DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Collection Development Policy for the No Gun Ri Digital Archive

노근리 디지털 아카이브 수집정책 연구

  • Received : 2016.07.24
  • Accepted : 2016.08.22
  • Published : 2016.08.31

Abstract

A collection policy (or a collection development policy) is a document that archival institutions must have to allow them to build their collections legitimately and consistently. Digital archives often lack sustainable financial and systematic supports. Thus, it is especially important for digital archives to have a policy for consistent collection activities. Digital archives have a different set of characteristics from physical records, and these characteristics should be considered in a collection policy. This study was initiated to create such a policy for the No Gun Ri Digital Archive. It reviewed existing literature for collection policies in archives and digital archives. Moreover, it examined several cases of digital archives and their policies to identify the necessary elements as well as the legal and procedural coverages for digital content and services. Furthermore, it studied the unique characteristics of the No Gun Ri incident and the No Gun Ri Digital Archive. Based on such investigation, a collection policy for the No Gun Ri Digital Archive was suggested. It is believed that suggesting a practical collection policy will provide a useful precedent for future digital archive projects.

수집정책은 기록관리기관에서 장서를 구축하는 데 있어 법적 당위성과 내용적 일관성을 위해 반드시 필요한 문서다. 특히, 구조적, 재정적 지속성이 부족한 디지털 아카이브에서는 장서 구축의 가이드라인이 절실하다. 하지만, 디지털이라는 태생적 특성과 대다수 프로젝트 형식으로 이루어지는 디지털 아카이브의 특이성으로 인해 수집정책의 요소와 내용은 실물 기록물을 수집하는 기관의 수집정책과는 달라지게 된다. 본 연구는 노근리 디지털 아카이브를 위한 수집정책을 마련하기 위해 시작되었다. 선행연구와 이론적 배경의 분석을 바탕으로 기존의 디지털 아카이브 수집정책 사례를 조사하고, 노근리사건과 노근리 디지털 아카이브의 성격과 특성을 분석하였다. 이렇게 탐구된 내용을 기반으로 노근리 디지털 아카이브의 수집정책을 구축하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. 강민정, 이승휘 (2015). 미국 대통령기록관의 수집정책에 관한 연구. 기록학연구, 46, 233-286.(Kang, Min-Jung & Lee, Seung-Hwi (2015). A Study on the Collection Policy of Presidential Libraries and Museums in the United States. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 46, 233-286.)
  2. 구본윤 (2009). 대통령기록관의 수집정책에 관한 연구. 석사학위논문. 한국외국어대학교 대학원.(Ku, Bon-Yun (2009). A Study on the Collection Policy of Presidential Archives. M.A. Dissertation. Department of Information and Record Management, The Graduate School of Hankook University of Foreign Studies.)
  3. 김수진, 정은경 (2012). 정부출연연구기관의 연구기록물 관리를 위한 수집 개선방안에 관한 연구. 한국비블리아학회지, 23(4), 109-124.(Kim, Su Jin & Chung, Eunkyung (2012). Toward Research Records Management in Government-funded Research Institutes. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 23(4), 109-124.)
  4. 김유승, 류반디 (2015). 노근리사건 도큐멘테이션 전략 수립을 위한 예비 분석 연구. 한국기록관리학회지, 15(4), 173-194.(Kim, You-seung & Ryu, Ban-Dee (2015). A Study on the Preliminary Analysis for the No-Gun Ri Massacre Documentation Strategy. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 15(4), 173-194.) https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2015.15.4.173
  5. 김지현 (2014). 미국, 캐나다, 호주 주립기록관의 민간기록물 수집정책 분석. 한국기록관리학회지, 14(3), 105-126.(Kim, Jihyun (2014). An Analysis of Policies on the Acquisition of Private Records at State/Provincial Archives in the U. S., Canada, and Australia. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 14(3), 105-126.) https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2014.14.3.105
  6. 노시훈 (2011). 광역 문화자원의 수집과 기록: 아시아 목화문화자원을 중심으로. 기록학연구, 28, 123-153.(Noh, Shi-Hun (2011). A Collecting and Record of Wide Area Cultural Resources: the Case of Asian Cotton Cultural Resources. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 28, 123-153.)
  7. 오명진 (2012). 동시대 역사적 사건의 기록화 전략: 2004년 대통령 탄핵사건을 중심으로. 박사학위논문. 한국외국어대학교 대학원.(Oh, Myung-Jin (2012). A Study on Documentation Strategies for Contemporary Histroical Events: with a focus on the Presidential Impeachment of 2004. Ph.D. Dissertation. Department of Information and Record Management, The Graduate School of Hankook University of Foreign Studies.)
  8. 윤은하, 김유승 (2016). 노근리사건의 사회적 기억과 기록에 관한 연구. 한국기록관리학회지, 16(2), 57-79.(Youn, Eunha & Kim, You-seung (2016). Understanding No Gun Ri Records from the Perspective of Social Memory. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 16(2), 57-79.) https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2016.16.2.057
  9. 이숙경 (2007). 대통령기록관 전시․교육 프로그램 사례연구 및 운영방안. 제7회 기록관리연구회 자료집.(Lee, Sook-Kyoung (2007). A Operational Plan and Case Studies of Presidential Archives' Exhibitions and Education Programs. 7th Records Management Study Group Semina.)
  10. 이은진, 이유진, 윤은하 (2015). 영락교회 역사자료실의 수집정책 개발에 관한 연구. 한국기록관리학회지, 15(2), 137-164.(Lee, Eunjin, Lee, Yujin, & Youn, Eunha (2015). A Study on Development of the Acquisition Policy for Young-nak Church's Archives. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 15(2), 137-164.)
  11. 이정희 (2009). 병무행정 매뉴스크립트 수집정책 연구. 한국기록관리학회지, 9(1), 5-32.(Lee, Jung-Hee (2009). A Study on the Acquisition Policy of Military Affairs Administration Manuscripts. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 9(1), 5-32.)
  12. 장윤이 (2014). 인천의 근현대 역사기록물의 디지털 아카이브 구축방법 연구. 인천학연구, 20, 147-192.(Jang, Yuni (2014). Study on the Construction Method of Digital Archives of Modern archives in Incheon. The Journal of Incheon Studies, 20, 147-192.)
  13. 장윤희 (2005). 대학기록물 수집정책에 관한 연구: 한신대학교를 중심으로. 한국기록관리학회지, 5(1), 23-46.(Jang, Yun-Hee (2005). A Study on the Collection Policy of Universtiy Archives: A Case Study of Hanshin Universtiy. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 5(1), 23-46.)
  14. 정은진 (2011). 연극기록물의 수집방안 연구. 기록학연구, 29, 35-78.(Jung, Eun Jin (2011). A Study on the Acquisiton Methods of Theater Collections. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 29, 35-78.)
  15. 조용성 (2010). 구술기록의 수집과 아카이브 정책에 관한 연구. 기록학연구, 25, 233-278.(Cho, Young-Sung (2010). A Study on the Collecting Policy of Oral History Archives. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 25, 233-278.)
  16. 한수연 (2005). 기록물 수집정책의 구성요소에 관한 연구. 석사학위논문. 이화여자대학교 정보과학대학원.(Han, Soo-Yeon (2005). A Study on the Components of Archival Collection Policy. M.A. Dissertation. The Graduate School of Information Science, Ewha University.)
  17. Abraham, T. (1991). Collection Policy or Documentation Strategy: Theory and Practice. The American Archivist, 54, 44-52. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.54.1.v2323483077xr227
  18. Anderson, J. (1985). Managing Change and Chance: Collecting Policies in Social History Archives. The American Archivist, 48(3), 296-303. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.48.3.r841l17518244654
  19. Caswell, M. (2014). Toward a Survivor-Centered Approach to Records Documenting Human Rights Abuses: Lessons from Community Archives. Archival Science, 14, 307-322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-014-9220-6
  20. Contnet Innovations (2009). Report to National Geospatial Digital Archive Regarding Geospatial Data Treatment in Data Format Registry Efforts. Retrieved July 12, 2016, from http://www.ngda.org/docs/CINGDAfindingspub121509.pdf
  21. Cox, R. J. (1989). A Documentation Strategy Case Study: Western New York. The American Archivist, 52, 192-200. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.52.2.6280321313744409
  22. Cramer, Tom (2009). The Stanford Digital Repository: Lessons Learned-A Report for NDIIPP. Retrieved July 12, 2016, from http://www.ngda.org/docs/SDRLessonsInPreservation.pdf
  23. Endelman, J. (1987). Looking Backward to Plan for the Future: Collection Analysis for Manuscript Repositories. The American Archivist, 50(3), 340-355. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.50.3.m24760mh124r6u3w
  24. Erwin, T., Sweetkind-Singer, J., & Larsgaard, M. L. (2009). The National Geospatial Digital Archives--Collection Development: Lessons Learned. Library Trends, 57(3), 490-515. https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.0.0049
  25. Grabowski, J. (1985). Fragments or Components: Theme Collections in a Local Setting. The American Archivist, 48(3), 304-314. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.48.3.j552384783776157
  26. Haas, J. K. & Samuels, H. W. (1986). The MIT Appraisal Project and Its Broader Implications. The American Archivist, 49, 310-314.
  27. Hackman, L. J. & Warnow-Blewett, J. (1987). The Documentation Strategy Process: A Model and a Case Study. The American Archivist, 50(1), 12-47. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.50.1.uxr6766121033766
  28. Ham, F. G. (1975). The Archival Edge. The American Archivist, 38(1), 5-13. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.38.1.7400r86481128424
  29. Henry, L. J. (1980). Collecting Policies of Special-Subject Repositories. The American Archivist, 43(1), 57-63. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.43.1.3751153111118078
  30. Janee, Greg, Sweetkind-Singer, Julie, & Moore, Terry (2009). Final Report of the National Geospatial Digital Archive (NGDA) and Federated Archive Cyberinfrastructure Testbed (FACIT) Projects. Retrieved July 12, 2016, from http://www.ngda.org/docs/ngda-final-report.pdf
  31. Kennedy, J. (2005). A collection development policy for digital information resources? The Australian Library Journal, 54(3), 238-244. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049670.2005.10721761
  32. Momryk, M. (2001). "National Significance": The Evolution and Development of Acquisition Strategies in the Manuscript Division, National Archives of Canada. Archivaria, 52(1), 151-174.
  33. National September 11 Memorial & Museum (2011). Collections Management Policy. Retrieved July 12, 2016, from http://www.911memorial.org/sites/all/files/2013_CollectionsPolicy_0.pdf
  34. NDGA (2007). Collection Development Policy for the National Geospatial Digital Archive: Node, Branner Earth Science Library and Map Collections (Branner), Stanford University. Retrieved July 12, 2016, from http://www.ngda.org/docs/SU_CDP_5_07.pdf
  35. NGDA (2006). Collection Development Policy for the National Geospatial Digital Archive (Final Version). Retrieved July 12, 2016, from http://www.ngda.org/docs/NGDA_Collection_Development_Policy.pdf
  36. NISO Framework Working Group (2007). A Framework of Guidance for Building Good Digital Collections. Baltimore, MD: National Information Standards Organization (NISO).
  37. Phillips, F. (1984). Developing Collecting Policies for Manuscript Collections. The American Archivist, 47(1), 30-42. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.47.1.x07k74g7331762q2
  38. Phillips, F. (1995). Congressional Papers: Collection Development Policies. The American Archivist, 58, 258-269. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.58.3.lh733452uv674280
  39. Reed-Scott, J. (1984). Collection Management Strategies for Archivists. The American Archivist, 47(1), 23-29. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.47.1.wt6721l537810j13
  40. SAADA (2015a). About. August 11, 2016, from https://www.saada.org/about
  41. SAADA (2015b). FAQ. August 11, 2016, from https://www.saada.org/faq
  42. Samuels, H. W. (1986). Who Controls the Past. The American Archivist, 49, 109-124. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.49.2.t76m2130txw40746
  43. Sauer, C. K. (2001). Doing the Best We Can? The Use of Collection Development Policies and Cooperative Collecting Activiies at Manuscript Repositories. The American Archivist, 64, 308-349. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.64.2.gj6771215231xm37
  44. Smyth, E. B. (1999). A Practical Approach To Writing a Collection Development Policy. Rare Books & Manuscripts Librarianship, 14(1), 27-31.
  45. Stevens, M., Flinn, A., & Shepherd, E. (2010). New Frameworks for Community Engagement in the Archives Sector: From Handing Over to Handing On. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 16, 59-76. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527250903441770
  46. Syracuse University (2010a). Pan Am Flight 103/Lockerbie Air Disaster Archives at Syracuse University Collection Policy. Retrieved July 12, 2016, from http://archives.syr.edu/panam/policy_pa103_collection.pdf
  47. Syracuse University (2010b). The Pan Am Flight 103 Story Archives Collection: Written Narratives. Retrieved July 10, 2016, from http://archives.syr.edu/panam/story_archives/wn.html
  48. Terranova, T. (2000). Free Labor: Producing Culture for the Digital Economy. Social Text, 18(2), 34-58.
  49. Wakimoto, D., Bruce, C., & Patridge, H. (2013). Archivist as Activist: Lessons from Three Queer Community Archives in California. Archival Science, 13(4), 293-316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-013-9201-1
  50. Zinn, H. (1977). Secrecy, Archives and the Public Interest. Midwestern Archivist, 2(2), 14-26.