Journal of Korean Society for Atmospheric Environment (한국대기환경학회지)

Korean Society for Atmospheric Environment (한국대기환경학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of Measurement Methods and Size Fraction of Fine Particles (PM10, PM2.5) from Stationary Emission Source Using Korean Standard and ISO: Coal Power Plant and Refinery

국내공정시험기준과 ISO 방법을 이용한 고정오염원 미세먼지 (PM10, PM2.5) 측정 방법 및 입경분율 비교: 석탄화력발전소, 석유정제시설 중심으로

  • Youn, Jong-Sang (Department of Environmental Engineering, Inha University) ;
  • Han, Sehyun (Department of Environmental Engineering, Inha University) ;
  • Jung, Yong-Won (Department of Environmental Engineering, Inha University) ;
  • Jeon, Ki-Joon (Department of Environmental Engineering, Inha University)
  • Received : 2017.07.10
  • Accepted : 2017.08.22
  • Published : 2017.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

We report mass concentration and size fraction of TPM, $PM_{10}$ and $PM_{2.5}$ according to Korea standard test method (ES 01301.1 and ES 01317.1) and ISO 23210 methods. Particulate matters were sampled in large stationary emission sources such as a coal power plant and B-C oil refinery. The Korea standard test method PM mass concentrations showed 3~3.5 times larger than the cascade impactor method. On the other hand, the size fraction results showed less than 5% difference (i.e. $PM_{2.5}/PM_{10}$) between two methods. Moreover, the correlation coefficient ($r^2$) is 0.84 between TPM results of the Korea standard test method and CleanSYS. These results suggested not only improvement of current test criteria in terms of technical and theoretical aspects. Further, additional measurements are required in various large stationary sources to compare current field data.

Keywords

References

  1. Brook, R.D., S. Rajagopalan, C.A. Pope, J.R. Brook, A. Bhatnagar, A.V. Diez-Roux, F. Holguin, Y. Hong, R.V. Luepker, M.A. Mittleman, and A. Peters (2010) Particulate matter air pollution and cardiovascular disease, Circulation, 121(21), 2331-2378. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0b013e3181dbece1
  2. Chang, C.J., H.H. Yang, C.A. Chang, and H.Y. Tsai (2012) Relationship between air pollution and outpatient visits for nonspecific conjunctivitis. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 53(1), 429-433. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.11-8253
  3. Chiu, H.F., C.Y. Peng, T.N. Wu, and C.Y. Yang (2013) Shortterm effects of fine particulate air pollution on ischemic heart disease hospitalizations in Taipei: a casecrossover study, Aerosol Air Quality Research, 13, 1563-1569.
  4. Corio, L.A. and J. Sherwell (2000) In-stack condensible particulate matter measurements and issues. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 50(2), 207-218. https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.2000.10464002
  5. EEA (2013) EMEP/EEA air pollutant emission inventory guidebook.
  6. IDI (2016) Incheon research of atmospheric environment improvement.
  7. ISO (2009) Stationary source emissions - determination of $PM_{10}$/$PM_{2.5}$ mass concentration in flue gas - measurement at low concentrations by use of impactor.
  8. Jang, K., H. Kim, Y. Lee, D. Song, N. Jung, S. Kim, J. Hong, S. Lee, and J. Han (2011) Estimating PM Emission Factor from Coal-Fired Power Plants in Korea, Journal of Korean Society for Atmospheric Environment, 27(5), 485-493. (in Korean with English abstract) https://doi.org/10.5572/KOSAE.2011.27.5.485
  9. Kim, J. and I. Hwang (2016) The characterization of PM, $PM_{10}$, and $PM_{2.5}$ from stationary sources, Journal of Korean Society for Atmospheric Environment, 32(6), 603-612. (in Korean with English abstract) https://doi.org/10.5572/KOSAE.2016.32.6.603
  10. Kim, J., S. Heo, H. Kim, M. Jo, S. Lim, S. Lee, and D. Kang (2017) A study on emission characteristics of air pollutants from the use of solid fuel, Journal of Korean Society for Atmospheric Environment, 33(2), 77-86. (in Korean with English abstract) https://doi.org/10.5572/KOSAE.2017.33.2.077
  11. Laden, F., J. Schwartz, F.E. Speizer, and D.W. Dockery (2006). Reduction in fine particulate air pollution and mortality: extended follow-up of the Harvard Six Cities study. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 173(6), 667-672. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200503-443OC
  12. Lu, H.Y., S.L. Lin, J.K. Mwangi, L.C. Wang, and H.Y. Lin (2016) Characteristics and source apportionment of atmospheric $PM_{2.5}$ at a coastal city in southern Taiwan. Aerosol Air Quality Research, 16, 1022-1034. https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2016.01.0008
  13. MOE (2014a) Air pollution standard process test, Measurement method of total particulate matter, ES 01301.1.
  14. MOE (2014b) Air pollution standard process test, Measurement method of PM-10 and PM-2.5, ES 01317.1.
  15. MOE (2015) Enforcement Rule of the Clean Air Conservation ACT.
  16. NIER (2009) Research for $PM_{2.5}$ emission criteria establishment.
  17. NIER (2012) Analysis $PM_{2.5}$ reduction efficiency and development of future management.
  18. NIER (2015) Improvement of $PM_{10}$, $PM_{2.5}$ sample-inlet design with the type and shape of sampling port.
  19. Pope, III, C.A., R.T. Burnett, G.D. Thurston, M.J. Thun, E.E. Calle, D. Krewski, and J.J. Godleski (2004) Cardiovascular mortality and long-term exposure to particulate air pollution: epidemiological evidence of general pathophysiological pathways of disease, Circulation, 109, 71-77.
  20. U.S EPA (2014) Method 201A-Determination of $PM_{10}$ and $PM_{2.5}$ emissions from stationary sources.
  21. U.S EPA (2015) Compilation of air pollutant emission factor (AP-42), Vol. I, Section 5.1 Petroleum refining (final section: April 2011).