The Impacts of Private Health Insurance on Medical Institution Selection: Evidence from Outpatient Service Utilization among Arthritis Patients

민간의료보험이 의료기관 종별 선택에 미치는 영향: 관절염 환자의 외래 이용을 중심으로

  • You, Chang Hoon (Graduate School of Healthcare Management and Policy, the Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Kang, Sungwook (Department of Public Health, Daegu Haany University) ;
  • Choi, Ji Heon (International Institute of Health) ;
  • Kwon, Young Dae (Department of Humanities and Social Medicine, College of Medicine and Catholic Institute for Healthcare Management, the Catholic University of Korea)
  • 유창훈 (가톨릭대학교 의료경영대학원) ;
  • 강성욱 (대구한의대학교 보건학부) ;
  • 최지헌 (지구촌보건의료연구소) ;
  • 권영대 (가톨릭대학교 의과대학 인문사회의학과 및 가톨릭의료경영연구소)
  • Received : 2017.02.15
  • Accepted : 2017.04.14
  • Published : 2017.06.30

Abstract

Recently, with the increase in the number of private health insurance subscribers, interest in overuse of the medical service is increasing. This study analyzed the impacts of private health insurance (PHI) on medical institution selection in outpatient service utilization among persons with arthritis. In order to control patients' health status, we extracted outpatient episodes with the same disease (KCD6, M13) from Korea Health Panel. The unit of analysis was an outpatient visit with arthritis in 2014 (n=23,363). In the light of insurance coverage, we redefined three type of private health insurance (ex, indemnity, fixed benefit, and non-insured) as a test variable and two type of medical institution (ex, hospital and physician visit) as a dependent variable. We conducted a probit regression analysis to identify the impacts of PHI on medical institution selection controlling for heteroscedasticity. The results of this study showed that the insured with indemnity were more likely to choose hospital departments than clinics (marginal effect=0.0475, p=0.000). The impact of participation of fixed benefit PHI was not as clear as that of indemnity type (marginal effect=0.0162, p=0.047). In conclusion, this study confirmed that PHI, particularly indemnity type has a significant impact on the selection of medical institutions. Healthcare policy makers should consider that PHI not only affects the overall quantitative increase in healthcare utilization, but also influences the selection of medical institutions.

Keywords

References

  1. OECD. OECD Health Statistics 2014.(http://www.oecd.org).
  2. Sung SC, Son MS. National health insurance statistical yearbook. Seoul: Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service and National Health Insurance Service. 2015.
  3. Jeong HS. The achievement and challenges of health insurance coverage improvement policies. HIRA Policy Brief. 2015;9(3):22-30.
  4. Ministry of Health and Welfare. 2013 National health expenditure (account). Seoul. Ministry of Health and Welfare, 2015.
  5. Seo NG, Kang TW, Hwang YH, Park JJ Lee SH, Lee JA et al. A basic report on the Korea Health Panel Survey of 2013. Seoul: Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs. 2015.
  6. Dionne G. Handbook of insurance, Springer, 2000.
  7. Yun H. Effects of private insurance on medical expenditure. KDI J Econ Policy 2008;30(2):99-128. https://doi.org/10.23895/kdijep.2008.30.2.99
  8. Kang S, You CH, Oh EH, Kwon YD. The impact of having private health insurance on healthcare utilization with controlling for endogeneity. Korean J Health Econ Policy 2010;16(1):139-159.
  9. Kim DH. Effects of fee-for-service health insurance on medical consumption. Korean Insur J 2014;98(98):61-90.
  10. Jeon B, Kwon S. Effect of private health insurance on health care utilization in a universal public insurance system: a case of South Korea. Health Policy 2013;113(1):69-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.05.007
  11. You CH, Kang S, Choi JH, Oh EH, Kwon YD. The effect of private health insurance on health care utilization: evidence from Korea Health Panel (2008-2010). Korean J Health Serv Manag 2014;8(2):101-113. https://doi.org/10.12811/kshsm.2014.8.2.101
  12. Ettner S. Adverse selection and the purchase of Medigap insurance by the elderly. J Health Econ 1997;16(5):543-562. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6296(97)00011-8
  13. Khandker RK, McCormack LA. Medicare spending by beneficiaries with various types of supplemental insurance. Med Care Res Rev 1999;56(2):137-155. https://doi.org/10.1177/107755879905600202
  14. Harmon C, Nolan B. Health insurance and health services utilization in Ireland. Health Econ 2001;10(2):135-145. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.565
  15. Vera-Hernandez, Angel M. Duplicate coverage and demand for health care. The case of Catalonia. Health Econ 1999;8(7):579-598. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(199911)8:7<579::AID-HEC478>3.0.CO;2-P
  16. Sapelli C, Vial B. Self-selection and moral hazard in Chilean health insurance. J Health Econ 2003;22(3):459-476. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6296(02)00121-2
  17. Buchmueller TC, Couffinhal A, Grignon M, Perronnin, M. Access to physician services: does supplemental insurance matter? Evidence from France. Health Econ 2004;13(7):669-687. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.879
  18. Bolhaar J, Lindeboom M, Van Der Klaauw B. A dynamic analysis of the demand for health insurance and health care. Eur Econ Rev 2012;56(4):669-690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2012.03.002
  19. Jones, AM, Koolman X, Van Doorslaer E. The impact of having supplementary private health insurance on the use of specialists. Annales d'Economie et de Statistique, 2006;83/84:251-275.
  20. Rodriguez, M, Stoyanova A. The effect of private insurance access on the choice of GP/specialist and public/private provider in Spain. Health Econ 2004;13(7):689-703. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.832
  21. Van Doorslaer E, Clarke P, Savage E. Hall J. Horizontal inequities in Australia's mixed public/private health care system. Health Policy 2008;86(1):97-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2007.09.018
  22. Kim M, Kwon S. The effect of outpatient cost sharing on health care utilization of the elderly. J Prev Med Public Health 2010;43(6):496-504. https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.2010.43.6.496
  23. Kim, HJ, Kim YH, Kim HS, Woo JS, Oh, SJ. The impact of outpatient coinsurance rate increase on outpatient healthcare service utilization in tertiary and general hospital. Health Policy Manag 2013:23(1);19-34. https://doi.org/10.4332/KJHPA.2013.23.1.019
  24. Kang HJ. Policy direction for decreasing the concentration of patients to extra-large hospitals. Health Welf Forum 2014:210(10);65-76.
  25. Cheong C, Lee TJ. The effect of increase in coinsurance rate for tertiary hospital visits on the choice among different types of medical facilities stratified by income levels in Korea. Korean J Health Econ Policy 2015:21(1);103-124.
  26. You CH, Kwon YD. Factors influencing medical institution selection for outpatient services. J Korean Med Assoc 2012;55(9):898-910. https://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2012.55.9.898
  27. Lee JC, Park JS, Kim HN, Kim KH. Healthcare utilization and expenditure depending on the types of private health insurance in Korea. Korean J Hosp Manag 2014:19(4);57-68.
  28. Kim DR. The effect of having usual source of care on the choice among different types of medical facilities. Health Policy Manag 2016:26(3);195-206. https://doi.org/10.4332/KJHPA.2016.26.2.195
  29. Jung YH, Seo NG, Go SG, Han EJ. A report on the Korea Health Panel Survey of 2008. Seoul: Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs, 2010.
  30. Cho WH, Kim HJ, Lee SH. A study on the criteria for selection of medical care facilities. Korean J Prev Med 1992;25:53-63.
  31. Lee SH. A study of hospital choice on the basis of consumption values theory. J Prev Med Public Health 1997;30:413-427.
  32. Habtom GK, Ruys P. The choice of a health care provider in Eritrea. Health Policy 2007;80:202-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2006.02.012
  33. Lee JC, Kim KH, Kim HN, Park YH. Factors associated with the hypertension outpatients' choice of healthcare providers in Korea. J Korean Med Assoc, 2011:54(9):961-970. https://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2011.54.9.961
  34. Lee JC, Kim KH, Kim HN, Kim NS. Factors associated with diabetes outpatient use of tertiary or general hospitals as their usual source of care in Korea. J Korean Med Assoc 2012:55(12):1215-1225. https://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2012.55.12.1215
  35. Lee EB. (2012). Clinical Manifestations and Differential Diagnosis of Arthritides. Korean J Med, 83(2), 157-161. https://doi.org/10.3904/kjm.2012.83.2.157
  36. Choi JH, Kang S, You CH, Kwon YD. The determinants of choosing traditional Korean medicine or conventional medicine: findings from the Korea Health Panel. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med, 2015;2015:147408.
  37. You CH, Kang S, Kwon YD, Oh EH. The effects of supplementary private health insurance on healthcare utilization and expenditures: indemnity vs. fixed-benefit. Korean Soc Secur Stud 2011;27(1):277-292.
  38. Grossman M. On the concept of health capital and the demand for health. J Polit Econ 1972:80(2):223-255. https://doi.org/10.1086/259880
  39. Anderson R. A Behavioral Model of Families' Use of Health Services. Research Series No. 25. Chicago: Center for Health Administration Studies, University of Chicago. 1968.
  40. Yun H, Lee S. Primary care and health care reform in Korea. Working paper (2012-04). Seoul. Korea Development Institute. 2012.
  41. Yun KJ, Oh YH, Lee SH, Ha SL, Yeo JY, Kim JH, et al. Issues and improving strategies on Korea Healthcare Delivery System, KIHASA, 2014.