DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of Community-Based SSI Programs on Promoting Middle School Students' Understanding of Issues and Character and Values as Citizens: Focused on Fine Dust Issues

지역사회연계 미세먼지 교육프로그램이 중학생들의 이슈에 대한 이해와 시민으로서의 인성과 가치관 함양에 미치는 효과

  • Received : 2017.09.24
  • Accepted : 2017.11.03
  • Published : 2017.12.31

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to investigate the effects of community-based SSI programs (SSI-COMM) regarding "fine dust" on promoting middle school students' understanding of community issues and their character and values as citizens. SSI-COMM on fine dust was implemented in 4 middle schools located in Seoul, and 151 7th graders participated in the program lasting over 8 weeks. Data was collected through two questionnaires (i.e. students' understanding of issues, and character and values as citizens) and individual interviews with selected students. Results indicated that there were statistically significant increases in their understanding of fine dust issue after the program. In addition, the program significantly contributed to enhancing students' character and values, especially in the domains of social and moral compassion and socioscientific accountability. Student interviews revealed that they became more aware of the local community problems caused by fine dusts and started to consider what efforts should be made to solve them. They also felt individual responsibility for the occurrence of fine dust, and the need for participation and practice of community activities for vulnerable groups in affected areas.

본 연구는 미세먼지 이슈를 중심으로 학교와 지역사회를 연계하는 과학교육 프로그램(SSI-COMM)을 개발하고 중학교 자유학기제에 적용하여 학생들의 지역사회 속 미세먼지 이슈에 대한 이해도와 인성적 태도 및 가치관에 미치는 교육적 효과를 탐색하였다. 서울시 자유학기제에 참여하는 4개 학교에서 총 151명의 학생들이 8회(16차시)에 걸쳐 프로그램에 참여하였다. 미세먼지 프로그램의 교육적 효과와 학생들의 참여 경험을 탐색하기 위해, 과학이슈에 대한 이해도 및 인성과 가치관을 측정하는 검사를 실시하였으며, 참여 학생 일부와의 개별 면담을 실시하였다. 연구 결과, 본 프로그램은 학생들이 미세먼지와 관련된 지식을 습득하는 데에 통계적으로 유의미한 효과가 있었다. 시민으로서의 인성과 가치관에 있어서는 생태학적 세계관 영역을 제외하고 사회 도덕적 공감, 과학관련 사회쟁점에 대한 책무성 영역에서 통계적으로 유의미한 향상이 있었다. 면담결과, 학생들은 본 프로그램을 통해 미세먼지가 자신이 속한 지역에 어떠한 문제를 야기하는지, 이를 해결하기 위해서는 어떤 노력을 해야 하는지 등에 대해 이해하게 되었고, 미세먼지의 발생에 개인의 책임감을 느끼고 미세먼지로 인해 피해를 입은 지역의 취약계층을 위한 지역사회활동의 참여와 실천의 필요성을 느끼게 되었음을 알 수 있었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Anderson, D., & Lucas, K. B. (1997). The effectiveness of orienting students to the physical features of a science museum prior to visitation. Research in Science Education, 27(4), 485-495. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02461476
  2. Barton, A. C., & Tan, E. (2010). We be burnin’! Agency, identity, and science learning. Journal of the Learning Science, 19(2), 187-229. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400903530044
  3. Bencze, L. (2017). Science and technology education promoting wellbeing for individuals, societies and environments: STEPWISE. Dordrecht: Springer.
  4. Birmingham, D., & Barton A. C. (2014). Putting on a green carnival: Youth taking educated action on socioscientific issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(3), 286-314. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21127
  5. Bouillion, L. M., & Gomez, L. M. (2001). Connecting school and community with science learning: Real world problems and school-community partnerships as contextual scaffolds. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(8), 878-898. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.1037
  6. Bowers, C. (1999). Changing the dominant cultural perspective in education. In G.A. Smith & D.R. Williams (Eds.), Ecological education in action: On weaving education, culture, and the environment (pp. 161-178). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
  7. Catalano, R. F., Oesterle, S., Fleming, C. B., & Hawkins, D. (2004). The importance of bonding to school for healthy development: Findings from the social development research group. Journal of School Health, 74(7), 252-261. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.2004.tb08281.x
  8. Cheak, M., Volk, T., & Hungerford, H. (2002). Mlolkai: An investment in children, the community, and the environment. Carbondale, IL: Center for Instruction, Staff Development, and Evaluation.
  9. Cheong, C. (2007). The effects of knowledge, beliefs and attitudes about environment on issue-based environmental problem solving in middle schools. The Environmental Education, 20(1), 118-130.
  10. Choe, J., & Lee, Y. (2015). A study on the impact of PM2.5 emissions on respiratory diseases. Journal of Environmental Policy and Adminstration, 23(4), 155-172. https://doi.org/10.15301/jepa.2015.23.4.155
  11. Colucci-Gray, L., Barbiero, G. E. C., & Gray, D. (2006). From scientific literacy to sustainability literacy: An ecological framework for education. Science Education, 90, 227-252. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20109
  12. Elmose, S., & Roth, W. M. (2005). Allgemeinbildung: Readiness for living in risk society. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(1), 11-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027041000229413
  13. Greene, J. C. (2007). Mixed methods in social inquiry. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.
  14. Hudson, D. (1999). Going beyond cultural pluralism: Science education for sociopolitical action. Science Education, 83(6), 775-796. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199911)83:6<775::AID-SCE8>3.0.CO;2-8
  15. Hudson, D. (2003). Time for action: Science education for an alternative future. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 645-670. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690305021
  16. Knapp, C. E. (2008). Place-based curricular and pedagogical models: My adventures in teaching through community contexts, In D. A. Gruenewald & G. A. Smith (Eds.), Place-based education in the global age: Local diversity (pp. 5-28). NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  17. Lee, H., Chang, H., Choi, K., Kim, S., & Zeidler, D. L. (2012). Developing character and values for global citizens: Analysis of pre-service science teachers’ moral reasoning on socioscientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 34(6), 925-953. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.625505
  18. Lee, H., Yoo, J., Choi, K., Kim, S., Krajcik, J., Herman, B. C., & Zeidler. D. L. (2013). Socioscientific issues as a vehicle for promoting character and values for global citizens. International Journal of Science Education, 35(12), 2079-2113. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.749546
  19. Lee, S., & Chang, N. (1993). The effect of the environmental education strategy through personalization of environment. The Korean Society for Environmental Education, 5, 71-88.
  20. Lickona, T. (1996). Eleven principles of effective character education. Journal of Moral Education, 25(1), 93-100. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305724960250110
  21. Lim M., & Barton, A. C. (2010). Exploring insideness in urban children’s sense of place. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(3), 328-337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.03.002
  22. Millar, R. (2006). Twenty first century science: Insights from the design and implementation of a scientific literacy approach in school science. International Journal of Science Education, 28(13), 1499-1521. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600718344
  23. Millar, R., & Osborne, J. (1998). Beyond 2000: Science education for the future. King's College London: Fulmar Colour Printing Company Limited.
  24. Ministry of Education. (2015). 2015 revised national science curriculum in Korea. Ministry of Education.
  25. Morgan, A. (2011). Place-based education versus geography education? In G. Butt (Ed.), Geography, education and the future (pp. 84-108). NY: Continuum International Publishing Group.
  26. Olsen J. K., Cox-Peterson, A. M., & McComas, W. F. (2001). The inclusion of informal environments in science teacher preparation. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 12(3), 155-173. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016715127697
  27. Orr, D. (1992). Place and pedagogy. In M. K. Stone & Z. Barlow, Z. (Eds.), Ecological literacy: Educating our children for a sustainable world (pp. 85-95). Oakland: Sierra Club Books.
  28. Park, E. (2007). Health risk assessment of fine particles and their hazardous chemicals. Unpublished doctorial dissertation, Dongduk Women's University, Korea.
  29. Park, S. (2014). A study on the evaluation of the awareness and the development of environmental education program about the particulate matter in the ambient air: Focused on middle school students. Unpublished master dissertation, Yonsei University, Korea.
  30. Park, S., & Shin, H. (2017). Analysis of the factors influencing PM2.5 in Korea: Focusing on seasonal factors. Journal of Environmental Policy and Adminstration, 25(1), 227-248. https://doi.org/10.15301/jepa.2017.25.1.227
  31. Pittman, K. J., & Fleming, W. P. (1991). A new vision: Promoting youth development. Center for Youth Development and Policy Research. Washington DC.
  32. Powers, A. L. (2004). An evaluation of four place-based education programs. Reports & Research, 35(4), 17-32.
  33. Roth, W. M. (2003). Scientific literacy as an emergent feature of collective human praxis. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 35(1), 9-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270210134600
  34. Roth, W. M. (2009). Activism or science/technology education as byproduct of capacity building. Journal for Activism in Science & Technology Education, 1(1), 16-31.
  35. Roth, W. M., & Lee, S. (2004). Science education as/for participation in the community. Science Education, 88(2), 263-294. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10113
  36. Ruiz, P. O., & Vallejos, R. M. (1999). The role of compassion in moral education. Journal of Moral Education, 28(1), 5-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/030572499103278
  37. Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2005). Patterns of informal reasoning in the context of socioscientific decision making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(1), 112-138. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20042
  38. Smith, G. A. (2002). Place-based education. Phi Delta Kappan, 83(8), 584-594. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170208300806
  39. Smith, G. A., & Sobel, D. (2010). Place-and community-based education in schools. NY: Routledge.
  40. Smith, G. A., & Williams, D. R. (1999). Ecological education in action: On weaving education, culture, and the environment. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
  41. Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., & Kalof, L. (1993). Value orientations, gender, and environmental concern. Environment & Behavior, 25, 322-348. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916593255002
  42. Stevenson, K. T. (2014). Role of significant life experiences in building environmental knowledge and behavior among middle school students. The Journal of Environmental Education, 45(3), 163-177. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2014.901935
  43. Tal, T., & Abramovitch, A. (2013). Activity and action: Bridging environmental sciences and environmental education. Research in Science Education, 43(4), 1665-1687. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-012-9327-9
  44. Theobald, P., & Curtiss, J. (2000). Communities as curricula. Forum for Applied Research and Public Policy, 15(1), 106-111.
  45. Yoon, O. (2016). Practices of place-based environmental education in a general education course for pre-service elementary teachers. The Journal of the Korean Association of Geographic and Environmental Education, 24(1), 139-150. https://doi.org/10.17279/jkagee.2016.24.1.139
  46. Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Simmons, M. L., & Howes, E. V. (2005). Beyond STS: A research-based framework for socio-scientific issues education. Science Education, 89(3), 357-377. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20048

Cited by

  1. 공과대학 학생을 위한 과학기술관련 사회·윤리 쟁점기반 수업이 인성과 가치관에 미치는 효과 탐색 vol.23, pp.3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.18108/jeer.2020.23.3.3
  2. 수직정원을 활용한 초등학교 식물교육프로그램 운영 효과 분석 vol.23, pp.5, 2017, https://doi.org/10.13087/kosert.2020.23.5.73
  3. 과학교육과 지속가능발전교육 접목 프로그램이 고등학생의 세계관에 미치는 영향 vol.13, pp.3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.15523/jksese.2020.13.3.253
  4. 지역환경문제에 관한 사회과학쟁점 토론이 고등학교 학생들의 환경인식 변화에 미치는 영향 vol.13, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.15523/jksese.2020.13.3.284