Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education (정보교육학회논문지)

Korea Association of Information Education (한국정보교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effect of Convergent Programming Study Utilizing Scratch and Sensor Board on the Elementary School Students

스크래치와 센서보드를 활용한 융합적 프로그래밍 학습이 초등학생들에게 미치는 효과

  • Moon, Wae-shik (Dept. of Computer Education, Chinju National University of Education)
  • 문외식 (진주교육대학교 컴퓨터교육과)
  • Received : 20161200
  • Published : 2017.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This research targeted some content of curriculum of the 2nd semester of the 6th grade to search a method for algorithm realization and digital programing of the regular curriculum. This research analyzed the effect of programing study on the elementary school students by analyzing the survey and teachers' evaluation result after programing utilized with some curriculum along with scratch and sensor board after conducting a class on 6th graders. As the result, interest and participation of programing study appeared higher, respectively 9.37% and 7.53% when sensor board, the hardware, rather than merely utilizing scratch while programing study. Also, understanding of class displayed 7.53% higher. Achievement evaluation that evaluated effective completion of programing, also, was analyzed effective, since it is available for a wide algorithm realization.

본 연구는 2018년부터 실시 예정인 프로그래밍 학습을 정규 교과 내용에서 알고리즘 구현과 이를 디지털적으로 프로그래밍 할 수 있는 방안을 찾기 위해 6학년 2학기 일부 교과내용을 학습모형으로 하였다. 6학년 학생들에게 교과수업 후 일부 교과내용을 스크래치와 센서보드를 함께 활용한 프로그래밍을 시킨 후 설문조사와 교사의 평가 결과를 분석하여 프로그래밍 학습이 초등학생들에게 어떠한 효과가 있는지를 분석하였다. 결과로서, 프로그래밍 학습 시 단순히 스크래치만 활용하는 것 보다 하드웨어인 센서보드를 함께 활용하면 프로그래밍 학습의 흥미도와 참여도가 각각 9.37%, 7.53%가 더 높았다. 또한, 교과수업의 이해도는 7.53%가 더 높게 나타났다. 프로그래밍의 효과적 완성도를 평가하는 성취도 평가에서도 폭 넓은 알고리즘 구현이 가능하여 효과적인 것으로 분석되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahn, S. J(2013). Effect of Programming Learning Using Pico board on Programming Interset and Metacognitnion of Middle School Students. Master Thesis. Korea National of University.
  2. Apple Site. http://www.apple.com/swift/playgrounds/
  3. Google Site. https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/coding-with-chrome/becloognjehhiood-mnimnehjcibkloed
  4. Hwang, Y. H, Mun, K.J, Park, Y. B.(2016). Study of Perception on Programming and Computational Thinking and Attitude toward Science Learning of High School Students through Software Inquiry Activity: Focus on using Scratch and physical computing materials. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 36(2), 325-335. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2016.36.2.0325
  5. Jang, Y. J, Lee, W. G(2014). A Study on Utilization of Programming Language for Physical Computing Education. Journal of the Korea Association of Computer Education, 18(2), 27-32.
  6. Korea Scientific, http://www.chocopi.org
  7. Lee, EunKyoung(2009). A Task Centered Scratch Programming Learning Program for Enhancing Learner's Problem Solving abilities. The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education, 12(6), 1-9.
  8. Ministry of Education(2014). Software-driven social action strategy briefing. July 23, 2014.
  9. Ministry of Education(2015). Guide of SW education. February, 2015.
  10. Moon, W. S(2014). Development and Application of STEAM Education Model using Scratch Programming and Sensor Board in Class of Elementary School Students. Journal of the Korea Association of Information Education 18(2), June 2014, pp. 213-224. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2014.18.2.213
  11. Moon, W. S(2015). The Application of the Scratch2.0 and the Sensor Board to the Programming Education of Elementary School. Journal of the Korea Association of Information Education 19(1), March 2015, pp. 149-158. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2015.19.1.149
  12. National University of Education(2015). Education Curriculum and Operations manual.
  13. Picocricket, http://www.picocricket.com/index.html
  14. Roboko, http://www.roboko.com/
  15. Scratch Site. http://scratch.mit.edu
  16. Yoon, J. H, Jun, Y. C(2015). A case study of Robot programming using GoGo Board. Journal of the Korea Association of Computer Education, 19(2), 29-33.