Journal of the Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture (한국전통조경학회지)

Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture (한국전통조경학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Monitoring and Evaluation on the Project for Utilization of Cultural Property - Focused on the Project "SaengSaeng Cultural Property" in 2016 -

문화재활용 사업 모니터링 및 평가 - 2016년 생생문화재사업을 중심으로 -

  • Received : 2017.03.02
  • Accepted : 2017.03.23
  • Published : 2017.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study carried out field evaluation by experts, monitoring by the public, and visitor satisfaction survey for 88 sites by using cultural property projects that received support from "SaengSaeng Cultural Property"in 2016. The result of the comprehensive evaluation was 'good', the part of planning, outcome, annual special index were 'good', field operation and performance were 'normal'. The field evaluation was rated as 'normal' by experts, monitoring by the public was 'good', and visitor satisfaction survey was also 'good'. The advantages of the project were as follows; increased enjoyment of local cultural assets, utilization of historical and cultural heritage as tourism, expansion of local participation and cooperation. On the other hand, the disadvantages were as follows; shortage of promotion to other local people, deterioration of program's quality, insufficient materials for explanation of cultural assets, insufficient program for staying. We suggested measures to develop the project as follows; developing paid contents in order to secure sustainability, connection with other programs, developing representative program and brand, improvement of environment to participate, strengthening of role for experienced local organization, utilization of local artists and volunteers, exchange between local organization, promoting by government organization, managing existing visitors, establishing of strategy for promotion, improvement of monitoring by the public, strengthening of reflection of visitor's opinions, consulting for each programs.

본 연구는 2016년 생생문화재 사업 지원을 받은 전국 88개 문화유산 활용사업을 대상으로, 문화재 활용에 대한 이해를 갖고 있는 전문 인력을 활용하여, 전문가 현장 평가 및 컨설팅, 일반인 모니터링, 관람객 만족도 조사를 진행하였다. 생생문화재 사업의 종합 평가 결과는 100점 만점에 평균 86.78점으로 양호 수준으로 확인되었다. 계획, 실적, 연차별 특별지표 부문은 양호 수준, 현장운영과 성과 부문은 보통수준으로 나타났다. 전문가 현장평가는 보통, 일반인 현장평가는 양호, 관람객 만족도 조사는 양호수준을 보였다. 사업의 종합적인 성과 중 우수한 점으로는 지역의 문화재 향유권 신장, 역사문화관광자원으로 활용 가능성 제고, 지역의 참여와 협력 확대 등이 있었다. 반면 미흡한 점으로는 타 지역민 대상 홍보 미흡, 예산 대비 많은 프로그램으로 인한 질 저하, 문화재 설명 자료 부족, 스테이 프로그램 부족 등이 있었다. 사업의 발전 방안으로는 프로그램 유료화를 통한 지속성 확보, 다른 사업과의 연계, 대표프로그램 및 브랜드 개발, 참여 환경 개선, 사업에 경험이 있는 단체의 역할 강화, 지역 예술가와 자원봉사자 활용, 수행 단체 간 프로그램 교류, 정부기간을 활용한 홍보, 기존 고객 관리, 홍보의 단계별 전략 수립, 일반인 모니터링 제도 개선, 관람객 의견 반영 강화, 사업별 집중 컨설팅을 제안하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Cultural Heritage Administration.(2014). A Monitoring on the Project 'SaengSaeng Cultural Property' in 2014. Cultural Heritage Administration.
  2. Cultural Heritage Administration.(2015). A Monitoring on the Project 'SaengSaeng Cultural Property' in 2015. Cultural Heritage Administration.
  3. Cultural Heritage Administration.(2016). A Monitoring on the Project 'SaengSaeng Cultural Property' in 2016. Cultural Heritage Administration.
  4. Hwang, H. J. and Park, C.H.(2015). Utilization of Cultural Assets; Is It a Realization of Authenticity? Or a Damage to Authenticity?. The Journal of Tourism Studies. 27(4): 3-26.
  5. Im, S. Y.(2015). A Namhansanseong case study on the significance and the improving direction of 'Vibrant Cultural Property Programs'. Konkuk University.
  6. Jang, H. S.(2006). Argument about cultural heritage utilization - focusing on the concept and scope of utilization-. Korea Humanities Content Society. 7: 155-173.
  7. Kim, H. W.(2010). A Study about Regional Officials' Understanding based on the Effect of Festival for utilizing Korea's Cultural Heritage: On the basis of Festivals of Goryeong Daegaya Dynasty, Baekje Cultural Regions and Anseong Baudeogi. Paichai University.
  8. Kim, K. H.(2014). A research for the safeguarding and utilisation of intangible cultural heritage in Korea. Korea University.
  9. Lee, C. G.(2013). A study on the activation of cultural heritage of palaces and jongmyo as tourism resources : focusing on the application plan of Gyeongbokgung palace, Changdeokgung palace, changgyeonggung palace, Deoksugng palace and Jongmyo. Chungang University.
  10. Lee, C. H.(2013). A study on the effective utilization methodology of Cultural Heritage Contents. Konkuk University.
  11. Lee, C. N.(2013). The Research on the Copyright Policy for the Protection, Preservation and Utilization of Intangible Cultural Heritage. Kangwon Law Review. 40: 63-92. https://doi.org/10.18215/kwlr.2013.40..63
  12. Lee, H. J.(2015). Planning for Archaeological Relics Excavated in City Center : A Case Study of Seven Redevelopment Rrojects in Seoul City Center. Seoul National University.
  13. Lee, J. H.(2003). Study about Management Improvement and Practical Plan of Intangible Cultural Properties : on the Basis of Arts Field. Chugye University for the Arts.
  14. Lee, S. K. and Kum, H. S.(2016). Visitor's Satisfaction and Perceived Value on Cultural Heritage. Journal of Arts, Management and Policy. 37: 65-93.
  15. Lee, Y. S.(2009). A Study on the Use of Contents of Local Cultural Heritage -Focused on the Intangible Culturla Heritage of the Honam Region-. The Korean Folklore. 49(1): 333-378.
  16. Park, Y. W.(2014). An Analysis and Activation of the Projects Utilizing the Royal Tombs of the Joseon Dynasty. Journal of Cultural Heritage. 47(4): 4-21.
  17. Ryu, H. C.(2014), Expanding the Concept of Cultural Heritage Utilization and Classifying the Types. Journal of Cultural Heritage. 47(1): 4-17.
  18. Shin, C. H.(2015). A Study on Utilization Plan of Modern and Contemporary Heritage : Focusing on Registered Cultural Assets and Future Heritage in Seoul. Hankuk University of Foreign Studies.