DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Tree Height Estimation of Pinus densiflora and Pinus koraiensis in Korea with the Use of UAV-Acquired Imagery

  • Talkasen, Lynn J. (Department of Agroforestry, College of Agriculture, Benguet State University) ;
  • Kim, Myeong Jun (Forest Environment and Geospatial Technology Research Institute) ;
  • Kim, Dong Hyeon (Department of Ecology and Environmental Systems, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Kim, Dong Geun (Department of Ecology and Environmental Systems, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Lee, Kawn Hee (Department of Forestry, Kyungpook National University)
  • Received : 2017.03.02
  • Accepted : 2017.05.15
  • Published : 2017.08.31

Abstract

The use of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) for the estimation of tree height is gaining recognition. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of tree height estimation of Pinus densiflora Sieb. et Zucc. and Pinus koraiensis Sieb. et Zucc. using digital surface model (DSM) generated from UAV-acquired imageries. Images were taken with the $Trimble^{(R)}$ UX5 equipped with Sony ${\alpha}5100$. The generated DSM, together with the digital elevation model (DEM) generated from a digital map of the study areas, were used in the estimation of tree height. Field measurements were conducted in order to generate a regression model and carry out accuracy assessment. The obtained coefficients of determination (R2) and root mean square error (RMSE) for P. densiflora (R2=0.71; RMSE=1.00 m) and P. koraiensis (R2=0.64; RMSE=0.85 m) are comparable to the results of similar studies. The results of the paired two-tailed t-test show that the two tree height estimation methods are not significantly different (p-value=0.04 and 0.10, alpha level=0.01), which means that tree height estimation using UAV imagery could be used as an alternative to field measurement.

Keywords

References

  1. Avery TE, Burkhart HE. 2002. Forest Measurements. 5th ed. McGraw Hill Inc., New York, USA, pp 456.
  2. Balenovic I, Seletkovic A, Pernar R, Jazbec A. 2015. Estimation of the mean tree height of forest stands by photogrammetric measurement using digital aerial images of high spatial resolution. Ann For Res 58: 125-143.
  3. Brack CL, Wood GB. 1998. Measuring the height of a single tree. http://fennerschool-associated.anu.edu.au/mensuration/BrackandWood1998/HEIGHT.HTM. Accessed 7 Jun 2016.
  4. Chang AJ, Yu KY, Kim YI, Lee BK. 2006. Estimation of Individual Tree and Tree Height using Color Aerial Photograph and LiDAR Data. Korean Journal of Remote Sensing 22: 543-551. https://doi.org/10.7780/kjrs.2006.22.6.543
  5. Chao H, Chen YQ. 2012. Remote sensing and actuation using unmanned vehicles. IEEE Press, New Jersey, USA, pp 198.
  6. Colomina I, Molina P. 2014. Unmanned aerial systems for photogrammetry and remote sensing: A review. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 92: 79-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2014.02.013
  7. Dandois JP, Ellis EC. 2013. High spatial resolution three-dimensional mapping of vegetation spectral dynamics using computer vision. Remote Sensing of Environment 136: 259-276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2013.04.005
  8. Diaz-Valera RA, de la Rosa R, Leon L, Zarco-Tejada PJ. 2015. High-Resolution Airborne UAV Imagery to Assess Olive Tree Crown Parameters Using 3D Photo Reconstruction: Application in Breeding Trials. Remote Sens 7: 4213-4232. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs70404213
  9. Erdody TL, Moskal LM. 2010. Fusion of LiDAR and imagery for estimating forest canopy fuels. Remote Sensing of Environment 114: 725-737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2009.11.002
  10. Fieber KD, Davenport IJ, Tanase MA, Ferryman JM, Gurney RJ, Becerra VM, Walker JP, Hacker JM. 2015. Validation of Canopy Height Profile methodology for small-footprint full-waveform airborne LiDAR data in a discontinuous canopy environment. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 104: 144-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2015.03.001
  11. Gopalakrishnan R, Thomas VA, Coulston JW, Wynne RH. 2015. Prediction of Canopy Heights over a Large Region Using Heterogeneous Lidar Datasets: Efficacy and Challenges. Remote Sens 7: 11036-11060. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs70911036
  12. Korea Forest Service (KFS). 2015. 2015 Statistical Yearbook of Forestry. KFS, Daejeon, South Korea, pp 440.
  13. Korea Forest Service (KFS). 2016. Forest geographic information service. http://116.67.44.22/forest/?systype=mymoun#/. Accessed 23 Mar 2016.
  14. Latifi H, Fassnach FE, Muller J, Tharani A, Dech S, Heurich M. 2015. Forest inventories by LiDAR data: A comparison of single tree segmentation and metric-based methods for inventories of a heterogeneous temperate forest. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 42: 162-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2015.06.008
  15. Lisein J, Pierrot-Deseilligny M, Bonnet S, Lejeune P. 2013. A Photogrammetric Workflow for the Creation of a Forest Canopy Height Model from Small Unmanned Aerial System Imagery. Forests 4: 922-944. https://doi.org/10.3390/f4040922
  16. Noh NJ, Kim C, Bae SW, Lee WK, Yoon TK, Muraoka H, Son Y. 2013. Carbon and nitrogen dynamics in a Pinus densiflora forest with low and high stand densities. J Plant Ecol 6: 368-379. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpe/rtt007
  17. van Laar A, Akca A. 2010. Forest Mensuration. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 362.
  18. Wallace L, Lucieer A, Malenovsky Z, Turner D, Vopenka P. 2016. Assessment of Forest Structure Using Two UAV Techniques: A Comparison of Airborne Laser Scanning and Structure from Motion (SfM) Point Clouds. Forest 7: 62. https://doi.org/10.3390/f7030062
  19. West PW. 2009. Tree and Forest Measurement. 2nd ed. Springer, London, United Kingdom, pp 192.
  20. Zarco-Tejada PJ, Diaz-Varela R, Angileri V, Loudjani P. 2014. Tree height quantification using very high resolution imagery acquired from an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) and automatic 3D photo-reconstruction methods. Europ J Agronomy 55: 89-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2014.01.004