Nuclear Engineering and Technology

Korean Nuclear Society (한국원자력학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Simulation and transient analyses of a complete passive heat removal system in a downward cooling pool-type material testing reactor against a complete station blackout and long-term natural convection mode using the RELAP5/3.2 code

  • Hedayat, Afshin (Reactor and Nuclear Safety School, Nuclear Science and Technology Research Institute (NSTRI))
  • Received : 2016.04.03
  • Accepted : 2017.03.31
  • Published : 2017.08.25
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this paper, a complete station blackout (SBO) or complete loss of electrical power supplies is simulated and analyzed in a downward cooling 5-MW pool-type Material Testing Reactor (MTR). The scenario is traced in the absence of active cooling systems and operators. The code nodalization is successfully benchmarked against experimental data of the reactor's operating parameters. The passive heat removal system includes downward water cooling after pump breakdown by the force of gravity (where the coolant streams down to the unfilled portion of the holdup tank), safety flapper opening, flow reversal from a downward to an upward cooling direction, and then the upward free convection heat removal throughout the flapper safety valve, lower plenum, and fuel assemblies. Both short-term and long-term natural core cooling conditions are simulated and investigated using the RELAP5 code. Short-term analyses focus on the safety flapper valve operation and flow reversal mode. Long-term analyses include simulation of both complete SBO and long-term operation of the free convection mode. Results are promising for pool-type MTRs because this allows operators to investigate RELAP code abilities for MTR thermal-hydraulic simulations without any oscillation; moreover, the Tehran Research Reactor is conservatively safe against the complete SBO and long-term free convection operation.

Keywords

References

  1. IAEA, Safety of Research Reactors. IAEA Safety Standards, Safety Requirements, No. NS-R-4, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 2005.
  2. IAEA, Fundamental Safety Principles. Safety Standard No. SF-1, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 2006.
  3. IAEA, Safety Analysis for Research Reactor. Safety Reports Series No. 55, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 2008.
  4. IAEA, Operational Limits and Conditions and Operating Procedures for Research Reactors. Safety Standard No. NS-G-4.4, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 2008.
  5. INRA and IAEA, Workshop on Strengthening the Role of the Regulatory Authority in Light of the Fukushima Accident. 5-8 Sep. 2014, Iran Nuclear Regulatory Authority (INRA) in Cooperation with International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Tehran, Iran, 2014.
  6. NSTRI and IAEA, Workshop on Periodic Safety Review of Tehran Research Reactor. 10-14 Oct. 2015, Nuclear Science and Technology Research Institute (NSTRI) in Cooperation with International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Tehran, Iran, 2015.
  7. RELAP5/MOD3.2 Code Manual, Code Structure, System Models, and Solution Methods, Idaho National engineering Laboratory (NUREG/CR-5535), 1999.
  8. K.Wolfert,V. Teschendorff, G. Lerchl, J.Miro,M.J. Burwell, The thermal-hydraulic code ATHLET for analysis of PWRand BWR systems, in: Proceedings of NURETH-4, Karlsruhe, vol. II, 1989, pp. 1234-1239.
  9. J.C. Micaelli, F. Barre, D. Bestion, CATHARE code development and assessment methodologies, in: Transactions of the ANS, Winter Meeting San Francisco, vol. 73, October 29-November 2, 1995, pp. 509-510.
  10. A.Hedayat, H.Davilu, J. Jafari, Loss of coolant accident analyses onTehran research reactor by RELAP5/MOD3 2 code, Prog. Nucl. Energy 49 (2007) 511-528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2007.07.009
  11. M. Lin, Y. Su, R. Hu, R. Zhang, Y. Yang, Development of a thermal-hydraulic system code for simulators based on RELAP5 code, Nucl. Eng. Des. 235 (2005) 925-936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2004.11.010
  12. S. Chatzidakis, A. Ikonomopoulos, Phenomenological investigation of loss of coolant accident in a research reactor facility, Nucl. Eng. Des. 256 (2013) 341-349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2012.08.025
  13. S. Chatzidakis, A. Ikonomopoulos, D. Ridikas, Evaluation of RELAP5/MOD3 behavior against loss of flow experimental results from two research reactor facilities, Nucl. Eng. Des. 255 (2013) 321-329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2012.11.005
  14. B. Di Maro, F. Pierro, A. Bousbia Salah, F. D'Auria, Analysis of a pump trip in a typical research reactor by RELAP5/MOD 3.3, in: Proceedings of ICAPP'03, Cordoba, Spain (Paper 3215), 2003.
  15. C.B. Davis, Applicability of RELAP5/MOD3.2 to research reactors, in: IAEA Regional Training Workshop on Safety Analysis Methodology and Computer Code Utilization, KINS, Daejeon, South Korea, 2002.
  16. T. Hamidouche, A. Bousbia-Salah, M. Adorni, F. D'Auria, Dynamic calculations of the IAEA safety MTR research reactor benchmark problem using RELAP5/3.2 code, Ann. Nucl. Energy 31 (2004) 1385-1402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2004.03.008
  17. AEOI, Safety Analyses Report for Tehran Research Reactor (SAR for TRR), Atomic Energy Organization of Iran, Tehran, 2002.
  18. AEOI, Final Safety Analyses Report for Tehran Research Reactor (FSAR for TRR), Atomic Energy Organization of Iran, Tehran, 2009.
  19. IAEA, Safety Assessment for Research Reactors and Preparation of the Safety Analysis Report, IAEA Safety Standards, Specific Safety Guide, No. SSG-20, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 2012.
  20. IAEA, Research Reactor Core Conversion from the Use of Highly Enriched Uranium to the Use of Low Enriched Uranium Fuels Guidebook, TECDOC-233, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 1980.
  21. IAEA, Research Reactor Core Conversion Guidebook, TECDOC-643, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 1992.
  22. B. Gebhart, Effects of viscous dissipation in natural convection, Fluid Mech. 14 (1962) 225-232. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112062001196
  23. B. Gebhart, J. Mollendorf, Viscous dissipation in external natural convection flows, J. Fluid Mech. 38 (1969) 97-107. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112069000061
  24. INRA and IAEA, Workshop on Regulatory Oversight of Fuel Safety, Iran Nuclear Regulatory Authority (INRA) in Cooperation with International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Tehran, Iran, Jan 31-Feb 4, 2015.
  25. F. Cardarelli, Materials Handbook, A Concise Desktop Reference, Springer Science and Business Media, New York, 2000.
  26. Valves, Piping & Pipelines in Handbook, second ed., Elsevier Advanced Technology, Kidlington, Oxford, 1996.
  27. J.K. Venard, One-dimensional flow, in: V.L. Streeter (Ed.), Handbook of Fluid Dynamics, first ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, 1965.
  28. M.M. El-Wakil, Nuclear Heat Transport, International Textbook Company, Scranton, PA, 1971.
  29. F.W. Dittus, L.M.K. Boelter, Heat Transfer in Automobile Radiators of the Tubular Type, vol. 2, University of California Publications in Engineering, Berkeley, 1930, pp. 443-461.
  30. S.W. Churchill, H.H.S. Chu, Correlating equations for laminar and turbulent free convection from a vertical plate, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 18 (1975) 1323-1329. https://doi.org/10.1016/0017-9310(75)90243-4
  31. A.G. Croff, ORIGEN 2: A Revised and Updated Version of the Oak Ridge Isotope Generation and Depletion Code. ORNL5621, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, USA, 1980.
  32. A. Hedayat, Conceptual analyses of equilibrium conditions to determine a long term fuel management strategy for research reactors, Prog. Nucl. Energy 71 (2014) 61-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2013.10.020
  33. A. Hedayat, Developing a practical optimization of the refueling program for ordinary research reactors using a modified simulated annealing method, Prog. Nucl. Energy 76 (2014) 191-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2014.05.021
  34. A. Hedayat, Benchmarking verification of the control rod effects on the MTR core parameters using the MTR-PC and MCNP codes throughout 3D core modeling and rod-drop experiment, Prog. Nucl. Energy 88 (2016) 183-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2015.12.001
  35. A. Hedayat, Developing a safe and high performance fuel management optimization for MTRs using stochastic knowledge base searches, Ann. Nucl. Energy 90 (2016) 157-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2015.10.040
  36. AEOI, Introduction to Safety Analysis Report Tehran Nuclear Center Research Reactor Tehran (and Its Drawing Attachments), Pennsylvania, American Machine & Foundry Company (AMF)/Atomic Energy Organization of Iran, Tehran, 1966.
  37. AEOI, Construction Drawing, Demineralized Water cooler, Suisio, Bergamo, Italy. IRN/342, 8504 (NUM. DIS. DWG. NUM. 9182), Atomic Energy Organization of Iran, Tehran, 1990.
  38. AEOI, Heat exchangers, Document Front Sheet. Suisio, Bergamo, Italy. CALC/8504, IRN/342, Atomic Energy Organization of Iran, Tehran, 1990.

Cited by

  1. Modeling and experimental production yield of 64Cu with natCu and natCu-NPs in Tehran Research Reactor vol.51, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2018.08.008
  2. Direct Numerical Simulation of Turbulent Flow Inside a Differentially Heated Composite Cavity vol.206, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2019.1595312
  3. Indefinite sustainability of passive residual heat removal system of small modular reactor using dry air cooling tower vol.52, pp.5, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2019.11.003
  4. Determination of the neutron and gamma ray dose rates of the irradiating beam tubes of a pool-type research reactor by using Monte Carlo simulation and experimental detectors regarding radiation prote vol.3, pp.None, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jandt.2021.06.001
  5. Developing a robust and flexible smart tool to predict a full range Critical Heat Flux (CHF) in different LWRs by using deep learning Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) via parallel multi-processing vol.142, pp.None, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2021.103985