DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Regional Analysis of Particulate Matter Concentration Risk in South Korea

국내 지역별 미세먼지 농도 리스크 분석

  • Oh, Jang Wook (Department of Industrial and Information Systems Engineering, Soongsil University) ;
  • Lim, Tea Jin (Department of Industrial and Information Systems Engineering, Soongsil University)
  • 오장욱 (숭실대학교 산업정보시스템공학과) ;
  • 임태진 (숭실대학교 산업정보시스템공학과)
  • Received : 2017.08.25
  • Accepted : 2017.10.25
  • Published : 2017.10.31

Abstract

Millions of People die every year from diseases caused by exposure to outdoor air pollution. Especially, one of the most severe types of air pollution is fine particulate matter (PM10, PM2.5). South Korea also has been suffered from severe PM. This paper analyzes regional risks induced by PM10 and PM2.5 that have affected domestic area of Korea during 2014~2016.3Q. We investigated daily maxima of PM10 and PM2.5 data observed on 284 stations in South Korea, and found extremely high outlier. We employed extreme value distributions to fit the PM10 and PM2.5 data, but a single distribution did not fit the data well. For theses reasons, we implemented extreme mixture models such as the generalized Pareto distribution(GPD) with the normal, the gamma, the Weibull and the log-normal, respectively. Next, we divided the whole area into 16 regions and analyzed characteristics of PM risks by developing the FN-curves. Finally, we estimated 1-month, 1-quater, half year, 1-year and 3-years period return levels, respectively. The severity rankings of PM10 and PM2.5 concentration turned out to be different from region to region. The capital area revealed the worst PM risk in all seasons. The reason for high PM risk even in the yellow dust free season (Jun. ~ Sep.) can be inferred from the concentration of factories in this area. Gwangju showed the highest return level of PM2.5, even if the return level of PM10 was relatively low. This phenomenon implies that we should investigate chemical mechanisms for making PM2.5 in the vicinity of Gwangju area. On the other hand, Gyeongbuk and Ulsan exposed relatively high PM10 risk and low PM2.5 risk. This indicates that the management policy of PM risk in the west side should be different from that in the east side. The results of this research may provide insights for managing regional risks induced by PM10 and PM2.5 in South Korea.

Keywords

References

  1. WHO, "WHO Global Urban Ambient Air Pollution", 2016
  2. Q, Zhang et al., "Transboundary Health Impacts of Transported Global Air Pollution and International Trade", Nature, Vol. 543, pp. 705-718, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature21712
  3. OECD, "The Economic Consequences of Outdoor Air Pollution", 2016.
  4. B. G. Loh and G. H. Choi, "Development of IoT-based PM2.5 Measuring Device", Journal of the Korean Society of Safety, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 21-26, 2017. https://doi.org/10.14346/JKOSOS.2017.32.1.21
  5. B. G. Loh and G. H. Choi, "Performance Evaluation of Low-cost Optical Components used for Measuring the Optical Density and Concentration of Particulate Matter(PM)", Journal of the Korean Society of Safety, Vol. 31, No. 5, pp. 1-6, 2016. https://doi.org/10.14346/JKOSOS.2016.31.5.1
  6. H. S. Kim, Y. S. Chung and M. B. Yoon, "An Analysis on the Impact of Large-scale Transports of Dust Pollution on Air Quality in East Asia as Observed in Central Korea in 2014", Air Quality, Atmos. & Health, Vol. 9, pp. 83-93, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-014-0312-5
  7. National Institute of Environmental Research, "A Study on the Health Impact and Management Policy of PM2.5 in Korea I", 2012.
  8. G. Shaddick et al., "Data Integration Model for Air Quality: A Hierarchical Approach to the Global Estimation of Exposures to Ambient Air Pollution", Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C, Vol. 66, pp.1-5, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1111/rssc.12179
  9. N. A. Mohd Amin et al., "Bayesian Extreme Modeling for Non-stationary Air Quality Data.", AIP Conference Proceedings, Vol. 1557, Issue 1, 2013.
  10. G. Battista et al., "Assessment of the Air Pollution Level in the City of Rome (Italy)", Sustainability, Vol. 8, Issue 9, pp. 838, 2016. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8090838
  11. W. Sun et al., "Prediction of 24-hour-average PM 2.5 Concentrations using a Hidden Markov Model with Different Emission Distributions in Northern California", Science of the Total Environment , Vol. 443, pp. 93-103, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.10.070
  12. S. Park and H. S. Oh, "Spatio-temporal Analysis of ParticulAte Matter Extremes in Seoul: Use of Multiscale Approach", Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, pp. 1-14, 2017.
  13. C. N. Behrens, H. F. Lopes and D. Gamerman, "Bayesian Analysis of Extreme Events with Threshold Estimation", Statistical Modelling, Vol. 4, pp. 227-244, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1191/1471082X04st075oa
  14. D. K. Dey and J. Yan, "Extreme Value Modeling and Risk Analysis: Methods and Applications", A Chapman and Hall Book, 2016.
  15. Y. Hu and C. J. Scarrott, "Evmix: An R package for Extreme Value Mixture Modelling, Threshold Estimation and Boundary Corrected Kernel Density Estimation", Submitted, available from http://www.math.canterbury.ac.nz/-c.scarrott/evmix, 2013.
  16. Stephenson, Alec, "A user's guide to the 'EVD'package (version 2.1)", Department of Statistics. Macquarie University. Australia, 2004.