DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Progressive collapse analysis of buildings with concentric and eccentric braced frames

  • Received : 2015.06.11
  • Accepted : 2016.11.23
  • Published : 2017.03.25

Abstract

In this study, the susceptibility of different symmetric steel buildings with dual frame system to Progressive Collapse (PC) was assessed. Some ten-story dual frame systems with different type of braced frames (concentrically and eccentrically braced frames) were considered. In addition, numbers and locations of braced bays were investigated (two and three braced bays in exterior frames) to quantitatively find out its effect on PC resistance. An Alternate Path Method (APM) with a linear static analysis was carried out based on General Services Administration (GSA 2003) guidelines. Maximum Demand Capacity Ratio (DCR) for the elements (beams and columns) with highest DCRs ($DCR_{moment}$ and $DCR_{shear}$) is given in tables. The results showed that the three braced bays with concentric braced frames especially X-braced and inverted V-braced frame systems had a lower susceptibility and greater resistance to PC. Also, the results represented that the beams were more critical than columns against PC after the removal of column.

Keywords

References

  1. AISC (2006), Steel construction manual, 13th Edition, American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago.
  2. ASCE 7-05 (2005), Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, American Society of Civil Engineers, New York.
  3. Coda, H.B. and Paccola, R.R. (2014), "A total-lagrangian positionbased FEM applied to physical and geometrical nonlinear dynamics of plane frames including semi-rigid connections and progressive collapse", Finite Elem. Anal. Des., 91, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finel.2014.07.001
  4. Elkoly, S. and ElAriss, B. (2014), "Progressive collapse evaluation of externally mitigated reinforced concrete beams", Eng. Fail. Anal., 40, 33-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2014.02.002
  5. Elsanadedy, H.M., Almusallam, T.H, Al-Salloum, Y.A. and Abbas, H. (2014), "Progressive collapse potential of a typical steel building due to blast attacks", J. Construct. Steel Res., 101, 143-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2014.05.005
  6. Gerasimidis, S. (2014), "Analytical assessment of steel frames progressive collapse vulnerability to corner column loss", J. Construct. Steel Res., 95, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2013.11.012
  7. Iranian code of practice for seismic resistant design of buildings (2004), Standard No. 2800, 3rd Edition, Building and Housing Research Center.
  8. ISC (2001), Security Design Criteria for New Federal Office Buildings and Major Modernization Projects, Interagency Security Committee.
  9. Jiang, J., Li, G.Q. and Usmani, A. (2014), "Progressive collapse mechanisms of steel frames exposed to fire", Adv. Struct. Eng., 17(3), 381-398. https://doi.org/10.1260/1369-4332.17.3.381
  10. Keyvani, L., Sasani, M. and Mirzaei, Y. (2014), "Compressive membrane action in progressive collapse resistance of RC flat plates", Eng. Struct., 59, 554-564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.10.040
  11. Zoghi, M.A. and Mirtaheri, M. (2016), "Progressive collapse analysis of steel building considering effects of infill panels", Struct. Eng. Mech., 59(1), 59-82. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2016.59.1.059
  12. Larijani, R.J, Celikag, M., Aghayan, I. and Kazemi, M. (2013), "Progressive collapse analysis of two existing steel buildings using a linear static procedure", Struct. Eng. Mech., 48(2), 207-220. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2013.48.2.207
  13. Le, J. and Xue, B. (2014), "Probabilistic analysis of reinforced concrete frame structures against progressive collapse", Eng. Struct., 76, 313-323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.07.016
  14. Tohidi, M., Yang, J. and Baniotopoulos, C. (2014), "Numerical evaluations of codified design methods for progressive collapse resistance of precast concrete cross wall structures", Eng. Struct., 76, 177-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.06.034
  15. Tsai, M.H. (2012), "Assessment of analytical load and dynamic increase factors for progressive collapse analysis of building frames", Adv. Struct. Eng., 15(1), 41-54. https://doi.org/10.1260/1369-4332.15.1.41
  16. U.S. GSA (2003), PC Analysis and Design Guidelines for New Federal Office Buildings and Major Modernization Projects, US General Services Administration, Washington (DC).

Cited by

  1. Seismic progressive collapse mitigation of buildings using cylindrical friction damper vol.20, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2021.20.1.001