like activity in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 89:627-632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbb.2008.02.021
  24. Yang SJ, Jung IC, Moon YH 2008 Effects of feeding citrus by products on nutritional components of Korean native chickens. J Life Sci 18:1369-1376 https://doi.org/10.5352/JLS.2008.18.10.1369
  25. Wu HC, Shiau CY, Chen HM, Chiou TK 2003 Antioxidant activities of carnosine, anserine, some free amino acids and their combination. J Food Drug Anal 11:148-153.