Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science

Korean Academy of Periodontology (대한치주과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparative, randomized, double-blind clinical study of alveolar ridge preservation using an extracellular matrix-based dental resorbable membrane in the extraction socket

  • Chang, Hyeyoon (Department of Periodontology, Seoul National University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Kim, Sulhee (Department of Periodontology, Seoul National University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Hwang, Jin wook (ESTeam Paris Sud, INSERM UMR-S 935, Paris-Sud University, Paris-Saclay University) ;
  • Kim, Sungtae (Department of Periodontology, Seoul National University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Koo, Ki-Tae (Department of Periodontology, Seoul National University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Kim, Tae-Il (Department of Periodontology, Seoul National University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Seol, Yang-Jo (Department of Periodontology, Seoul National University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Lee, Yong-Moo (Department of Periodontology, Seoul National University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Ku, Young (Department of Periodontology, Seoul National University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Lee, Jong-Ho (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Seoul National University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Rhyu, In-Chul (Department of Periodontology, Seoul National University School of Dentistry)
  • Received : 2017.05.08
  • Accepted : 2017.06.01
  • Published : 2017.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to radiographically and clinically compare the effect of extracellular matrix (ECM) membranes on dimensional alterations following a ridge preservation procedure. Methods: One of 2 different ECM membranes was applied during a ridge preservation procedure. A widely used ECM membrane (WEM; Bio-Gide, Geistlich Biomaterials, Wolhusen, Switzerland) was applied in the treatment group and a newly developed ECM membrane (NEM; Lyso-Gide, Oscotec Inc., Seongnam, Korea) was applied in the control group. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans and alginate impressions were obtained 1 week and 6 months after the ridge preservation procedure. Results were analyzed using the independent t-test and the nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test. Results: There were no significant differences between the ECM membranes in the changes in the dimension, width, and height of the extraction socket or the quantity of bone tissue. Conclusions: The NEM showed comparable clinical and radiographic results to the WEM following the ridge preservation procedure.

Keywords

References

  1. Amler MH, Johnson PL, Salman I. Histological and histochemical investigation of human alveolar socket healing in undisturbed extraction wounds. J Am Dent Assoc 1960;61:32-44. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1960.0152
  2. Pietrokovski J, Massler M. Alveolar ridge resorption following tooth extraction. J Prosthet Dent 1967;17:21-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(67)90046-7
  3. Araujo MG, Lindhe J. Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol 2005;32:212-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00642.x
  4. Cardaropoli G, Araujo M, Lindhe J. Dynamics of bone tissue formation in tooth extraction sites. An experimental study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol 2003;30:809-18. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-051X.2003.00366.x
  5. Van der Weijden F, Dell'Acqua F, Slot DE. Alveolar bone dimensional changes of post-extraction sockets in humans: a systematic review. J Clin Periodontol 2009;36:1048-58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01482.x
  6. Schropp L, Wenzel A, Kostopoulos L, Karring T. Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following single-tooth extraction: a clinical and radiographic 12-month prospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2003;23:313-23.
  7. Barone A, Aldini NN, Fini M, Giardino R, Calvo Guirado JL, Covani U. Xenograft versus extraction alone for ridge preservation after tooth removal: a clinical and histomorphometric study. J Periodontol 2008;79:1370-7. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2008.070628
  8. Iasella JM, Greenwell H, Miller RL, Hill M, Drisko C, Bohra AA, et al. Ridge preservation with freeze-dried bone allograft and a collagen membrane compared to extraction alone for implant site development: a clinical and histologic study in humans. J Periodontol 2003;74:990-9. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2003.74.7.990
  9. Vignoletti F, Matesanz P, Rodrigo D, Figuero E, Martin C, Sanz M. Surgical protocols for ridge preservation after tooth extraction. A systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23 Suppl 5:22-38.
  10. Araujo M, Linder E, Wennstrom J, Lindhe J. The influence of Bio-Oss Collagen on healing of an extraction socket: an experimental study in the dog. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2008;28:123-35.
  11. Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Felice P, Karatzopoulos G, Worthington HV, Coulthard P. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: horizontal and vertical bone augmentation techniques for dental implant treatment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009:CD003607.
  12. Hammerle CH, Araujo MG, Simion M Osteology Consensus Group 2011. Evidence-based knowledge on the biology and treatment of extraction sockets. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23 Suppl 5:80-2. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02370.x
  13. Thalmair T, Fickl S, Schneider D, Hinze M, Wachtel H. Dimensional alterations of extraction sites after different alveolar ridge preservation techniques - a volumetric study. J Clin Periodontol 2013;40:721-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12111
  14. Lekovic V, Camargo PM, Klokkevold PR, Weinlaender M, Kenney EB, Dimitrijevic B, et al. Preservation of alveolar bone in extraction sockets using bioabsorbable membranes. J Periodontol 1998;69:1044-9. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1998.69.9.1044
  15. Bunyaratavej P, Wang HL. Collagen membranes: a review. J Periodontol 2001;72:215-29. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2001.72.2.215
  16. Zubery Y, Goldlust A, Alves A, Nir E. Ossification of a novel cross-linked porcine collagen barrier in guided bone regeneration in dogs. J Periodontol 2007;78:112-21. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2007.060055
  17. Rothamel D, Benner M, Fienitz T, Happe A, Kreppel M, Nickenig HJ, et al. Biodegradation pattern and tissue integration of native and cross-linked porcine collagen soft tissue augmentation matrices - an experimental study in the rat. Head Face Med 2014;10:10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-10-10
  18. Hwang JW, Kim S, Kim SW, Lee JH. Effect of extracellular matrix membrane on bone formation in a rabbit tibial defect model. Biomed Res Int 2016;2016:6715295.
  19. Omran M, Min S, Abdelhamid A, Liu Y, Zadeh HH. Alveolar ridge dimensional changes following ridge preservation procedure: part-2 - CBCT 3D analysis in non-human primate model. Clin Oral Implants Res 2016;27:859-66. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12701
  20. Cardaropoli D, Tamagnone L, Roffredo A, Gaveglio L, Cardaropoli G. Socket preservation using bovine bone mineral and collagen membrane: a randomized controlled clinical trial with histologic analysis. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2012;32:421-30.
  21. Jung RE, Philipp A, Annen BM, Signorelli L, Thoma DS, Hammerle CH, et al. Radiographic evaluation of different techniques for ridge preservation after tooth extraction: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol 2013;40:90-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12027
  22. Fickl S, Zuhr O, Wachtel H, Stappert CF, Stein JM, Hurzeler MB. Dimensional changes of the alveolar ridge contour after different socket preservation techniques. J Clin Periodontol 2008;35:906-13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01305.x

Cited by

  1. A randomized controlled clinical study of periodontal tissue regeneration using an extracellular matrix-based resorbable membrane in combination with a collagenated bovine bone graft in intrabony defe vol.47, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2017.47.6.363
  2. Bone Augmentation of Peri-Implant Dehiscence Defects Using Multilaminated Small Intestinal Submucosa as a Barrier Membrane: An Experimental Study in Dogs vol.2019, pp.None, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8962730
  3. Evaluation of the mechanical properties and clinical efficacy of biphasic calcium phosphate-added collagen membrane in ridge preservation vol.50, pp.4, 2020, https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2001080054
  4. Evaluation of Guided Bone Regeneration in Critical Defects Using Bovine and Porcine Collagen Membranes: Histomorphometric and Immunohistochemical Analyses vol.2021, pp.None, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8828194