DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Data Analytics for Social Risk Forecasting and Assessment of New Technology

데이터 분석 기반 미래 신기술의 사회적 위험 예측과 위험성 평가

  • Suh, Yongyoon (Department of Safety Engineering, Pukyong National University)
  • Received : 2017.02.09
  • Accepted : 2017.05.31
  • Published : 2017.06.30

Abstract

A new technology has provided the nation, industry, society, and people with innovative and useful functions. National economy and society has been improved through this technology innovation. Despite the benefit of technology innovation, however, since technology society was sufficiently mature, the unintended side effect and negative impact of new technology on society and human beings has been highlighted. Thus, it is important to investigate a risk of new technology for the future society. Recently, the risks of the new technology are being suggested through a large amount of social data such as news articles and report contents. These data can be used as effective sources for quantitatively and systematically forecasting social risks of new technology. In this respect, this paper aims to propose a data-driven process for forecasting and assessing social risks of future new technology using the text mining, 4M(Man, Machine, Media, and Management) framework, and analytic hierarchy process (AHP). First, social risk factors are forecasted based on social risk keywords extracted by the text mining of documents containing social risk information of new technology. Second, the social risk keywords are classified into the 4M causes to identify the degree of risk causes. Finally, the AHP is applied to assess impact of social risk factors and 4M causes based on social risk keywords. The proposed approach is helpful for technology engineers, safety managers, and policy makers to consider social risks of new technology and their impact.

Keywords

References

  1. A. R. Kohler and C. Som, "Risk Preventative Innovation Strategies for Emerging Technologies: The Cases of Nano-textiles and Smart-textiles", Technovation, Vol. 34, No. 8, pp. 420-430, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2013.07.002
  2. R. E. Alcock and J. Busrsby, "Risk Migration and Scientific Advance: The Case of Flame-Retardant Compounds", Risk Analysis, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 369-381, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00739.x
  3. T. Assmuth, M. Hilden and C. Benighaus, "Integrated Risk Assessment and Risk Governance as Socio-political Phenomena: A Synthetic View of the Challenges", Science of the Total Environment, Vol. 408, pp. 3943-3953, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.11.034
  4. World Economic Forum, "The Global Risks Report 2017-12th edition", World Economic Forum, 2017.
  5. European Environment Agency, "Late Lessons from Early Warnings: The precautionary Principle", Copenhagen, Denmark, pp. 1896-2000, 2001.
  6. M. Amer, T. U. Daim and A. Jetter, "A Review of Scenario Planning", Futures, Vol. 46, pp. 23-40, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2012.10.003
  7. D. Sarpong and M. Maclean, "Scenario Thinking: A Practice-Based Approach for the Identification of Opportunities for Innovation", Futures, Vol. 43, No. 10, pp. 1154-1163, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2011.07.013
  8. S. H. Choi, "The Detection Model of Disaster Issues based on the Risk Degree of Social Media Contents", Journal of the Korean Society of Safety, Vol. 31, No. 6, pp. 121-128, 2016. https://doi.org/10.14346/JKOSOS.2016.31.6.121
  9. KOSHA, "4M Risk Assessment Technique", 2011.
  10. T. L. Saaty, "The Analytic Hierarchy Process", McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 1980.
  11. C. Durst, M. Durst, T. Kolonko, A. Neef and F. Greif, "A Holistic Approach to Strategic Foresight: A Foresight Support System for the German Federal Armed Forces", Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 97, No. 3, pp. 91-104, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.01.005
  12. R. Kostoff, D. Toothman, H. Eberhart and J. Humenik, "Textmining Using Database Tomography and Bibliometrics: A Review", Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 68, No. 3, pp. 223-252, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1625(01)00133-0
  13. A. Kokangul, U. Polat and C. Dagsuyu, "A New Approximation for Risk Assessment Using the AHP and Fine Kinney Methodologies", Safety Science, Vol. 91, pp.24-32, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2016.07.015
  14. J. Lee, I. Han and S. R. Chang, "A Study on the Risk Level of Work Types in Urban Railway Construction", Journal of the Korean Society of Safety, Vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 98-103, 2016. https://doi.org/10.14346/JKOSOS.2016.31.2.98
  15. N. J. Kim, S. E. Lee and H. J. Kim, "Related Laws and Performance Criteria for Public Service Drones for Disaster Safety", Journal of the Korean Society of Safety, Vol. 31, No. 4, pp. 150-155, 2016. https://doi.org/10.14346/JKOSOS.2016.31.4.150