DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of EEG Changes Induced by Action Execution and Action Observation

  • Kim, Ji Young (Department of Physical Therapy, College of Medical Science, Catholic University of Daegu) ;
  • Ko, Yu-Min (Department of Physical Therapy, Gangneung Yeongdong College) ;
  • Park, Ji Won (Department of Physical Therapy, College of Medical Science, Catholic University of Daegu)
  • Received : 2017.01.17
  • Accepted : 2017.03.07
  • Published : 2017.02.28

Abstract

Purpose: Recent electrophysiological studies have shown that the sensorymotor cortex is activated during both actual action excuted by themselves and observation of action performed by other persons. Observation of action based on mirror neuron system can be used as a cognitive intervention to promote motor learning. The purpose of this study was to investigate the brain activity changes during action observation and action execution using EEG. Methods: Thirty healthy volunteers participated and were requested to perform hand action and to observe the video of hand action performed by another person. The EEG activity was evaluated by a method which segregated the time-locked for each condition. To compare the differences between action observation and execution, the Mu suppression and the relative band power were analysed. Results: The results showed significant mu suppression during the action observation and execution, but the differences between the two conditions were not observed. The relative band power showed a significant difference during the action observation and execution, but there were no differences between the two conditions. Conclusion: These results indicate that action execution and observation involve overlapping neural networks in the sensorymotor cortical areas, proposing positive changes on neurophysiology. We are expected to provide information related to the intervention of cognitive rehabilitation.

Keywords

References

  1. Reynolds C, Osuagwu BA, Vuckovic A. Influence of motor imagination on cortical activation during functional electrical stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol. 2015;126(7):1360-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2014.10.007
  2. Kang HG. A study of brain activity during grasping and supination using EEG analysis. Seoul, University of Science & Technogogy, 2013.
  3. Mouthon A, Ruffieux J, Walchli M et al. Task-dependent changes of corticospinal excitability during observation and motor imagery of balance tasks. Neuroscience. 2015;303:535-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.07.031
  4. Johansson BB. Current trends in stroke rehabilitation. A review with focus on brain plasticity. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica. 2011;123(3):147-59. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0404.2010.01417.x
  5. Small SL, Buccino G, Solodkin A. The mirror neuron system and treatment of stroke. Developmental Psychobiology. 2012;54(3):293-310. https://doi.org/10.1002/dev.20504
  6. Rizzolatti G, Craighero L. The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience. 2004;27:169-4. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144230
  7. Kim SH, Cho JS. Action observation and cortical connectivity: Evidence from EEG analysis. J Kor Phys Ther. 2016:28(6):398-407. https://doi.org/10.18857/jkpt.2016.28.6.398
  8. Schoffelen JM, Poort J, Oostenveld R et al. Selective movement preparation is subserved by selective increases in corticomuscular gamma-band coherence. J Neurosci. 2011;31(18):6750-8. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4882-10.2011
  9. Chatrian GE, Petersen MC, Lazarte JA. The blocking of the rolandic wicket rhythm and some central changes related to movement. Electroencephalography And Clinical Neurophysiology. 1959;11(3):497-510. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4694(59)90048-3
  10. Gastaut HJ, Bert J. EEG changes during cinematographic presentation (moving picture activation of the EEG). Electroencephalography And Clinical Neurophysiology. 1954;6(0):433-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4694(54)90058-9
  11. Sabate M, Llanos C, Enriquez E et al. Mu rhythm, visual processing and motor control. Clinical Neurophysiology. 2012;123(3):550-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2011.07.034
  12. Pineda JA. The functional significance of mu rhythms: translating "seeing" and "hearing" into "doing". Brain Research Reviews. 2005;50:57-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresrev.2005.04.005
  13. Hari R. Brain rhythms and reactivity of the human motor cortex. International Congress Series. 2002;1226(0):87-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0531-5131(01)00499-X
  14. Hari R. Action-perception connection and the cortical mu rhythm. Progress in Brain Research. 2006;159:253-60.
  15. Babiloni C, Babiloni F, Carducci F et al. Human cortical electroencephalography (EEG) rhythms during the observation of simple aimless movements: a high-resolution EEG study. NeuroImage. 2002;17(2):559-72. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2002.1192
  16. Muthukumaraswamy SD, Johnson BW, McNair NA. Mu rhythm modulation during observation of an object-directed grasp. Cognitive Brain Research. 2004;19(2):195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2003.12.001
  17. Kim SH. A neuroscientific approach to the relationship between creativity and knowledge. Korea National University. Dissertation of Master's Degree. 2010.
  18. Muller-Putz GR, Zimmermann D, Graimann B et al. Event-related beta EEG-changes during passive and attempted foot movements in paraplegic patients. Brain Res. 2007;1137:84-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2006.12.052
  19. Noh HJ. Effects of gradually decreasing action observation training on stroke patients balance and gait ability . Daejeon University. Dissertation of Doctorate Degree. 2015.
  20. Divekar NV, John LR. Neurophysiological, behavioural and perceptual differences between wrist flexion and extension related to sensorimotor monitoring as shown by corticomuscular coherence. Clin Neurophysiol. 2013;124:136-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2012.07.019
  21. Houdayer E, Labyt E, Cassim F et al. Relationship between event-related beta synchronization and afferent inputs: analysis of finger movement and peripheral nerve stimulations. Clin Neurophysiol. 2006;117(3):628-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2005.12.001
  22. Fang Y, Daly JJ, Sun J et al. Functional corticomuscular connection during reaching is weakened following stroke. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009; 120(5):994-1002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2009.02.173
  23. Muller GR, Neuper C, Rupp R et al. Event-related beta EEG changes during wrist movements induced by functional electrical stimulation of forearm muscles in man. Neurosci Lett. 2003;340(2):143-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3940(03)00019-3
  24. Oberman LM, Ramachandran VS, Pineda JA. Modulation of mu suppression in children with autism spectrum disorders in response to familiar or unfamiliar stimuli: the mirror neuron hypothesis. Neuropsychologia. 2008;46(5):1558-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.01.010
  25. Bernier R, Dawson G, Webb S et al. EEG mu rhythm and imitation impairments in individuals with autism spectrum disorder. Brain & Cognition. 2007;64(3):228-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2007.03.004
  26. Pineda JA, Hecht E. Mirroring and mu rhythm involvement in social cognition: are there dissociable subcomponents of theory of mind? Biological Psychology. 2009;80(3):306-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2008.11.003
  27. Grezes J, Decety J. Functional anatomy of execution, mental simulation, observation, and verb generation of actions: a meta-analysis. Human Brain Mapping. 2001;12:1-19. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0193(200101)12:1<1::AID-HBM10>3.0.CO;2-V
  28. Muthukumaraswamy SD, Johnson BW. Changes in rolandic mu rhythm during observation of a precision grip. Psychophysiology. 2004;41:152-6. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8986.2003.00129.x
  29. Perry A, Bentin S. Mirror activity in the human brain while observing hand movements: a comparison between EEG desynchronization in the mu-range and previous fMRI results. Brain Research. 2009;1282:126-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2009.05.059
  30. Shahid S, Sinha RK, Prasad G. Mu and beta rhythm modulations in motor imagery related post-stroke EEG: a study under BCI framework for post-stroke rehabilitation. BMC Neuroscience. 2010;11:1-2. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-11-1
  31. Puzzo I, Cooper NR, Vetter P et al. EEG activation differences in the pre-motor cortex and supplementary motor area between normal individuals with high and low traits of autism. Brain Research. 2010;1342:104-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2010.04.060
  32. Kim JS KK. Clinical feasibility of action observation based on mirror neuron system on walking performance in post stroke patients. J Phys Ther Sci. 2012;24:597-9. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.24.597
  33. Ahn BM. EEG analysis for design of brain-computer interface(BCI). Korea National University of Education. Dissertation of Master's Degree. 2010.
  34. Lee SL. EEG analysis of concentrativeness due to visual stimulus task. Pukyong National University. Dissertation of Master's Degree. 2014.
  35. Oberman LM, Hubbard EM, McCleery JP et al. EEG evidence for mirror neuron dysfunction in autism spectrum disorders. Cognitive Brain Research. 2005;24(2):190-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.01.014
  36. Pfurtscheller G, Brunner C, Schlogl A et al. Mu rhythm (de)synchronization and EEG single-trial classification of different motor imagery tasks. NeuroImage. 2006;31:153-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.12.003

Cited by

  1. Effects of Gradually Decreasing Action Observation Training on Upper Extremity Function of Chronic Stroke Patients vol.26, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.14519/jksot.2018.26.3.05
  2. Effects of Functional Electrical Stimulation Intensity Level on Corticomuscular Coherence during Action Observation vol.32, pp.5, 2017, https://doi.org/10.18857/jkpt.2020.32.5.307