Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science (구강회복응용과학지)

Korean Academy of Stomatognathic Function and Occlusion (대한턱관절교합학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of repeated learning for two dental CAD software programs

두 종의 치과용 캐드 소프트웨어에 대한 반복학습의 효과

  • Son, KeunBaDa (Department of Dental Science, Graduate School, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Lee, Wan-Sun (Advanced Dental Device Development Institute, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Lee, Kyu-Bok (Department of Dental Science, Graduate School, Kyungpook National University)
  • 손큰바다 (경북대학교 대학원 치의과학과) ;
  • 이완선 (경북대학교 첨단치과의료기기개발연구소) ;
  • 이규복 (경북대학교 대학원 치의과학과)
  • Received : 2017.05.09
  • Accepted : 2017.06.12
  • Published : 2017.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to assess the relationship between the time spent designing custom abutments and repeated learning using dental implant computer aided design (CAD) software. Materials and Methods: The design of customized abutments was performed four stages using the 3DS CAD software and the EXO CAD software, and measured repeatedly three times by each stage. Learning effect by repetition was presented with the learning curve, and the significance of the reduction in the total time and the time at each stage spent on designing was evaluated using the Friedman test and the Wilcoxon signed rank test. The difference in the design time between groups was analyzed using the repeated measure two-way ANOVA. Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS statistics software (P < 0.05). Results: Repeated learning of the customized abutment design displayed a significant difference according to the number of repetition and the stage (P < 0.001). The difference in the time spent designing was found to be significant (P < 0.001), and that between the CAD software programs was also significant (P = 0.006). Conclusion: Repeated learning of CAD software shortened the time spent designing. While less design time on average was spent with the 3DS CAD than with the EXO CAD, the EXO CAD showed better results in terms of learning rate according to learning effect.

목적: 치과 임플란트 캐드 소프트웨어를 이용하여 맞춤형 지대주 디자인 시에 소요되는 시간과 반복학습의 관계를 평가하는 것이다. 연구 재료 및 방법: 맞춤형 지대주 디자인은 3DS 캐드 소프트웨어와 EXO 캐드 소프트웨어를 사용하여 지정된 4개의 단계 순으로 시행되었고, 단계별로 3회 반복 측정하였다. 반복학습에 의한 학습효과는 학습곡선으로 나타냈고, 반복학습에 따른 디자인 시에 소요되는 총 시간과 단계별 소요되는 시간의 감소가 유의한지는 Friedman 검정과 사후검증(Wilcoxon signed rank test)으로 평가하였다. 디자인 시간과 군간의 차이는 반복 측정 이 요인 분석으로 평가하였다. 통계 분석은 SPSS 통계 소프트웨어를 사용하여 수행하였다(P < 0.05). 결과: 맞춤형 지대주 디자인의 반복학습은 횟수와 단계에 따라 유의한 차이를 나타냈다(P < 0.001). 디자인 시간에 따른 차이는 유의한 것으로 나타났으며(P < 0.001), 캐드 소프트웨어 간의 차이도 유의한 것으로 나타났다(P = 0.006). 결론: 캐드 소프트웨어의 반복학습은 디자인 시간을 단축하였고 디자인 평균시간은 3DS 캐드가 EXO 캐드에 비하여 더 적게 소요되었으나, 학습효과에 따른 학습률은 EXO 캐드가 3DS 캐드보다 좋은 결과를 보였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Duret F, Preston JD. CAD/CAM imaging in dentistry. Curr Opin Dent 1991;1:150-4.
  2. Duret F, Blouin JL, Duret B. CAD-CAM in dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc 1988;117:715-20. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1988.0096
  3. Park JH, Kim JE, Shim JS. Digital workflow for a dental prosthesis that considers lateral mandibular relation. J Prosthet Dent 2017;117:340-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.07.034
  4. Lee JJ. Relationship of dental stone properties and margins setting in CAD system. Available from: http://www.riss.kr/search/detail/DetailView.do?p_mat_type=be54d9b8bc7cdb09&control_no=3a 8f324dac3261eaffe0bdc3ef48d419 (updated 2017 May 9).
  5. Lewis S, Beumer J 3rd, Hornburg W, Moy P. The" UCLA" abutment. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1988;3:183-9.
  6. Duke ES. The status of CAD/CAM in restorative dentistry. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2001;22: 968-72.
  7. Kim HE, Cho IH. Stress analysis and fatigue failure of prefabricated and customized abutments of dental implants. J Dent Rehabil Appl Sci 2013;29:209-23. https://doi.org/10.14368/jdras.2013.29.3.209
  8. Rieder CE. Customized implant abutment copings to achieve biologic, mechanical, and esthetic objectives. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1996;16:20-9.
  9. Heydecke G, Sierraalta M, Razzoog ME. Evolution and use of aluminum oxide single-tooth implant abutments: a short review and presentation of two cases. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15:488-93.
  10. Hong JI. A study on user's learn ability evaluation method using learning curve model. Graduate School of Korea University of Technology and Education, Master's Thesis; 2007.
  11. Nielsen J, Landauer TK. A mathematical model of the finding of usability problems. in Proceedings of the INTERACT'93 and CHI'93 conference on Human factors in computing systems; 1993.
  12. Hwang H. Work management. Seoul; Youngji munhwhasa; 1987. p.203-7.
  13. Wright TP. Factors affecting the cost of airplanes. J Aeronaut Sci 1936;3:122-8. https://doi.org/10.2514/8.155
  14. Kahouli-Brahmi S. Technological learning in energy-environment-economy modelling: a survey. Energy Policy 2008;36:138-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.09.001
  15. Chambers D. Learning curves: what do dental students learn from repeated practice of clinical procedures? J Dent Educ 2012;76:291-302.
  16. Kim J. Comparison of learning curves between two different intraoral scanners. Available from: http://www.riss.kr/search/detail/DetailView.do?p_mat_type=be54d9b8bc7cdb09&control_no=22db71188 64f83fdffe0bdc3ef48d419 (updated 2017 May 9).
  17. Simpson AH, Howie CR, Norrie J. Surgical trial design - learning curve and surgeon volume: determining whether inferior results are due to the procedure itself, or delivery of the procedure by the surgeon. Bone Joint Res 2017;6:194-5. https://doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.64.BJR-2017-0051
  18. Gonzalez JM, Cohen J, Gromski MA, Saito K, Loundou A, Matthe K. Learning curve for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) of pancreatic lesions in a novel ex-vivo simulation model. Endosc Int Open 2016;4:E1286-91. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-118176
  19. Ospina ODA, Medina AMR, Marulanda MC, Buitrago LMG. Cumulative Sum learning curves (CUSUM) in basic anaesthesia procedures. Rev Colomb Anestesiol 2014;42:142-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rca.2014.03.004
  20. Khan N, Abboudi H, Khan MS, Dasgupta P, Ahmed K. Measuring the surgical ‘learning curve': methods, variables and competency. BJU Int 2014; 113:504-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.12197
  21. Berglund C, Soderholm P. Modeling technical change in energy system analysis: analyzing the introduction of learning-by-doing in bottom-up energy models. Energy Policy 2006;34:1344-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2004.09.002
  22. Ray LaHood, Lisa P. Jackson. Final rule making for 2017-2025 light-duty vehicle greenhouse gas emission standards and corporate average fuel economy standards. EPA and NHTSA 2012;3-24.
  23. Jirapinyo P, Abidi WM, Aihara H, Zaki T, Tsay C, Imaeda AB, Thompson CC. Preclinical endoscopic training using a part-task simulator: learning curve assessment and determination of threshold score for advancement to clinical endoscopy. Surg Endosc 2017 Feb 22. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5436-x. [Epub ahead of print]
  24. Arai T, Lefevre T, Hovasse T, Hayashida K, Watanabe Y, O'Connor SA, Benamer H, Garot P, Cormier B, Bouvier E, Morice MC, Chevalier B. Evaluation of the learning curve for transcatheter aortic valve implantation via the transfemoral approach. Int J Cardiol 2016;203:491-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.10.178

Cited by

  1. 치과용 모형 스캐너의 지대치 중첩 과정이 최종 가상 모형에 미치는 영향 vol.57, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2019.57.3.203
  2. Evaluating usability of and satisfaction with two types of dental CAD software vol.35, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.14368/jdras.2019.35.1.11
  3. Digital Evaluation of the Accuracy of Computer-Guided Dental Implant Placement: An In Vitro Study vol.9, pp.16, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/app9163373
  4. Assessment of Compatibility between Various Intraoral Scanners and 3D Printers through an Accuracy Analysis of 3D Printed Models vol.13, pp.19, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13194419