DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Recent Discussion and Policy Trends of Japan for the Development of Marginal Village Policy

한계마을정책 개발을 위한 최근 일본의 한계집락 관련 논의 및 정책 동향 연구

  • Received : 2017.12.22
  • Accepted : 2018.01.06
  • Published : 2018.02.28

Abstract

This study is a basic research for the development of 'Marginal Village Policy' in response to the hollowing-out of rural areas. For this purpose, the viewpoint of "Regeneration" & "Reconstruction" of the "Marginal Village Theory" and the recent "Rural Planning Theory of Evacuation" in Japan were reviewed. The background and trends of Marginal Village policy in Japan were also investigated. And based on this, the implications and future tasks for Korea were summarized as follows; (1)It is necessary to be interested in the disappearance of villages and marginal villages and to form positive discussions and social consensus. (2)Continuous field investigation and management of changes in population and village functions at regional and village level are required. (3)In addition to increasing the importance of depopulation problems, it is necessary to establish 'marginal villages' as a public policy target. (4)It is necessary to review and consider the viewpoint of reconstruction along with regeneration. (5)It is necessary to pay attention that the software project is expanded, and the regeneration & reconstruction policies of the rural villages are aimed at revitalizing the rural community. (6)It is necessary to consider the possibility of applying 'spacial construction' along with the expansion of the academic debate on the 'rural planning theory of evacuation'. On the basis of this, in this study, rural villages were classified into 'continuous villages', 'semi-marginal villages' and 'marginal villages' according to the degree of marginalization, and the basic framework of 'Marginal Village Policy' was proposed, which is to encourage the differentiated policies of 'continuous villages' by 'rural village policy', 'semi-marginal villages' and 'marginal villages' by 'marginal village policy'.

Keywords

References

  1. 조영재 외, 2013, 과소화.고령화에 대응한 '한계마을정책' 도입을 위한 기초연구, 충남연구원 전략연구 2013-07.
  2. 조영재 외, 2014, 농촌마을 과소화.고령화에 대응한 마을재편 방안 연구, 충남연구원 전략연구 2014-07.
  3. Cho, Young-Jae, 2015, A Study on the Relation between the Hollowization and the Phenomenon of Decreasing and Aging Population in Rural Villages - Focused on Geumsan-gun, Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning, 21(4): 85-94. https://doi.org/10.7851/ksrp.2015.21.4.085
  4. 秋津元輝, 2013, 撤退 しない農村を支える論理, 農業と経済, 第79券 1号, pp.36-45.
  5. 大西隆 外, 2011, これで納得 ! 集落再生- 限界集落 のゆくえ, ぎょうせい.
  6. 大野晃, 2005, 限界集落-その実体が問いかけるもの, 農業と経済, 第71券3号, pp.5-13.
  7. 大野晃, 2008, 限界集落と地域再生, 北海道新聞社.
  8. 大野晃, 2015, 山.川.海の流域社会学- 山の荒廃問題から 流域 の環境保全へ, 文理閣.
  9. 小田切徳美, 2009, 農山村再生- 限界集落 をこえて, 岩波書店.
  10. 小田切徳美, 2011, 農山村再生の実践, 農文協.
  11. 小田切徳美, 2014, 農山村は消滅しない, 岩波新書.
  12. 大森けんいち, 2005, 集落消滅の社会的損失, 農業と経済, 第71券3号, pp.25-34.
  13. 笠松浩樹, 2005, 中山間地域における限界集落の実態, 季刊中国総研, 3号.
  14. 国土交通省.総務省, 2007, 平成18年度国土形成計画策定のための集落の状況に関する現況把握調査.
  15. 国土交通省.総務省, 2011, 過疎地域等における集落の状況に関する現況把握調査.
  16. 国土交通省.総務省, 2016, 過疎地域等条件不利地域における集落の現況把握調査報告書.
  17. 佐藤信, 2012 限界集落 論と北海道の農村社会, 開発論集(89), pp.65-76.
  18. 高野和良, 2005 限界集落 過疎地域の生活と国土資源の持続性-極小化する家族と農山村高齢化の現状, 農業と経済, 第71券3号, pp.14-24.
  19. 農村開発委員会, 2003, 平成14年農村集落組織づくり支援検討調査報告書.
  20. 農村開発委員会, 2006, 平成17年度限界集落における集落機能の実態に関する調査報告書.
  21. 農村開発委員会a, 2007, 小規模.高齢化集落の存続, 農村工学研究, 財団法人農林統計協会.
  22. 農村開発委員会b, 2007, 平成18年度限界集落における集落機能の実態に関する調査報告書.
  23. 林直樹 外, 2010, 撤退の農村計画-過疎地域からはじまる戦略的再編, 学芸出版社.
  24. 福与徳文, 2005, 集落の再編戸数と葬式の出役人数-過疎地域における集落再編を計画する視点の一つとして, 農業と経済, 第71券3号, pp.68-74.
  25. 福与徳文, 2011, 地域社会の機能と再生-農村社会計画論, 日本経済評論社.
  26. 増田寛也, 2014, 地方消滅, 中公新書.
  27. 守田秀則, 2008, 条件不利地域における集落再編の課題と方策, 農村計画学会日韓セミナ一, 2008年11月.
  28. 山下祐介, 2012, 限界集落の真実一過疎の村は消えるか?, ちくま新書.