Journal of Korea Water Resources Association (한국수자원학회논문집)

Korea Water Resources Association (한국수자원학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation on applicability of on/off-line parameter calibration techniques in rainfall-runoff modeling

온·오프라인 매개변수 보정기법에 따른 강우-유출해석 적용성 평가

  • Lee, Dae Eop (Department of Construction and Disaster Prevention Engineering, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Kim, Yeon Su (K-water Institute) ;
  • Yu, Wan Sik (International Water Resources Research Institute, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Lee, Gi Ha (Department of Construction and Disaster Prevention Engineering, Kyungpook National University)
  • 이대업 (경북대학교 건설방재공학과) ;
  • 김연수 (Kwater 융합연구원) ;
  • 유완식 (충남대학교 국제수자원연구소) ;
  • 이기하 (경북대학교 건설방재공학과)
  • Received : 2017.01.16
  • Accepted : 2017.03.09
  • Published : 2017.04.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate applicability of both online and offline parameter calibration techniques on rainfall-runoff modeling using a conceptual lumped hydrologic model. To achieve the goal, the storage function model was selected and then two different automatic calibration techniques: SCE-UA (offline method) and particle filter (online method) were applied to calibrate the optimal parameter sets for 9 rainfall events in the Cheoncheon catchment, upper area of the Yongdam multi-purpose dam. In order to assess reproducibility of hydrographs from the parameter sets of both techniques, the observed discharge of each event was divided into low flow (below average flow) and high flow (over average flow). The results show that the particle filter method, updating the parameters in real-time, provides more stable reproducibility than the SCE-UA method regardless of low and high flow. The optimal parameters estimated by SCE-UA are very sensitive to the selected objective functions used in this study: RMSE and HMLE. In particular, the parameter sets from RMSE and HMLE demonstrate superior goodness-of-fit values for high flow and low flow periods, respectively.

본 연구에서는 오프라인 및 온라인 매개변수 자동보정기법을 이용하여 개념적 집중형 수문모형의 매개변수를 보정한 후, 각 보정기법에 따른 강우-유출 해석 결과를 비교 분석하여 기법별 적용성을 평가하였다. 이를 위해 용담댐 상류 천천 유역을 대상으로 9개의 단기 강우사상을 선정하고, 강우-유출 모의를 위한 수문모형으로 저류함수모형을 선택하였다. 또한 저류함수모형의 매개변수 보정을 위한 자동보정기법으로 오프라인 기법으로는 SCE-UA, 온라인 기법으로는 파티클 필터를 선정하여 해석을 수행하였다. 각 기법에 따른 유출 해석결과의 재현성 평가를 위해 관측수문곡선의 평균유량을 근거로 하여 저수부(평균유량 이하)와 고수부(평균유량 초과)로 구분하여 모의결과를 비교 검토하였다. 그 결과, 매 시간 입력자료를 이용하여 매개변수를 실시간으로 업데이트하는 파티클 필터의 경우, 저수부와 고수부에 구분없이 전반적으로 우수한 재현성을 보여주었다. 반면에 SCE-UA의 경우, 대상 사상에 대한 전체기간의 정보를 활용하여 선택된 목적함수 RMSE와 HMLE를 최소로 하는 최적 매개변수를 추정함에 따라 일정규모 이상의 홍수사상에서는 목적함수에 따라 매개변수의 변동성이 나타났으며, 고수부에서는 RMSE, 저수부에서는 HMLE가 비교적 우수한 유출모의 결과를 나타내는 것으로 분석되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Arulampalam, M., Maskell, S., Gordon, N., and Clapp, T. (2002). "A tutorial on particle filters for online nonlinear/non-Gaussian Bayesian tracking." IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, Vol. 50, No. 2, pp. 174-188. https://doi.org/10.1109/78.978374
  2. Bae, D. H., Lee, B. J., and Georgakakos, K. P. (2009). "Stochastic continuous storage function model with ensemble kalman filtering (I) : Model development." Journal of Korea Water Resources Association, KWRA, Vol. 42, No. 11, pp. 953-961. https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2009.42.11.953
  3. Choi, J. N., Ahn, W. S., Kim, T. G., and Chung, G. H. (2009). "Development of empirical formulas for storage function method." Journal of Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation, KOSHAM, Vol. 9, No. 5, pp. 125-130.
  4. Chung, G. H., Park, H. S., Sung, J. Y., and Kim, H. J. (2012). "Determination and evaluation of optimal parameters in storage function method using SCE-UA." Journal of Korea Water Resources Association, KWRA, Vol. 45, No. 11, pp. 1169-1186. https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2012.45.11.1169
  5. Doucet, A., Godsill, S., and Andrieu, C. (2000). "On sequential Monte Carlo sampling methods for Bayesian filtering." Statistics and Computing, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 197-208. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008935410038
  6. Duan, Q. (1991). A global optimization strategy for efficient and effective calibration of hydrologic models. Ph. D. thesis, University of Arizona, Tucson, United States of America.
  7. Duan, Q. Y., Gupta, V. K., and Sorooshian, S. (1993). "Shuffled complex evolution approach for effective and efficient global minimization." Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Vol. 76, No. 3, pp. 501-521. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00939380
  8. Duan, Q. Y., Sorooshian, S., and Gupta, V. K. (1992). "Effective and efficient global optimization for conceptual rainfall-runoff models." Water Resources Research, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp. 1015-1031. https://doi.org/10.1029/91WR02985
  9. Gordon, N. J., Salmond, D. J., and Smith, A. F. M.. (1993). "Novel approach to nonlinear/non-gaussian bayesian state estimation." IEE Proceedings-F, Vol. 140, No. 2, pp. 107-113.
  10. Kim, Y. S. (2013). Probabilistic Estimation of River Discharge Considering Channel Characteristics Uncertainty with Particle Filters. Ph. D. thesis, University of Kyoto, Kyoto, Japan.
  11. Kim, J. R., Kim, J. C., Jeong, D. K., and Kim, J. H. (2006). "The optimal parameter estimation of storage function model based on the dynamic effect ournal title." Journal of Korea Water Resources Association, KWRA, Vol. 39, No. 7, pp. 593-603. https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2006.39.7.593
  12. Kim, Y. S., Lee, G. H., An, H. U., and Yang, J. E. (2015). "Uncertainty assessment of soil erosion model using particle filtering." Journal of Mountain Science, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 828-840. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-014-3408-3
  13. Kim, Y. S., Tachikawa, Y., and Shiiba, M. (2012). "Simultaneous estimation of inflow and channel roughness using 2d hydraulic model and particle filters." Journal of Flood Risk Management, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 112-123. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-318X.2012.01164.x
  14. Kimura, T. (1961). The flood runoff analysis method by the storage function model. The Public Works Research Institute, Ministry of Construction, Japan.
  15. Kitagawa, G. (1996), "Monte carlo filter and smoother for nonlinear nongaussian state-space models." Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 1-25. https://doi.org/10.2307/1390750
  16. Lee, G. H. (2008). Assessment of prediction uncertainty due to various sources involved in rainfall-runoff modeling. Ph. D. thesis, University of Kyoto, Kyoto, Japan.
  17. Lee, G. H., Tachikawa, Y., and Takara, K. (2007). "Identification of model structural stability through comparison of hydrologic models." Annual Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, JSCE, No. 51, pp. 49-54.
  18. Murakami, A., Shuku, T., Nishimura, S., Fujisawa, K., and Nakamura, K. (2013). "Data assimilation using the particle filter for identifying the elasto-plastic material properties of geomaterials." International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, Vol. 37, No. 11, pp. 1642-1669. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.2125
  19. Noh, S. J. (2013). Sequential monte carlo methods for probabilistic forecasts and uncertainty assessment in hydrologic modeling. Ph. D. thesis, University of Kyoto, Kyoto, Japan.
  20. Noh, S. J., Tachikawa, Y., Shiiba, M., and Kim, S. (2011). "Dual state-parameter updating scheme on a conceptual hydrologic model using sequential Monte Carlo filters." Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. B1 (Hydraulic Engineering), Vol. 67, No. 4, pp. I_1-I_6. https://doi.org/10.2208/jscejhe.67.I_1
  21. Park, B. J., Cha, H. S., and Kim, J. H. (1997). "A study on parameters estimation of storage function model using the genetic algorithms." Journal of Korea Water Resources Association, KWRA, Vol. 30, No. 4, pp. 347-355.
  22. Ristic, B., Arulampalam, B., and Gordon, N. J. (2004). "Beyond the kalman filter; Particle filters for tracking applications." Artech House Pub, Boston, United States of America., pp. 35-62.
  23. Shin, C. K., Cho, H. S., Jung, K. S., and Kim, J. H. (2004). "Grid based rainfall-runoff modelling using storage funcion method." Journal of Korea Water Resources Association, KWRA, Vol. 37, No. 11, pp. 969-978. https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2004.37.11.969
  24. Song, J. H., Kim, H. S., Hong I. P., and Kim S. U. (2006). "Parameter calibration of storage function model and flood forecasting (1) Calibration methods and evaluation of simulated flood hydrograph." Journal of The Korean Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 26, No. 1B, pp. 27-38.
  25. Sorooshian, S., and Gupta, V. K. (1995). "Model calibration." Computer models of watershed hydrology, Edited by Singh, V. P., Water Resources Publications, Highland Ranch, pp. 23-68.