Journal of Science Education (과학교육연구지)

Science Education Research Institute Kyungpook National University (경북대학교 과학교육연구소)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Exploring the Possibility of Applying Social and Emotional Learning to Science Subjects: Analysis of Social Emotional Learning Contents in Science Textbooks

과학교과의 사회정서학습(Social and Emotional Learning) 적용 가능성 탐색: 과학 교과서의 과학과 사회정서학습 요소 분석

  • Received : 2017.06.30
  • Accepted : 2017.12.14
  • Published : 2017.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the possibility of Science Social and Emotional Learning(SSEL). The factors of SSEL were suggested, and by utilizing them, the contents of middle school's science and Chemistry 1 textbook were analyzed. The factors are as follow: numeracy, information and communication technology, critical thinking, creative thinking, personal and social capability, ethical understanding, and intercultural understanding. The results showed that the 60~70% of textbooks put emphasis on numeracy, information and communication technology, critical thinking, creative thinking while some factors were limited in th contents, which were personal and social capability, ethical understanding, and intercultural understanding. Therefore, teacher should try to reconstruct the teaching and learning materials and fill in the deficiencies of SSEL factors through class activities. In addition, it is suggested to study specific application methods such as science activities or experiment activities in detail to meet social and emotional learning.

본 논문은 과학과에서 사회정서학습(Science Social and Emotional Learning, SSEL)의 적용 가능성을 탐색하기 위하여 과학과 사회정학습 요소를 제안하고, 그에 따라 중학교 과학 교과서의 물질 분야 및 고등학교 화학I 교과서의 내용을 분석하였다. 과학과 사회정서학습의 가능성과 필요성은 과학교육의 목표인 과학적 소양과 과학의 본성에서 찾을 수 있었다. 과학과 사회정서학습의 요소는 '수리(Numeracy),' '정보통신활용(Information and Communication Technology, ICT),' '비판적 사고(Critical Thinking),' '창의적 사고(Creative Thinking),' '사회적 기술(Personal and Social Capability),' '윤리적 이해(Ethical Understanding),' '문화적 이해(Intercultural Understanding)' 등으로 구분하여 제시하였고, 그에 따라 과학 교과서 중 물질의 분야 및 화학I 교과서의 내용을 분석하였다. 분석 결과에 따르면, 과학과 물질분야의 교과서 내용 및 화학I 교과서의 내용에 수리, 정보통신활용, 비판적 사고, 창의적 사고가 60~70% 이상 포함되어 있으나, 사회적 기술능력, 윤리적 이해 능력, 문화적 이해 능력 등은 제한적으로 반영된 것으로 나타났다. 교과서의 부족한 요소들에 대해서는 추후 교과서의 내용의 수정 또는 교사의 수업을 통한 보완 등이 필요하다. 또한 과학 교과에서 얻고자 하는 과학적 탐구 능력과 사회정서적 역량을 동시에 기를 수 있는 과학과 활동이나 실험 활동 등 구체적인 적용 방안에 대한 연구가 필요하다.

Keywords

References

  1. American Association for the Advancement of Science [AAAS]. (1989). Project 2061: Science for all Americans. Washington, DC: Author.
  2. Aikenhead, G. S. (2006). Science education for everyday life: Evidence-based practice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  3. Australian Primary Schools Mental Health Initiative (2010). Components social and emotional learning for students. Retrieved from https://www.kidsmatter.edu.au/sites/default/files/public/KidsMatterComponent_InformationPack.pdf
  4. Baek, Y., Park, H., KiM, Y., Noh, W., Park, J., Lee, J., Jeong, J., Choi, H., & Han, H. (2011). STEAM education in Korea. Journal of Learner Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 11(4), 149-171.
  5. Barrectine, C. D. (1986). Science education: Education in, or about science? Science Education, 70(5), 407-499.
  6. Berkowitz, M. W., & Simmons, P. (2003). Integrating science education and character education. In D. L. Zeilder (Ed.), The role of moral reasoning on semiscientific issues and discourse in science education (pp. 117-138). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  7. Blakr, C. (2002). School readiness: Integrating cognition and emotion in neurobiological conceptualization of children's functioning at school entry. American Psycologist, 57, 111-127. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.57.2.111
  8. Brandt, R. S. (1999). Successful implementation of SEL programs: Lessons from the thinking skills movement. In J. Cohen (Ed.), Educating hearts and minds: Social emotional learning and the passage into adolescence (pp.173-183). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  9. Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning [CASEL]. (2012). Safe and sound: An educational leader's guide to evidence-based social and emotional learning programs. Chicago, IL: Author.
  10. Catalono, R., Berglund, M. L., Ryan, J. A., Lonczak, H. S., & Hawkins, J. D. (2002). Positive youth development in the United States: Research findings on evaluation of positive youth development programs. Prevention and Treatment, 5, N, P.
  11. Cha. K. (2013). A study on setting up the concept of character education (Master's thesis). Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
  12. Cheek. D. W. (1992). Thinking constructively about science, technology, and society education, Albany, New York, NY: State University of New Press.
  13. Cheon, H. (2015). Democratic students become citizens. CCTODAY.
  14. Cho, M. (2016). Responsibility and character, Herald Economic.
  15. Cho, N. (2017). Social and emotional Learning for Character Education. Education.
  16. Choi, I. (2015). Narrative based subject-integration character education for the social emotional learning. Journal of Korean Language Education, 36, 337-360.
  17. Choi, S. (2016). Character Education as a historic discourse. The Korean Journal of Philosophy of Education, 37(2), 179-197.
  18. Choi, Y., Kim I., & Im S. (2015). The relationships between moral sensitivity and preference for science, belief about learning science of middle school students. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 35(1), 65-72. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2015.35.1.0065
  19. Coie, J. D., Miller-John, S., & Bagwell, C. (2002). Prevention science. In A. J. Sameroff, M. Lewis, & S. M. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of developmental psychopathology (pp. 309-108). New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
  20. Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing Scientific Knowledge in the Classroom. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 5-12. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X023007005
  21. Durlak, J. A., & Weissberg, R. P. (2007). The impact of after-school program that promote personal and social skills. Chicago, IL: Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning.
  22. Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., & Schellinger, K. B. (2011). The impact of enhancing students' social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Development, 82(1), 405-432. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01564.x
  23. Elias, M. (2014). The future of character education and social-emotional learning: The need for whole school and community linked approaches. Journal of Character Education, 19(1), 37-42.
  24. Garvey, W. D., & Griffith, B. C. (1972). Communication and information processing within scientific disciplines: Empirical findings for psychology. Information Storage and Retrieval, 8, 123-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-0271(72)90041-1
  25. Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence. New York, NY: Bantam.
  26. Graziano, P. A., Reavis, R. D., Keane, S. P., & Calkins, S. D. (2007). The role of emotion regulation in children's early academic success. Journal of School Psychology, 45, 3-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2006.09.002
  27. Greenberg, M. T., Domitrovich, C., & Bumbarger, B. (2001). The prevention of mental disorders in school-age children: Current state of the field. Prevention and Treatment, 4, N, P.
  28. Greenberg, M. T., Weissberg, R. P., O'Brien, M. T., Zins, J. E., Fredericks, L., Sesnik, Hl, et al. (2003). Enhancing school-based prevention and youth development through coordinated social, emotional, and academic learning. American Psychologist, 58, 466-474. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.58.6-7.466
  29. Gross, J. J. (2002). Emotion regulation: Affective, cognitive and social consequences. Psychophysiology, 39, 281-291. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0048577201393198
  30. Han, B. (2016). The 55% of Teachers said that 'Need character education.' The Korean Federation of Teachers' Association Newspaper.
  31. Holbrook, J. & Rannikmae, M. (2007). Nature of Science Education for Enhancing Scientific Literacy. International Journal of Science education, 29(11), 1347-1362. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690601007549
  32. Hong, H. Paik, H., & Goh, Y. (2013). Critical review on self-directed learning and personal character education and their alternatives at schooling. Journal of Research in Education, 46(10), 188-200.
  33. Howse, R., Calkins, S., Anastopoulos, A., Keane, S., & Shelton, T. (2003). Regulatory contributors to children's academic achievement. Early Education and Development, 14, 101-119. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15566935eed1401_7
  34. Jimenez-Aleixandre, M., Rodriguez, M., & Duschl, R. A. (2000). 'Doing the lesson' or 'doing science': Argument in high school genetics. Science Education, 84(6), 757-792 https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-237X(200011)84:6<757::AID-SCE5>3.0.CO;2-F
  35. Kenneth, M. & Barbara, G. (2011). Social and emotional learning in the classroom promoting mental health and academic success. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  36. Keys, C. (1999). Revitalizing instruction in scientific genres: Connecting knowledge production with writing to learn in science. Science Education, 83, 115-130. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199903)83:2<115::AID-SCE2>3.0.CO;2-Q
  37. Kim, J., Kang, C., So, K., Son, M., Jin, D., & Lee, S. (2012). Developmental study of the curriculum with character education (Report 2012). Seoul: Ministry of Education, Science, & Technology.
  38. Kim, M. & Hong, H. (2015). Educational necessity and implications of social.emotional learning. Journal of Learner Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 15(5), 95-117.
  39. Kim, S. (2013). Key Approaches in Character Education (Master's thesis). Ewha Womens University, Seoul, Korea.
  40. Kim, Y. & Chung, W. (2001). An regression analysis for variables on effect of development of scientific thinking. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 21(4), 710-724.
  41. Korean Educational Development Institute (2015a). A study on the mid-long-term development plan for character education improvement. Seoul: Author.
  42. Korean Educational Development Institute (2015b). Research on how to revitalize primary and secondary school students'character education(III): Develop in-service materials on character education for middle school teachers. Seoul: Author.
  43. Korean Educational Development Institute (2016). Promoting core competency education and building innovative learning ecosystems for fostering talent for the future(II). Seoul: Author.
  44. Kuhl, J., & Kraska, K. (1989). Self-regulation and metamotivation: Computational mechanisms, development, and assessment. In R. Kanfer, P. Ackerman, & R. Cudeck (Eds.), Abilitites, motivation, and methodology: The Minnesota Symposium on learning and individual differences (pp. 373-373). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  45. Kum, K. (2004). An analysis into the practical examples of korean character-education and a proposal of ethical personalism (II). Journal of the New Korean Philosophical Association, 35, 27-52.
  46. Kwak, B., Yu, B., & Yoon, H. (1997). Practice for character education. Seoul; Central Education.
  47. Kwak, Y. (2013). Way of restructuring key competencies for a revision of science curriculum. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 34(4), 368-377.
  48. Lee, G., Kwak, Y., Lee, S., & Choi, J. (2013). Design of the competencies-based national curriculum for the future society. Seoul: Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation.
  49. Lee, I. (2009). A theoretical foundation for the promotion of a social and emotional competencies of children. Journal of Philosophy Education, 25, 7-40.
  50. Lee, J., & Lee, H. (2013). Application and improvement plan of expressive dance program for SEL(Social and Emotional Learning) on highschool students. The Korean Journal of Dance, 71(3), 91-116.
  51. Lee, M. (2014). Characteristics and trends in the classifications of scientific literacy definitions. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 34(2), 55-62. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2014.34.2.0055
  52. Lemke, J. L. (1995). Textual politics: Discourse and social dynamics. London, England: Taylor & Francis.
  53. Lewis, J., & Leach, J. (2006). Discussion of socio-scientific issues: The role of science knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 28(11), 1267-1287. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500439348
  54. Library of Congress. (2011). H.R.2437-Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning Act of 2011. Retrieved from https://www.congress.gov/bill/112th-congress/house-bill/2437/text
  55. Lim, Y., & Jang, S. (2016). An analysis on the relationship between key competencies and subjects of the 2015 revised national curriculum: Using semantic network analysis. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 16(10), 749-771. https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2016.16.10.749
  56. Martin, R., Drew, K., Gaddis, L., & Moseley, M. (1988). Prediction of elementary school achievement from preschool temperament: Three studies. School Psychology Review, 17, 125-137.
  57. McComas, W. F., & Olson, J. K. (1998). The nature of science in international science education standards documents. In W. F. McComas (Ed.). The nature of science in science education: Rationale and strategies (pp. 41-52). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
  58. McNeill, K. L., & Krajcik, J. (2008). Inquiry and scientific explanations: Helping students use evidence and reasoning. In J. Luft, R. Bell, & J. Gess-Newsome (Eds.). Science as inquiry in the secondary setting (pp. 121-134). Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association Press.
  59. Merrell, K. W. (2008). Social-Emotional Assets and Resilience Scale. Eugene, OR: University of Oregon, School Psychology Program.
  60. Merrell, K. W., Carrizales, D., Feuerborn, L., Gueldner, A., & Tran, O. (2007a). Strong Kids for Grades 3-5. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brooks Publishing, co.
  61. Merrell, K. W., Carrizales, D., Feuerborn, L., Gueldner, A., & Tran, O. (2007b). Strong Kids for Grades 6-8. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brooks Publishing, co.
  62. Merrell, K. W., Carrizales, D., Feuerborn, L., Gueldner, A., & Tran, O. (2007c). Strong Teens for Grades 9-12. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brooks Publishing, co.
  63. Merrell, K. W. & Guelder, B. (2010). Social and emotional learning in the classroom: Promoting mental health and academic success. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  64. Merrell, K. W., Parisi, D., & Whitcomb, S. (2007). Strong start-grades K-2: A social and emotional learning curriculum. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brooks Publishing, co.
  65. Micheal, K. D., & Crowley, S. L. (2002). How effective are treatments for child and adolescent depression? A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 22, 247-269. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7358(01)00089-7
  66. Ministry of Education [MOE]. (2011). 2009 revised National Curriculum. Seoul: Author.
  67. Ministry of Education [MOE]. (2014). Policy research for the establishment of vision in character education. Seoul: Jinhan M&B.
  68. Ministry of Education [MOE]. (2015). 2015 revised National Curriculum. Sejong: Author.
  69. Moon, S. (2015). Character education by statistics. Retrieved from http://kess.kedi.re.kr/post/6647539?itemCode=03
  70. Moon, Y., et al. (2010). Creativity and character education (KOFAC report 2009-19). Seoul: Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science & Creativity.
  71. Moorhead, B. (1995). Words aptly spoken. Washington, DC: Overlake Christian Bookstore.
  72. Nam, I., & Im, S. (2017). Analysis of trends of character-related research in science education. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 37(3), 493-505. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2017.37.3.493
  73. National Research Council [NRC]. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  74. National Research Council [NRC]. (2011). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  75. National Scientific Council on the Developing Child (2004). Children's emotional development is built into the architecture of their brains: Working paper No.2. www.developingchild.harvard.edu
  76. Newton, C., & Wells, B. (1999). The development of between-word processes in the connected speech of children aged between three and seven. In B. Maassen, & P. Groenen, (Eds.). Pathologies of Speech and Language: Advances in Clinical Phonetics and Linguistics (pp. 67-75). London, England: Whurr Publishers Ltd.
  77. Noh, I. (2016). 2016 Youth dream & talk concert. KLD.
  78. Nuangchalerm, P. (2009). Development of socioscientific issues-based teaching for preservice science teachers. Journal of Social Sciences, 5(3), 239-243. https://doi.org/10.3844/jssp.2009.239.243
  79. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD]. (2014). Talent OECD, Competency framework. Paris, France: Author.
  80. Park, D., & Park J. (2016) Directions for character education in science education and a theoretical approach of nature-study of character education. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 36(5), 581-589. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2016.36.4.0581
  81. Park, J. (2014). Humanity education and teaching school subjects: Is it possible and necessary to teach the humanity? The Korean Society for the Study of Moral Education, 26(1), 177-194.
  82. Park. K. (2012). Education for secondary school students, Hankookilbo.
  83. Park, Y. (2016). Start-up for outstanding people. Blue Report.
  84. Park, Y., Ku, H., Moon, J., Ahn, S., Yoo, B., Lee, K., Lee, S., Lee, S., Ju, M., Cha, Y., & Ham, S. (2013). Current status and remaining challenges of STEAM: An analysis from the perspective of Yungbokhap education. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 31(1), 159-186. https://doi.org/10.15708/kscs.31.1.201303.007
  85. Payton, J., Weissberg. R., Durlak, J., Dynmicki, A., Taylor, R., Schellinger, K., & Pachan, M. (2008). The positive impact of social and emotional learning for kindergarten to eighth-grade students. Chicago, IL: CASEL.
  86. Pink, D. (2006). A whole new mind: Why right-brainers will rule the future, Riverhead Books. Pittsburgh Post-Gazette.
  87. PSJ (2017). Educational policy for advanced countries. Better tomorrow with sharing.
  88. Psychology Glossary (2017). Social and emotional learning. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/
  89. Reeve, J. (2009). Understanding motivation and emotion (5th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  90. Sadler, T. D., & Donnelly, L. A. (2006). Socioscientific argumentation: The effects of content knowledge and morality. International Journal of Science Education, 28(12), 1463-1488. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600708717
  91. Song. H. (2012). Play for character education. The Kyunghyang Shinmun.
  92. Sorsby, B. (2000). The irresistible rise of the nature of science in science curricula. In J. Sears, & P. Sorensen (Eds.). Issues in science teaching. London, England: Routledge Falmer.
  93. Spektor-Levy, O., & Eylon, B. (2008). Teaching communication skills in science: Tracing teacher change. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 462-477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.10.009
  94. US Department of Education (2017). Social and emotional development research background. US Department of Education Report.
  95. Watson, J. (2004). Students’ discussions in practical scientific inquiries. International Journal of Science Education, 26(1), 25-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000072764
  96. World Economic Forum (2016). The Global Competitiveness Report 2016-2017. Retrieved from https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-global-competitiveness-report-2016-2017-1
  97. Yang, J., Kim, H., Lei G. Kim, E., Kim, S., & Lee, H. (2012). Perceptions of science teachers on socioscientific issues as instructional tool for creativity and character education. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 32(1), 113-128. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2012.32.1.113
  98. Yu, B. (2015). A study on virtue education approach and practical principles in character education. The Journal of Korea elementary education, 26(1), 303-322.
  99. Zeidler, D. L. & Keefer, M. (2003). The role of moral reasoning and the status of socioscientific issues in science education. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  100. Zembal-Saul, C. (2002). Insects and scientific problem solving go together. In D. Tippins, T. Koballa, and B. Payne (Eds.), Learning from cases: Unraveling the complexities of elementary science teaching (pp. 18-23). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon, Inc.
  101. Zembal-Saul, C., Krajcik, J., & Blumenfeld, P. (2002). Elementary student teachers’ science content representations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(6), 443-463. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10032
  102. Zembal-Saul, C., Munford, D., Crawford, B., Friedrichsen, P., & Land, S. (2002). Scaffolding preservice science teachers’ evidence-based arguments during an investigation of natural selection. Research in Science Education, 32(4), 437-463. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022411822951
  103. Zins, J. E., Bloodworth, M. R., Weissberg, R. P., & Walberg, H. J. (2004). Building academic success on social and emotional learning: What does the research say? New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

Cited by

  1. 예비 생물교사를 위한 사회정서학습에 기반한 SSI 논증 프로그램 적용 효과 탐색 vol.38, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2018.38.2.259
  2. 다양한 상호작용 기반의 멘토멘티 프로그램에서 나타난 인성 교육 가능성 탐색 -"과학 선생님 되어보기" 활동을 중심으로- vol.39, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2019.39.1.13