Journal of the Korean Society of Surveying, Geodesy, Photogrammetry and Cartography (한국측량학회지)

Korean Society of Surveying, Geodesy, Photogrammetry and Cartography (한국측량학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Comparative Study on the NSDI Assessment

  • Received : 2017.09.29
  • Accepted : 2017.10.31
  • Published : 2017.10.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

United States of America started NSDI in 1994 for the first time in the world. EU and other many countries invested lots of budget on NSDI due to necessity to manage countries and social economy. As skepticism for effect of such investment has risen, developed countries predicted higher effect compared to investment using ROI and other methods. FGDC clarified that geospatial information is a critical national assets. USA has managed NSDI by introducing portfolio concept for it recognizing NSDI as financial assets from fixed assets. Currently directions of NSDI and its advancement has been proceeded variably depending on corresponding organizations, human resources, budget and national policies. This study analyzed recent trends regarding NSDI assessment methods from developed countries and researchers. Assessment of NSDI is introduced only by some countries such as EU, USA and Canada. This study analyzed USA's assessment model and indicator that assess NSDI in a way that various external organizations (COGO, URISA) participate, EU INSPIRE Directives, monitoring and Canada's CGDI assessment methods. Besides these, this study analyzed STIG that adopted Financial Infrastructure from European studies and Korea's NSDI monitoring assessment indicator research. Further this study suggested assessment directions for future NSDI through implications of NSDI assessment method analysis.

Keywords

References

  1. Coleman, D., Rajabifard, A., and Crompvoets, J. (2016), Spatial Enablement in a Smart World, GSDI Association Press, Gilbertville.
  2. Coppa, I., Woodgate, P. W., and Mohamed-Ghouse Z.S. (2016), Global Outlook 2016 : Spatial Information Industry, Australia and New Zealand Cooperative Research Centre for Spatial Information, Melbourne.
  3. Craglia, M. and Borzacchiello, M. T. (2004), INSPIRE Impact assessment : lesson learned, European Commission Joint Research Center Digital Earth Unit, Ispra, http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/events/conferences/cost_benefits/INSPIRE_IA_Lessons_learned.pdf (last date accessed: 29 September 2017).
  4. Crompvoets, J., Bregt, A., Rajabifard, A., and Williamson, I. (2004), Assessing the worldwide developments of national spatial data clearinghouses, International Journal of Geographical Information Science, Vol. 18, No. 7, pp. 665-689. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658810410001702030
  5. Crompvoets, J., Rajabifard, A., Loenen, B. V., and Fernandez, T. D. (2008), A Multi-View Framework to Assess SDIs, The Melbourne University Press. Melbourne, pp. 193-210.
  6. Dangermond, J., Sankaran, S., Lucchi, R., and Hogeweg, M. (2017), Article : Re-imagine INSPIRE by leveraging open data and Web GIS, GIS Professional Magazine, Lemmer, https://www.gis-professional.com/content/article/reimagine-inspire-by-leveraging-open-data-and-web-gis (last date accessed: 29 September 2017).
  7. Defra (2014), INSPIRE Benefits : Guide for data publishers, Department for Environment Food & Rural Affairs, London, https://data.gov.uk/sites/default/files/INSPIRE%20Benefits%20Publishers%202014.pdf (last date accessed: 29 September 2017).
  8. Douglas, D. (2004), The SDI Cookbook version 2.0, GSDI(Global Spatial Data Infrastructure), Bonn, http://gsdiassociation.org/images/publications/cookbooks/SDI_Cookbook_GSDI_2004_ver2.pdf (last date accessed: 29 September 2017).
  9. ECORYS Nederland BV. and Grontmij Nederland BV. (2009), Cost-Benefits analysis INSPIRE : Final report, ECORYS Nederland BV, Rotterdam, https://www.geonovum.nl/sites/default/files/nkba_engelse_vertaling.pdf (last date accessed: 29 September 2017).
  10. EEA (2014), Mid-term evaluation report on INSPIRE implementation. EEA Technical report(EUR 91574 EN), European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/midterm-evaluation-report-on-inspire-implementation (last date accessed: 29 September 2017).
  11. FGDC (2016), National spatial data infrastructure strategic framework, Federal Geographic Data Committee, Reston, https://www.fgdc.gov/nsdi-plan/2017/nsdi-strategic-framework.pdf (last date accessed: 29 September 2017).
  12. GeoConnections (2016), 2016 Invitation for projects, Announcement Code: GNS16IFP, Natural Resources Canada, Ottawa, https://www.nrcan.gc.ca/sites/www.nrcan.gc.ca/files/earth-sciences/files/pdf/geomatics/GeoConnectionAO2016EN.pdf (last date accessed: 29 September 2017).
  13. GSDI (2014), GSDI Strategy and strategic plan 2015-2020, Global Spatial Data Infrastructure Association, Bonn, http://gsdiassociation.org/images/official_docs/GSDI_Strategic_Plan_2015-2020.pdf (last date accessed: 29 September 2017).
  14. INSPIRE (2013), INSPIRE Monitoring indicators guidelines, Infrastructure for Spatial Information in Europe, Brussels, https://inspire.ec.europa.eu/documents/inspire-monitoring-indicators-%E2%80%93-guidelines-document-0 (last date accessed: 29 September 2017).
  15. Jacoby, S., Smith, J., Ting, L., and Williamson, I. (2002), Developing a common spatial data infrastructure between state and local government-an Australian case study, International Journal of Geographical Information Science, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 305-322. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658810110096001
  16. Koh, J. H. (2007), A study on the national spatial data infrastructure of USA, Journal of the Korean Society of Surveying, Geodesy, Photogrammetry and Cartography, Vol. 25, No. 6_1, pp. 485-497.
  17. KPMG (2016), 2015 Assessment of the canadian geospatial data infrastructure, Klynveld Peat Marwick Goerdeler, Ottawa, http://ftp.maps.canada.ca/pub/nrcan_rncan/publications/ess_sst/297/297880/cgdi_ip_0049_e.pdf (last date accessed: 29 September 2017).
  18. LG GDI-DE (2013), Member state report: Germany, Lenkungsgremium Geodateninfrastruktur Deutschland, Frankfurt, http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/reports/country_reports_mr2012/DE-INSPIRE-Report-2013_ENV-2013-00433-00-00-EN-TRA-00.pdf (last date accessed: 29 September 2017).
  19. Masser, I. (2015), Article : The first seven years of INSPIRE implementation, GIS Professional Magazine, Lemmer, https://www.gis-professional.com/content/article/an-autobiography-the-first-seven-years-of-inspire-implementation?output=pdf (last date accessed: 29 September 2017).
  20. Masser, I. (2017), Evaluating the performance of large scale SDIs: two contrasting approaches, International Journal of Spatial Data Infrastructures Research, Vol. 12, pp. 26-38.
  21. NSGIC (2010), NSGIC statewide GMA model, National States Geographic Information Council, New Orleans, https://www.fgdc.gov/organization/coordination-group/meeting-minutes/2010/september/geospatial-maturity-assessment-model-danielle-ayan.pdf/at_download/file (last date accessed: 29 September 2017).
  22. Park, J. T. (2016), A Study on the Development of Monitoring Indicators for National Geospatial Data Infrastructure Policy, KRIHS, Anyang (in Korean), 38p.
  23. Pashova, L. and Bandrova, T. (2017), A brief overview of current status of European spatial data infrastructures-relevant developments and perspectives for Bulgaria, Geo-spatial Information Science, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 97-108. https://doi.org/10.1080/10095020.2017.1323524
  24. Rajabifard, A. and Williamson, I. P. (2001), Spatial data infrastructures: concept, SDI hierarchy and future directions, In Proceedings of GEOMATICS'80 Conference, 21-22 October ,Tehran, Iran, pp. 1-10.
  25. Real Estate Cadastre Agency of the Republic of Macedonia. (2011), D2.5 Cost-Benefit analysis, Real Estate Cadastre Agency of the Republic of Macedonia, Skopje, http://www.katastar.gov.mk/userfiles/file/NSDI/Sozdavanje%20deloven%20koncept/D25%20Cost%20Benefits%20Analysis%20Corrected.pdf (last date accessed: 7 September 2017).
  26. UK-INSPIRE (2013), Member state report: United Kingdom, United Kingdom-Infrastructure for Spatial Information in Europe, London, https://data.gov.uk/sites/default/files/UK%20INSPIRE%20Member%20State%20Report%202013%20doc_10.pdf (last date accessed: 6 September 2017).
  27. UN-GGIM (2015), Future trends in geospatial information management : the five to ten year vision, Second Edition December 2015, United Nations-Global Geospatial Information Management, New York, http://ggim.un.org/documents/Future-trends.pdf (last date accessed: 27 September 2017).
  28. URISA (2012), Geospatial management competency model, Urban and Regional Information Systems Association, Des Plaines, http://www.urisa.org/clientuploads/directory/GMI/Advocacy/GMCM%20final.pdf (last date accessed: 9 September 2017).
  29. URISA GIS Management Institute (2015), GIS capability maturity model, URISA GIS Management Institute, Des Plaines, http://www.urisa.org/clientuploads/directory/GMI/GISCMM-Final201309(Endorsed%20for%20Publication).pdf (last date accessed: 4 September 2017).
  30. USGS (2009), Advancing statewide spatial data infrastructures in support of the NSDI, United States Geological Survey, Reston, https://docslide.net/documents/nsgic-march-2006-advancing-statewide-spatial-data-infrastructures-in-support-of-the-national-spatial-data-infrastructure-nsdi-workshop-on-developing.html (last date accessed: 8 Septem ber 2017).
  31. Williamson, I. P., Rajabifard, A., and Feeney, M. E. F. (2003), Developing Spatial Data Infrastructures: From Concept to Reality, Taylor & Francis Inc, New York. N.Y.
  32. Williamson, I. P. (2004), Building SDIs-the challenges ahead, In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference: Global Spatial Data Infrastructure, 2-6 February, Bangalore, India, pp. 2-6.
  33. Williamson, I. P., Rajabifard, A., and Binns, A. (2006), Challenges and issues for SDI development. International Journal of Spatial Data Infrastructures Research, Vol. 1, pp. 24-35.