DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Assembly strategies of wind turbine towers for minimum fatigue damage

  • Received : 2017.03.28
  • Accepted : 2017.11.13
  • Published : 2017.12.25

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to present a method to obtain the dynamic response of a wind turbine tower in time domain by means of the generation of time series and to estimate the associated fatigue damage by means of a Rainflow counting algorithm. The proposed method is based on assuming the vortex shedding is a bidimensional phenomena and on following a classical modal superposition method to obtain the structure dynamic response. Four different wind turbine tower geometric configurations have been analyzed in a range of usual wind velocities and covering extreme wind velocities. The obtained results have shown that, depending on the turbulence intensity and the mean wind velocity, there are tower geometric configurations more advantageous from the fatigue load standpoint. Consequently, the presented model can be utilized to define assembly strategies oriented to fatigue damage minimization.

Keywords

References

  1. ASTM (1985), Standard Practices for Cycle Counting in Fatigue Analysis, Technical Report ASTM Standard E1049-85, ASTM International.
  2. Belver, A.V., Iban, A.L. and Martin, C.E.L. (2012), "Coupling between structural and fluid dynamic problems applied to vortex shedding in a 90 m steel chimney", J. Wind Eng. Industr. Aerodyn., 100(1), 30-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2011.10.007
  3. Berny-Brandt, E.A. and Ruiz, S.E. (2016), "Reliability over time of wind turbines steel towers subjected to fatigue", Wind Struct., 3(1), 75-90.
  4. Chen, X. (2013), "Estimation of stochastic crosswind response of wind-excited tall buildings with nonlinear aerodynamic damping", Eng. Struct., 56, 766-778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.05.044
  5. Chen, X. (2014), "Analysis of crosswind fatigue of wind-excited structures with nonlinear aerodynamic damping", Eng. Struct., 74, 145-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.04.049
  6. Dyrbye, C. and Hansen, S. (1997), Wind Loads on Structures, Wiley.
  7. E1049-85, A.S. (1985), Standard Practices for Cycle Counting in Fatigue Analysis, Annual Book of ASTM Standars, ASTM International, 3.
  8. Eurocode-1 (2010), Actions on Structures. Part 1-4: General Actions- Wind Actions, Technical Report BS EN 1991-1-4:2005+A1:2010, British Standards.
  9. Gorski, P. (2009), "Some aspects of the dynamic cross-wind response of tall industrial chimney", Wind Struct., 12(3), 259-279. https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2009.12.3.259
  10. Hansen, S. (1998), "Vortex-Induced vibrations of line-like structures", CICIND Rep., 15(4), 15-23.
  11. IEC-61400-1 (2003), Part 1: Safety Requirements, Wind Turbine Generator Systems IEC 61400-1, Edition 3, International Electrotechnical Commission.
  12. Llorente Gonzalez, J.I. (2006), Tool for Preventing the Vortex Effect, WO Patent App. PCT/ES2006/000,148.
  13. Nguyen, T.C., Huynh, T.C. and Kim, J.T. (2015), "Numerical evaluation for vibration-based damage detection in wind turbine tower structure", Wind Struct., 21(6), 657-675. https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2015.21.6.657
  14. Nguyen, T.C., Huynh, T.C., Yi, J.H. and Kim, J.T. (2017), "Hybrid bolt-loosening detection in wind turbine tower structures by vibration and impedance responses", Wind Struct., 24(4), 385-403. https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2017.24.4.385
  15. Nies lony, A. (2009), "Determination of fragments of multiaxial service loading strongly in uencing the fatigue of machine components", Mech. Syst. Sign. Proc., 23(8), 2712-2721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2009.05.010
  16. Ragan, P. and Manuel, L. (2007), "Comparing estimates of wind turbine fatigue loads using timedomain and spectral methods", Wind Eng., 31(2), 83-99. https://doi.org/10.1260/030952407781494494
  17. Repetto, M.P. and Solari, G. (2002), "Dynamic crosswind fatigue of slender vertical structures", Wind Struct., 5(6), 527-542. https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2002.5.6.527
  18. Repetto, M.P. and Solari, G. (2010), "Wind-induced fatigue collapse of real slender structures", Eng. Struct., 32(12), 3888-3898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.09.002
  19. Ruscheweyh, H. (1994), Vortex Excited Vibrations, in Wind-Excited Vibrations of Structures, Springer, 51-84.
  20. Shinozuka, M. and Deodatis, G. (1991), "Simulation of stochastic processes by spectral representation", Appl. Mech. Rev., 44(4), 191-204. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3119501
  21. Tranvik, P. and Alpsten, G. (2002), Dynamic Behaviour under Wind Loading of a 90 m Steel Chimney, Report 9647-3, Alstom Power Station AB.
  22. Trivellato, F. and Castelli, M.R. (2015), "Appraisal of Strouhal number in wind turbine engineering", Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 49, 795-804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.127
  23. Veers, P.S. (1988), Three-Dimensional Wind Simulation, Technical Report SAND-88-0152C, Sandia National Labs., Albuquerque, NM, U.S.A.
  24. Verboom, G. and Van Koten, H. (2010), "Vortex excitation: Three design rules tested on 13 industrial chimneys", J. Wind Eng. Industr. Aerodyn., 98(3), 145-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2009.10.008
  25. Vickery, B. and Basu, R. (1983a), "Across-wind vibrations of structure of circular cross-section. Part II. Development of a mathematical model for full-scale application", J. Wind Eng. Industr. Aerodyn., 12(1), 75-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(83)90081-8
  26. Vickery, B. and Basu, R. (1983b), "Across-wind vibrations of structures of circular cross-section. Part I. Development of a mathematical model for two-dimensional conditions", J. Wind Eng. Industr. Aerodyn., 12(1), 49-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(83)90080-6
  27. Vickery, B. and Basu, R. (1984), "The response of reinforced concrete chimneys to vortex shedding", Eng. Struct., 6(4), 324-333. https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-0296(84)90030-0
  28. Vickery, B.J. and Clark, A.W. (1972), "Lift or across-wind response to tapered stacks", J. Struct. Div., 98(1), 1-20.

Cited by

  1. Alternative steel lattice structures for wind energy converters vol.12, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1108/ijsi-05-2019-0042