DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development of Uniaxial Tensile Test Method to Evaluate Material Property of Tungsten Carbide-Cobalt Alloys for Cold Forging Dies

냉간단조 금형 WC-Co합금의 인장시험방법 개발 및 물성평가

  • 권인우 (한국생산기술연구원 뿌리산업기술연구소 성형기술그룹) ;
  • 서영호 (포스코(주) 선재마케팅실 선재솔루션그룹) ;
  • 정기호 (한국생산기술연구원 뿌리산업기술연구소 성형기술그룹)
  • Received : 2017.12.13
  • Accepted : 2018.10.15
  • Published : 2018.12.01

Abstract

Cold forging, carried out at room temperature, leads to high dimensional accuracy and excellent surface integrity as compared to other forging methods such as warm and hot forgings. In the cold forging process, WC-Co (Tungsten Carbide-Cobalt) alloy is the mainly used material as a core dies because of its superior hardness and strength as compared to other structural materials. For cold forging, die life is the most significant factor because it is directly related to the manufacturing cost due to periodic die replacement in mass production. To investigate die life of WC-Co alloy for cold forging, mechanical properties such as strength and fatigue are essentially necessary. Generally, uniaxial tensile test and fatigue test are the most efficient and simplest testing method. However, uniaxial tension is not efficiently application to WC-Co alloy because of its sensitivity to alignment of the specimen due to its brittleness and difficulty in thread machining. In this study, shape of specimen, tools, and testing methods, which are appropriate for uniaxial tensile test for WC-Co alloy, are proposed. The test results such as Young's modulus, tensile strength and stress-strain curves are compared to those in previous literature to validate the proposed testing methods. Based on the validation of test results it was concluded that the newly developed testing method is applicable to other cemented carbides like Titanium carbides with high strength and brittleness, and also can be utilized to carry out fatigue tests for further investigation on die life of cold forging.

Keywords

SSGGB@_2018_v27n6_370_f0001.png 이미지

Fig. 1 Assembled jig and specimen

SSGGB@_2018_v27n6_370_f0002.png 이미지

Fig. 3 Initially designed WC-Co alloy tensile specimen

SSGGB@_2018_v27n6_370_f0003.png 이미지

Fig. 4 Tensile test, conducted with the initially designed jig and specimen

SSGGB@_2018_v27n6_370_f0004.png 이미지

Fig. 12 Comparison of elastic range and non-linear deforming behavior depending on wt. Co contents (a) Co 20% (b) Co 14% (c) Co 6%

SSGGB@_2018_v27n6_370_f0005.png 이미지

Fig. 2 (a) Assembly drawing of the initially designed jig for tensile test (b) Front and right side views (c) Bottom side view

SSGGB@_2018_v27n6_370_f0006.png 이미지

Fig. 5 (a) Fractured specimen after tensile test with initially designed jig (b) Measured strain values at two different points within gage length

SSGGB@_2018_v27n6_370_f0007.png 이미지

Fig. 6 (a) Asymmetry of initially designed jig (b) Strain distribution of jig (c) Strain distribution of specimen

SSGGB@_2018_v27n6_370_f0008.png 이미지

Fig. 7 (a) Strain distribution of modified jig (b) Strain distribution of specimen under tension

SSGGB@_2018_v27n6_370_f0009.png 이미지

Fig. 8 (a) Initially designed specimen (b) Modified specimen with the head of Ø31 mm

SSGGB@_2018_v27n6_370_f0010.png 이미지

Fig. 9 (a) Modified jig with symmetry (b) Pin pressing the specimen for fatigue test

SSGGB@_2018_v27n6_370_f0011.png 이미지

Fig. 10 (a) Fractured specimen after tensile test with modified jig and specimen (b) Measured strain values before and after modification

SSGGB@_2018_v27n6_370_f0012.png 이미지

Fig. 11 (a) Stress-strain curve of WC-Co alloy (wt. Co 20%) based on tensile test result (b) Comparison to the test results in the literature (wt. Co 6% & 14%)

Table. 1 Condition of finite element analysis

SSGGB@_2018_v27n6_370_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Comparison of elastic modulus and tensile strengths depending on Co content

SSGGB@_2018_v27n6_370_t0002.png 이미지

References

  1. T. Altan, G. Ngaile and G. Shen, 2005, Cold and hot forging : Fundamentals and Applications, ASM International, Ohio, pp. 295-296.
  2. G. E. Dieter, 1961, Mechanical Metallurgy, McGRAW-HILL, New York, pp. 218-219.
  3. W. Weibull, 1939, A statistical theory of the strength of materials, IVA Proceedings Nr. 151, Stockholm.
  4. General carbide corporation, 2010, Designer's guide to tungsten carbide, http://www.generalcarbide.com.
  5. T. Klunsner S. Wurster, P. Supanic, R. Ebner, M. Jenko, J.Glatzle, A. Puschel and R. Pippan, 2011, Effect of specimen size on the tensile strength of WC-Co hard metal, Acta materialia, Vol. 59, Issue 10, pp. 4244-4252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2011.03.049
  6. O. M. Tariq, 2013, Ph. D. Thesis, KTH Industrial engineering and management, Stockholm, pp. 9-19, 27-37.
  7. Matthew J. Kerper, Lewis E. Mong, Maurice B. Stiefel, and Sylvanus F. Holley, 1958, Evaluation of tensile, compressive, torsional, transverse, and impact tests and correlation of results for brittle cermets, J. Res. Nat. Bureau of Standards 61, pp.149-169. https://doi.org/10.6028/jres.061.019
  8. A. Kriz and D. Bricin, 2017, Powder metallurgy - fundamentals and case studies, INTECH, Rijeka, Chap. 12, p. 277.