DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Text Mining and Visualization of Papers Reviews Using R Language

  • Li, Jiapei (Department of Library Information Consulting, Hebei Geology University) ;
  • Shin, Seong Yoon (School of Computer Information & Communication Engineering, Kunsan National University) ;
  • Lee, Hyun Chang (Department of Digital Contents Engineering, Wonkwang University)
  • Received : 2017.08.07
  • Accepted : 2017.09.20
  • Published : 2017.09.30

Abstract

Nowadays, people share and discuss scientific papers on social media such as the Web 2.0, big data, online forums, blogs, Twitter, Facebook and scholar community, etc. In addition to a variety of metrics such as numbers of citation, download, recommendation, etc., paper review text is also one of the effective resources for the study of scientific impact. The social media tools improve the research process: recording a series online scholarly behaviors. This paper aims to research the huge amount of paper reviews which have generated in the social media platforms to explore the implicit information about research papers. We implemented and shown the result of text mining on review texts using R language. And we found that Zika virus was the research hotspot and association research methods were widely used in 2016. We also mined the news review about one paper and derived the public opinion.

Keywords

References

  1. K. Weller, "Social media and altmetrics: an overview of current alternative approaches to measuring scholarly impact," in Incentives and Performance. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2015.
  2. J. Priem, T. Taraaborelli, P. Groth, and Neylon, "Altmetrics: a manifesto," 2010 [Internet], Available: http://altmetrics.org/manifesto/.
  3. P. Wouters and R. Costas, "Users, narcissism and control: tracking the impact of scholarly publications in the 21st century," 2012 [Internet], Available: http://apo.org.au/node/28603.
  4. M. A. Hearst, "Untangling text data mining," in Proceeding of the 37th annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics on Computational Linguistics (ACL), College Park, MD, pp. 3-10, 1999.
  5. S. Sudhahar, G. De Fazio, R. Franzosi, N. Cristianini, "Network analysis of narrative content in large corpora," Natural Language Engineering, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 81-112, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1351324913000247
  6. R. Franzosi, "Quantitative narrative analysis," Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 191, no. 7, pp. 2388-2391, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.01594-08
  7. S. Sudhahar, GA. Veltri, and N. Cristianini, "Automated analysis of the US presidential elections using big data and network analysis," Big Data & Society, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1-28, 2015.
  8. I. Flaounas, M. Turchi, O. Ali, N. Fyson, T. De Bie, N. Mosdell, J. Lewis, and N. Cristianini, "The structure of EU Mediasphere," PLoS ONE, vol. 5, no. 12, pp. e14243, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0014243
  9. V. Lampos and N. Cristianini, "Nowcasting events from the social web with statistical learning," ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 1-22, 2012.
  10. I. Flaounas, O. Ali, M. Turchi, T. Snowsill, F. Nicart, and T. De Bie, "NOAM: news outlets analysis and monitoring system," in Proceedings of the 2011 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, Athens, Greece, pp. 1275-1277, 2011.
  11. N. Cristianini, "Automatic discovery of patterns in media content," in Combinatorial Pattern Matching. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 2-13, 2011.
  12. I. Flaounas, O. Ali, T. Lansdall-Welfare, T. De Bie, N. Mosdell, J. Lewis, and N. Cristianini, "Research methods in the age of digital journalism," Digital Journalism, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 102-116, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2012.714928
  13. T. Lansdall-Welfare, V. Lampos, and N. Cristianini, "Effects of the recession on public mood in the UK," in Proceedings of International Conference on World Wide Web, Lyon, France, pp. 1221-1226, 2012.
  14. L. Bornmann, "Do altmetrics point to the broader impact of research? An overview of benefits and disadvantages of altmetrics," Journal of Informetrics, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 895-903, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005
  15. B. Davis, I. Hulpuş, M. Taylor, and C. Hayes, "Challenges and opportunities for detecting and measuring diffusion of scientific impact across heterogeneous altmetric sources," 2015 [Internet], Available: http://altmetrics.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/altmetrics15_paper_21.pdf.
  16. M. Taylor, "Exploring the boundaries: how altmetrics can expand our vision of scholarly communication and social impact," Information Standards Quarterly, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 27-32, 2013. https://doi.org/10.3789/isqv25no2.2013.05
  17. C. P. Hoffmann, C. Lutz, and M. Meckel, "A relational altmetric? Network centrality on ResearchGate as an indicator of scientific impact," Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 765-775, 2015.