Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences

Asian Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (아세아태평양축산학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Determination and prediction of digestible and metabolizable energy concentrations in byproduct feed ingredients fed to growing pigs

  • Son, Ah Reum (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Konkuk University) ;
  • Park, Chan Sol (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Konkuk University) ;
  • Kim, Beob Gyun (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Konkuk University)
  • Received : 2016.08.12
  • Accepted : 2016.11.14
  • Published : 2017.04.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objective: An experiment was conducted to determine digestible energy (DE) and metabolizable energy (ME) of different byproduct feed ingredients fed to growing pigs, and to generate prediction equations for the DE and ME in feed ingredients. Methods: Twelve barrows with an initial mean body weight of 31.8 kg were individually housed in metabolism crates that were equipped with a feeder and a nipple drinker. A $12{\times}10$ incomplete Latin square design was employed with 12 dietary treatments, 10 periods, and 12 animals. A basal diet was prepared to mainly contain the corn and soybean meal (SBM). Eleven additional diets were formulated to contain 30% of each test ingredient. All diets contained the same proportion of corn:SBM ratio at 4.14:1. The difference procedure was used to calculate the DE and ME in experimental ingredients. The in vitro dry matter disappearance for each test ingredient was determined. Results: The DE and ME values in the SBM sources were greater (p<0.05) than those in other ingredients except high-protein distillers dried grains. However, DE and ME values in tapioca distillers dried grains (TDDG) were the lowest (p<0.05). The most suitable regression equations for the DE and ME concentrations (kcal/kg on the dry matter [DM] basis) in the test ingredients were: $DE=5,528-(156{\times}ash)-(32.4{\times}neutral\;detergent\;fiber\;[NDF])$ with root mean square error = 232, $R^2=0.958$, and p<0.001; $ME=5,243-(153 ash)-(30.7{\times}NDF)$ with root mean square error = 277, $R^2=0.936$, and p<0.001. All independent variables are in % on the DM basis. Conclusion: The energy concentrations were greater in the SBM sources and were the least in the TDDG. The ash and NDF concentrations can be used to estimate the energy concentrations in the byproducts from oil-extraction and distillation processes.

Keywords

References

  1. Chiba LI. Protein supplements. In: Lewis AJ, Southern LL, editors. Swine nutrition. Washington, DC: CRC Press; 2001. p. 803-37.
  2. Sauvant D, Perez JM, Tran G. Tables of composition and nutritional value of feed materials: pigs, poultry, sheep, goats, rabbits, horses, and fish. 2nd ed. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Wageningen Academic Publishers; 2004.
  3. Park CS, Son AR, Kim BG. Prediction of gross energy and digestible energy in copra meal, palm kernel meal, and cassava root fed to pigs. J Anim Sci 2012;90:221-3.
  4. Committee on Nutrient Requirements of Swine, National Research Council. Nutrient requirements of swine. 11th ed. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2012.
  5. Son AR, Ji SY, Kim BG. Digestible and metabolizable energy concentrations in copra meal, palm kernel meal, and cassava root fed to growing pigs. J Anim Sci 2012;90:140-2. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.53822
  6. Stein HH, Casas GA, Abelilla JJ, Liu YH, Sulabo RC. Nutritional value of high fiber co-products from the copra, palm kernel, and rice industries in diets fed to pigs. J Anim Sci Biotechnol 2015;6:56. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-015-0056-6
  7. Kim BG, Kim T. A program for making completely balanced Latin Square designs employing a systemic method. Rev Colom Cienc Pecua 2010;23:277-82.
  8. Committee on Nutrient Requirements of Swine, National Research Council. Nutrient requirements of swine. 10th ed. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1998.
  9. Kong C, Adeola O. Evaluation of amino acid and energy utilization in feedstuff for swine and poultry diets. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2014;27:917-25. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2014.r.02
  10. Ahn JY, Kil DY, Kong C, Kim BG. Comparison of oven-drying methods for determination of moisture content in feed ingredients. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2014;27:1615-22. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2014.14305
  11. Kim BG, Petersen GI, Hinson RB, Allee GL, Stein HH. Amino acid digestibility and energy concentration in a novel source of high-protein distillers dried grains and their effects on growth performance of pigs. J Anim Sci 2009;87:4013-21. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2009-2060
  12. Horwitz W, Latimer GW; AOAC International. Official methods of analysis of AOAC International. 18th ed. Gaithersburg, MD: AOAC International; 2005.
  13. Boisen S, Fernandez JA. Prediction of the total tract digestibility of energy in feedstuffs and pig diets by in vitro analyses. Anim Feed Sci Technol 1997;68:277-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(97)00058-8
  14. Kong C, Park CS, Kim BG. Effects of an enzyme complex on in vitro dry matter digestibility of feed ingredients for pigs. Springerplus 2015;4:261. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-015-1060-1
  15. Park KR, Park CS, Kim BG. An enzyme complex increases in vitro dry matter digestibility of corn and wheat in pigs. Springerplus 2016;5:598. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2194-5
  16. Ravindran V, Kornegay ET, Webb KE, Jr. Effects of fiber and virginiamycin on nutrient absorption, nutrient retention and rate of passage in growing swine. J Anim Sci 1984;59:400-8. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1984.592400x
  17. Kim BG, Lindemann MD, Cromwell GL, Balfagon A, Agudelo JH. The correlation between passage rate of digesta and dry matter digestibility in various stages of swine. Livest Sci 2007;109:81-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2007.01.082
  18. Noblet J, Le Goff G. Effect of dietary fibre on the energy value of feeds for pigs. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2001;90:35-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(01)00195-X
  19. Baker KM, Stein HH. Amino acid digestibility and concentration of digestible and metabolizable energy in soybean meal produced from conventional, high-protein, or low-oligosaccharide varieties of soybeans and fed to growing pigs. J Anim Sci 2009;87:2282-90. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2008-1414
  20. Berrocoso JD, Rojas OJ, Liu Y, et al. Energy concentration and amino acid digestibility in high-protein canola meal, conventional canola meal, and soybean meal fed to growing pigs. J Anim Sci 2015;93:2208-17. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2014-8528
  21. Widmer MR, McGinnis LM, Stein HH. Energy, phosphorus, and amino acid digestibility of high-protein distillers dried grains and corn germ fed to growing pigs. J Anim Sci 2007;85:2994-3003. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2006-840
  22. Xue PC, Dong B, Zang JJ, Zhu ZP, Gong LM. Energy and standardized ileal amino acid digestibilities of Chinese distillers dried grains, produced from different regions and grains fed to growing pigs. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2012;25:104-13.
  23. Gutierrez NA, Serao NVL, Kerr BJ, Zijlstra RT, Patience JF. Relationships among dietary fiber components and the digestibility of energy, dietary fiber, and amino acids and energy content of nine corn coproducts fed to growing pigs. J Anim Sci 2014;92:4505-17. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2013-7265
  24. Rodriguez DA, Sulabo RC, Gonzalez-Vega JC, Stein HH. Energy concentration and phosphorus digestibility in canola, cottonseed, and sunflower products fed to growing pigs. Can J Anim Sci 2013;93:493-503. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas2013-020
  25. Adeola O, Kong C. Energy value of distillers dried grains with solubles and oilseed meals for pigs. J Anim Sci 2014;92:164-70. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2013-6662
  26. Woyengo TA, Beltranena E, Zijlstra RT. Nonruminant nutrition symposium: Controlling feed cost by including alternative ingredients into pig diets: A review. J Anim Sci 2014;92:1293-305. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2013-7169
  27. Sulabo RC, Ju WS, Stein HH. Amino acid digestibility and concentration of digestible and metabolizable energy in copra meal, palm kernel expellers, and palm kernel meal fed to growing pigs. J Anim Sci 2013;91:1391-9. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2012-5281
  28. Saittagaroon S, Kawakishi S, Namiki M. Characterisation of polysaccharides of copra meal. J Sci Food Agric 1983;34:855-60. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740340813
  29. Rojas OJ, Liu Y, Stein HH. Phosphorus digestibility and concentration of digestible and metabolizable energy in corn, corn coproducts, and bakery meal fed to growing pigs. J Anim Sci 2013;91:5326-35. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2013-6324
  30. Noblet J, Perez JM. Prediction of digestibility of nutrients and energy values of pig diets from chemical analysis. J Anim Sci 1993;71:3389-98. https://doi.org/10.2527/1993.71123389x

Cited by

  1. Energy Concentration and Phosphorus Digestibility in Hatchery Byproducts Fed to Nursery Pigs vol.9, pp.5, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9050255
  2. Effects of a Hatchery Byproduct Mixture on Growth Performance and Digestible Energy of Various Hatchery Byproduct Mixtures in Nursery Pigs vol.10, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10010174
  3. Supplemental protease improves in vitro disappearance of dry matter and crude protein in feather meal and copra meal for pigs vol.49, pp.None, 2017, https://doi.org/10.37496/rbz4920200095
  4. Amino acid and calcium digestibility in hatchery byproducts fed to nursery pigs vol.270, pp.None, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2020.114703
  5. Prediction equations for digestible and metabolizable energy concentrations in feed ingredients and diets for pigs based on chemical composition vol.34, pp.2, 2021, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.20.0293
  6. Energy values of copra meal and cornstarch for broiler chickens vol.100, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.10.064
  7. Novel Two-Slope Equations to Predict Amino Acid Concentrations Using Crude Protein Concentration in Soybean Meal vol.11, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11040280
  8. Measures Matter-Determining the True Nutri-Physiological Value of Feed Ingredients for Swine vol.11, pp.5, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11051259
  9. Effects of Dietary Perilla Cake Supplementation in Growing Pig on Productive Performance, Meat Quality, and Fatty Acid Profiles vol.11, pp.11, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11113213