Earthquakes and Structures

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Seismic performance evaluation of buckling restrained braced frames (BRBF) using incremental nonlinear dynamic analysis method (IDA)

  • Khorami, M. (Facultad de Arquitectura y Urbanismo, Universidad Tecnologica Equinoccial, Calle Rumipamba s/n y Bourgeois) ;
  • Khorami, M. (Civil Engineering Department, Islamic Azad University) ;
  • Alvansazyazdi, M. (Facultad Ingenieria Ciencias Fisicas y Matematica, Carrera Ingenieria Civil, Universidad Central del Ecuador) ;
  • Shariati, M. (Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Tabriz) ;
  • Zandi, Y. (Department of Civil Engineering, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University) ;
  • Jalali, A. (Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Tabriz) ;
  • Tahir, M.M. (UTM Construction Research Centre, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Institute for Smart Infrastructure and Innovative Construction)
  • Received : 2016.06.12
  • Accepted : 2017.12.28
  • Published : 2017.12.25
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this paper, the seismic behavior of BRBF structures is studied and compared with special concentric braced frames (SCBF). To this purpose, three BRBF and three SCBF structures with 3, 5 and 10 stories are designed based on AISC360-5 and modelled using OpenSees. These structures are loaded in accordance with ASCE/SEI 7-10. Incremental nonlinear dynamic analysis (IDA) are performed on these structures for 28 different accelerograms and the median IDA curves are used to compare seismic capacity of these two systems. Results obtained, indicates that BRBF systems provide higher capacity for the target performance level in comparison with SCBF systems. And structures with high altitude (in this study, 5 and 10 stories) with the possibility of exceeding the collapse prevention performance level, further than lower altitude (here 3 floors) structures.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : University of Tabriz

References

  1. AISC (2005), AISC 360-05, Specification for Structural Steel Buildings, American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, IL.
  2. AISC (2005), Specification for Structural Steel Buildings, American Institute of Steel Construction, Inc., Chicago, IL.
  3. Alhajri, T., Tahir, M., Azimi, M., Mirza, J., Lawan, M., Alenezi, K. and Ragaee, M. (2016), "Behavior of pre-cast U-shaped composite beam integrating cold-formed steel with ferro-cement slab", Thin Wall. Struct., 102, 18-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2016.01.014
  4. Azimi, M., Adnan, A.B., Tahir, M.M., Sam, A.R.B.M. and Razak, S.M.B.S.A. (2015), "Seismic performance of ductility classes medium RC beam-column connections with continuous rectangular spiral transverse reinforcements", Lat. Am. J. Solid. Struct., 12(4), 787-807. https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-78251387
  5. Azimi, M., Bagherpourhamedani, A., Tahir, M.M., Sam, A.R.B.M. and Ma, C.K. (2016), "Evaluation of new spiral shear reinforcement pattern for reinforced concrete joints subjected to cyclic loading", Adv. Struct. Eng., 19(5), 730-745. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433216630371
  6. Bazzaz M., Andalib, Z., Kafi, M.A. and Kheyroddin, A. (2015), "Evaluating the performance of OBS-CO in steel frames under monotonic load", Earthq. Struct., 8(3), 697-710.
  7. Bazzaz, M., Andalib, Z., Kheyroddin, A. and Kafi, M.A. (2015), "Numerical comparison of the seismic performance of steel rings in off-centre bracing system and diagonal bracing system", Steel Compos. Struct., 19(4), 917-937. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2015.19.4.917
  8. Bazzurro, P. and Cornell, C.A. (1994), "Seismic hazard analysis of nonlinear structures. II: Applications", J. Struct. Eng., 120(11), 3345-3365. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1994)120:11(3345)
  9. Council, B.S.S. (2000), "Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings", Report FEMA-356, Washington, DC.
  10. Dimitrios, V. and Michalis, F. (2009), "Incremental dynamic analysis for estimating seismic performance sensitivity and uncertainty", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 39(2), 141-163. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.935
  11. Ghowsi, A.F. and Sahoo, D.R. (2015), "Fragility assessment of buckling-restrained braced frames under near-field earthquakes", Steel Compos. Struct., 19(1), 173-190. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2015.19.1.173
  12. Giugliano, M.T., Longo, A., Montuori, R. and Piluso, V. (2010), "Plastic design of CB-frames with reduced section solution for bracing members", J. Constr. Steel Res., 66(5), 611-621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2010.01.001
  13. Giugliano, M.T., Longo, A., Montuori, R. and Piluso, V. (2011), "Seismic reliability of traditional and innovative concentrically braced frames", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 40(13), 1455-1474. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.1098
  14. Hakim, S.J.S., Noorzaei, J., Jaafar, M., Jameel, M. and Mohammadhassani, M. (2011), "Application of artificial neural networks to predict compressive strength of high strength concrete", Int. J. Phys. Sci., 6(5), 975-981.
  15. Hsu, H., Juang, J. and Chou, C. (2011), "Experimental evaluation on the seismic performance of steel knee braced frame structures with energy dissipation mechanism", Steel Compos. Struct., 11(1), 77-91. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2011.11.1.077
  16. Iran National Provisions for Design of Earthquake Resistant Buildings (2004), 2800 Code, 3rd Edition, Building and Housing Research Center, September.
  17. Isolation Engineering, for Nippon Steel Corporation to Ove Arup & Partners California, Ltd. and Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development.
  18. Khoo, H.H., Tsai, K.C., Tsai, C.Y., and Wang, K.J. (2016), "Bidirectional substructure pseudo-dynamic tests and analysis of a full-scale two-story buckling-restrained braced frame", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 45(7), 1085-1107 https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2696
  19. Kim, J., Park, J. and Kim, S.D. (2009), "Seismic behavior factors of buckling-restrained braced frames", Struct. Eng. Mech., 33(3), 261-284. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2009.33.3.261
  20. Kim, S.H. and Choi, S.M. (2015), "Structural behavior of inverted V-braced frames reinforced with non-welded buckling restrained braces", Steel Compos. Struct., 19(6), 1581-1598. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2015.19.6.1581
  21. Longo, A., Montuori, R. and Piluso, V. (2008), "Influence of design criteria on seismic reliability of X-braced frames", J. Earthq. Eng., 12(3), 406-431. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460701457231
  22. Longo, A., Montuori, R. and Piluso, V. (2008), "Plastic design of seismic resistant V-braced frames", J. Earthq. Eng., 12(8), 1246-1266. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460802211867
  23. Longo, A., Montuori, R. and Piluso, V. (2008), "Failure mode control of X-braced frames under seismic actions", J. Earthq. Eng., 12(5), 728-759. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460701572955
  24. Longo, A., Montuori, R. and Piluso, V. (2009), "Seismic reliability of V-braced frames: Influence of design methodologies", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 38(14), 1587-1608. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.919
  25. Longo, A., Montuori, R. and Piluso, V. (2015), "Seismic design of chevron braces cupled with MRF fail safe systems", Earthq. Struct., 8(5), 1215-1239. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2015.8.5.1215
  26. Longo, A., Montuori, R. and Piluso, V. (2016), "Moment framesconcentrically braced frames dual systems: analysis of different design criteria", Struct. Infrastr. Eng., 12(1), 122-141. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2014.996164
  27. Lopez, W.A. and Sabelli, R. (2004), "Seismic design of bucklingrestrained braced frames", Steel Tips, 78.
  28. Luco, N. and Cornell, C.A. (1998), "Effects of random connection fractures on the demands and reliability for a 3-story preNorthridge SMRF structure", Proceedings of the 6th US National Conference on Earthquake Engineering.
  29. Luco, N. and Cornell, C.A. (2000), "Effects of connection fractures on SMRF seismic drift demands", J. Struct. Eng., 126(1), 127-136. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2000)126:1(127)
  30. Ma, C.K., Awang, A.Z., Garcia, R., Omar, W., Pilakoutas, K. and Azimi, M. (2016), Nominal Curvature Design of Circular HSC Columns Confined with Post-tensioned Steel Straps. Structures, Elsevier.
  31. Ma, C.K., Awang, A.Z., Omar, W., Liang, M., Jaw, S.W. and Azimi, M. (2016), "Flexural capacity enhancement of rectangular high-strength concrete columns confined with post-tensioned steel straps: Experimental investigation and analytical modeling", Struct. Concrete, 17(4), 668-676. https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.201500123
  32. MATLAB (2004), The Language of Technical Computing, Version 7 (R14).
  33. Mazzoni, S., McKenna, F., Scott, M.H. and Fenves, G.L. (2006), "OpenSees command language manual", Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research (PEER) Center.
  34. McKenna, F., Fenves, G., Jeremic, B. and Scott, M. (2008), Open System for Earthquake Engineering Simulation, http://opensees.berkeley.edu.
  35. Mehanny, S.S.F. and Deierlein, G.G. (1999), "Modeling and assessment of seismic performance of composite frames with reinforced concrete columns and steel beams", Stanford University.
  36. Mohammadhassani, M., Jumaat, M.Z. and Jameel, M. (2012), "Experimental investigation to compare the modulus of rupture in high strength self compacting concrete deep beams and high strength concrete normal beams", Constr. Build. Mater., 30, 265-273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.12.004
  37. Mohammadhassani, M., Nezamabadi-Pour, H., Jumaat, M., Jameel, M., Hakim, S. and Zargar, M. (2013), "Application of the ANFIS model in deflection prediction of concrete deep beam", Struct. Eng. Mech., 45(3), 319-332.
  38. Mohammadhassani, M., Suhatril, M., Shariati, M. and Ghanbari, F. (2014), "Ductility and strength assessment of HSC beams with varying of tensile reinforcement ratios", Struct. Eng. Mech., 48(6), 833-848. https://doi.org/10.12989/SEM.2013.48.6.833
  39. Nassar, A.A. and Krawinkler, H. (1991), "Seismic demands for SDOF and MDOF systems", John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Department of Civil Engineering, Stanford University.
  40. Niknam, A., Ahmadi, H. and Mahdavi, N. (2007), "Using nonlinear incremental dynamic analysis (IDA) to study seismic behavior of structures", 2nd National Conference on Retrofitting and Rehabilitation of Structures, Iran. (in Persian)
  41. Popov, E.P. and Pister, K.S. (1980), Structural Engineering and Structural Mechanics: A Volume Honoring Egor P. Popov, Prentice Hall.
  42. Saxey, B. and Daniels, M. (2014), "Characterization of overstrength factors for buckling restrained braces", Australasian Structural Engineering (ASEC) Conference, Auckland, New Zealand.
  43. SIE (2001), "Cyclic tests of nippon steel corporation unbonded braces", Unpublished Teport by Seismic.
  44. Stergiou, E. and Kiremidjian, A.S. (2008), "Treatment of uncertainties in seismic-risk analysis of transportation systems", PEER Report 2008/02.
  45. Uriz, P. (2005), "Towards earthquake resistant design of concentrically braced steel structure", University of California, Berkeley.
  46. Vamvatsikos, D. and Cornell, C.A. (2002), "Incremental dynamic analysis", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 31(3), 491-514. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.141
  47. Yun, S.Y., Hamburger, R.O., Cornell, C.A. and Foutch, D.A. (2002), "Seismic performance evaluation for steel moment frames", J. Struct. Eng., 128(4), 534-545. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:4(534)

Cited by

  1. A New Fibonacci-based Algorithm for Locating Peak Intensity Measure of IDA Curves vol.43, pp.suppl1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-018-0201-5
  2. On transient hygrothermal vibration of embedded viscoelastic flexoelectric/piezoelectric nanobeams under magnetic loading vol.8, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.12989/anr.2020.8.1.049
  3. The effect of RBS connection on energy absorption in tall buildings with braced tube frame system vol.34, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2020.34.3.393
  4. Optimizing reinforced concrete beams under different load cases and material mechanical properties using genetic algorithms vol.34, pp.4, 2020, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2020.34.4.467
  5. Computational estimation of the earthquake response for fibre reinforced concrete rectangular columns vol.34, pp.5, 2017, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2020.34.5.743
  6. Seismic resilience evaluation of RC-MRFs equipped with passive damping devices vol.18, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2020.18.3.391
  7. Elevated temperature resistance of concrete columns with axial loading vol.9, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.12989/acc.2020.9.4.355
  8. Bending analysis of magneto-electro piezoelectric nanobeams system under hygro-thermal loading vol.8, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.12989/anr.2020.8.3.203
  9. Influence of porosity and cement grade on concrete mechanical properties vol.10, pp.5, 2017, https://doi.org/10.12989/acc.2020.10.5.393
  10. Prediction of total sediment load: A case study of Wadi Arbaat in eastern Sudan vol.26, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2020.26.6.781
  11. Assessment of microstructure and surface effects on vibrational characteristics of public transportation vol.11, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.12989/anr.2021.11.1.101
  12. Smart estimation of automatic approach in enhancing the road safety under AASHTO Standard specification and STM vol.79, pp.3, 2021, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2021.79.3.389
  13. Application of multi-hybrid metaheuristic algorithm on prediction of split-tensile strength of shear connectors vol.28, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2021.28.2.167
  14. Analyzing shear strength of steel-concrete composite beam with angle connectors at elevated temperature using finite element method vol.40, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2021.40.6.853