The Journal of Fisheries Business Administration (수산경영론집)

The Korean Society of Fisheries Business Administration (한국수산경영학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Estimation of Conservation Value of Fisheries Resource Protected Area using CVM

수산자원보호구역의 보전 가치 추정에 관한 연구

  • Kang, Seok-Kyu (Department of Business Administration, Jeju National University)
  • Received : 2017.06.05
  • Accepted : 2017.06.29
  • Published : 2017.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to estimate conservation value of fisheries resource protected area by the double-bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation method. The data in this analysis come from a survey of respondents of resident in fisheries resource protected area using a proportional stratified sampling from the population. The questionnaires covered all the 5 fisheries resource protected area and the sample size of every protected area was 120 questionnaires. The survey period was from August to October in 2016. Above all, the average willingness to pay amount(WTP) per person of Namhae-Tongyoung I, Namhae-Tongyoung II, Jindong bay, Hansan bay, Cheonsu bay is estimated \6,215, \13,215, \6,405, \9,785, and \10,390 respectively. And, the total value of Namhae-Tongyoung I, Namhae-Tongyoung II, Jindong bay, Hansan bay, and Cheonsu bay is evaluated \108.8 billion, \357 billion, \118 billion, 210.2 billion, \ 245.8 billion respectively. Moreover, the yearly value of Namhae-Tongyoung I, Namhae-Tongyoung II, Jindong bay, Hansan bay, and Cheonsu bay is evaluated \6 billion, \19.6 billion, \6.5 billion, 11.6 billion, \ 13.5 billion. In conclusion, fisheries resource protected area has the higher conservational value. Consequently, it is essential for now or future generation's use of fisheries resources. In light of the fisheries resource protected area's value and importance, this should be promoted to the public including the local community who utilizes fisheries resource protected area wisely. Also, this suggests that the policy for fishery resource's creation and management is needed in fisheries resource protected area.

Keywords

References

  1. 강석규 (2016),"CVM을 이용한 선상낚시체험 활동의 효용 가치", 수산경영론집, 47 (4), 45-55.
  2. 강석규 (2015),"제주 한라생태숲의 경제적 가치평가,"제주녹색환경지원센터, 최종보고서.
  3. 국립수산과학원 (2016), 수산자원보호구역 사회경제적 가치평가.
  4. 박선영.유승훈.구세주 (2011),"보성갯벌의 비시장가치 평가", 해양정책연구, 26 (2), 47-73.
  5. 한국개발연구원 (2008),"예비타당성조사 수행을 위한 일반지침 수정.보완 연구", 제5판.
  6. 한국개발연구원 (2012), 예비타당성조사를 위한 CVM 분석 지침 개선연구.
  7. 한국개발연구원 (2015), CVM(조건부가치측정법) 분석지침 개선.
  8. 한국수산과학원 (2014), 2013년 수산자원보호구역 조사보고서(해수면 및 내수면).
  9. 한국환경정책.평가연구원 (2008),"우리나라 주요 습지의 경제적 가치 평가 연구", UNDP/GEF 국가습지보전사업관리단.
  10. 한국해양수산개발원 (2012),"수산자원보호구역 및 수산자원관리수면 개선 방안 연구", 한국수산자원관리공단.
  11. Brouwer, R., Brouwer, S., Eleveld, M. A., Verbraak. M., Wagtendonk, A. J. and van der Woerd, H. J. (2016),"Public willingness to pay for alternative management regimes of remote marine protected areas in the North Sea,"Marine Policy, 68, 195-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2016.03.001
  12. EUROPARC and IUCN (2000),"Guidelines for protected area management categories-interpretation and application of the protected area management categories in Europe,"EUROPARC & WCPA, Grafenau Germany.
  13. FAO (2012), Marine Protected Areas and Fisheries.
  14. Hanemann, W. M. (1984),"Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete responses," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 66, 332-341. https://doi.org/10.2307/1240800
  15. Hanemann, W. M., Loomis, J. and Kanninen, B. (1991),"Statistical efficiency of double-bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation,"American Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 73 (4), 1255-1263. https://doi.org/10.2307/1242453
  16. Lopez-Feldman, A.(2012)," Introduction to contingent valuation using Stata,"MPRA Paper No. 41018.
  17. Wang, P. W., Ya, J. Zhong, L. S. and Mei, R. (2016),"Respondent uncertainty and reliability in contingent valuation-A case of the Dalai lake protected area,"Limmologica, 58, 59-68.