Journal of Engineering Education Research (공학교육연구)

Korean Society for Engineering Education (한국공학교육학회)
권호 표지

The Effects of Flipped Learning and Mind-Wandering on Idea Generation: Focusing on the use of SIT & BCC

플립드 러닝과 마인드 원더링이 아이디어 창출에 미치는 영향: SIT와 BCC의 활용을 중심으로

  • Yeo, Hyung-Seok (Department of Management of Technology, Sungkyunkwan University) ;
  • Park, Young-Taek (Department of Management of Technology, Sungkyunkwan University)
  • 여형석 (성균관대학교 기술경영학과) ;
  • 박영택 (성균관대학교 기술경영학과)
  • Received : 2017.09.01
  • Accepted : 2017.09.26
  • Published : 2017.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

It is examined that how flipped learning and mind-wandering affect an idea generation task. For the purpose, the participants in the idea generation task are divided into two groups to learn SIT(Systematic Inventive Thinking) and BCC(Business Creativity Codes) as idea generating tools in advance. One group learned the tools in a classroom, and the other group through an online education program. The creativity level of an idea is evaluated in the dimensions of originality, practicality, and realizability. The creativity levels of the ideas from the two groups are not statistically different in all the three creativity dimensions. To examine the effect of mind-wandering, another group generated ideas two hours a day in four days instead of eight hours in one day. The creativity levels of the ideas from the third group are higher in the dimensions of originality and practicality. This shows that the effectiveness of flipped learning is not so different from the face-to-face learning in a classroom, and mind-wandering has a positive effect in the learning.

Keywords

References

  1. 강익선.송해근.박영택(2016). 아이디어의 창의성과 측정에 관한 연구. 품질경영학회지, 44(1), 139-152. https://doi.org/10.7469/JKSQM.2016.44.1.139
  2. 강정하.최인수(2008). 과학적 창의성. 교육심리연구, 22(3), 537-562.
  3. 김중현.여형석.박영택(2017). 트리즈 도구별 활용도 분석: S 사의 적용사례를 중심으로. 공학교육연구, 20(4), 3-11.
  4. 김진하(2016). 제 4 차 산업혁명 시대, 미래사회 변화에 대한 전략적 대응 방안 모색. KISTEP R&D InI. (15), 45-59.
  5. 김휘규.박영택(2016). 건설 설계VE의 효율적 문제해결 아이디어 도출을 위한 비즈니스창의성코드(BCC) 활용방안. 한국건축시공학회지, 16(4), 367-379. https://doi.org/10.5345/JKIBC.2016.16.4.367
  6. 박영택(2016). 박영택 창의발상론, 한국표준협회미디어.
  7. 박진영.박영택(2017). 신제품 디자인 콘셉트에 내재된 비즈니스 창의성코드에 대한 연구: K-디자인 수상작을 중심으로. 한국창업학회지, 12(3), 310-332.
  8. 여형석.김중현.이준영.박영택(2017). 신제품 콘셉트 발상을 위한 SIT & BCC 활용에 관한 연구. 산업디자인학연구, 11(3), 게재승인.
  9. 연주한.박영택(2017). 해외 아이디어 상품들의 내재된 발명적 사고원리와 창의성에 관한 연구: 일반기계분야를 중심으로. 한국창업학회지, 12(1), 167-192.
  10. 이선영(2017). 제4차 산업혁명 시대의 교육심리학. 한국교육학연구, 23(1), 231-260.
  11. 이은택(2016). K-MOOC 최고 인기강좌는 경제학 들어가기, 동아일보, 2016년 4월 7일. http://news.donga.com/3/all/20160407/77444324/1
  12. 조아라(2017). 대학생들이 학습 중 겪는 딴생각에 대한 두 가지 대처전략의 효과 차이: 수용 전략 대 사고억제 전략. 서울대학교 박사학위논문
  13. 허건.송해근.심재헌.박영택(2016) 창의적인 식품 개발에 있어서 SIT의 효과성에 관한 연구: H사의 신제품을 중심으로. 품질경영학회지, 44(1), 95-108. https://doi.org/10.7469/JKSQM.2016.44.1.095
  14. Amabile, T. M. (1982). Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 997-1013. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.43.5.997
  15. Amabile, T. M (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 357-376 https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.2.357
  16. Antrobus, J. S., Singer, J. L., Goldstein, S., Fortgang, M.(1970). Mind-Wandering and cognitive structure. Transactions of the New York Academy of Science. 32(2), 242-252 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2164-0947.1970.tb02056.x
  17. Baird, B., Smallwood, J., Mrazek, M. D., Kam, J. W., Franklin, M. S., & Schooler, J. W. (2012). Inspired by distraction: mind wandering facilitates creative incubation. Psychological Science. 23(10), 1117-1122. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612446024
  18. Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2014). Flipped Learning: Maximizing face time. Training & Development. 68(2), 28-31.
  19. Bonk, C. J., & Graham, C. R. (2012). The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs. John Wiley & Sons.
  20. Boyd, D. & Goldenberg, J.(2013). Inside the Box: A Proven System of Creativity for Breakthrough Results. Simon & Shuster. 이경식 역(2014). 틀 안에서 생각하기. 책읽는 수요일.
  21. Buckner, R. L., & Carroll, D. C. (2007). Self-projection and the brain. Trends in cognitive sciences, 11(2), 49-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.004
  22. Campbell, D. T. (1960). Blind variation and selective retentions in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Psychological review, 67(6), 380. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040373
  23. Christoff, K. et al.(2009). Experience sampling during fMRI reveals default network and executive system contributions to mind wandering. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 106(21), 8719-8724. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0900234106
  24. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York. Harper Collins.
  25. Finke, R. A. 1990. Creative Imagery: Discoveries and Inventions in Visualization. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  26. Hadamard, J. (1954). An essay on the psychology of invention in the mathematical field. Courier Corporation.
  27. Horowitz, R. (2001). From TRIZ to ASIT in 4 Steps. The TRIZ journal, http://www.triz-journal.com/archives/2001/08/c/index.htm.
  28. Koestler, A. (1964). The Act of Creation. New York: Macmillan
  29. Kaufman, J. C., Plucker, J., Baer, J. (2008). Essentials of creativity assessment. New York: Wiley.
  30. Kvavilashvili, L., & Mandler, G. (2004). Out of one’s mind: A study of involuntary semantic memories. Cognitive psychology. 48(1), 47-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0285(03)00115-4
  31. McMillan, R. L., Kaufman, S. B., & Singer, J. L. (2013). Ode to positive constructive daydreaming. Frontiers in psychology. 4.
  32. Mason, M. F. et al.(2007). Wandering minds: the default network and stimulus-independent thought. Science. 315 (5810), 393-395. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1131295
  33. Miller, A. I. (2000). Insights of genius: Imagery and creativity in science and art. MIT Press.
  34. Mooneyham, B. W., & Schooler, J. W. (2013). The costs and benefits of Mind-Wandering: a review. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale. 67(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031569
  35. Piller, F. T. and Walcher, D. (2006). Toolkits for Idea Competitions: A Novel Method to Integrate Users in New Product Development. R&D Management, 36(3), 307?318. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00432.x
  36. Poincare, H. (1908). Science et methode. New York. NY: Thomas Nelson and Sons.
  37. Poincare, H. (1913). The foundation of science. Lancaster. PA: Science Press.
  38. Raichle, M. E. et al. (2001). A default mode of brain function. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 98(2), 676-682. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.98.2.676
  39. Schwab,K.(2016). The Fourth Industrial Revolution Colony/Geneva: World Economic Forum. 송경진(역)(2016). 제4차 산업혁명. 새로운 현재.
  40. Schooler, J. W. (2002). Re-representing consciousness: Dissociations between experience and meta-consciousness. Trends in cognitive sciences. 6(8), 339-344. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(02)01949-6
  41. Schooler, J. W. et al. (2014). The middle way: Finding the balance between mindfulness and Mind-Wandering. The psychology of learning and motivation. 60, 1-33.
  42. Singer, J. L. (1974). Daydreaming and the Stream of Thought. American Scientist. 62(4), 417-425.
  43. Singer, J. L. (1975). Navigating the stream of consciousness: research in daydreaming and related inner experience. American Psychologist. 30(7), 727. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076928
  44. Simonton, D. K. (1988). Creativity, leadership, and chance. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed). The nature of creativity: Current pshchological perspectives : 386-426. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  45. Smallwood, J. M. et al.(2003). Task unrelated thought whilst encoding information. Consciousness and cognition. 12(3), 452-484. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-8100(03)00018-7
  46. Smallwood, J. et al. (2004). Subjective experience and the attentional lapse: Task engagement and disengagement during sustained attention. Consciousness and cognition. 13(4), 657-690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2004.06.003
  47. Smallwood, J., & Schooler, J. W. (2006). The restless mind. Psychological bulletin. 132(6), 946. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.6.946
  48. Smallwood, J., & Andrews-Hanna, J. (2013). Not all minds that wander are lost: the importance of a balanced perspective on the Mind-Wandering state. Frontiers in psychology: 4.
  49. Stern, Y., Biton, I. & Maor, Z. (2006). Systematically creating coincidental product evolution case studies of the application of the systematic inventive thinking(SIT) method in the chemical industry. Journal of Business Chemistry, 3(1), 13-21.
  50. Stern, Y, Taragin, R. & Larry, S. (2007). New thoughts for food. Food Technology. 61(10), 34-40.
  51. SWITL (2011), SWITL picks up sauce without changing it's shape #DigInfo. Available from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mDlHGhKHIdM
  52. Varendonck, J. (1921). The Psychology of Day-Dreams. London: Allen & Unwin.
  53. Wallas, G.(1926). The Art of Thought. Harcourt. Brace and Company.
  54. Weisberg, R. W. (2006). Creativity: Understanding innovation in problem solving, science, invention, and the arts. John Wiley & Sons. 김미선(역)(2009). 창의성: 문제 해결, 과학, 발명, 예술에서의 혁신. 시그마프레스.