DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Growing Density and Cavity Volume of Container Influence Major Temperate Broad-leaved Tree Species of Physiological Characteristics in Nursery Stage

용기의 생육밀도와 용적에 따른 온대 주요 활엽수의 생리 특성 변화

  • Cho, Min Seok (Forest Practice Research Center, National Institute of Forest Science) ;
  • Jeong, Jaeyeob (Forest Practice Research Center, National Institute of Forest Science) ;
  • Yang, A-Ram (Forest Practice Research Center, National Institute of Forest Science)
  • 조민석 (국립산림과학원 산림생산기술연구소) ;
  • 정재엽 (국립산림과학원 산림생산기술연구소) ;
  • 양아람 (국립산림과학원 산림생산기술연구소)
  • Received : 2017.01.25
  • Accepted : 2017.03.14
  • Published : 2017.03.31

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of container types on physiological characteristics of Zelkova serrata, Fraxinus rhynchophylla and Quercus serrata in the container nursery stage. We used 16 container types [4 growing densities (100, 144, 196 and $256\;seedlings/m^2$)${\times}4$ cavity volumes (460, 380, 300 and $220cm^3/cavity$)] and performed two-way ANOVA to test the differences in photosynthesis, photochemical efficiency and chlorophyll content among container types. Also, multiple regression analysis was conducted to correlate container dimensions with photosynthetic rate. Container types had a strong influence on photosynthesis of three species seedlings. Growing densities and cavity volumes had a significant interaction effect on photosynthetic rate, water use efficiency, stomatal conductance and chlorophyll contents except stomatal conductance of Q. serrata. In all three species, however, interactions between the two factors of container type were not found with regard to photochemical efficiency. Growing density was negatively correlated with photosynthetic rate of F rhynchophylla and Q. serrata, while cavity volumes positively affected on those of three species seedlings. The range of optimal container types was determined by multiple regression analysis based on photosynthetic rate. Consequently, optimal growing density and cavity volume of container by each tree species were found to be approximately $160{\sim}210\;seedlings/m^2$ and $430{\sim}460cm^3/cavity$ for Z. serrata, $130{\sim}150\;seedlings/m^2$ and $390{\sim}440cm^3/cavity$ for F. rhynchophylla and $130{\sim}170\;seedlings/m2$ and $420{\sim}460cm^3/cavity$ for Q. serrata, respectively. Application of adequate container will induce higher quality seedling production in nursery stage, which will also increase seedling growth in plantation stage.

본 연구에서는 느티나무, 물푸레나무 및 졸참나무를 대상으로 시설양묘 과정에서 요구되는 적정 용기의 생육밀도 및 용적을 구명하고자, 16 종류의 용기[4 생육밀도(100, 144, 196, 256본/$m^2$)${\times}4$ 용적(460, 380, 300, 220 $cm^3$/구)]에서 생산된 용기묘의 생리 특성을 조사 분석하였다. 생육밀도 및 용적에 따른 용기묘의 광합성 특성, 광화학 효율 및 엽록소 함량변화를 알아보기 위해 이원분산분석과 다중회귀분석을 이용하였다. 세 수종 모두 용기의 생육밀도와 용적은 묘목의 광합성 기구에 영향을 미치며, 두 요인간의 상호작용이 졸참나무의 기공전도도를 제외하고 광합성 속도, 수분이용효율, 기공전도도 및 엽록소 함량에서 확인되었다. 그러나 광화학 효율은 생육밀도와 용적에 따른 상호작용이 없었다. 또한, 물푸레나무와 졸참나무의 광합성 속도는 생육밀도와 부의 상관관계를 보였으며, 세 수종 모두 광합성 속도와 용적과는 정의 상관관계를 보였다. 광합성 속도를 기준으로 다중회귀분석기법을 적용한 결과, 느티나무는 160~210본/$m^2$과 430~460 $cm^3$/구, 물푸레나무는 130~150본/$m^2$과 390~440 $cm^3$/구, 졸참나무는 130~170본/$m^2$과 420~460 $cm^3$/구가 최적 용기 규격으로 판단된다. 향후, 수종별 적정 용기 적용으로 양묘과정에서 우량 용기묘 생산뿐만 아니라, 조림 후에도 우수한 생장을 기대할 수 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Adams, H.D. and Kolb, T.E. 2004. Drought responses of conifers in ecotone forests of northern Arizona: tree ring growth and leaf ${\delta}13C$. Oecologia 140: 217-225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-004-1585-4
  2. Adams III, W.W., Winter, K., Schreiber, U. and Schramel, P. 1990. Photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics in relationship to changes in pigment and element composition of leaves of Platanus occidentalis L. during autumnal leaf senescence. Plant Physiology 92: 1184-1190. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.92.4.1184
  3. Aghai, M.M., Pinto, J.R. and Davis, A.S. 2014. Container volume and growing density influence western larch (Larix occidentalis Nutt.) seedling development during nursery culture and establishment. New Forests 45: 199-213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-013-9402-8
  4. Apholo P. and Rikala, R. 2003. Field performance of silver-birch planting-stock grown at different spacing and in containers of different volume. New Forests 25: 93-108.
  5. Arnon, D.I. 1949. Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts. Polyphenoloxidase in Beta Vulgaris. Plant Physiology 24: 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.24.1.1
  6. Ashraf, M., Arfan, M., Shahbaz, M., Ahmad, M. and Jamil, A. 2002. Gas exchange characteristics and water relations in some elite okra cultivars under water deficit. Photosynthetica 40: 615-620. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024368522742
  7. Ashton, P.M.S. and Berlyn, G.P. 1992. Leaf adaptations of some Shorea species to sun and shade. New Phytologist 121: 587-596. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1992.tb01130.x
  8. Barker, M.G., Press, M.C. and Brown, N.D. 1997. Photosynthetic characteristics of dipterocarp seedlings in three tropical rain forest light environments: a basis for niche partitioning. Oecologia 112: 453-463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420050332
  9. Barnett, J.P. and Brissette, J.C. 1986. Producing Southern Pine Seedlings in Containers. USDA Forest Service, Southern Forest Experiment Station. pp. 71.
  10. Bigras, F.J. 2005. Photosynthetic response of white spruce families to drought stress. New Forests 29: 135-148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-005-0245-9
  11. Binder, W.D., Fielder, P., Mohammed, G.H. and L'Hirondelle, S.J. 1997. Applications of chlorophyll fluorescence for stock quality assessment with different types of fluorometers. New Forests 13: 63-89. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006513720073
  12. Bose, S., Herbert, S.K. and Fork, D.C. 1988. Fluorescence characteristics of photoinhibition and recovery in a sun and a shade species of the red algal genus Porphyra. Plant Physiology 86: 946-950. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.86.3.946
  13. Chaves, M.M. and Oliveira, M.M. 2004. Mechanisms underlying plant resilience to water deficits: prospects of water-saving agriculture. Journal of Experimental Botany 55: 2365-2384. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erh269
  14. Cho, M.S. 2015. Effects of growing density and cavity volume of container on growth performances and physiological characteristics of major temperate broad-leaved tree species in nursery and plantation stage. Doctoral Dissertation in Chungnam National University. pp. 194 (in Korean with English abstract).
  15. Cho, M.S., Lee, S.W., Hwang, J. and Kim, S.K. 2012. Growth performances of container seedlings of deciduous hardwood plantation species grown at different container types. Journal of Korean Forest Society 101(2): 324-332 (in Korean with English abstract).
  16. Cornic, G. 2000. Drought stress inhibits photosynthesis by decreasing stomatal aperture-not by affecting ATP synthesis. Trends in Plant Science 5: 1360-1385.
  17. Demmig, B. and Bjorkman, O. 1987. Comparison of the effect of excessive light on chlorophyll fluorescence (77K) and photon yield of O2 evolution in leaves of higher plants. Planta 171: 171-184. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00391092
  18. Dominguez-Lerena, S., Sierra, N.H., Manzano, I.C., Bueno, L.O., Rubira, J.L.P. and Mexal, J.G. 2006. Container characteristics influence Pinus pinea seedling development in the nursery and field. Forest Ecology and Management 221: 63-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2005.08.031
  19. Dreyer, E., Fichter, J. and Bonneau, M. 1994. Nutrient content and photosynthesis in young yellowing Norway spruce trees (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) following calcium and magnesium fertilisation. Plant Soil 160: 67-78. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00150347
  20. Dumroese, R.K., Sung, S.S., Pinto, J.R., Davis, A.S. and Scott, D.A. 2013. Morphology, gas exchange, and chlorophyll content of longleaf pine seedlings in response to rooting volume, copper root pruning, and nitrogen supply in a container nursery. New Forests 344: 881-897.
  21. Genty, B., Briantais, J.M. and Baker, N.R. 1989. The relationship between the quantum yield of photosynthetic electron transport and quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence. Biochemica et Byophysica Acta 990: 97-92.
  22. Gimenez, C., Mitchell, V.J. and Lawlor, D.W. 1992. Regulation of photosynthetic rate of two sunflower hybrids under water stress. Plant Physiology 98: 516-524. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.98.2.516
  23. Grossnickle, S.C. 2005. Importance of root growth in overcoming planting stress. New Forests 30: 273-294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-004-8303-2
  24. Groves, K.M., Warren, S.L. and Bilderback, T.E. 1998. Irrigation volume, application, and controlled-release fertilizer: I. Effect on plant growth and mineral nutrient content in containerized plant production. Journal of Environmental Horticulture 16: 176-181.
  25. Haase, D.L., Rose, R. and Trobaugh, J. 2006. Field performance of three stock sizes of Douglas-fir container seedlings grown with slow-release fertilizer in the nursery growing medium. New Forests 31: 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-004-5396-6
  26. Helenius, P., Luoranen, J. and Rikala, R. 2005. Physiological and morphological responses of dormant and growing Norway spruce container seedlings to drought after planting. Annals of Forest Science 62: 201-207. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:2005011
  27. Hiscox, J.D. and Israelstam, G.F. 1978. A method for the extraction of chlorophyll from leaf tissue without maceration. Canadian Journal of Botany 57: 1332-1334.
  28. Hocking, D. and Mitchell, D.L. 1974. The influences of rooting volume: seedling espacement and substratum density on greenhouse growth of lodgepole pine, white spruce, and Douglas-fir grown in extruded peat cylinders. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 5: 440-451.
  29. Hwang, J., Cho, M.S., Kim, W.G., Kim, S.K., Park, B.B. and Lee, S.W. 2013. Development of Container Nursery Production System for High Quality Seedling. Korea Forest Research Institute. pp. 194 (in Korean).
  30. Khan, S.R., Rose, R., Haase, D.L. and Sabin, T.E. 1996. Soil water stress: Its effects on phenology, and morphology of containerized douglas-fir seedlings. New Forests 12: 19-39. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00029980
  31. Kim, J.J., Kwon, K.W., Kim, P.G., Yoon, T.S., Lee, K.J., Chung, Y.S. and Son, K.S. 2010. Characteristics of meteorological disasters in Korean nursery industry. Journal of Climate Research 5(1): 42-53 (in Korean with English abstract).
  32. Kim, P.G. and Lee, E.J. 2001. Ecophysiology of photosynthesis 1 : Effects of light intensity and intercellular CO2 pressure on photosynthesis. Korean Journal of Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 3(2): 126-133 (in Korean with English abstract).
  33. KFS (Korea Forest Service). 2014. The Guidelines for Seed and Nursery Practices. pp. 100 (in Korean).
  34. KFS (Korea Forest Service). 2016. Statistical Yearbook of Forestry in 2016. pp. 414 (in Korean).
  35. Krause. G.H. and Weis, E. 1991. Chlorophyll fluorescence and photosynthesis; The basics. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 42: 313-349. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pp.42.060191.001525
  36. Landis, T.D., Tinus, R.W., McDonald, S.E. and Barnett, J.P. 1990. Containers and Growing Media. The Container Tree Nursery Manual: Agriculture Handbook 674. Vol. 2. USDA. Forest Service. Washington. pp. 88.
  37. Leugner, J., Jurasek, A. and Martincova, J. 2009. Comparison of morphological and physiological parameters of the planting material of Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.) from intensive nursery technologies with current bareroot plants. Journal of Forest Science 55: 511-517. https://doi.org/10.17221/21/2009-JFS
  38. Liang, Z.S., Yang, J.W., Shao, H.B. and Han, R.L. 2006. Investigation on water consumption characteristics and water use efficiency of poplar under soil water deficits on the Loess Plateau. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces 53: 23-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2006.07.008
  39. Lloret, F., Casanovas, C. and Penuelas, J. 1999. Seedling survival of Mediterranean shrubland species in relation to root:shoot ratio, seed size and water and nitrogen use. Functional Ecology 13: 210-216. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2435.1999.00309.x
  40. Lu, Q., Wen, X., Lu, C., Zhang, Q. and Kuang, T. 2003. Photoinhibition and photoprotection in senescent leaves of field-grown wheat plants. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 41: 749-754. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0981-9428(03)00098-6
  41. Mackinney, G. 1941. Absorption of light by chlorophyll solution. Journal of Biological Chemistry 140: 315-322.
  42. Margolis, H.A. and Brand, D.G. 1990. An ecophysiological basis for understanding plantation establishment. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 20: 375-390. https://doi.org/10.1139/x90-056
  43. Maxwell, K. and Johnson, G.N. 2000. Chlorophyll fluorescence-a practical guide. Journal of Experimental Botany 51: 659-668. https://doi.org/10.1093/jexbot/51.345.659
  44. Oliet, J., Planelles, R., Artero, F., Valverde, R., Jacobs, D. and Segura, M.L. 2009. Field performance of Pinus halepensis planted in Mediterranean arid conditions: relative influence of seedling morphology and mineral nutrition. New Forests 37: 313-331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-008-9126-3
  45. Oqvist, G. and Huner, N.P.A. 1991. Effects of cold acclimation on the susceptibility of photosynthesis to photoinhibition in scots pine and in winter and spring cereals: a fluorescence analysis. Functional Ecology 5: 91-100. https://doi.org/10.2307/2389559
  46. Osonubi, O. and Davies W.J. 1980. The Influence of plant water stress on stomatal control of gas exchange at different levels of atmospheric humidity. Oecologia 46: 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00346957
  47. Pinto, J.R., Dumroese, R.K., Davis, A.S. and Landis, T.D. 2011. Conducting seedling stocktype trials: a new approach to an age old question. Journal of Foresty 109: 293-299.
  48. Rascher, U., Liebig, M. and Luttge, U. 2000. Evaluation of instant light-response curves of chlorophyll fluorescence parameters obtained with a portable chlorophyll fluorometer on site in the field. Plant, Cell and Environment 23: 1397-1405. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3040.2000.00650.x
  49. Richards, R.A. and Condon, A.G. 1993. Challenges Ahead in Using Carbon Isotope Discrimination in Plant-Breeding Programs. Academic Press, Inc. San Diego. pp. 451-462.
  50. Romero, A.E., Ryder, J., Fisher, J.T. and Mexal, J.G. 1986. Root system modification of container stock for arid land plantings. Forest Ecology and Management 16: 281-290. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1127(86)90028-9
  51. Sagrera, B., Biel, C. and Save, R. 2013. Effects of container volume and pruning on morpho-functional characters of Salix elaeagnos Scop. under water stress for Mediterranean riparian ecosystems restoration. African Journal of Agricultural Research 8: 191-200.
  52. Salifu, K.F. and Jacobs, D.F. 2006. Characterizing fertility targets and multi-element interactions in nursery culture of Quercus rubra seedlings. Annals of Forest Science 63: 231-237. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:2006001
  53. Scarratt, J.B. 1972. Effect of Tube Diameter and Spacing on the Size of Tubed Seedling Planting Stock. Canadian Forestry Service. Great Lakes Forest Research Centre. pp. 16.
  54. South, D.B, Harris, S.W., Bernett, J.P., Hainds, M.J. and Gjerstad, D.H. 2005. Effect of container type and seedlings size on survival and early height growth of Pinus palustris seedlings in Alabama, USA. Forest Ecology and Management 204: 385-398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2004.09.016
  55. Takemura, T., Hanagata, N., Sugihara, K., Baba, S., Karube, I. and Dubinsky, Z. 2000. Physiological and biochemical responses to salt stress in the mangrove, Bruguiera gymnorrhiza. Aquatic Botany 68: 15-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3770(00)00106-6
  56. Terashima, I. and Hikosaka, K. 1995. Comparative ecophysiology of leaf and canopy photosynthesis. Plant, Cell and Environment 18: 1111-1128. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.1995.tb00623.x
  57. Timmis, R. and Tanaka, Y. 1976. Effects of container density and plant water stress on growth and cold hardiness of Douglas-fir seedlings. Forest Science 22(2): 167-172.
  58. Tsakaldimi1, M., Zagas, T., Tsitsoni, T. and Ganatsas, P. 2005. Root morphology, stem growth and field performance of seedlings of two Mediterranean evergreen oak species raised in different container types. Plant and Soil 278: 85-93 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-005-2580-1
  59. Zhang, J.W., Feng, Z., Cregg, B.M. and Schumann, C.M. 1997. Carbon isotopic composition, gas exchange, and growth of three populations of ponderosa pine differing in drought tolerance. Tree Physiology 17: 461-466. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/17.7.461

Cited by

  1. 묘령 및 식재밀도에 따른 느티나무 조림목의 초기 생육 특성 vol.109, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.14578/jkfs.2020.109.4.390