Journal of the Korea Convergence Society (한국융합학회논문지)

Korea Convergence Society (한국융합학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Influence of College Student' Leadership Behavior Characteristics on Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Moderating Effect of Self-Efficacy

대학생의 리더십 행동 특성이 조직시민행동에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구: 자기효능감의 조절효과

  • Kim, Jae-Boong (School of Business, Trade & Social Welfare, Korea National University of Transportation)
  • 김재붕 (한국교통대학교 경영.통상.복지학부)
  • Received : 2017.10.10
  • Accepted : 2017.12.20
  • Published : 2017.12.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study is one on the effect of leadership behavior characteristics in Korea and China on organizational citizenship behavior by means of moderating effect of self-efficacy. This study conducted analysis using PLS as methodology. This study conducted analysis on the effect of leadership behavior characteristics in Korea and China on organizational citizenship behavior. It was found in both Korea and China that leadership behavior characteristics makes positive influence on organizational citizenship behavior but without moderating effect of self-efficacy. Results of this study could be practically used in educational institutions in charge of leadership training, besides college students, and help seeking for direction to nurture basic attainments on leader's behavior characteristics.

본 연구는 한국과 중국의 리더십 행동 특성이 조직시민행동에 미치는 영향에 미치는 요인을 파악한 연구로 PLS 방법을 사용하여 분석을 수행하였다. 본 연구는 한국과 중국 대학생을 대상으로 리더십 행동 특성이 조직시민행동에 미치는 영향에 대한 분석을 수행 하였다. 리더십 행동 특성이 조직시민행동에 긍정적 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났으며, 조절효과는 없는 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구의 결과는 대학생들 외에도 리더십에 대한 교육을 진행하고 있는 교육기관에서 실무적으로 활용이 가능할 것으로 보이며, 리더의 행동 특성에 대한 기본적인 소양을 함양하기 위한 방향성을 모색하는데 도움을 줄 수 있을 것으로 보인다.

Keywords

References

  1. Parise JJ. The effect of systematic training in leadership skills on the leadership potential of selected gifted high school students. UMI Dissertation Services. A Bell & Howell Company: Michigan, 1988.
  2. Sims Jr PR, Lorenzi P. The new leadership paradigm. Sage Publications. Ins: Newbury Park, 1992.
  3. Baker RW, Siryk B. Measuring academic of motivation of matriculating college freshman. Journal of College Student Personnal. 1984, 25, pp. 459-64.
  4. Knott JE, Dahler DM. A Structured group program for new students. Journal of College Student Personnel. 1978, 19, pp. 456-61.
  5. Lee N. The Effect of the Leadership Group-Activity on College Students' Leadership and Self-Esteem. The Korea Journal of Counseling 2005, 6(2), pp. pp. 387-99
  6. Lee JM, Bae JH, Kim KG. The effect of Job Characteristics, Volunteering Satisfaction and Empowerment on Organizational Citizenship Behavior of undergraduate students. Korean journal of youth studies. 2012, 19(6), pp. 227-248.
  7. Kim HJ. A Study on Relations among Ethics Management, Organization Citizenship Behavior and Business Performance of Medical Institutions Establishing Medical Tourism. Journal of Industrial Economics and Business. 2012, 25(1), pp. 41-64
  8. Kang EJ. Volunteer Satisfaction, Trust and Organizational Citizenship Behavior in Volunteer Organizations, Master's thesis, Chungbuk National University, 2005.
  9. Park EM, Park ST. The Effectiveness of Absorptive Capacity Formation Mechanism on Innovation Performance by Industry. Indian Journal of Science and Technology. 2015, 8(21), pp.1-9.
  10. Kim JB. The relationship between leadership traits, Team climate and creative behavior of organizational member's : the moderating effect of self-efficacy. Korea Business Review. 2011, 70, pp. 495-522
  11. Kim JB, Park SH, Kang SD. A Study on the Difference in Leadership Recognition in Korea vs China: Focusing on Questionnaire Survey. Indian Journal of Science and Technology. 2016, 9(26), pp.1-8.
  12. Organ DW. Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome, Lexington MA: Lexington Books, 1988.
  13. Lee SK. The Impact of Multi-Form Organizational Commitment on Organizational Citizenship Behavior - The Moderating Role of Self-Efficacy. Korea Service Industry Academy. 2008, 4(2), pp. 1-15.
  14. Organ DW, Ryan K. A Meta-Analytic Review of Attitudinal and Dispositional Predictors of Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Personnel Psychology. 1995, 48, pp. 775- 802. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1995.tb01781.x
  15. Somech A, Drach-Zahavy A. Understanding extra-role behavior in schools: the relationships between job satisfaction, sense of efficacy, and teachers' extra-role behavior. Teaching and Teacher Education. 2000, 16, pp. 649-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(00)00012-3
  16. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review. 1977, 84(2), pp. 191-215 https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
  17. Matsui, Tsukamoto. Relation between career self-efficacy measures based on occupational titles and Holland codes and model environments: A methodological contribution. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 1991, 38, pp. 78-91 https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791(91)90019-I
  18. Bandura A. Jourden FJ. Self-regulatory mechanisms governing the impact of social comparison on complex decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1991, 60, pp. 941-51. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.6.941
  19. Eden D. Pygmalion, goal setting, and expectancy: Compatible ways to raise productivity. Academy of Management Review. 1988, 13, pp. 639-52. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1988.4307530
  20. Lee JC. The Effects of Leader's Consideration and LMX on Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Perceived Performance Rating. Korea Journal of Business Administration. 2009, 22(5), pp. 2979-98.
  21. Yang CY, JI SH, Kang YS. Multi-Mediation of Self-efficacy and Learning Goal Orientation in the links Superior's Communication Ability and Innovative Behavior. The Korea Contents Society. 2015, 15(12), pp. 572-85. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2015.15.12.572
  22. Fornell C, Larcker DF. Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research. 1981, 18(1), pp. 39-50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
  23. Chin WW, Gopal A. Adoption Intention in GSS: Relative Importance of Beliefs. DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems. 1995, 26, pp. 42-64. https://doi.org/10.1145/217278.217285
  24. Nunnally. Psychometric theory. MacGraw-Hill: New York, 1978.