Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society

The Korean Neurosurgical Society (대한신경외과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Lower T1 Slope as a Predictor of Subsidence in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion with Stand-Alone Cages

  • Lee, Su Hun (Department of Neurosurgery, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Jun Seok (Department of Neurosurgery, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital) ;
  • Sung, Soon Ki (Department of Neurosurgery, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital) ;
  • Son, Dong Wuk (Department of Neurosurgery, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Sang Weon (Department of Neurosurgery, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital) ;
  • Song, Geun Sung (Department of Neurosurgery, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital)
  • Received : 2017.04.07
  • Accepted : 2017.06.13
  • Published : 2017.09.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objective : Preoperative parameters including the T1 slope (T1S) and C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA) have been recognized as predictors of kyphosis after laminoplasty, which is accompanied by posterior neck muscle damage. The importance of preoperative parameters has been under-estimated in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) because there is no posterior neck muscle damage. We aimed to determine whether postoperative subsidence and pseudarthrosis could be predicted according to specific parameters on preoperative plain radiographs. Methods : We retrospectively analyzed 41 consecutive patients (male : female, 22 : 19; mean age, $51.15{\pm}9.25years$) who underwent ACDF with a stand-alone polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) cage (>1 year follow-up). Parameters including SVA, T1S, segmental angle and range of motion (ROM), C2-C7 cervical angle and ROM, and segmental inter-spinous distance were measured on preoperative plain radiographs. Risk factors of subsidence and pseudarthrosis were determined using multivariate logistic regression. Results : Fifty-five segments (27 single-segment and 14 two-segment fusions) were included. The subsidence and pseudarthrosis rates based on the number of segments were 36.4% and 29.1%, respectively. Demographic data and fusion level were unrelated to subsidence. A greater T1S was associated with a lower risk of subsidence (p=0.017, odds ratio=0.206). A cutoff value of T1S<$28^{\circ}$ significantly predicted subsidence (sensitivity : 70%, specificity : 68.6%). There were no preoperative predictors of pseudarthrosis except old age. Conclusion : A lower T1S (T1S<$28^{\circ}$) could be a risk factor of subsidence following ACDF. Surgeons need to be aware of this risk factor and should consider various supportive procedures to reduce the subsidence rates for such cases.

Keywords

References

  1. Ames CP, Blondel B, Scheer JK, Schwab FJ, Le Huec JC, Massicotte EM, et al. : Cervical radiographical alignment: comprehensive assessment techniques and potential importance in cervical myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38(22 Suppl 1) : S149-S160, 2013 https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a7f449
  2. Barsa P, Suchomel P : Factors affecting sagittal malalignment due to cage subsidence in standalone cage assisted anterior cervical fusion. Eur Spine J 16 : 1395-1400, 2007 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-006-0284-8
  3. Bartels RH, Donk RD, Feuth T : Subsidence of stand-alone cervical carbon fiber cages. Neurosurgery 58 : 502-508; discussion 502-508, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000197258.30821.50
  4. Brenke C, Dostal M, Scharf J, Weiss C, Schmieder K, Barth M : Influence of cervical bone mineral density on cage subsidence in patients following stand-alone anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Eur Spine J 24 : 2832-2840, 2015 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3725-9
  5. Cho JH, Ha JK, Kim DG, Song KY, Kim YT, Hwang CJ, et al. : Does preoperative T1 slope affect radiological and functional outcomes after cervical laminoplasty? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 39 : E1575-E1581, 2014 https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000000614
  6. Francke EI, Demetropoulos CK, Agabegi SS, Truumees E, Herkowitz HN : Distractive force relative to initial graft compression in an in vivo anterior cervical discectomy and fusion model. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35 : 526-530, 2010 https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181bb0e6e
  7. Fujibayashi S, Neo M, Nakamura T : Stand-alone interbody cage versus anterior cervical plate for treatment of cervical disc herniation: sequential changes in cage subsidence. J Clin Neurosci 15 : 1017-1022, 2008 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2007.05.011
  8. Gercek E, Arlet V, Delisle J, Marchesi D : Subsidence of stand-alone cervical cages in anterior interbody fusion: warning. Eur Spine J 12 : 513-516, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-003-0539-6
  9. Gillis CC, Kaszuba MC, Traynelis VC : Cervical radiographic parameters in 1- and 2-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 25 : 421-429, 2016 https://doi.org/10.3171/2016.2.SPINE151056
  10. Gum JL, Glassman SD, Douglas LR, Carreon LY : Correlation between cervical spine sagittal alignment and clinical outcome after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 41 : E81-E84, 2012
  11. Harrison DD, Troyanovich SJ, Harrison DE, Janik TJ, Murphy DJ : A normal sagittal spinal configuration: a desirable clinical outcome. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 19 : 398-405, 1996
  12. Huang DN, Yu M, Xu NF, Li M, Wang SB, Sun Y, et al. : The relationship between changes of cervical sagittal alignment after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion and spino-pelvic sagittal alignment under roussouly classification: a four-year follow-up study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 18 : 87, 2017 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1447-y
  13. Hyun SJ, Kim KJ, Jahng TA, Kim HJ : Relationship between T1 slope and cervical alignment following multilevel posterior cervical fusion surgery: impact of T1 slope minus cervical lordosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 41 : E396-E402, 2016 https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000001264
  14. Kawakami M, Tamaki T, Yoshida M, Hayashi N, Ando M, Yamada H : Axial symptoms and cervical alignments after cervical anterior spinal fusion for patients with cervical myelopathy. J Spinal Disord 12 : 50-56, 1999
  15. Kim B, Yoon DH, Ha Y, Yi S, Shin DA, Lee CK, et al. : Relationship between T1 slope and loss of lordosis after laminoplasty in patients with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Spine J 16 : 219-225, 2016 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2015.10.042
  16. Kim TH, Lee SY, Kim YC, Park MS, Kim SW : T1 slope as a predictor of kyphotic alignment change after laminoplasty in patients with cervical myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38 : E992-E997, 2013 https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182972e1b
  17. Kim WB, Hyun SJ, Choi H, Kim KJ, Jahng TA, Kim HJ : Long-term followup results of anterior cervical inter-body fusion with stand-alone cages. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 59 : 385-391, 2016 https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2016.59.4.385
  18. Knott PT, Mardjetko SM, Techy F : The use of the T1 sagittal angle in predicting overall sagittal balance of the spine. Spine J 10 : 994-998, 2010 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2010.08.031
  19. Kwon WK, Kim PS, Ahn SY, Song JY, Kim JH, Park YK, et al. : Analysis of associating factors with C2-7 sagittal vertical axis after two-level anterior cervical fusion: comparison between plate augmentation and standalone cages. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 42 : 318-325, 2017 https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000001776
  20. Lee YS, Kim YB, Park SW : Risk factors for postoperative subsidence of single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: the significance of the preoperative cervical alignment. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 39 : 1280-1287, 2014 https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000000400
  21. Lim TH, Kwon H, Jeon CH, Kim JG, Sokolowski M, Natarajan R, et al. : Effect of endplate conditions and bone mineral density on the compressive strength of the graft-endplate interface in anterior cervical spine fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26 : 951-956, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200104150-00021
  22. Lin S, Zhou F, Sun Y, Chen Z, Zhang F, Pan S : The severity of operative invasion to the posterior muscular-ligament complex influences cervical sagittal balance after open-door laminoplasty. Eur Spine J 24 : 127-135, 2015 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3605-3
  23. Nolan JP Jr, Sherk HH : Biomechanical evaluation of the extensor musculature of the cervical spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 13 : 9-11, 1988 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-198801000-00003
  24. Odom GL, Finney W, Woodhall B : Cervical disk lesions. J Am Med Assoc 166 : 23-28, 1958 https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1958.02990010025006
  25. Park JY, Choi KY, Moon BJ, Hur H, Jang JW, Lee JK : Subsidence after single-level anterior cervical fusion with a stand-alone cage. J Clin Neurosci 33 : 83-88, 2016 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2016.01.042
  26. Sakai K, Yoshii T, Hirai T, Arai Y, Torigoe I, Tomori M, et al. : Cervical sagittal imbalance is a predictor of kyphotic deformity after laminoplasty in cervical spondylotic myelopathy patients without preoperative kyphotic alignment. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 41 : 299-305, 2016 https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000001206
  27. Schmieder K, Wolzik-Grossmann M, Pechlivanis I, Engelhardt M, Scholz M, Harders A : Subsidence of the wing titanium cage after anterior cervical interbody fusion: 2-year follow-up study. J Neurosurg Spine 4 : 447-453, 2006 https://doi.org/10.3171/spi.2006.4.6.447
  28. Smith GW, Robinson RA : The treatment of certain cervical-spine disorders by anterior removal of the intervertebral disc and interbody fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Am 40-A : 607-624, 1958
  29. Tang JA, Scheer JK, Smith JS, Deviren V, Bess S, Hart RA, et al. : The impact of standing regional cervical sagittal alignment on outcomes in posterior cervical fusion surgery. Neurosurgery 76 Suppl 1 : S14-S21; discussion S21, 2015 https://doi.org/10.1227/01.neu.0000462074.66077.2b
  30. Tang JA, Scheer JK, Smith JS, Deviren V, Bess S, Hart RA, et al. : The impact of standing regional cervical sagittal alignment on outcomes in posterior cervical fusion surgery. Neurosurgery 71 : 662-669; discussion 669, 2012 https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0b013e31826100c9
  31. Thome C, Leheta O, Krauss JK, Zevgaridis D : A prospective randomized comparison of rectangular titanium cage fusion and iliac crest autograft fusion in patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy. J Neurosurg Spine 4 : 1-9, 2006 https://doi.org/10.3171/spi.2006.4.1.1
  32. Tome-Bermejo F, Morales-Valencia JA, Moreno-Perez J, Marfil-Perez J, Diaz-Dominguez E, Pinera AR, et al. : Long-term changes in sagittal alignment and its clinical implications after cervical interbody fusion cage subsidence for degenerative cervical disc disease. A prospective study with standalone lordotic tantalum cages. Clin Spine Surg, 2016 [Epub ahead of print]
  33. Yang JJ, Yu CH, Chang BS, Yeom JS, Lee JH, Lee CK : Subsidence and nonunion after anterior cervical interbody fusion using a stand-alone polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage. Clin Orthop Surg 3 : 16-23, 2011 https://doi.org/10.4055/cios.2011.3.1.16

Cited by

  1. Differences in Cervical Sagittal Alignment Changes in Patients Undergoing Laminoplasty and Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion vol.15, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.14245/ns.1834864.432
  2. Which factors predict the loss of cervical lordosis following cervical laminoplasty? A review of various indices and their clinical implications vol.10, pp.None, 2017, https://doi.org/10.25259/sni_339_2019
  3. Risk Factors of Allogenous Bone Graft Collapse in Two-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion vol.62, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2019.0008
  4. The Effect of Bi-Cortical Screw Fixation for Subsidence and Cervical Alignment in Patients Undergoing Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion vol.5, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.21129/nerve.2019.5.2.41
  5. Factors predicting loss of cervical lordosis following cervical laminoplasty: A critical review vol.11, pp.3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_70_20
  6. Association of cervical sagittal alignment with adjacent segment degeneration and heterotopic ossification following cervical disc replacement with Prestige-LP disc vol.28, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1177/2309499020968295
  7. A Study on the Influence of Lumbar Lordosis and Intervertebral Disc Angle by Obesity vol.14, pp.3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.7742/jksr.2020.14.3.235
  8. Quality improvement of general anteroposterior radiographic image of vertebral body according to optimum angle of incidence vol.29, pp.2, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3233/xst-200786
  9. Optimum Angle of Incidence for General Anteroposterior Radiographic Image According to Lordosis angle : For Obese People vol.17, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5392/ijoc.2021.17.1.018
  10. Changes in Cervical Sagittal Balance after Anterior Decompression and Fusion vol.35, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.2531/spinalsurg.35.55