DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

동해안 울진해역 원통형 고둥 통발의 재질별 어획 성능

Catching efficiency of the whelk pot in accordance with the pot materials in the Uljin waters, East sea

  • 안희춘 (국립수산과학원 수산공학과) ;
  • 배재현 (국립수산과학원 동해수산연구소 자원환경과) ;
  • 박창두 (국립수산과학원 동해수산연구소 자원환경과) ;
  • 박종명 (국립수산과학원 동해수산연구소 자원환경과) ;
  • 홍성익 (바다생태리서치) ;
  • 윤병선 (국립수산과학원 동해수산연구소 자원환경과) ;
  • 김병관 (국립수산과학원 수산공학과) ;
  • 김성훈 (국립수산과학원 수산공학과)
  • AN, Heui-Chun (Fisheries Engineering Reseach Division, National Institute of Fisheries Science) ;
  • BAE, Jae-Hyun (Fisheries Resources and Environment Research Division, East Sea Fisheries Research Institute, National Institute of Fisheries Science) ;
  • PARK, Chang-Doo (Fisheries Resources and Environment Research Division, East Sea Fisheries Research Institute, National Institute of Fisheries Science) ;
  • PARK, Jong-Myung (Fisheries Resources and Environment Research Division, East Sea Fisheries Research Institute, National Institute of Fisheries Science) ;
  • HONG, Sung-Eic (Bada Ecology Research) ;
  • YOON, Byung-Sun (Fisheries Resources and Environment Research Division, East Sea Fisheries Research Institute, National Institute of Fisheries Science) ;
  • KIM, Pyungkwan (Fisheries Engineering Reseach Division, National Institute of Fisheries Science) ;
  • KIM, Seong-Hun (Fisheries Engineering Reseach Division, National Institute of Fisheries Science)
  • 투고 : 2016.10.26
  • 심사 : 2017.02.03
  • 발행 : 2017.02.28

초록

Fishing pots are one of the important fishing gears in our coastal and offshore fisheries. In terms of a sustainable use of marine resources, there are concerns about the ghost fishing by lost pots. It is reported that 10 to 70% of the pots are abandoned or lost annually. This study is to compare the catching efficiency of drum type whelk pots that are made of biodegradable nets to those made of the ordinary nets, in the eastern coast of Korea. Five types of drum pots were used with combination of biodegradable nets and ordinary (PA, PE) nets applied to the main and funnel parts of the pots: pots with biodegradable nets (Bio+Bio); pots with PE net (PE+PE); pots with body and funnel made of biodegradable nets and PE nets respectively (Bio+PE); pots with body and funnel made of PE nets and PA nets respectively (PE+PA); pots with body and funnel made of PE nets and biodegradable net respectively (PE+Bio). Field experiments were conducted from June $18^{th}$, 2015 to August $7^{th}$, 2015 using a commercial fishing vessel in the Uljin waters on the eastern coast of Korea. Two fleets of pots with one hundred in each, 20 pots of each type, were casted for 8 to 15 days to analyze their catching efficiency. The catch of target species, whelks, was 202,563.0 g with catch rate of 38.7% of the total catch, while the bycatch was 320,709.7 g with the rate of 61.3% of the total catch. The catch of whelks was the highest in the Bio+PE pots (46,020.3 g), followed by the Bio+Bio pots (42,027.5 g), the PE+Bio pots (41,849.9 g) and the lowest being PE+PE pots (38,054.2 g). Compared to the conventional pots, the pots with biodegradable nets on the body or entrance part had slightly higher catch rate for both the target species and the bycatch. The PE+PE had the lowest catch rate. There is no significant difference in catch between the pots with biodegradable nets and the ordinary nets for the target species such as Buccinum opisthoplectum, Neptunea eulimata, Buccinum striatissimum. Consequently, using biodegradable nets for the conventional whelk pots can reduce ghost fishing by lost gears while keeping the performance of the pots.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Bae HM and Moon BC. 2003. Study on the land recover characteristics from the process of reclamation in the islands -On the case study in Shinan Gun-. J of the Korea Planning Association 38(2), 217-228.
  2. Kim J. 2007. The impact of large-scale reclamation projects on the lives of local residents with the Saemangeum projects as an example. Eco. Vol.11, No.2, 285-316.
  3. Kim YJ. 1998. An investigation on the actual state of the fishing villages and the attitude of fisherman. J. of Fisheries Business Administration 29(1), 89-120.
  4. Ku DW and Hong DH. 2011. A study on the social impacts of Saemangeum project : Focused on the changes after the completion of the last tide embankment construction in 2006. ECO, 15(2), 39-80.
  5. Hahm HH. 2004. Ousted fisherman and Saemangum tideland reclamation project. Korean Cultural Anthropology 37(1), 151-182.
  6. Hahm HH. 2010. Human life in Saemangeum after reclamation. J of The Korean Society for Marine Environment & Energy 13(4), 313-326.
  7. Hahm HH, Jung MH and Lee DC. 2011. A study of interactional relations between marine ecology and fishery in the area of Saemangeum. ECO, 15(2), 7-37.
  8. Koh CH, Ryu JS and Khim JS. 2010. The Saemangeum : History and controversy. J of The Korean Society for Marine Environment & Energy 13(4), 327-334.
  9. National Statistical Office, 2005. http://kostat.go.kr/portal/korea/index.action
  10. Park JM. 2002. The Saemankeum reclamation project and social change in adjacent local villages. ECO, 202-230.
  11. Park SY. 2007. Structure and peculiarities of social conflict around Saemangeum reclamation project. ECO, 11(1), 133-166.
  12. Song DY. 1999. Book review of "What happened to the people of Siwha Lake" Korean Cultural Anthropology, 32(1), 341-344.
  13. Yun HS and Kim HC. 1990. Effect of reclamation on fisheries. Rural Economy, 13(4), 73-86.