Applied Chemistry for Engineering (공업화학)

The Korean Society of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry (한국공업화학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Optimization of Waste Cooking Oil-based Biodiesel Production Process Using Central Composite Design Model

중심합성계획모델을 이용한 폐식용유 원료 바이오디젤 제조공정의 최적화

  • Hong, Seheum (Department of Polymer Science and Engineering, Dankook University) ;
  • Lee, Won Jae (Department of Chemical Engineering, Dankook University) ;
  • Lee, Seung Bum (Department of Chemical Engineering, Dankook University)
  • Received : 2017.08.01
  • Accepted : 2017.08.13
  • Published : 2017.10.10
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this study, the optimization process was carried out by using the central composite model of the response surface methodology in waste cooking oil based biodiesel production process. The acid value, reaction time, reaction temperature, methanol/oil molar ratio, and catalyst amount were selected process variables. The response was evaluated by measuring the FAME content (more than 96.5%) and kinematic viscosity (1.9~5.5 cSt). Through basic experiments, the range of optimum operation variables for the central composite model, such as reaction time, reaction temperature and methanol/oil molar ratio, were set as between 45 and 60 min, between 50 and $60^{\circ}C$, and between 8 and 12, respectively. The optimum operation variables, such as biodiesel production reaction time, temperature, and methanol/oil molar ratio deduced from the central composite model were 55.2 min, $57.5^{\circ}C$, and 10, respectively. With those conditions the results deduced from modeling were as followings: the predicted FAME content of the biodiesel and the kinematic viscosity of 97.5% and 2.40 cSt, respectively. We obtained experimental results with deduced operating variables mentioned above as followings: the FAME content and kinematic viscosity of 97.7% and 2.41 cSt, respectively. Error rates for the FAME content and kinematic viscosity were 0.23 and 0.29%, respectively. Therefore, the low error rate could be obtained when the central composite model among surface reaction methods was applied to the optimized production process of waste cooking oil raw material biodiesel.

본 연구에서는 폐식용유를 이용한 바이오디젤 제조공정에 반응표면분석법 중 중심합성계획모델을 이용하여 최적화 과정을 수행하였다. 공정변수로는 폐식용유의 산가, 반응시간, 반응온도, 메탄올/유지 몰비, 촉매량 등을 선택하였고, 반응치로는 FAME 함량(96.5% 이상) 및 동점도(1.9~5.5 cSt)를 설정하였다. 기초실험을 통해 계량인자범위를 반응시간 (45~60 min), 반응온도($50{\sim}60^{\circ}C$), 메탄올/유지 몰비(8~12)로 정하고, 중심합성계획모델을 이용한 최적화 결과 바이오디젤의 제조공정의 최적조건은 반응시간 55.2 min, 반응온도 $57.5^{\circ}C$, 메탄올/유지 몰비 10으로 나타났다. 이 조건에서 바이오디젤의 예측 FAME 함량은 97.5%, 동점도는 2.40 cSt이었으며, 실제 실험을 통해 확인한 결과 FAME 함량(97.7%), 동점도(2.41 cSt)로 측정되어 오차율은 각각 0.23, 0.29%로 나타났다. 따라서 폐식용유 원료 바이오디젤 제조공정 최적화 과정에 반응표면분석법 중 중심합성계획모델을 적용할 경우 매우 낮은 오차율을 얻을 수 있었다.

Keywords

References

  1. H. Jaliliannosrati, N. A. S. Amin, A. Talebian-Kiakalaieh, and I. Noshadi, Microwave assisted biodiesel production from Jatropha curcas L. seed by two-step in situ process: Optimization using response surface methodology, Bioresour. Technol., 136, 565-573 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.02.078
  2. A. P. S. Dias, J. Puna, J. Gomes, M. J. N. Correia, and J. Bordado, Biodiesel production over lime. Catalytic contributions of bulk phases and surface Ca species formed during reaction, Renew. Energy, 99, 622-630 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.07.033
  3. M. M. Hasan and M. M. Rahman, Performance and emission characteristics of biodiesel-diesel blend and environmental and economic impacts of biodiesel production: A review, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 74, 938-948 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.045
  4. M. Farooq, A. Ramli, and A. Naeem, Biodiesel production from low FFA waste cooking oil using heterogeneous catalyst derived from chicken bones, Renew. Energy, 76, 362-368 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2014.11.042
  5. M. Farooq, A. Ramli, and D. Subbarao, Biodiesel production from waste cooking oil using bifunctional heterogeneous solid catalysts, J. Clean. Prod., 59, 131-140 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.06.015
  6. O. Unal, Optimization of shot peening parameters by response surface methodology, Surf. Coat. Technol., 305, 99-109 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2016.08.004
  7. S. Yavari, A. Malakahmad, N. B. Sapari, and S. Yavari, Sorption properties optimization of agricultural wastes-derived biochars using response surface methodology, Process Saf. Environ. Prot., 109, 509-519 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2017.05.002
  8. M. S. Nobandegani, M. R. S. Birjandi, T. Darbandi, M. M. Khalilipour, and D. Mohebbi-Kalhori, An industrial Steam Methane Reformer optimization using response surface methodology, J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng., 36, 540-549 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2016.10.031
  9. A. Tgarguifa, S. Abderafi, and T. Bounahmidi, Energetic optimization of Moroccan distillery using simulation and response surface methodology, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 75, 415-425 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.006
  10. T. Belwal, P. Dhyani, I. D. Bhatt, R. S. Rawal, and V. Pande, Optimization extraction conditions for improving phenolic content and antioxidant activity in Berberis asiatica fruits using response surface methodology (RSM), Food Chem., 207, 115-124 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.03.081
  11. A. Alberti, A. A. F. Zelinski, D. M. Zardo, I. M. Demiate, A. Nogueira, and L. I. Mafra, Optimisation of the extraction of phenolic compounds from apples using response surface methodology, Food Chem., 149, 151-158 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.10.086
  12. N. Ilaiyaraja, K. R. Likhith, G. R. Sharath Babu, and F. Khanum, Optimisation of extraction of bioactive compounds from Feronia limonia (wood apple) fruit using response surface methodology (RSM), Food Chem., 173, 348-354 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.10.035
  13. A. A. D'Archivio and M. A. Maggi, Investigation by response surface methodology of the combined effect of pH and composition of water-methanol mixtures on the stability of curcuminoids, Food Chem., 219, 414-418 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.09.167
  14. M. Rahmani, E. Ghasemi, and M. Sasani, Application of response surface methodology for air assisted-dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction of deoxynivalenol in rice samples prior to HPLC-DAD analysis and comparison with solid phase extraction cleanup, Talanta, 165, 27-32 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2016.12.031
  15. G. I. Danmaliki, T. A. Saleh, and A. A. Shamsuddeen, Response surface methodology optimization of adsorptive desulfurization on nickel/activated carbon, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 313, 993-1003 (2017).
  16. J. Cao, Y. Wu, Y. Jin, P. Yilihan, and W. Huang, Response surface methodology approach for optimization of the removal of chromium (VI) by NH2-MCM-41, J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng., 45, 860-868 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2013.09.011
  17. L. Wang, X. Dong, H. Jiang, G. Li, and M. Zhang, Preparation of a novel carbon-based solid acid from cassava stillage residue and its use for the esterification of free fatty acids in waste cooking oil, Bioresour. Technol., 158, 392-395 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.02.132
  18. I. K. Hong, H. Jeon, H. Kim, and S. B. Lee, Preparation of waste cooking oil based biodiesel using microwave irradiation energy, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 42, 107-112 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2016.07.035

Cited by

  1. Utilization of Organic Liquid Fertilizer in Microalgae Cultivation for Biodiesel Production vol.23, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12257-018-0081-3