DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparative Analysis of Requirements for Information Presentation on In-vehicle Display Systems by Driving Career

운전 경력에 따른 차량 내 디스플레이 정보표시 요구사항 비교

  • Gu, Bo Ram (Technology & Design Research Center, School of Integrated Technology, Yonsei Institute of Convergence Technology, Yonsei University) ;
  • Ju, Da Young (Technology & Design Research Center, School of Integrated Technology, Yonsei Institute of Convergence Technology, Yonsei University)
  • 구보람 (연세대학교 글로벌융합기술원 글로벌융합공학부 기술과디자인연구센터) ;
  • 주다영 (연세대학교 글로벌융합기술원 글로벌융합공학부 기술과디자인연구센터)
  • Received : 2016.08.22
  • Accepted : 2016.08.30
  • Published : 2016.11.01

Abstract

The accelerated convergence of automobiles and ICT has led to an increase in in-vehicle electronic devices designed to enhance the safety and convenience of drivers. Consequently, the information presentation on in-vehicle display systems for drivers and passengers need to be taken into account in order to guarantee driving stability while satisfying the needs of UX-based design users. This study compared and evaluated requirements for information items shown on in-vehicle displays regarding driving safety and convenience by groups according to driving career. A total of 38 information items related to safety and convenience that can be displayed while driving and pulling over were collected. Their level of necessity was tested and evaluated by 234 drivers. Using the results, we conducted a comparative analysis on the requirements for information presentation on in-vehicle display systems by groups according to driving career.

Keywords

References

  1. H. S. Kim, K. T. Jung and D. H. Lee, "A Study on the Menu Type of Instrument Cluster IVIS," Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea, Vol.32, No.2, pp.189-198, 2013. https://doi.org/10.5143/JESK.2013.32.2.189
  2. T. Y. Koo, B. Y. Kim, S. H. Ji, C. H. Bae, J. H. Park and M. W. Suh, "A Study on Workload of Using Telematics while Driving," Transactions of KSAE, Vol.17, No.2, pp.26-33, 2009.
  3. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Visual Manual NHTSA Driver Distraction Guidelines for In-vehicle Electronic Devices, NHTSA-2014-0088, 2014.
  4. Right Brain, UX Trend Report 2014 Connected_Car, http://www.slideshare.net/kimtaesook/ux-trendreport-2014-connectedcar?qid=17add91b-a0aa-4cfa-a779-612bc823ec02&v=&b=&from_search=1, 2015.
  5. F. D. Davis, "Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology," MIS Quarterly, Vol.13, No.3, pp.319-340, 1989. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  6. P. Green, Measures and Methods Used to Assess the Safety and Usability of Driver Information Systems, Technical Report FHWA-RD-94-088, McLean, VA: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, 1995.
  7. Y. Yan, The Effects of Increased Workload on Driving Performance and Visual Behavior, Ph. D. Dissertation, University of Southampton, Southampton, 2011.
  8. B. Pfleging and A. Schmidt, "(Non-) Drivingrelated Activities in the Car: Defining Driver Activities for Manual and Automated Driving," CHI'15, Seoul, 2015.
  9. W. W. Wierwille, "Demands on Driver Resources Associated with Introducing Advanced Technology into the Vehicle," Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol.1, Issue 2, pp.133-142, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1016/0968-090X(93)90010-D