DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

In vitro evaluation methods on adaptation of fixed dental prosthesis

고정성 보철물의 적합도에 대한 실험적 평가방법

  • Lee, Hyunho (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Lee, Du-Hyeong (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Lee, Kyu-Bok (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University)
  • 이현호 (경북대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 이두형 (경북대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 이규복 (경북대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실)
  • Received : 2016.11.27
  • Accepted : 2017.04.25
  • Published : 2017.06.30

Abstract

Clinically, the fit of fixed prosthesis is an essential element for successful restoration. The fit of prosthesis is largely classified into marginal fit and internal fit, and various methods to assess these have been introduced including microscopic margin measurement, cross-sectional measurement, silicone replica technique, 3-dimensional scanning data superposition, weight technique and micro CT scanning. Thus, this study is aimed at proposing a more convenient and accurate measurement method of fits in a digital environment by comparatively analyzing the advantages and disadvantages of each known method based on existing literature.

임상적으로 고정성보철물의 적합도는 성공적인 수복을 위해 필수적인 요소이다. 보철물의 적합도는 크게 변연적합도와 내면적합도로 분류되며, 이를 평가하기 위한 방법으로는 현미경 변연 측정법, 절단면 측정법, 실리콘 복제법, 3차원 스캔데이터 중첩법, 무게 측정법, 마이크로 CT 측정법 등 다양한 방법들이 소개되고 있다. 이에 본 연구에서는 기존의 문헌들을 바탕으로 각 방법들의 장, 단점을 비교분석함으로써 디지털환경에서 보다 편리하고 정확한 측정법을 제시하고자 한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Kim MY, Lee KW, Moon HS, Chung MK. A study on the gratification of the patient in the Dental Hospital. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2008;46:65-82.
  2. Rekow ED. High-technology innovations-and limitations-for restorative dentistry. Dent Clin North Am 1993;37:513-24.
  3. Hung SH, Hung KS, Eick JD, Chappell RP. Marginal fit of porcelain-fused-to-metal and two types of ceramic crown. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:26-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90260-J
  4. Schwartz NL, Whitsett LD, Berry TG, Stewart JL. Unserviceable crowns and fixed partial dentures: life-span and causes for loss of serviceability. J Am Dent Assoc 1970;81:1395-401. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1970.0398
  5. Grasso JE, Nalbandian J, Sanford C, Bailit H. Effect of restoration quality on periodontal health. J Prosthet Dent 1985;53:14-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(85)90056-3
  6. Holmes JR, Bayne SC, Holland GA, Sulik WD. Considerations in measurement of marginal fit. J Prosthet Dent 1989;62:405-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(89)90170-4
  7. Suarez MJ, Gonzalez de Villaumbrosia P, Pradies G, Lozano JF. Comparison of the marginal fit of Procera AllCeram crowns with two finish lines. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:229-32.
  8. Pelekanos S, Koumanou M, Koutayas SO, Zinelis S, Eliades G. Micro-CT evaluation of the marginal fit of different In-Ceram alumina copings. Eur J Esthet Dent 2009;4:278-92.
  9. Christensen GJ. Marginal fit of gold inlay casting. J Prosthet Dent 1966;16:297-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(66)90082-5
  10. Sorensen SE, Larsen IB, Jorgensen KD. Gingival and alveolar bone reaction to marginal fit of subgingival crown margins. Scand J Dent Res 1986;94: 109-14.
  11. Assif D, Rimer Y, Aviv I. The flow of zinc phosphate cement under a full-coverage restoration and its effect on marginal adaptation according to the location of cement application. Quitessence Int 1987;18:765-74.
  12. McLean JW, von Fraunhofer JA. The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique. Br Dent J 1971;131:107-11. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4802708
  13. McLean JW. Polycarboxylate cements. Five years' experience in general practice. Br Dent J 1972;132: 9-15. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4802795
  14. Grey NJ, Piddock V, Wilson MA. In vitro comparison of conventional crowns and a new all-ceramic system. J Dent 1993;21:47-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(93)90051-Q
  15. Tuntiprawon M. Wilson PR. The effect of cement thickness on the fracture strength of all-ceramic crowns. Aust Dent J 1995;40:17-21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.1995.tb05607.x
  16. Jorgensen KD, Esbensen AL. The relationship between the film thickness of zinc phosphate cement and the retention of veneer crowns. Acta Odontol Scand 1968;26:169-75. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016356809026130
  17. Passon C, Lambert RH, Lambert RL, Newman S. The effect of multiple layers of die-spacer on crown retention. Oper Dent 1992;17:42-9.
  18. Sorensen JA, Munksgaard EC. Interfacial gaps of resin cemented ceramic inlays. Eur J Oral Sci 1995; 103:116-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.1995.tb00128.x
  19. Molin MK, Karlsson SL, Kristiansen MS. Influence of film thickness on joint bend strength of a ceramic/resin composite joint. Dent Mater 1996;12: 245-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(96)80030-3
  20. Kunii J, Hotta Y, Tamaki Y, Ozawa A, Kobayashi Y, Fugishima A, Miyazaki T, Fujiwara T. Effect of sintering on the marginal and internal fit of CAD/CAM-fabricated zirconia frameworks. Dent Mater J 2007;26:820-6. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.26.820
  21. Mitchell CA, Pintado MR, Douglas WH. Nondestructive, in vitro quantification of crown margins. J Prosthet Dent 2001;85:575-84. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2001.114268
  22. Shearer B, Gough MB, Setchell DJ. Influence of marginal configuration and porcelain addition on the fit of In-Ceram crowns. Biomaterials 1996;17: 1891-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-9612(95)00302-9
  23. Rahme HY, Tehini GE, Adib SM, Ardo AS, Rifai KT. In vitro evaluation of "replica technique" in the measurement of the fit of Procera crowns. J Contemp Dent Pract 2008;9:25-32.
  24. Tsitrou EA, Northeast SE, van Noort R. Evaluation of the marginal fit of three margin designs of resin composite crowns using CAD/CAM. J Dent 2007;35:68-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2006.04.008
  25. Tjan AH, Li T, Logan GI, Baum L. Marginal accuracy of complete crowns made from alternative casting alloys. J Prosthet Dent 1991;66:157-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80041-1
  26. Stappert CF, Dai M, Chitmongkolsuk S, Gerds T, Strub JR. Marginal adaptation of three-unit fixed partial dentures constructed from pressed ceramic systems. Br Dent J 2004;196:766-70. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4811390
  27. Wolfart S, Wegner SM, Al-Halabi A, Kern M. Clinical evaluation of marginal fit of a new experimental all-ceramic system before and after cementation. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:587-92.
  28. Okutan M, Heydecke G, Butz F, Strub JR. Fracture load and marginal fit of shrinkage-free ZrSiO4 allceramic crowns after chewing simulation. J Oral Rehabil 2006;33:827-32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2006.01637.x
  29. Att W, Komine F, Gerds T, Strub JR. Marginal adaptation of three different zirconium dioxide three-unit fixed dental prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 2009;101:239-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60047-0
  30. Tinschert J, Natt G, Mautsch W, Spiekermann H, Anusavice KJ. Marginal fit of alumina- and zirconia-based fixed partial dentures produced by a CAD/CAM system. Oper Dent 2001;26:367-74.
  31. Beschnidt SM, Strub JR. Evaluation of the marginal accuracy of different all-ceramic crown systems after simulation in the artificial mouth. J Oral Rehabil 1999;26:582-93. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00449.x
  32. Kern M, Schaller HG, Strub JR. Marginal fit of restorations before and after cementation in vivo. Int J Prosthodont 1993;6:585-91.
  33. Assif D, Antopolski B, Helft M, Kaffe I. Comparison of methods of clinical evaluation of the marginal fit of complete cast gold crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1985;54:20-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(85)80062-7
  34. Groten M, Axmann D, Probster L, Weber H. Determination of the minimum number of marginal gap measurements required for practical in-vitro testing. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:40-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(00)70087-4
  35. Luthardt RG, Bornemann G, Lemelson S, Walter MH, Huls A. An innovative method for evaluation of the 3-D internal fit of CAD/CAM crowns fabricated after direct optical versus indirect laser scan digitizing. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:680-5.
  36. Moldovan O, Luthardt RG, Corcodel N, Rudolph H. Three-dimensional fit of CAD/CAM-made zirconia copings. Dent Mater 2011;27:1273-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.09.006
  37. Kim KB, Kim JH, Kim WC, Kim HY, Kim JH. Evaluation of the marginal and internal gap of metal-ceramic crown fabricated with a selective laser sintering technology: two- and threedimensional replica techniques. J Adv Prosthodont 2013;5:179-86. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2013.5.2.179
  38. Coli P, Karlsson S. Fit of a new pressure-sintered zirconium dioxide coping. Int J Prosthodont 2004; 17:59-64.
  39. Laurent M, Scheer, P, Dejou J, Laborde G. Clinical evaluation of the marginal fit of cast crowns-validation of the silicon replica method. J Oral Rehabil 2008;35:116-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2003.01203.x
  40. Kim JH, Kim KB. Evaluation of dimensional stability of digital dental model fabricated by impression scanning method. J Dent Hyg Sci 2014;14:15-21.
  41. DeLong R, Heinzen M, Hodges JS, Ko CC, Douglas WH. Accuracy of a system for creating 3D computer models of dental arches. J Dent Res 2003;82:438-42. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910308200607
  42. Bae SY, Park JY, Jeong ID, Kim JH, Kim WC. Three-dimensional analysis of marginal and internal fit of copings fabricated with polyetherketoneketone (PEKK) and zirconia. J Prosthodont Res 2017;61:106-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2016.07.005
  43. Schaefer O, Watts DC, Sigusch BW, Kuepper H, Guentsch A. Marginal and internal fit of pressed lithium disilicate partial crowns in vitro: a three-dimensional analysis of accuracy and reproducibility. Dent Mater 2012;28:320-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.12.008
  44. Kim KB, Jung JK, Kim JH. Accuracy of digital impression made from different elastomeric impression materials: three-dimensional superimpositional analysis. J Dent Hyg Sci 2014;14:94-100.
  45. Nakamura T, Dei N, Kojima T, Wakabayashi K. Marginal and internal fit of Cerec 3 CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:244-8.
  46. Lee KB, Park CW, Kim KH, Kwon TY. Marginal and internal fit of all-ceramic crowns fabricated with two different CAD/CAM systems. Dent Mater J 2008;27:422-6. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.27.422
  47. Colpani JT, Borba M, Della Bona A. Evaluation of marginal and internal fit of ceramic crown copings. Dent Mater 2013;29:174-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.10.012
  48. Borba M, Cesar PF, Griggs JA, Della Bona A. Adaptation of all-ceramic fixed partial dentures. Dent Mater 2011;27:1119-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.08.004
  49. Seo D, Yi Y, Roh B. The effect of preparation designs on the marginal and internal gaps in Cerec3 partial ceramic crowns. J Dent 2009;37:374-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2009.01.008
  50. Alfaro DP, Ruse ND, Carvalho RM, Wyatt CC. Assessment of the internal fit of lithium disilicate crowns using micro-CT. J Prosthodont 2015;24: 381-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12274
  51. Rungruanganunt P, Kelly JR, Adams DJ. Two imaging techniques for 3D quantification of precementation space for CAD/CAM crowns. J Dent 2010;38:995-1000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2010.08.015
  52. Kim JH, Jeong JH, Lee JH, Cho HW. Fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated from conventional and digital impressions assessed with micro-CT. J Prosthet Dent 2016;116:551-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.03.028
  53. Nawafleh NA, Mack F, Evans J, Mackay J, Hatamleh MM. Accuracy and reliability of methods to measure marginal adaptation of crowns and FDPs: a literature review. J Prosthodont 2013;22:419-28. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12006

Cited by

  1. 치과용 모형 스캐너의 지대치 중첩 과정이 최종 가상 모형에 미치는 영향 vol.57, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2019.57.3.203
  2. 다양한 CAD/CAM 방식으로 제작한 금속하부구조물 간의 변연 및 내면 적합도 비교 연구 vol.57, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2019.57.3.211
  3. 치과용 3D 프린터로 제작된 임시 수복용 레진의 정확도 평가 vol.19, pp.6, 2019, https://doi.org/10.13065/jksdh.20190094
  4. Evaluation of intaglio surface trueness and margin quality of interim crowns in accordance with the build angle of stereolithography apparatus 3-dimensional printing vol.126, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.04.028
  5. 단일 절삭가공용 왁스 디스크 내에서 순차적 절삭가공 순서에 따른 크라운의 내면 및 변연 적합도 비교 vol.59, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2021.59.4.395